Idiots Mirandize Terrorist & He STOPS Talking!!

[OriginalShroom]

Any confession the suspect makes regarding the bombing before he is Mirandized does not fall under the "public safety" exception.

The longer they interrogate him, the more likely he will self-incriminate, all of which could very well be inadmissable in court. It is far better to Mirandize him so that such confessions can be admitted.

It is also noteworthy none of you have noticed he has not lawyered up yet.

This may well be the first and only issue on which we will agree, politically that is.

There is no exception in the Constitution. The language is very clear.

 

[SanTropez]

Whose Side Is Obama On?
A pattern of soft-pedaling U.S. response to terrorism prompts questions

(EXCERPT)

Tuesday, April 30, 2013
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Washington Times
by Frank Gaffney
(Frank J. Gaffney Jr. was an assistant secretary of defense under President Reagan)

In the wake of the Boston Marathon bombing, the investigation into its perpetrators
has been marred by a series of bizarre and even alarming actions by President Obama
and his administration. Unfortunately, these increasingly suggest a pattern that is
at odds with our national and homeland security. The question must be occurring to
many Americans: Whose side is he on?

Consider just a few of the recent examples suggesting the ominous answer is “not ours”:

Team Obama decided precipitously to charge the surviving alleged bomber, Dzhokhar
Tsarnaev, in civilian court. This action resulted in his being read Miranda rights
and obtaining a lawyer, prompting him to refuse to answer more questions from
investigators. Former federal prosecutor Andrew C. McCarthy observed, “Obama was
determined to end the public debate over whether the jihadist is a wartime enemy
combatant or a mere criminal defendant.”

Mr. McCarthy theorizes on what is going on here: “[We] are being softened up. Steered
by its Gitmo bar veterans and lawyer left compass, the Obama administration i
executing a massive national-security fraud: the farce that the jihad against
America can be judicialized, that civilian-court processes are a better answer to
enemy warfare than are combat protocols.”

Then there is the peculiar case of the Saudi “student,” Abdul Rahman al-Harbi.
Glenn Beck and syndicated columnist Diana West have done yeoman’s work connecting
the proverbial dots on this young man, starting with his detention at the scene
of the bombing (where he was wounded) and initial designation as a “person of
interest” in the investigation. The FBI reportedly spent seven hours searching
his apartment but, following an in-person and unscheduled intervention with Mr.
Obama by the Saudi foreign minister, Mr. al-Harbi ceased to be classified as even
a witness to the jihadist attack.

Cont........






-

 

[JakeStarkey]

Reported for violation of posting rules.