IDF murders children playing on beach

[Phoenall]

LINK ?

In other words you cant prove your claims.

I can, but you do not have the background to understand it. Here is some background on the subject.

The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978

A biased report from an islamonazi source, the DPR is not neutral and is spouting lies and propaganda.

See this


In her June 21, 2004 speech [4] at a Conference on Confronting anti-Semitism: Education for Tolerance and Understanding sponsored by the United Nations Department of Information and in her articles,[5] human rights scholar and activist Anne Bayefsky, attending as representative of the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists, criticized the UN approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, advocated the necessity of deep reforms within the UN, and noted that the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people and the annual UN Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People is the only UN day dedicated to a specific people.

The event celebrating an annual "International Day of Solidarity With the Palestinian People" on November 29, 2005 was attended by Kofi Annan and other high-ranking diplomats. In his January 3, 2006 letter to Mr. Annan, the US ambassador John Bolton criticized the UN for promoting anti-Israel agenda and noted that the map prominently displayed at the event "erases the state of Israel".

...the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people...​

How many other groups of people are stateless with no rights?

Name some.

Well for starters the Palestinians have a state and rights, so it leaves the Kurds and the Basques

 

[Phoenall]

And of course Hamas never harmed children before!!
Who the **** go outside during war?
The Jihadists are consuming themselves.

Nothing you said justifies the air strike. Nor does it make it legal. You deliberately murdered children playing soccer. That is an example of just how sick your society has become.

So what justifies the firing of illegal rockets at Israeli children, or mining Israeli schools ?

 

[Phoenall]

Know who murdered them? Hamas . Why didn't Hamas accept the Cesse Fire? The Israeli Soldiers should be executed ( even though Israel does not have the Death Penty) but those serving life for the killing of Israelis shouldn't ?
They should get the Death Penalty after those Hamas Scumbags get Hanged for the killing of those three Israeli Boys.

Why don't you finish your education and learn good grammar?

I feel like I'm being punished, just reading your post.

Try reading the Geneva conventions to see what they have to say about who was to blame

 

[Phoenall]

The Zionist will never accept the truth, Posting the facts makes no difference to them. The fact that there were hundreds of thousands of non-Jews living Palestine that were evicted by the Jews is just not part of their fairy tale.

Under the laws of the time they could have executed them as traitors, just as the arab muslims did to the Jews that did not manage to escape in time.

How can people being driven from their homes by a foreign military be traitors?

Because they were fighting against the sovereign rulers of the land, making them traitors. They had two options leave or fight, the cowards ran

 

[Phoenall]

In other words you cant prove your claims.

I can, but you do not have the background to understand it. Here is some background on the subject.

The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978

A biased report from an islamonazi source, the DPR is not neutral and is spouting lies and propaganda.

See this


In her June 21, 2004 speech [4] at a Conference on Confronting anti-Semitism: Education for Tolerance and Understanding sponsored by the United Nations Department of Information and in her articles,[5] human rights scholar and activist Anne Bayefsky, attending as representative of the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists, criticized the UN approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, advocated the necessity of deep reforms within the UN, and noted that the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people and the annual UN Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People is the only UN day dedicated to a specific people.

The event celebrating an annual "International Day of Solidarity With the Palestinian People" on November 29, 2005 was attended by Kofi Annan and other high-ranking diplomats. In his January 3, 2006 letter to Mr. Annan, the US ambassador John Bolton criticized the UN for promoting anti-Israel agenda and noted that the map prominently displayed at the event "erases the state of Israel".

...the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people...​

How many other groups of people are stateless with no rights?

Name some.

In other words you cant prove your claims.

I can, but you do not have the background to understand it. Here is some background on the subject.

The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978

A biased report from an islamonazi source, the DPR is not neutral and is spouting lies and propaganda.

See this


In her June 21, 2004 speech [4] at a Conference on Confronting anti-Semitism: Education for Tolerance and Understanding sponsored by the United Nations Department of Information and in her articles,[5] human rights scholar and activist Anne Bayefsky, attending as representative of the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists, criticized the UN approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, advocated the necessity of deep reforms within the UN, and noted that the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people and the annual UN Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People is the only UN day dedicated to a specific people.

The event celebrating an annual "International Day of Solidarity With the Palestinian People" on November 29, 2005 was attended by Kofi Annan and other high-ranking diplomats. In his January 3, 2006 letter to Mr. Annan, the US ambassador John Bolton criticized the UN for promoting anti-Israel agenda and noted that the map prominently displayed at the event "erases the state of Israel".

...the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people...​

How many other groups of people are stateless with no rights?

Name some.

Kurdistan, Northern Cyprus, Tibet, Kabylia (in Algeria), and Western Sahara. Not quite as desperate, but there are also separatist movements in Hong Kong, Quebec and Scotland.

Are they citizens of a country where they can just get a passport? Have they been remove from their homeland?

The Palestinians can get a passport any time they want one. And they removed themselves from their homelands in Syria, Egypt, Saudi, Iraq and Yemen.

 

[Phoenall]

And your own article states:

Israeli officials urged the evacuation of several districts in the Gaza Strip where more than 100,000 people live, as it intensified its operation against Palestinian militants.

But I suppose Hamas assured them that it didn't apply to them. I sometimes wonder what Hamas tells the Gazans. Is it anything like what the Taliban told the Afghanistan's?

And it's probably no different than what the Israeli's tell you.

Just because you tell someone to leave, doesn't mean you can legally kill them if they don't. You cannot target people who take no part in hostilities.

If they act as human shields then they are no longer civilians but militia. If they are forced to stay then the onus is on hamas to protect them. If Israel target a military installation and the civilians are killed it is down to hamas. Read the Geneva conventions

 

[Phoenall]

Now that's a quality education...
"We're being shelled?! Let's go play on the beach!"
Stupid is as stupid does.

And murderers do, as a murderer does.

And who are the proven murderers in law ?

 

[Billo_Really]

Try reading the Geneva conventions to see what they have to say about who was to blame

I did. It say's Israel is to blame.

Why don't you stop lying about what the GC say's?

Fuckin' troll!

 

[P F Tinmore]

And your own article states:

Israeli officials urged the evacuation of several districts in the Gaza Strip where more than 100,000 people live, as it intensified its operation against Palestinian militants.

But I suppose Hamas assured them that it didn't apply to them. I sometimes wonder what Hamas tells the Gazans. Is it anything like what the Taliban told the Afghanistan's?

And it's probably no different than what the Israeli's tell you.

Just because you tell someone to leave, doesn't mean you can legally kill them if they don't. You cannot target people who take no part in hostilities.

If they act as human shields then they are no longer civilians but militia. If they are forced to stay then the onus is on hamas to protect them. If Israel target a military installation and the civilians are killed it is down to hamas. Read the Geneva conventions

Why do you shovel Israeli shit?

While the Israeli government repeatedly stated that many civilian casualties were the result of Hamas using the Gazan population as human shields[393] several British media organizations (including The Guardian, and The Independent) dismissed such claims as "myths"[394][395] and the BBC's Middle East editor Jeremy Bowen likewise said he "saw no evidence of Hamas using Palestinians as human shields."[396] Additionally the London-based NGO, Amnesty International, dismissed such claims, stated it was unable to verify them and emphasized that even if they were true the IDF would still have a responsibility to protect civilians.[46][397]

2014 Israel Gaza conflict - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia​

 

[Phoenall]

Try reading the Geneva conventions to see what they have to say about who was to blame

I did. It say's Israel is to blame.

Why don't you stop lying about what the GC say's?

Fuckin' troll!

I don't, but you do. Did you read the part about civilians acting as human shields. Did you read about using civilian areas to fire weapons from, and using illegal weapons. Did you read about deliberately targeting children, and using chemical/biological weapons.
If you had you would be screaming for hamas blood.
Who was it the ICJ recently found guilty of war crimes in gaza last summer, that caused the P.A to drop their charges ?

 

[Phoenall]

And your own article states:

Israeli officials urged the evacuation of several districts in the Gaza Strip where more than 100,000 people live, as it intensified its operation against Palestinian militants.

But I suppose Hamas assured them that it didn't apply to them. I sometimes wonder what Hamas tells the Gazans. Is it anything like what the Taliban told the Afghanistan's?

And it's probably no different than what the Israeli's tell you.

Just because you tell someone to leave, doesn't mean you can legally kill them if they don't. You cannot target people who take no part in hostilities.

If they act as human shields then they are no longer civilians but militia. If they are forced to stay then the onus is on hamas to protect them. If Israel target a military installation and the civilians are killed it is down to hamas. Read the Geneva conventions

Why do you shovel Israeli shit?

While the Israeli government repeatedly stated that many civilian casualties were the result of Hamas using the Gazan population as human shields[393] several British media organizations (including The Guardian, and The Independent) dismissed such claims as "myths"[394][395] and the BBC's Middle East editor Jeremy Bowen likewise said he "saw no evidence of Hamas using Palestinians as human shields."[396] Additionally the London-based NGO, Amnesty International, dismissed such claims, stated it was unable to verify them and emphasized that even if they were true the IDF would still have a responsibility to protect civilians.[46][397]

2014 Israel Gaza conflict - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia​

Shows just how anti semitic they are. Do you want pictures from unbiased reporters showing the extent of hamas using human shields.





Hamas Admits Launching Rockets From Civilian Areas The Investigative Project on Terrorism


Hamas now publicly admits that it used civilian areas to launch rockets at Israel during the summer war, according to a Times of Israel report.

But in admitting that "mistakes" were made, the terrorist organization claims that it had no choice but to fire from urban areas since Gaza is so densely populated. A BBC map of the Gaza Strip demonstrates that there are open areas in which Hamas could have set up their operations to avoid innocent casualties.

According to Hamas, it is not about whether the terrorists fired from residential areas, but rather exactly how close they were to civilian structures.

"The Israelis kept saying rockets were fired from schools or hospitals when, in fact, they were fired from 200-300 meters [220-328 yards] away. Still there were some mistakes made and they were quickly dealt with," senior Hamas official Ghazi Hamad told the Associated Press.

Hamas We Place Civilians in the Line of Fire - YouTube


Want more or is this enough to prove you wrong.

 

[Daniyel]

And of course Hamas never harmed children before!!
Who the **** go outside during war?
The Jihadists are consuming themselves.

Nothing you said justifies the air strike. Nor does it make it legal. You deliberately murdered children playing soccer. That is an example of just how sick your society has become.

1.it wasn't an air strike.
2.attacking Hamas facilities is not only a legitimate act by international law but a blessed step in eradicating violent world terrorism.
3.you the one want entire Israel to be nuked, that is the definition of sick - needless to say hypocrite.
4.I didn't do any of this, but you insists on saying it was me, there you proved us all that it's not about the actions one take - with zero justification you see all Israelis as one that you would gladly see dead.

 

[P F Tinmore]

And your own article states:

Israeli officials urged the evacuation of several districts in the Gaza Strip where more than 100,000 people live, as it intensified its operation against Palestinian militants.

But I suppose Hamas assured them that it didn't apply to them. I sometimes wonder what Hamas tells the Gazans. Is it anything like what the Taliban told the Afghanistan's?

And it's probably no different than what the Israeli's tell you.

Just because you tell someone to leave, doesn't mean you can legally kill them if they don't. You cannot target people who take no part in hostilities.

If they act as human shields then they are no longer civilians but militia. If they are forced to stay then the onus is on hamas to protect them. If Israel target a military installation and the civilians are killed it is down to hamas. Read the Geneva conventions

Why do you shovel Israeli shit?

While the Israeli government repeatedly stated that many civilian casualties were the result of Hamas using the Gazan population as human shields[393] several British media organizations (including The Guardian, and The Independent) dismissed such claims as "myths"[394][395] and the BBC's Middle East editor Jeremy Bowen likewise said he "saw no evidence of Hamas using Palestinians as human shields."[396] Additionally the London-based NGO, Amnesty International, dismissed such claims, stated it was unable to verify them and emphasized that even if they were true the IDF would still have a responsibility to protect civilians.[46][397]

2014 Israel Gaza conflict - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia​

Shows just how anti semitic they are. Do you want pictures from unbiased reporters showing the extent of hamas using human shields.





Hamas Admits Launching Rockets From Civilian Areas The Investigative Project on Terrorism


Hamas now publicly admits that it used civilian areas to launch rockets at Israel during the summer war, according to a Times of Israel report.

But in admitting that "mistakes" were made, the terrorist organization claims that it had no choice but to fire from urban areas since Gaza is so densely populated. A BBC map of the Gaza Strip demonstrates that there are open areas in which Hamas could have set up their operations to avoid innocent casualties.

According to Hamas, it is not about whether the terrorists fired from residential areas, but rather exactly how close they were to civilian structures.

"The Israelis kept saying rockets were fired from schools or hospitals when, in fact, they were fired from 200-300 meters [220-328 yards] away. Still there were some mistakes made and they were quickly dealt with," senior Hamas official Ghazi Hamad told the Associated Press.

Hamas We Place Civilians in the Line of Fire - YouTube


Want more or is this enough to prove you wrong.

The first video is from the IDF, Known liars.

The second video is funny because rocket launchers do not look like that. Something a dimwit would not ask is how those fins fit through those tubes. Also, this video is from an Israeli site.

 

[Phoenall]

And your own article states:

But I suppose Hamas assured them that it didn't apply to them. I sometimes wonder what Hamas tells the Gazans. Is it anything like what the Taliban told the Afghanistan's?

And it's probably no different than what the Israeli's tell you.

Just because you tell someone to leave, doesn't mean you can legally kill them if they don't. You cannot target people who take no part in hostilities.

If they act as human shields then they are no longer civilians but militia. If they are forced to stay then the onus is on hamas to protect them. If Israel target a military installation and the civilians are killed it is down to hamas. Read the Geneva conventions

Why do you shovel Israeli shit?

While the Israeli government repeatedly stated that many civilian casualties were the result of Hamas using the Gazan population as human shields[393] several British media organizations (including The Guardian, and The Independent) dismissed such claims as "myths"[394][395] and the BBC's Middle East editor Jeremy Bowen likewise said he "saw no evidence of Hamas using Palestinians as human shields."[396] Additionally the London-based NGO, Amnesty International, dismissed such claims, stated it was unable to verify them and emphasized that even if they were true the IDF would still have a responsibility to protect civilians.[46][397]

2014 Israel Gaza conflict - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia​

Shows just how anti semitic they are. Do you want pictures from unbiased reporters showing the extent of hamas using human shields.





Hamas Admits Launching Rockets From Civilian Areas The Investigative Project on Terrorism


Hamas now publicly admits that it used civilian areas to launch rockets at Israel during the summer war, according to a Times of Israel report.

But in admitting that "mistakes" were made, the terrorist organization claims that it had no choice but to fire from urban areas since Gaza is so densely populated. A BBC map of the Gaza Strip demonstrates that there are open areas in which Hamas could have set up their operations to avoid innocent casualties.

According to Hamas, it is not about whether the terrorists fired from residential areas, but rather exactly how close they were to civilian structures.

"The Israelis kept saying rockets were fired from schools or hospitals when, in fact, they were fired from 200-300 meters [220-328 yards] away. Still there were some mistakes made and they were quickly dealt with," senior Hamas official Ghazi Hamad told the Associated Press.

Hamas We Place Civilians in the Line of Fire - YouTube


Want more or is this enough to prove you wrong.

The first video is from the IDF, Known liars.

The second video is funny because rocket launchers do not look like that. Something a dimwit would not ask is how those fins fit through those tubes. Also, this video is from an Israeli site.

They could have been finless rockets or mortars. The tubes were just for holding the projectile in place. But did you see the video of one being fired.
Oh and look olive trees that the Palestinians don't seem to be bothered about destroying ...............

 

[P F Tinmore]

And it's probably no different than what the Israeli's tell you.

Just because you tell someone to leave, doesn't mean you can legally kill them if they don't. You cannot target people who take no part in hostilities.

If they act as human shields then they are no longer civilians but militia. If they are forced to stay then the onus is on hamas to protect them. If Israel target a military installation and the civilians are killed it is down to hamas. Read the Geneva conventions

Why do you shovel Israeli shit?

While the Israeli government repeatedly stated that many civilian casualties were the result of Hamas using the Gazan population as human shields[393] several British media organizations (including The Guardian, and The Independent) dismissed such claims as "myths"[394][395] and the BBC's Middle East editor Jeremy Bowen likewise said he "saw no evidence of Hamas using Palestinians as human shields."[396] Additionally the London-based NGO, Amnesty International, dismissed such claims, stated it was unable to verify them and emphasized that even if they were true the IDF would still have a responsibility to protect civilians.[46][397]

2014 Israel Gaza conflict - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia​

Shows just how anti semitic they are. Do you want pictures from unbiased reporters showing the extent of hamas using human shields.





Hamas Admits Launching Rockets From Civilian Areas The Investigative Project on Terrorism


Hamas now publicly admits that it used civilian areas to launch rockets at Israel during the summer war, according to a Times of Israel report.

But in admitting that "mistakes" were made, the terrorist organization claims that it had no choice but to fire from urban areas since Gaza is so densely populated. A BBC map of the Gaza Strip demonstrates that there are open areas in which Hamas could have set up their operations to avoid innocent casualties.

According to Hamas, it is not about whether the terrorists fired from residential areas, but rather exactly how close they were to civilian structures.

"The Israelis kept saying rockets were fired from schools or hospitals when, in fact, they were fired from 200-300 meters [220-328 yards] away. Still there were some mistakes made and they were quickly dealt with," senior Hamas official Ghazi Hamad told the Associated Press.

Hamas We Place Civilians in the Line of Fire - YouTube


Want more or is this enough to prove you wrong.

The first video is from the IDF, Known liars.

The second video is funny because rocket launchers do not look like that. Something a dimwit would not ask is how those fins fit through those tubes. Also, this video is from an Israeli site.

They could have been finless rockets or mortars. The tubes were just for holding the projectile in place. But did you see the video of one being fired.
Oh and look olive trees that the Palestinians don't seem to be bothered about destroying ...............

You are just making up stupid excuses to cover your lying buddies in Israel.

1) Those tubes are too big.

2) Launchers are not fixed into the ground.

 

[Phoenall]

If they act as human shields then they are no longer civilians but militia. If they are forced to stay then the onus is on hamas to protect them. If Israel target a military installation and the civilians are killed it is down to hamas. Read the Geneva conventions

Why do you shovel Israeli shit?

While the Israeli government repeatedly stated that many civilian casualties were the result of Hamas using the Gazan population as human shields[393] several British media organizations (including The Guardian, and The Independent) dismissed such claims as "myths"[394][395] and the BBC's Middle East editor Jeremy Bowen likewise said he "saw no evidence of Hamas using Palestinians as human shields."[396] Additionally the London-based NGO, Amnesty International, dismissed such claims, stated it was unable to verify them and emphasized that even if they were true the IDF would still have a responsibility to protect civilians.[46][397]

2014 Israel Gaza conflict - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia​

Shows just how anti semitic they are. Do you want pictures from unbiased reporters showing the extent of hamas using human shields.





Hamas Admits Launching Rockets From Civilian Areas The Investigative Project on Terrorism


Hamas now publicly admits that it used civilian areas to launch rockets at Israel during the summer war, according to a Times of Israel report.

But in admitting that "mistakes" were made, the terrorist organization claims that it had no choice but to fire from urban areas since Gaza is so densely populated. A BBC map of the Gaza Strip demonstrates that there are open areas in which Hamas could have set up their operations to avoid innocent casualties.

According to Hamas, it is not about whether the terrorists fired from residential areas, but rather exactly how close they were to civilian structures.

"The Israelis kept saying rockets were fired from schools or hospitals when, in fact, they were fired from 200-300 meters [220-328 yards] away. Still there were some mistakes made and they were quickly dealt with," senior Hamas official Ghazi Hamad told the Associated Press.

Hamas We Place Civilians in the Line of Fire - YouTube


Want more or is this enough to prove you wrong.

The first video is from the IDF, Known liars.

The second video is funny because rocket launchers do not look like that. Something a dimwit would not ask is how those fins fit through those tubes. Also, this video is from an Israeli site.

They could have been finless rockets or mortars. The tubes were just for holding the projectile in place. But did you see the video of one being fired.
Oh and look olive trees that the Palestinians don't seem to be bothered about destroying ...............

You are just making up stupid excuses to cover your lying buddies in Israel.

1) Those tubes are too big.

2) Launchers are not fixed into the ground.

Irrelevant as the pictures and video show the tubes were buried in the ground and fired rockets. Not even you can deny that this is the case. What you are showing is commercial mortar firing stations, not home made rocket launchers

 

[Indofred]

I see little point in this thread any more.
Israel has now been proven innocent of all crimes.
Of course, Israeli law is now changing so all criminals will try themselves in court, only allowing the witnesses the defence want to appear.

The conviction rate for that country is expected to drop to zero by the middle of next week.

 

[P F Tinmore]

I see little point in this thread any more.
Israel has now been proven innocent of all crimes.
Of course, Israeli law is now changing so all criminals will try themselves in court, only allowing the witnesses the defence want to appear.

The conviction rate for that country is expected to drop to zero by the middle of next week.

Israel is farce city. Every time it investigates itself it finds itself not guilty. Coincidence that. Look at Cast Lead.

1400 people killed the vast majority civilians including hundreds of children. Vast amounts of civilian infrastructure destroyed.

And the only one bounced was a low rank putz who stole a credit card.

 

[aris2chat]

I see little point in this thread any more.
Israel has now been proven innocent of all crimes.
Of course, Israeli law is now changing so all criminals will try themselves in court, only allowing the witnesses the defence want to appear.

The conviction rate for that country is expected to drop to zero by the middle of next week.

Israeli soldiers are convicted of crimes by Israeli courts. It is standard for Israel to investigate charges of soldier misconduct or potential war crimes. Even charges of cursing or striking a palestinian are brought to court.

 

[montelatici]

I see little point in this thread any more.
Israel has now been proven innocent of all crimes.
Of course, Israeli law is now changing so all criminals will try themselves in court, only allowing the witnesses the defence want to appear.

The conviction rate for that country is expected to drop to zero by the middle of next week.

Israeli soldiers are convicted of crimes by Israeli courts. It is standard for Israel to investigate charges of soldier misconduct or potential war crimes. Even charges of cursing or striking a palestinian are brought to court.

There haven't been any convictions to speak of. It is propaganda and a farce.