IDF murders children playing on beach

[P F Tinmore]

P F Tinmore, et al,

The "facts on the ground" reflect the escalating discord and developed differences that evolved over time. Not the original intent of either the immigrants or the Allied Powers. You cannot evaluate the conditions that exist today and equate them to the intended purpose of nearly a century ago.

(OFF TOPIC)
P F Tinmore, et al,

It was not a "defensive position." I do not believe I made such a claim; that under Articles 4 and 6 --- encouragement and facilitation of Jewish immigration to affect the establishment of the Jewish National Home and the interests of the Jewish population in Palestine, was a defensive position.

I believe the claim was that it was a best course of action decision made by the Allied Powers at the San Remo Convention in 1920. The Allied Powers having accepted receivership of the territories by means of the unconditional surrender in the Mudros Armistice and the Treaty of Sevres.

You never did explain how going from Europe to Palestine to take over the country is a defensive position.

(COMMENT)

The defense of the territory, within such boundaries as was determined by the Principal Allied Powers, to which the Mandate for Palestine applied (Short Title: Palestine made by the Order in Council) was the sole concern of the Allied Powers; and not the indigenous population. The responsibilities for the defense of the territories were relegated to the Occupied Enemy Territory Administration (OETA) having administration over Levantine and Mesopotamian provinces until transferred to the Civilian Administrations were established under the Mandate.

The purpose of the encouraged immigration was for reconstituting their Jewish National Home under the lawful control of the Mandatory ---- via ---- the Allied Powers and League of Nations.

Most Respectfully,
R

Are you saying that the Zionists did not go to Palestine to take over the country.

BTW, they did it too. So the facts on the ground confirm that I am correct.

(COMMENT)

Clearly there were Jewish Immigrants that have greater expectations than they experienced. It doesn't mean that they entirety of the immigrants intended to supplant the indigenous population. What has evolved through today is a result of continuos conflict between the two cultures.

Most Respectfully,
R

Well, there was the Zionist leadership and the rest were just cannon fodder for their project. You can't blame the Jews in general as they were just sucked into the scam.

LINK ?

 

[Phoenall]

(OFF TOPIC)
P F Tinmore, et al,

It was not a "defensive position." I do not believe I made such a claim; that under Articles 4 and 6 --- encouragement and facilitation of Jewish immigration to affect the establishment of the Jewish National Home and the interests of the Jewish population in Palestine, was a defensive position.

I believe the claim was that it was a best course of action decision made by the Allied Powers at the San Remo Convention in 1920. The Allied Powers having accepted receivership of the territories by means of the unconditional surrender in the Mudros Armistice and the Treaty of Sevres.

(COMMENT)

The defense of the territory, within such boundaries as was determined by the Principal Allied Powers, to which the Mandate for Palestine applied (Short Title: Palestine made by the Order in Council) was the sole concern of the Allied Powers; and not the indigenous population. The responsibilities for the defense of the territories were relegated to the Occupied Enemy Territory Administration (OETA) having administration over Levantine and Mesopotamian provinces until transferred to the Civilian Administrations were established under the Mandate.

The purpose of the encouraged immigration was for reconstituting their Jewish National Home under the lawful control of the Mandatory ---- via ---- the Allied Powers and League of Nations.

Most Respectfully,
R

Are you saying that the Zionists did not go to Palestine to take over the country.

BTW, they did it too. So the facts on the ground confirm that I am correct.

Yes we are as the LoN had granted them the land in 1923, which they had every right to do. The facts on the ground show that the arab muslims received the lions share of Palestine that they had no rights or links to, after all they did come from Mecca in Saudi

Yes we are as the LoN had granted them the land in 1923...​

Link?

Mandate of Palestine

Indeed, you need to read it not just listen to what the liars tell you.

I have read it, and the preamble so unlike you I know what it says and what it means. I don't listen to your lies which is why I run rings round you on this subject

 

[montelatici]

Are you saying that the Zionists did not go to Palestine to take over the country.

BTW, they did it too. So the facts on the ground confirm that I am correct.

Yes we are as the LoN had granted them the land in 1923, which they had every right to do. The facts on the ground show that the arab muslims received the lions share of Palestine that they had no rights or links to, after all they did come from Mecca in Saudi

Yes we are as the LoN had granted them the land in 1923...​

Link?

Mandate of Palestine

Indeed, you need to read it not just listen to what the liars tell you.

I have read it, and the preamble so unlike you I know what it says and what it means. I don't listen to your lies which is why I run rings round you on this subject

Now that's hilarious.

 

[Phoenall]

P F Tinmore, et al,

The "facts on the ground" reflect the escalating discord and developed differences that evolved over time. Not the original intent of either the immigrants or the Allied Powers. You cannot evaluate the conditions that exist today and equate them to the intended purpose of nearly a century ago.

(OFF TOPIC)
P F Tinmore, et al,

It was not a "defensive position." I do not believe I made such a claim; that under Articles 4 and 6 --- encouragement and facilitation of Jewish immigration to affect the establishment of the Jewish National Home and the interests of the Jewish population in Palestine, was a defensive position.

I believe the claim was that it was a best course of action decision made by the Allied Powers at the San Remo Convention in 1920. The Allied Powers having accepted receivership of the territories by means of the unconditional surrender in the Mudros Armistice and the Treaty of Sevres.

(COMMENT)

The defense of the territory, within such boundaries as was determined by the Principal Allied Powers, to which the Mandate for Palestine applied (Short Title: Palestine made by the Order in Council) was the sole concern of the Allied Powers; and not the indigenous population. The responsibilities for the defense of the territories were relegated to the Occupied Enemy Territory Administration (OETA) having administration over Levantine and Mesopotamian provinces until transferred to the Civilian Administrations were established under the Mandate.

The purpose of the encouraged immigration was for reconstituting their Jewish National Home under the lawful control of the Mandatory ---- via ---- the Allied Powers and League of Nations.

Most Respectfully,
R

Are you saying that the Zionists did not go to Palestine to take over the country.

BTW, they did it too. So the facts on the ground confirm that I am correct.

(COMMENT)

Clearly there were Jewish Immigrants that have greater expectations than they experienced. It doesn't mean that they entirety of the immigrants intended to supplant the indigenous population. What has evolved through today is a result of continuos conflict between the two cultures.

Most Respectfully,
R

Well, there was the Zionist leadership and the rest were just cannon fodder for their project. You can't blame the Jews in general as they were just sucked into the scam.

LINK ?

In other words you cant prove your claims.

 

[Phoenall]

Yes we are as the LoN had granted them the land in 1923, which they had every right to do. The facts on the ground show that the arab muslims received the lions share of Palestine that they had no rights or links to, after all they did come from Mecca in Saudi

Yes we are as the LoN had granted them the land in 1923...​

Link?

Mandate of Palestine

Indeed, you need to read it not just listen to what the liars tell you.

I have read it, and the preamble so unlike you I know what it says and what it means. I don't listen to your lies which is why I run rings round you on this subject

Now that's hilarious.

Is it, or is it just you going int hysterics again.

 

[P F Tinmore]

P F Tinmore, et al,

The "facts on the ground" reflect the escalating discord and developed differences that evolved over time. Not the original intent of either the immigrants or the Allied Powers. You cannot evaluate the conditions that exist today and equate them to the intended purpose of nearly a century ago.

Are you saying that the Zionists did not go to Palestine to take over the country.

BTW, they did it too. So the facts on the ground confirm that I am correct.

(COMMENT)

Clearly there were Jewish Immigrants that have greater expectations than they experienced. It doesn't mean that they entirety of the immigrants intended to supplant the indigenous population. What has evolved through today is a result of continuos conflict between the two cultures.

Most Respectfully,
R

Well, there was the Zionist leadership and the rest were just cannon fodder for their project. You can't blame the Jews in general as they were just sucked into the scam.

LINK ?

In other words you cant prove your claims.

I can, but you do not have the background to understand it. Here is some background on the subject.

The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978

 

[montelatici]

The Zionist will never accept the truth, Posting the facts makes no difference to them. The fact that there were hundreds of thousands of non-Jews living Palestine that were evicted by the Jews is just not part of their fairy tale.

 

[Phoenall]

P F Tinmore, et al,

The "facts on the ground" reflect the escalating discord and developed differences that evolved over time. Not the original intent of either the immigrants or the Allied Powers. You cannot evaluate the conditions that exist today and equate them to the intended purpose of nearly a century ago.

(COMMENT)

Clearly there were Jewish Immigrants that have greater expectations than they experienced. It doesn't mean that they entirety of the immigrants intended to supplant the indigenous population. What has evolved through today is a result of continuos conflict between the two cultures.

Most Respectfully,
R

Well, there was the Zionist leadership and the rest were just cannon fodder for their project. You can't blame the Jews in general as they were just sucked into the scam.

LINK ?

In other words you cant prove your claims.

I can, but you do not have the background to understand it. Here is some background on the subject.

The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978

A biased report from an islamonazi source, the DPR is not neutral and is spouting lies and propaganda.

See this


In her June 21, 2004 speech [4] at a Conference on Confronting anti-Semitism: Education for Tolerance and Understanding sponsored by the United Nations Department of Information and in her articles,[5] human rights scholar and activist Anne Bayefsky, attending as representative of the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists, criticized the UN approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, advocated the necessity of deep reforms within the UN, and noted that the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people and the annual UN Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People is the only UN day dedicated to a specific people.

The event celebrating an annual "International Day of Solidarity With the Palestinian People" on November 29, 2005 was attended by Kofi Annan and other high-ranking diplomats. In his January 3, 2006 letter to Mr. Annan, the US ambassador John Bolton criticized the UN for promoting anti-Israel agenda and noted that the map prominently displayed at the event "erases the state of Israel".

 

[Phoenall]

The Zionist will never accept the truth, Posting the facts makes no difference to them. The fact that there were hundreds of thousands of non-Jews living Palestine that were evicted by the Jews is just not part of their fairy tale.

Under the laws of the time they could have executed them as traitors, just as the arab muslims did to the Jews that did not manage to escape in time.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Well, there was the Zionist leadership and the rest were just cannon fodder for their project. You can't blame the Jews in general as they were just sucked into the scam.

LINK ?

In other words you cant prove your claims.

I can, but you do not have the background to understand it. Here is some background on the subject.

The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978

A biased report from an islamonazi source, the DPR is not neutral and is spouting lies and propaganda.

See this


In her June 21, 2004 speech [4] at a Conference on Confronting anti-Semitism: Education for Tolerance and Understanding sponsored by the United Nations Department of Information and in her articles,[5] human rights scholar and activist Anne Bayefsky, attending as representative of the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists, criticized the UN approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, advocated the necessity of deep reforms within the UN, and noted that the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people and the annual UN Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People is the only UN day dedicated to a specific people.

The event celebrating an annual "International Day of Solidarity With the Palestinian People" on November 29, 2005 was attended by Kofi Annan and other high-ranking diplomats. In his January 3, 2006 letter to Mr. Annan, the US ambassador John Bolton criticized the UN for promoting anti-Israel agenda and noted that the map prominently displayed at the event "erases the state of Israel".

...the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people...​

How many other groups of people are stateless with no rights?

Name some.

 

[P F Tinmore]

The Zionist will never accept the truth, Posting the facts makes no difference to them. The fact that there were hundreds of thousands of non-Jews living Palestine that were evicted by the Jews is just not part of their fairy tale.

Under the laws of the time they could have executed them as traitors, just as the arab muslims did to the Jews that did not manage to escape in time.

How can people being driven from their homes by a foreign military be traitors?

 

[ForeverYoung436]

LINK ?

In other words you cant prove your claims.

I can, but you do not have the background to understand it. Here is some background on the subject.

The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978

A biased report from an islamonazi source, the DPR is not neutral and is spouting lies and propaganda.

See this


In her June 21, 2004 speech [4] at a Conference on Confronting anti-Semitism: Education for Tolerance and Understanding sponsored by the United Nations Department of Information and in her articles,[5] human rights scholar and activist Anne Bayefsky, attending as representative of the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists, criticized the UN approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, advocated the necessity of deep reforms within the UN, and noted that the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people and the annual UN Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People is the only UN day dedicated to a specific people.

The event celebrating an annual "International Day of Solidarity With the Palestinian People" on November 29, 2005 was attended by Kofi Annan and other high-ranking diplomats. In his January 3, 2006 letter to Mr. Annan, the US ambassador John Bolton criticized the UN for promoting anti-Israel agenda and noted that the map prominently displayed at the event "erases the state of Israel".

...the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people...​

How many other groups of people are stateless with no rights?

Name some.

LINK ?

In other words you cant prove your claims.

I can, but you do not have the background to understand it. Here is some background on the subject.

The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978

A biased report from an islamonazi source, the DPR is not neutral and is spouting lies and propaganda.

See this


In her June 21, 2004 speech [4] at a Conference on Confronting anti-Semitism: Education for Tolerance and Understanding sponsored by the United Nations Department of Information and in her articles,[5] human rights scholar and activist Anne Bayefsky, attending as representative of the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists, criticized the UN approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, advocated the necessity of deep reforms within the UN, and noted that the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people and the annual UN Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People is the only UN day dedicated to a specific people.

The event celebrating an annual "International Day of Solidarity With the Palestinian People" on November 29, 2005 was attended by Kofi Annan and other high-ranking diplomats. In his January 3, 2006 letter to Mr. Annan, the US ambassador John Bolton criticized the UN for promoting anti-Israel agenda and noted that the map prominently displayed at the event "erases the state of Israel".

...the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people...​

How many other groups of people are stateless with no rights?

Name some.

Kurdistan, Northern Cyprus, Tibet, Kabylia (in Algeria), and Western Sahara. Not quite as desperate, but there are also separatist movements in Hong Kong, Quebec and Scotland.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

In other words you cant prove your claims.

I can, but you do not have the background to understand it. Here is some background on the subject.

The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978

A biased report from an islamonazi source, the DPR is not neutral and is spouting lies and propaganda.

See this


In her June 21, 2004 speech [4] at a Conference on Confronting anti-Semitism: Education for Tolerance and Understanding sponsored by the United Nations Department of Information and in her articles,[5] human rights scholar and activist Anne Bayefsky, attending as representative of the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists, criticized the UN approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, advocated the necessity of deep reforms within the UN, and noted that the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people and the annual UN Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People is the only UN day dedicated to a specific people.

The event celebrating an annual "International Day of Solidarity With the Palestinian People" on November 29, 2005 was attended by Kofi Annan and other high-ranking diplomats. In his January 3, 2006 letter to Mr. Annan, the US ambassador John Bolton criticized the UN for promoting anti-Israel agenda and noted that the map prominently displayed at the event "erases the state of Israel".

...the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people...​

How many other groups of people are stateless with no rights?

Name some.

In other words you cant prove your claims.

I can, but you do not have the background to understand it. Here is some background on the subject.

The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978

A biased report from an islamonazi source, the DPR is not neutral and is spouting lies and propaganda.

See this


In her June 21, 2004 speech [4] at a Conference on Confronting anti-Semitism: Education for Tolerance and Understanding sponsored by the United Nations Department of Information and in her articles,[5] human rights scholar and activist Anne Bayefsky, attending as representative of the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists, criticized the UN approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, advocated the necessity of deep reforms within the UN, and noted that the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people and the annual UN Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People is the only UN day dedicated to a specific people.

The event celebrating an annual "International Day of Solidarity With the Palestinian People" on November 29, 2005 was attended by Kofi Annan and other high-ranking diplomats. In his January 3, 2006 letter to Mr. Annan, the US ambassador John Bolton criticized the UN for promoting anti-Israel agenda and noted that the map prominently displayed at the event "erases the state of Israel".

...the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people...​

How many other groups of people are stateless with no rights?

Name some.

Kurdistan, Northern Cyprus, Tibet, Kabylia (in Algeria), and Western Sahara. Not quite as desperate, but there are also separatist movements in Hong Kong, Quebec and Scotland.

In other words you cant prove your claims.

I can, but you do not have the background to understand it. Here is some background on the subject.

The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978

A biased report from an islamonazi source, the DPR is not neutral and is spouting lies and propaganda.

See this


In her June 21, 2004 speech [4] at a Conference on Confronting anti-Semitism: Education for Tolerance and Understanding sponsored by the United Nations Department of Information and in her articles,[5] human rights scholar and activist Anne Bayefsky, attending as representative of the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists, criticized the UN approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, advocated the necessity of deep reforms within the UN, and noted that the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people and the annual UN Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People is the only UN day dedicated to a specific people.

The event celebrating an annual "International Day of Solidarity With the Palestinian People" on November 29, 2005 was attended by Kofi Annan and other high-ranking diplomats. In his January 3, 2006 letter to Mr. Annan, the US ambassador John Bolton criticized the UN for promoting anti-Israel agenda and noted that the map prominently displayed at the event "erases the state of Israel".

...the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people...​

How many other groups of people are stateless with no rights?

Name some.

In other words you cant prove your claims.

I can, but you do not have the background to understand it. Here is some background on the subject.

The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978

A biased report from an islamonazi source, the DPR is not neutral and is spouting lies and propaganda.

See this


In her June 21, 2004 speech [4] at a Conference on Confronting anti-Semitism: Education for Tolerance and Understanding sponsored by the United Nations Department of Information and in her articles,[5] human rights scholar and activist Anne Bayefsky, attending as representative of the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists, criticized the UN approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, advocated the necessity of deep reforms within the UN, and noted that the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people and the annual UN Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People is the only UN day dedicated to a specific people.

The event celebrating an annual "International Day of Solidarity With the Palestinian People" on November 29, 2005 was attended by Kofi Annan and other high-ranking diplomats. In his January 3, 2006 letter to Mr. Annan, the US ambassador John Bolton criticized the UN for promoting anti-Israel agenda and noted that the map prominently displayed at the event "erases the state of Israel".

...the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people...​

How many other groups of people are stateless with no rights?

Name some.

Kurdistan, Northern Cyprus, Tibet, Kabylia (in Algeria), and Western Sahara. Not quite as desperate, but there are also separatist movements in Hong Kong, Quebec and Scotland.

I meant that the latter 3 aren't quite as desperate as the first 5. I wasn't talking about the Palestinians.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

In other words you cant prove your claims.

I can, but you do not have the background to understand it. Here is some background on the subject.

The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978

A biased report from an islamonazi source, the DPR is not neutral and is spouting lies and propaganda.

See this


In her June 21, 2004 speech [4] at a Conference on Confronting anti-Semitism: Education for Tolerance and Understanding sponsored by the United Nations Department of Information and in her articles,[5] human rights scholar and activist Anne Bayefsky, attending as representative of the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists, criticized the UN approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, advocated the necessity of deep reforms within the UN, and noted that the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people and the annual UN Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People is the only UN day dedicated to a specific people.

The event celebrating an annual "International Day of Solidarity With the Palestinian People" on November 29, 2005 was attended by Kofi Annan and other high-ranking diplomats. In his January 3, 2006 letter to Mr. Annan, the US ambassador John Bolton criticized the UN for promoting anti-Israel agenda and noted that the map prominently displayed at the event "erases the state of Israel".

...the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people...​

How many other groups of people are stateless with no rights?

Name some.

In other words you cant prove your claims.

I can, but you do not have the background to understand it. Here is some background on the subject.

The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978

A biased report from an islamonazi source, the DPR is not neutral and is spouting lies and propaganda.

See this


In her June 21, 2004 speech [4] at a Conference on Confronting anti-Semitism: Education for Tolerance and Understanding sponsored by the United Nations Department of Information and in her articles,[5] human rights scholar and activist Anne Bayefsky, attending as representative of the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists, criticized the UN approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, advocated the necessity of deep reforms within the UN, and noted that the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people and the annual UN Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People is the only UN day dedicated to a specific people.

The event celebrating an annual "International Day of Solidarity With the Palestinian People" on November 29, 2005 was attended by Kofi Annan and other high-ranking diplomats. In his January 3, 2006 letter to Mr. Annan, the US ambassador John Bolton criticized the UN for promoting anti-Israel agenda and noted that the map prominently displayed at the event "erases the state of Israel".

...the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people...​

How many other groups of people are stateless with no rights?

Name some.

Kurdistan, Northern Cyprus, Tibet, Kabylia (in Algeria), and Western Sahara. Not quite as desperate, but there are also separatist movements in Hong Kong, Quebec and Scotland.

In other words you cant prove your claims.

I can, but you do not have the background to understand it. Here is some background on the subject.

The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978

A biased report from an islamonazi source, the DPR is not neutral and is spouting lies and propaganda.

See this


In her June 21, 2004 speech [4] at a Conference on Confronting anti-Semitism: Education for Tolerance and Understanding sponsored by the United Nations Department of Information and in her articles,[5] human rights scholar and activist Anne Bayefsky, attending as representative of the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists, criticized the UN approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, advocated the necessity of deep reforms within the UN, and noted that the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people and the annual UN Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People is the only UN day dedicated to a specific people.

The event celebrating an annual "International Day of Solidarity With the Palestinian People" on November 29, 2005 was attended by Kofi Annan and other high-ranking diplomats. In his January 3, 2006 letter to Mr. Annan, the US ambassador John Bolton criticized the UN for promoting anti-Israel agenda and noted that the map prominently displayed at the event "erases the state of Israel".

...the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people...​

How many other groups of people are stateless with no rights?

Name some.

In other words you cant prove your claims.

I can, but you do not have the background to understand it. Here is some background on the subject.

The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978

A biased report from an islamonazi source, the DPR is not neutral and is spouting lies and propaganda.

See this


In her June 21, 2004 speech [4] at a Conference on Confronting anti-Semitism: Education for Tolerance and Understanding sponsored by the United Nations Department of Information and in her articles,[5] human rights scholar and activist Anne Bayefsky, attending as representative of the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists, criticized the UN approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, advocated the necessity of deep reforms within the UN, and noted that the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people and the annual UN Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People is the only UN day dedicated to a specific people.

The event celebrating an annual "International Day of Solidarity With the Palestinian People" on November 29, 2005 was attended by Kofi Annan and other high-ranking diplomats. In his January 3, 2006 letter to Mr. Annan, the US ambassador John Bolton criticized the UN for promoting anti-Israel agenda and noted that the map prominently displayed at the event "erases the state of Israel".

...the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people...​

How many other groups of people are stateless with no rights?

Name some.

Kurdistan, Northern Cyprus, Tibet, Kabylia (in Algeria), and Western Sahara. Not quite as desperate, but there are also separatist movements in Hong Kong, Quebec and Scotland.

I meant that the latter 3 aren't quite as desperate as the first 5. I wasn't talking about the Palestinians.

I forgot Chechnya. They were the ones responsible for the Boston bombings.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

I can, but you do not have the background to understand it. Here is some background on the subject.

The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978

A biased report from an islamonazi source, the DPR is not neutral and is spouting lies and propaganda.

See this


In her June 21, 2004 speech [4] at a Conference on Confronting anti-Semitism: Education for Tolerance and Understanding sponsored by the United Nations Department of Information and in her articles,[5] human rights scholar and activist Anne Bayefsky, attending as representative of the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists, criticized the UN approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, advocated the necessity of deep reforms within the UN, and noted that the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people and the annual UN Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People is the only UN day dedicated to a specific people.

The event celebrating an annual "International Day of Solidarity With the Palestinian People" on November 29, 2005 was attended by Kofi Annan and other high-ranking diplomats. In his January 3, 2006 letter to Mr. Annan, the US ambassador John Bolton criticized the UN for promoting anti-Israel agenda and noted that the map prominently displayed at the event "erases the state of Israel".

...the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people...​

How many other groups of people are stateless with no rights?

Name some.

I can, but you do not have the background to understand it. Here is some background on the subject.

The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978

A biased report from an islamonazi source, the DPR is not neutral and is spouting lies and propaganda.

See this


In her June 21, 2004 speech [4] at a Conference on Confronting anti-Semitism: Education for Tolerance and Understanding sponsored by the United Nations Department of Information and in her articles,[5] human rights scholar and activist Anne Bayefsky, attending as representative of the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists, criticized the UN approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, advocated the necessity of deep reforms within the UN, and noted that the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people and the annual UN Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People is the only UN day dedicated to a specific people.

The event celebrating an annual "International Day of Solidarity With the Palestinian People" on November 29, 2005 was attended by Kofi Annan and other high-ranking diplomats. In his January 3, 2006 letter to Mr. Annan, the US ambassador John Bolton criticized the UN for promoting anti-Israel agenda and noted that the map prominently displayed at the event "erases the state of Israel".

...the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people...​

How many other groups of people are stateless with no rights?

Name some.

Kurdistan, Northern Cyprus, Tibet, Kabylia (in Algeria), and Western Sahara. Not quite as desperate, but there are also separatist movements in Hong Kong, Quebec and Scotland.

I can, but you do not have the background to understand it. Here is some background on the subject.

The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978

A biased report from an islamonazi source, the DPR is not neutral and is spouting lies and propaganda.

See this


In her June 21, 2004 speech [4] at a Conference on Confronting anti-Semitism: Education for Tolerance and Understanding sponsored by the United Nations Department of Information and in her articles,[5] human rights scholar and activist Anne Bayefsky, attending as representative of the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists, criticized the UN approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, advocated the necessity of deep reforms within the UN, and noted that the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people and the annual UN Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People is the only UN day dedicated to a specific people.

The event celebrating an annual "International Day of Solidarity With the Palestinian People" on November 29, 2005 was attended by Kofi Annan and other high-ranking diplomats. In his January 3, 2006 letter to Mr. Annan, the US ambassador John Bolton criticized the UN for promoting anti-Israel agenda and noted that the map prominently displayed at the event "erases the state of Israel".

...the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people...​

How many other groups of people are stateless with no rights?

Name some.

I can, but you do not have the background to understand it. Here is some background on the subject.

The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978

A biased report from an islamonazi source, the DPR is not neutral and is spouting lies and propaganda.

See this


In her June 21, 2004 speech [4] at a Conference on Confronting anti-Semitism: Education for Tolerance and Understanding sponsored by the United Nations Department of Information and in her articles,[5] human rights scholar and activist Anne Bayefsky, attending as representative of the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists, criticized the UN approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, advocated the necessity of deep reforms within the UN, and noted that the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people and the annual UN Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People is the only UN day dedicated to a specific people.

The event celebrating an annual "International Day of Solidarity With the Palestinian People" on November 29, 2005 was attended by Kofi Annan and other high-ranking diplomats. In his January 3, 2006 letter to Mr. Annan, the US ambassador John Bolton criticized the UN for promoting anti-Israel agenda and noted that the map prominently displayed at the event "erases the state of Israel".

...the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people...​

How many other groups of people are stateless with no rights?

Name some.

Kurdistan, Northern Cyprus, Tibet, Kabylia (in Algeria), and Western Sahara. Not quite as desperate, but there are also separatist movements in Hong Kong, Quebec and Scotland.

I meant that the latter 3 aren't quite as desperate as the first 5. I wasn't talking about the Palestinians.

I forgot Chechnya. They were the ones responsible for the Boston bombings.

It's sorta sad that the plights of all the peoples I mentioned above are completely ignored because they aren't controlled by Jews.

 

[P F Tinmore]

In other words you cant prove your claims.

I can, but you do not have the background to understand it. Here is some background on the subject.

The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978

A biased report from an islamonazi source, the DPR is not neutral and is spouting lies and propaganda.

See this


In her June 21, 2004 speech [4] at a Conference on Confronting anti-Semitism: Education for Tolerance and Understanding sponsored by the United Nations Department of Information and in her articles,[5] human rights scholar and activist Anne Bayefsky, attending as representative of the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists, criticized the UN approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, advocated the necessity of deep reforms within the UN, and noted that the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people and the annual UN Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People is the only UN day dedicated to a specific people.

The event celebrating an annual "International Day of Solidarity With the Palestinian People" on November 29, 2005 was attended by Kofi Annan and other high-ranking diplomats. In his January 3, 2006 letter to Mr. Annan, the US ambassador John Bolton criticized the UN for promoting anti-Israel agenda and noted that the map prominently displayed at the event "erases the state of Israel".

...the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people...​

How many other groups of people are stateless with no rights?

Name some.

In other words you cant prove your claims.

I can, but you do not have the background to understand it. Here is some background on the subject.

The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978

A biased report from an islamonazi source, the DPR is not neutral and is spouting lies and propaganda.

See this


In her June 21, 2004 speech [4] at a Conference on Confronting anti-Semitism: Education for Tolerance and Understanding sponsored by the United Nations Department of Information and in her articles,[5] human rights scholar and activist Anne Bayefsky, attending as representative of the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists, criticized the UN approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, advocated the necessity of deep reforms within the UN, and noted that the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people and the annual UN Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People is the only UN day dedicated to a specific people.

The event celebrating an annual "International Day of Solidarity With the Palestinian People" on November 29, 2005 was attended by Kofi Annan and other high-ranking diplomats. In his January 3, 2006 letter to Mr. Annan, the US ambassador John Bolton criticized the UN for promoting anti-Israel agenda and noted that the map prominently displayed at the event "erases the state of Israel".

...the UNDPR is the only UN Division devoted to a single group of people...​

How many other groups of people are stateless with no rights?

Name some.

Kurdistan, Northern Cyprus, Tibet, Kabylia (in Algeria), and Western Sahara. Not quite as desperate, but there are also separatist movements in Hong Kong, Quebec and Scotland.

Are they citizens of a country where they can just get a passport? Have they been remove from their homeland?

 

[Billo_Really]

And your own article states:

Israeli officials urged the evacuation of several districts in the Gaza Strip where more than 100,000 people live, as it intensified its operation against Palestinian militants.

But I suppose Hamas assured them that it didn't apply to them. I sometimes wonder what Hamas tells the Gazans. Is it anything like what the Taliban told the Afghanistan's?

And it's probably no different than what the Israeli's tell you.

Just because you tell someone to leave, doesn't mean you can legally kill them if they don't. You cannot target people who take no part in hostilities.

 

[Billo_Really]

Now that's a quality education...
"We're being shelled?! Let's go play on the beach!"
Stupid is as stupid does.

And murderers do, as a murderer does.

 

[Billo_Really]

And of course Hamas never harmed children before!!
Who the **** go outside during war?
The Jihadists are consuming themselves.

Nothing you said justifies the air strike. Nor does it make it legal. You deliberately murdered children playing soccer. That is an example of just how sick your society has become.

 

[Billo_Really]

Know who murdered them? Hamas . Why didn't Hamas accept the Cesse Fire? The Israeli Soldiers should be executed ( even though Israel does not have the Death Penty) but those serving life for the killing of Israelis shouldn't ?
They should get the Death Penalty after those Hamas Scumbags get Hanged for the killing of those three Israeli Boys.

Why don't you finish your education and learn good grammar?

I feel like I'm being punished, just reading your post.