ICE Shooting: New Video from Case With Agents Accused of Lying Under Oath

[Marener]

The leftists in the alternate reality of Minneapolis’istan are desperate to protect their criminals.

Is it a crime for a law enforcement officer to lie on a police report?

 

[Hollie]

Is it a crime for a law enforcement officer to lie on a police report?

Is it a crime to make your type of false statements?

 

[Marener]

Is it a crime to make your type of false statements?

No.

A cop tried to kill some one and frame them. That’s not okay unless you’re an authoritarian thug.

 

[Hollie]

No.

A cop tried to kill some one and frame them. That’s not okay unless you’re an authoritarian thug.

I guess your say-so is a conviction. Is that the new leftist standard for convictions? “,,,,, because I say so”?

You’re just an authoritarian hack.

 

[Muhammed]

New video appears to undermine claims by the federal government

No it doesn't.

 

[Marener]

I guess your say-so is a conviction. Is that the new leftist standard for convictions? “,,,,, because I say so”?

You’re just an authoritarian hack.

It’s on video.

 

[Hollie]

It’s on video.

The conviction is on video? I guess in the alternative reality of the authoritarian hack “ I dun’ seen it on the YouTube” is an instant conviction.

 

[Marener]

The conviction is on video? I guess in the alternative reality of the authoritarian hack “ I dun’ seen it on the YouTube” is an instant conviction.

Poor Hollie. Hasn’t been given permission from MAGA to watch the video of the incident and think for themself.

 

[Hollie]

Poor Hollie. Hasn’t been given permission from MAGA to watch the video of the incident and think for themself.

Poor authoritarian hack. Presumes that a YouTube video supplants the need for a trial.

You authoritarian hacks don't understand that in the Great Satan system of jurisprudence there is a process called “discovery”, whereby depositions, examination of evidence and presentation of evidence at trial takes place. You have the burden of ignorance about YouTube as evidence for an immediate conviction.

 

[Marener]

Poor authoritarian hack. Presumes that a YouTube video supplants the need for a trial.

You authoritarian hacks don't understand that in the Great Satan system of jurisprudence there is a process called “discovery”, whereby depositions, examination of evidence and presentation of evidence at trial takes place. You have the burden of ignorance about YouTube as evidence for an immediate conviction.

The video is clear proof that the ICE agent lied. You can see it for yourself. You don’t actually need permission from your controllers.

The reason you’re afraid to look at it is because you fear doubt.

 

[EdwinAMartin]

Evidence?... that video is not evidence... you couldn't see the attack or what took place....

lol there could have been 10 people there that nobody would see from that angle. Fleege here just wants to legalize killing Federal law enforcement officers like other Democrats.

 

[EdwinAMartin]

You learned the ICE agent blatantly lied.

Your fellow commies won a Darwin award, is all. We're all better off for it.

 

[Hollie]

The video is clear proof that the ICE agent lied. You can see it for yourself. You don’t actually need permission from your controllers.

The reason you’re afraid to look at it is because you fear doubt.

Once again, you’re convinced a YouTube video is a default conviction.

In the authoritarian world of the leftist hack, let’s just do away with discovery and proceed to an automatic conviction.

After all, you dun’ seen it on the YouTube……

 

[Marener]

Once again, you’re convinced a YouTube video is a default conviction.

In the authoritarian world of the leftist hack, let’s just do away with discovery and proceed to an automatic conviction.

After all, you dun’ seen it on the YouTube……

The only one talking about convictions is you, and you only do it when you don’t want to believe something in front of your face.

It’s a double standard.

The video shows the agent lied. That’s a fact.

 

[Hollie]

The only one talking about convictions is you, and you only do it when you don’t want to believe something in front of your face.

It’s a double standard.

The video shows the agent lied. That’s a fact.

“ that’s a fact”… “because I say so”.

The one whining about a conviction is you. A video of unknown origin and authenticity is not “pwoof” of anything. You are convinced of guilt because of bias and your status as the sole arbiter of “phacts”.

 

[Marener]

“ that’s a fact”… “because I say so”.

The one whining about a conviction is you. A video of unknown origin and authenticity is not “pwoof” of anything. You are convinced of guilt because of bias and your status as the sole arbiter of “phacts”.

It’s a fact because you can see it.

Obviously we don’t need a court case to decide what is and isn’t a fact, when we can see it for ourselves.

 

[Hollie]

It’s a fact because you can see it.

Obviously we don’t need a court case to decide what is and isn’t a fact, when we can see it for ourselves.

It’s a “phact” because you dun’ seen it on the YouTube.

 

[Marener]

It’s a “phact” because you dun’ seen it on the YouTube.

The video was released by the city from their cameras.

 

[leftwinger]

Moral: don't bring a gun to a riot. Don't fight Police who are doing assigned job.

 

[Hollie]

The video was released by the city from their cameras.

Well…. Let’s go right to a conviction. No need for any further verification or investigation.