ICE decides 4th amendment no longer applies too them

[Leo123]

ICE has decided on their own that the executive branch, on their own without any judicial involvement, can forcibly enter homes.

This is a clear violation of the 4th amendment and we’ve seen this in action in jurisdictions around the country.

The memo outlining the policy has been tightly controlled, clearly not wanting this information to get out.

Immigration officers assert sweeping power to enter homes without a judge's warrant, memo says

An Immigration and Customs Enforcement memo obtained by The Associated Press reveals that the agency allows immigration officers to forcibly enter homes to make arrests without a judicial warrant.

apnews.com

This is the kind of constitutional violation that I think warrants criminal prosecution.

None of this would be needed if sanctuary states cooperated with ICE and detained these illegal, criminal aliens as they should do under Federal law. You loons are either too stupid or just support seditious behavior. How do you expect ICE to arrest these criminals, by asking them nicely? You guys have lost your senses because of your TDS.

 

[Leo123]

That warrant comes from an immigration judge, who is an employee of the executive branch. These do not come from article 3 judges and therefore the administration is usurping judicial power for itself.

So what?

 

[Leo123]

I don't think Trump has ever read the Constitution.

He clearly doesn't think any of it applies to him or his presidency.

Basically he got the Supreme Court to say he could do whatever he wanted without fear of prosecution. And he's making the most of that.

Walz should read immigration law because his sanctuary state is illegal.

 

[Concerned American]

That warrant comes from an immigration judge, who is an employee of the executive branch. These do not come from article 3 judges and therefore the administration is usurping judicial power for itself.

Do you know what the three branches of gov't in the US are, Moroner? Obviously not. Newsflash--Executive, JUDICIAL, Legislative. Now STFU or educate yourself.

 

[Concerned American]

Walz should read immigration law because his sanctuary state is illegal.

He is aiding and abetting known criminals and obstructing justice for starters.

 

[Marener]

So what?

So it’s unconstitutional.

 

[Leo123]

ICE has decided on their own that the executive branch, on their own without any judicial involvement, can forcibly enter homes.

This is a clear violation of the 4th amendment and we’ve seen this in action in jurisdictions around the country.

The memo outlining the policy has been tightly controlled, clearly not wanting this information to get out.

Immigration officers assert sweeping power to enter homes without a judge's warrant, memo says

An Immigration and Customs Enforcement memo obtained by The Associated Press reveals that the agency allows immigration officers to forcibly enter homes to make arrests without a judicial warrant.

apnews.com

This is the kind of constitutional violation that I think warrants criminal prosecution.

Since when is having a warrant to go after illegal alien criminals a 'constitutional violation?' The 4th allows ICE to enter a home during exigent circumstances and an illegal criminal with felonies living in a home is certainly an exigent circumstance. The 4th amendment allows enforcement against criminal aliens.

 

[Leo123]

So it’s unconstitutional.

No it isn't, the 4th amendment allows for going after criminal, illegal aliens.

 

[Concerned American]

So it’s unconstitutional.

LOL, you don't know what the branches of the US government are or their responsibilities and you are trying to convince us you're a constitutional scholar now? ROTFLMFAO.

 

[Marener]

Since when is having a warrant to go after illegal alien criminals a 'constitutional violation?' The 4th allows ICE to enter a home during exigent circumstances and an illegal criminal with felonies living in a home is certainly an exigent circumstance. The 4th amendment allows enforcement against criminal aliens.

It’s not a judicial warrant. The 4th amendment is designed to keep the government out of your home without a judicial warrant.

 

[Leo123]

It’s not a judicial warrant. The 4th amendment is designed to keep the government out of your home without a judicial warrant.

No, that is for the non-criminal illegal aliens. A warrant is not needed for exigent circumstances where criminals are holed up in a residence, I suggest you actually read the 4th amendment. Now why don't you explain why Walz is not breaking the law by allowing a sanctuary state and harboring criminal, illegal aliens?

 

[LeftofLeft]

The Left loves the Constitution…, and then when the Left does not like the the Constitution, they remind us that the Constitution was written by White Owning Slave Owners.

 

[BS Filter]

ICE has decided on their own that the executive branch, on their own without any judicial involvement, can forcibly enter homes.

This is a clear violation of the 4th amendment and we’ve seen this in action in jurisdictions around the country.

The memo outlining the policy has been tightly controlled, clearly not wanting this information to get out.

Immigration officers assert sweeping power to enter homes without a judge's warrant, memo says

An Immigration and Customs Enforcement memo obtained by The Associated Press reveals that the agency allows immigration officers to forcibly enter homes to make arrests without a judicial warrant.

apnews.com

This is the kind of constitutional violation that I think warrants criminal prosecution.

From the article: "The memo authorizes ICE officers to use force to enter a residence based solely on a more narrow administrative warrant to arrest someone with a final order of removal,"

Looks like ICE has the authority.

 

[Rawley]

I looked at the 4th amendment and I don’t see where it allows the executive branch to enter a home without a judicial warrant.

I've looked at it too. There is no requirement for a judicial warrant in the 4th amendment.

 

[Rawley]

That warrant comes from an immigration judge, who is an employee of the executive branch. These do not come from article 3 judges and therefore the administration is usurping judicial power for itself.

Nothing about a judicial warrant in the 4th Amendment. I'll ask again, what is the Supreme Court precedent that an administrative arrest warrant executing a final order of removal from an immigration judge is a 4th amendment violation?

We'll wait.

 

[Marener]

From the article: "The memo authorizes ICE officers to use force to enter a residence based solely on a more narrow administrative warrant to arrest someone with a final order of removal,"

Looks like ICE has the authority.

So you’re saying the executive branch can grant themselves judicial authority.

 

[Rogue AI]

ICE has decided on their own that the executive branch, on their own without any judicial involvement, can forcibly enter homes.

This is a clear violation of the 4th amendment and we’ve seen this in action in jurisdictions around the country.

The memo outlining the policy has been tightly controlled, clearly not wanting this information to get out.

Immigration officers assert sweeping power to enter homes without a judge's warrant, memo says

An Immigration and Customs Enforcement memo obtained by The Associated Press reveals that the agency allows immigration officers to forcibly enter homes to make arrests without a judicial warrant.

apnews.com

This is the kind of constitutional violation that I think warrants criminal prosecution.

You really need to learn how to read. Illegals have been given 'advice' that ICE needs a warrant to execute a final deportation order. Cite the law that actually supports this 'advice'. There is no legal question as to ICE's authority to deport illegal aliens. Even the half baked liberal rag article does not say any old house, it is very specific to executing final deportation orders. If a final deportation order was been issued there are no due process issues.

This liberal whining is based solely on unsupported 'advice'. How pathetic.

 

[Rawley]

So you’re saying the executive branch can grant themselves judicial authority.

4th time. Nothing in the 4th Amendment about "judicial authority."

 

[BS Filter]

So you’re saying the executive branch can grant themselves judicial authority.

Administrative authority. That's what your article says.

 

[Concerned American]

Administrative authority. That's what your article says.

Moroner is trolling. Don't feed the troll.