I Want A Refund

[okfine]

Trump's cornerstone for his 2020 re-election bid received a big blow on Thursday.
Two of his hugely celebrated USSC picks voted to release his financial information.
Out of nine possible votes only two voted for Trump. Should Trump and his supporters ask for a refund?

'They're all laughing at you': Trump mocked after both of his SCOTUS picks rule against him on taxes

President Donald Trump faced a stinging defeat on Thursday after the United States Supreme Court ruled that he cannot block a subpoena for his financial records from New York County District Attorney Cy Vance.What made the decision particularly notable was the fact that both of President Trump's...

www.rawstory.com

"President Donald Trump faced a stinging defeat on Thursday after the United States Supreme Court ruled that he cannot block a subpoena for his financial records from New York County District Attorney Cy Vance.
What made the decision particularly notable was the fact that both of President Trump’s picks for the Supreme Court — Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh — ruled against him in the case."

 

[Ricky LIbtardo]

What the clowns won't tell you is the SCOTUS told the idiots you have to have a specific reason, not your bullshit fishing expeditions.

So, no problem for Trump. No political bullshit.

Surprised some people are stupid enough to claim this is a victory for the libtardos.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Let's hope Ginsburg keels over this summer.

 

[jc456]

What the clowns won't tell you is the SCOTUS told the idiots you have to have a specific reason, not your bullshit fishing expeditions.

So, no problem for Trump. No political bullshit.

Surprised some people are stupid enough to claim this is a victory for the libtardos.

Exactly. They don't understand the ruling at all.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Trump's cornerstone for his 2020 re-election bid received a big blow on Thursday.
Two of his hugely celebrated USSC picks voted to release his financial information.
Out of nine possible votes only two voted for Trump. Should Trump and his supporters ask for a refund?

'They're all laughing at you': Trump mocked after both of his SCOTUS picks rule against him on taxes

President Donald Trump faced a stinging defeat on Thursday after the United States Supreme Court ruled that he cannot block a subpoena for his financial records from New York County District Attorney Cy Vance.What made the decision particularly notable was the fact that both of President Trump's...

www.rawstory.com

"President Donald Trump faced a stinging defeat on Thursday after the United States Supreme Court ruled that he cannot block a subpoena for his financial records from New York County District Attorney Cy Vance.
What made the decision particularly notable was the fact that both of President Trump’s picks for the Supreme Court — Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh — ruled against him in the case."

We all remember at this forum how Leftists literally had the meltdowns of meltdowns over those two Cuckservatives and so WHO should be laughing? Yes Rightists should be laughing at the idiot Leftists, but those meltdowns of meltdowns were VERY entertaining, we had about 20 or more threads from unhinged Leftists losing it over those two Cuckservative nominations.

OF COURSE you were not here Noob but no doubt your meltdown would have been Grand Mal Seizure level.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Let's hope Ginsburg keels over this summer.

Then The Donald should replace with a TOTAL Right-Wing BASTARD of BASTARDS aged between 40-44 years in age.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Let's hope Ginsburg keels over this summer.

Then The Donald should replace with a TOTAL Right-Wing BASTARD of BASTARDS aged between 40-44 years in age.

The litmus test should be "will you strike down as unconstitutional, the NFA, allowing citizens to manufacture, sell, and purchase machine guns with no background checks or licensing?"

Anything but an unequivocal "YES" is a disqualifer.

 

[Crepitus]

Trump's cornerstone for his 2020 re-election bid received a big blow on Thursday.
Two of his hugely celebrated USSC picks voted to release his financial information.
Out of nine possible votes only two voted for Trump. Should Trump and his supporters ask for a refund?

'They're all laughing at you': Trump mocked after both of his SCOTUS picks rule against him on taxes

President Donald Trump faced a stinging defeat on Thursday after the United States Supreme Court ruled that he cannot block a subpoena for his financial records from New York County District Attorney Cy Vance.What made the decision particularly notable was the fact that both of President Trump's...

www.rawstory.com

"President Donald Trump faced a stinging defeat on Thursday after the United States Supreme Court ruled that he cannot block a subpoena for his financial records from New York County District Attorney Cy Vance.
What made the decision particularly notable was the fact that both of President Trump’s picks for the Supreme Court — Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh — ruled against him in the case."

Those damn judges just won't stay bought!

 

[Votto]

Let's hope Ginsburg keels over this summer.

FYI, she died 3 years ago

 

[jc456]

Trump's cornerstone for his 2020 re-election bid received a big blow on Thursday.
Two of his hugely celebrated USSC picks voted to release his financial information.
Out of nine possible votes only two voted for Trump. Should Trump and his supporters ask for a refund?

'They're all laughing at you': Trump mocked after both of his SCOTUS picks rule against him on taxes

President Donald Trump faced a stinging defeat on Thursday after the United States Supreme Court ruled that he cannot block a subpoena for his financial records from New York County District Attorney Cy Vance.What made the decision particularly notable was the fact that both of President Trump's...

www.rawstory.com

"President Donald Trump faced a stinging defeat on Thursday after the United States Supreme Court ruled that he cannot block a subpoena for his financial records from New York County District Attorney Cy Vance.
What made the decision particularly notable was the fact that both of President Trump’s picks for the Supreme Court — Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh — ruled against him in the case."

Those damn judges just won't stay bought!

they did their job. not sure what you won? but I'm laughing at you.

 

[okfine]

Trump's cornerstone for his 2020 re-election bid received a big blow on Thursday.
Two of his hugely celebrated USSC picks voted to release his financial information.
Out of nine possible votes only two voted for Trump. Should Trump and his supporters ask for a refund?

'They're all laughing at you': Trump mocked after both of his SCOTUS picks rule against him on taxes

President Donald Trump faced a stinging defeat on Thursday after the United States Supreme Court ruled that he cannot block a subpoena for his financial records from New York County District Attorney Cy Vance.What made the decision particularly notable was the fact that both of President Trump's...

www.rawstory.com

"President Donald Trump faced a stinging defeat on Thursday after the United States Supreme Court ruled that he cannot block a subpoena for his financial records from New York County District Attorney Cy Vance.
What made the decision particularly notable was the fact that both of President Trump’s picks for the Supreme Court — Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh — ruled against him in the case."

Those damn judges just won't stay bought!

Trump was handed a list of possibles to pick from. From the Federalist Society.
Talk about snake bit.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Let's hope Ginsburg keels over this summer.

Then The Donald should replace with a TOTAL Right-Wing BASTARD of BASTARDS aged between 40-44 years in age.

The litmus test should be "will you strike down as unconstitutional, the NFA, allowing citizens to manufacture, sell, and purchase machine guns with no background checks or licensing?"

Anything but an unequivocal "YES" is a disqualify.

If The Senate did not have so many Cuckservatives aka RINOs then The Donald could have nominated actual CONSERVATIVES like Thomas and Alito and Scalia BUT if he would have then the Cuckservatives aka RINOs ie. Mitt Romney, that Collins woman and that woman from Alaska would have voted with the party they should have joined already the Democrats, there is zero Conservative with those three ALSO that Mitch McConnell is VERY WEAK, he has NO SPINE, the Republican Senate leader should be a TOTAL RIGHT-WING BASTARD of BASTARDS who will crack the WHIP.

Democrats aka Communists are TOTAL FAR LEFT BASTARDS of BASTARDS, the Republicans SHOULD have been going toe to toe with those BASTARDS for the past four years. The Republicans should NEVER COMPROMISE EVER, because the Democrats aka Communists NEVER COMPROMISE EVER.

Gloves OFF. TOTAL War Mode. Period.

 

[jc456]

Trump was handed a list of possibles to pick from. From the Federalist Society.
Talk about snake bit.

trump didn't lose. you're still confused on the ruling.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Let's hope Ginsburg keels over this summer.

Then The Donald should replace with a TOTAL Right-Wing BASTARD of BASTARDS aged between 40-44 years in age.

Replace an old dead beat smelly ass like Darth Bader with some fresh conservative woman who knows all about law.

Also makes the other two ugly broads look like shit.
Emily Compagno - Wikipedia
She graduated with a B.A. in Political Science from the University of Washington where she was awarded the U.S. Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps' Cadet of the Quarter Award.[2][8] She graduated with a J.D. from the University of San Francisco School of Law in 2006.[2] After passing the California bar, she worked as a criminal defense attorney in San Francisco while also serving as captain of the Oakland Raider's cheerleading squad, the Raiderettes.[2][8] The NFL selected her as an Ambassador and she promoted the NFL brand in Beijing and Shanghai; and was one of five NFL cheerleaders selected to visit U.S. troops with the USO stationed in Iraq and Kuwait.[2] Compagno was a Senior Judge Judicial Extern for John T. Noonan at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.[8] She then went on to work as a federal attorney at the Social Security Administration.[8] She has also held legal positions in Cape Town, South Africa, and Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.[8]

 

[okfine]

Trump was handed a list of possibles to pick from. From the Federalist Society.
Talk about snake bit.

trump didn't lose. you're still confused on the ruling.

How come Trump is losing his shit on Twitter?

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Trump's cornerstone for his 2020 re-election bid received a big blow on Thursday.
Two of his hugely celebrated USSC picks voted to release his financial information.
Out of nine possible votes only two voted for Trump. Should Trump and his supporters ask for a refund?

'They're all laughing at you': Trump mocked after both of his SCOTUS picks rule against him on taxes

President Donald Trump faced a stinging defeat on Thursday after the United States Supreme Court ruled that he cannot block a subpoena for his financial records from New York County District Attorney Cy Vance.What made the decision particularly notable was the fact that both of President Trump's...

www.rawstory.com

"President Donald Trump faced a stinging defeat on Thursday after the United States Supreme Court ruled that he cannot block a subpoena for his financial records from New York County District Attorney Cy Vance.
What made the decision particularly notable was the fact that both of President Trump’s picks for the Supreme Court — Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh — ruled against him in the case."

Those damn judges just won't stay bought!

Trump was handed a list of possibles to pick from. From the Federalist Society.
Talk about snake bit.

Yes and 98% of that list was NOT acceptable to the RINOs, at that time also that included as well as Mitt Romney, the Collins woman, the Alaska woman it included that Beta Cuck Faggot Jeff Flake and so The Donald had to go with Brett Faggot and Neil Faggot or those places would have stayed vacant.

This is what happens when you allow RINOs to be elected, who is in charge of picking these Cuckservatives? They NEVER should have been picked in the FIRST place, actual CONSERVATIVES should have been picked for those ALREADY Republican seats.

Democrats NEVER pick DINOs who support the Republicans on CRUCIAL votes. Republicans should NEVER pick RINOs then who support the Democrats on CRUCIAL votes.

 

[jc456]

Trump was handed a list of possibles to pick from. From the Federalist Society.
Talk about snake bit.

trump didn't lose. you're still confused on the ruling.

How come Trump is losing his shit on Twitter?

where?

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Let's hope Ginsburg keels over this summer.

Then The Donald should replace with a TOTAL Right-Wing BASTARD of BASTARDS aged between 40-44 years in age.

Replace an old dead beat smelly ass like Darth Bader with some fresh conservative woman who knows all about law.

Also makes the other two ugly broads look like shit.
Emily Compagno - Wikipedia
She graduated with a B.A. in Political Science from the University of Washington where she was awarded the U.S. Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps' Cadet of the Quarter Award.[2][8] She graduated with a J.D. from the University of San Francisco School of Law in 2006.[2] After passing the California bar, she worked as a criminal defense attorney in San Francisco while also serving as captain of the Oakland Raider's cheerleading squad, the Raiderettes.[2][8] The NFL selected her as an Ambassador and she promoted the NFL brand in Beijing and Shanghai; and was one of five NFL cheerleaders selected to visit U.S. troops with the USO stationed in Iraq and Kuwait.[2] Compagno was a Senior Judge Judicial Extern for John T. Noonan at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.[8] She then went on to work as a federal attorney at the Social Security Administration.[8] She has also held legal positions in Cape Town, South Africa, and Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.[8]

How CONSERVATIVE is she? Is she 99.9% Conservative or more like 70% Conservative?

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Trump's cornerstone for his 2020 re-election bid received a big blow on Thursday.
Two of his hugely celebrated USSC picks voted to release his financial information.
Out of nine possible votes only two voted for Trump. Should Trump and his supporters ask for a refund?

'They're all laughing at you': Trump mocked after both of his SCOTUS picks rule against him on taxes

President Donald Trump faced a stinging defeat on Thursday after the United States Supreme Court ruled that he cannot block a subpoena for his financial records from New York County District Attorney Cy Vance.What made the decision particularly notable was the fact that both of President Trump's...

www.rawstory.com

"President Donald Trump faced a stinging defeat on Thursday after the United States Supreme Court ruled that he cannot block a subpoena for his financial records from New York County District Attorney Cy Vance.
What made the decision particularly notable was the fact that both of President Trump’s picks for the Supreme Court — Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh — ruled against him in the case."

Those damn judges just won't stay bought!

Maybe like John Roberts they are being Blackmailed from elsewhere to vote AGAINST the Conservative side and support the Leftist side. Most of John Roberts votes recently are beyond bizarro from a Conservative.

 

[irosie91]

Let's hope Ginsburg keels over this summer.

Then The Donald should replace with a TOTAL Right-Wing BASTARD of BASTARDS aged between 40-44 years in age.

try not to be bitter, Lucy. Donald is----(so sorry but it is true) ----under the skin, a traditional democrat