I think Wray is going to be a problem for Democrats.

[Skylar]

Zero charges equates to -

Democrats not being subject to penalties from breaking US Law.

I keep saying it.
Your side keeps confirming it.

Not being subject to penalties.....by Durham? A republican special counsel seated by a republican AG during a republican administration.....

......is for the benefit of Democrats?

You sure you want to die on that rhetorical hill?

 

[Skylar]

Theater? Oh, you mean like Russian collusion.

So you're equating Comer's 'judgment day' and his desire to release the document to the public with claims of Russian Collusion?

Well that was easy.

 

[Godboy]

Not being subject to penalties.....by Durham? A republican special counsel seated by a republican AG during a republican administration.....

......is for the benefit of Democrats?

You sure you want to die on that rhetorical hill?

No, they arent being held accountable by the DOJ and FBI. Stop asking stupid questions.

 

[Godboy]

So you're equating Comer's 'judgment day' and his desire to release the document to the public with claims of Russian Collusion?

Well that was easy.

No, YOU equated that, which is weird as fuck. Why did you say that weird shit?

 

[Billiejeens]

No, they arent being held accountable by the DOJ and FBI. Stop asking stupid questions.

No chance.

 

[Skylar]

No, they arent being held accountable by the DOJ and FBI. Stop asking stupid questions.

Durham has prosecutorial power, could convene grand juries, could try defendants.

And did.

Durham charged NO ONE with any of the 'crimes' that are being said were 'obvious'. He referred NO ONE for any of the 'crimes' that are being said were 'obvious'. He recommended charges for NO ONE on any of the 'crimes' that are being said were 'obvious'.

In all the hysteric hyperbole and panty shitting theatrics, there's clearly something y'all are missing.

 

[BS Filter]

So you're equating Comer's 'judgment day' and his desire to release the document to the public with claims of Russian Collusion?

Well that was easy.

Yes, it was.

 

[BS Filter]

Durham has prosecutorial power, could convene grand juries, could try defendants.

And did.

Durham charged NO ONE with any of the 'crimes' that are being said were 'obvious'. He referred NO ONE for any of the 'crimes' that are being said were 'obvious'. He recommended charges for NO ONE on any of the 'crimes' that are being said were 'obvious'.

In all the hysteric hyperbole and panty shitting theatrics, there's clearly something y'all are missing.

It's not his job to refer anyone be charged.

 

[Skylar]

It's not his job to refer anyone be charged.

It was his job to prosecute any crime he found. Durham charged NO ONE with any of the 'crimes' that are being said were 'obvious'.

So....y'all know Durham's job better than he did?

Or was Durham in the bag for Democrats and just folded into the conspiracy too?

 

[kaz]

Zero charges equates to -

Democrats not being subject to penalties from breaking US Law.

I keep saying it.
Your side keeps confirming it.

What's truly stupid is that when Skylar gets his way and there is only the Democrat party left in this country, he will have no more rights than we do. He thinks he's fighting for our servitude. He is, but he's also fighting for his own, and he doesn't grasp that

 

[Skylar]

What's truly stupid is that when Skylar gets his way and there is only the Democrat party left in this country, he will have no more rights than we do. He thinks he's fighting for our servitude. He is, but he's also fighting for his own, and he doesn't grasp that

What's truly stupid is the idea that Durham, a republican special counsel seated by a republican AG in a republican administration....

....would have been looking to protect Democrats.

And yet, that's the silly, shit conspiracy that is being fronted.

 

[kaz]

What's truly stupid is the idea that Durham, a republican special counsel seated by a republican AG in a republican administration....

....would have been looking to protect Democrats.

And yet, that's the silly, shit conspiracy that is being fronted.

Durham is a cog, this is just a deflection from the point. It isn't about whether Durham was right or wrong, it's whether anyone is allowed to hold a Democrat politician accountable, and there isn't.

That leads to one place, and you are too lost in politics to see it. We aren't the same, our side does not want government to run our lives, other than the socons who are at least a minority. But you are eliminating your party's opposition, and that should scare the fuck out of you, but sadly doesn't.

The best government is the smallest. Any government we have is a direct threat to our freedom

 

[Skylar]

Durham is a cog, this is just a deflection from the point. It isn't about whether Durham was right or wrong, it's whether anyone is allowed to hold a Democrat politician accountable, and there isn't.

That leads to one place, and you are too lost in politics to see it. We aren't the same, our side does not want government to run our lives, other than the socons who are at least a minority. But you are eliminating your party's opposition, and that should scare the fuck out of you unless you're high up in the Democrat party

Durham had full prosecutorial discretion. He could charge anyone he could convince a grand jury committed crimes. And did, 3 times. 2 resulted in acquittals. One, a plea deal with community service.

Claims Durham wasn't *allowed* to prosecute crimes he found is more meaningless conspiracy excuse making for the dissonance between the gibbering panty shitting hysterics of our self appointed board 'experts'........and reality.

You'll find that most conservative cosnpiracies about law enforcement, the courts and the law.....are just conservatives not knowing what the fuck they're talking about.

 

[Marener]

Durham is a cog, this is just a deflection from the point. It isn't about whether Durham was right or wrong, it's whether anyone is allowed to hold a Democrat politician accountable, and there isn't.

If Durham could have prosecuted someone, he would have.

The truth you refuse to acknowledge is that he didn't have a case that he could prosecute. The stories about illegal activity you have been telling each other are just stories with no proof.

 

[kaz]

Durham had full prosecutorial discretion. He could charge anyone he could convince a grand jury committed crimes. And did, 3 times. 2 resulted in acquittals. One, a plea deal with community service.

Claims Durham wasn't *allowed* to prosecute crimes he found is more meaningless conspiracy excuse making for the dissonance between the gibbering panty shitting hysterics of our self appointed board 'experts'........and reality.

You'll find that most conservative cosnpiracies about law enforcement, the courts and the law.....are just conservatives not knowing what the fuck they're talking about.

What about Durham was a cog don't you understand? What Democrat has been held accountable for the Hillary made up three year Russiagate investigation? What major Democrat has been held accountable for anything else? We are already a one party country, but you're working hard to end the others, not just leave us with minor influence.

Again, when you win, you'll be coming over to our side and be treated like we are. Nice job

 

[kaz]

If Durham could have prosecuted someone, he would have.

The truth you refuse to acknowledge is that he didn't have a case that he could prosecute. The stories about illegal activity you have been telling each other are just stories with no proof.

Durham = cog, I'm not debating him, go fuck yourself, racist

 

[Catsnmeters]

That's on them then.

On who?

Dems would love a word where information is classified by default.

Not sure what this made up narrative has to do with my post. Try to stay on topic, Skippy.

Not at all but you managed to distract from the cover up with an irrevelancy so good job.

How is a president's absolute power to change classification irrelevant?

What do you think Wray meant when he said that the guy who reported the Biden bribery operation might lose his life if the form got out? They never said that about people who reported derogatory information about Trump.

I don't know. What does that have to do with this conversation?

 

[Skylar]

What about Durham was a cog don't you understand?

Oh, the claim I understood perfectly. But you typing a sentence doesn't make reality form to match around you.

Any claim that Durham wasn't *allowed* to prosecute crimes he found is meaningless conspiracy nonsense. There's nothing to back the claim up.

Nor does Durham say he was in restricted from doing so. The claim is entirely imaginary.

And we don't charge people with felonies because someone on chat board imagined something

 

[Catsnmeters]

You don't know who he told. Everything is going to be okay. You're just afraid of nothing. Blame the leftist media propaganda.

Exactly the point.

Thanks for that.

 

[Marener]

Durham = cog, I'm not debating him, go fuck yourself, racist

Durham is a prosecutor. If he had things he could prosecute, he would.

I don't know what you mean by "Durham = cog". Are you claiming he was intentionally trying not to prosecute Democrats?