Hydroxychloroquine

COVID-19 is unlikely to bind to ocular surfaces:

Jul 2020 Ocular Surfaces
'....The evidence suggests that coronaviruses are unlikely to bind to ocular surface cells to initiate infection.'.

Doesn't mean it cant travel in tear ducts or other "non-ocular" components of the eye...
 
Huge Covid-19 spike in Oklahoma thanks to Trump having his Trumptard followers not wearing mask when packed together indoors. This is now the "Trumpvirus"! Trump is the reason this country is the most infected country on the planet, in depression with high unemployment & widespread riots!

All Trump had to do was send every citizen a mask & mandate they wear it indoors at stores, schools, work, etc. Trump should have also mandated all parks & beaches remain open and everyone get 15+ minutes of sunlight every day to elevate their Vitamin D3 levels. Trump is a Hydroxychloroquine pill popping IDIOT!!!
 
Huge Covid-19 spike in Oklahoma thanks to Trump having his Trumptard followers not wearing mask when packed together indoors. This is now the "Trumpvirus"! Trump is the reason this country is the most infected country on the planet, in depression with high unemployment & widespread riots!

All Trump had to do was send every citizen a mask & mandate they wear it indoors at stores, schools, work, etc. Trump should have also mandated all parks & beaches remain open and everyone get 15+ minutes of sunlight every day to elevate their Vitamin D3 levels. Trump is a Hydroxychloroquine pill popping IDIOT!!!

10 people per 100k..........OMFG.........we are all gonna die..........well if you are in a nursing home in New York City.......well you are probably already dead.
 
New Hydroxychloroquine Study Vindicates President Trump and Should End Dr. Fauci’s Career at NIAID and in Medicine

3 Juky 2020 ~~ By Jim Hoft
A new Hydroxychloroquine study conducted by Henry Ford Health System revealed hydroxychloroquine successfully lowered the death rate among hospitalized COVID-19 patients by a significant margin.
According to Just The News the use of hydroxychloroquine cut the mortality rate of coronavirus victims in half.
The study examined 2,541 patients who had been hospitalized in six hospitals between March 10 and May 2, 2020.
More than twenty-six percent (26.4%) of patients who did not receive hydroxychloroquine died.
But among those who received hydroxychloroquine, fewer than half that number — 13% — died.
More than 90% of the patients received hydroxychloroquine within 48 hours of admission to the hospital. Scientists say giving the drug early during illness may be a key to success.
Now it is clear in the Henry Ford study along with several international studies that hydroxychloroquine saves lives.
This study should also end Dr. Fauci’s career in medicine.
Dr. Fauci has fought against the use of hydroxychloroquine in treating coronavirus since it was first discovered as a successful treatment to the disease.



Comment:
Until the administration was apprised of the Covid-19 epidemic, I doubt if PDJT ever spoke to Dr. Fauci. PDJT went to war against the Wuhan Covid-19 with the weapons he had.
Dr. Fauci is a product of Obama administration and from what he's previous said to the nation there is obvious bias in his actions.
I'm all for the advancement of medicine and development of new drugs, however in a case like this where a treatment is found to work, all hospitals should be using thattreatment until and if a better treatment becomes available.
Remdesivir may be good but before it was used the HCQ cocktail w/Zinc available and would have saved countless lives. The deaths of those not treated with the HCQ cocktail after it was reported that it worked should be attributed to his decisions.
Please note that Fauci was involved in the development of 'Remdesivir" during the obama importation of Ebola. The drug was never approved because it didn't work and all of the research money was down the tubes. Fauci is also the guy that touted the testing of Remdesivir against Wuhan Covid-19, During his tenure he's diverted a lot of funds and energy toward development of many of the drugs making it possible for people to enjoy Aids as seen on tv commercials.
 
Researchers not involved with the study were critical. They noted that the Henry Ford team did not randomly treat patients but selected them for various treatments based on certain criteria.

"As the Henry Ford Health System became more experienced in treating patients with COVID-19, survival may have improved, regardless of the use of specific therapies," Dr. Todd Lee of the Royal Victoria Hospital in Montreal, Canada, and colleagues wrote in a commentary in the same journal.

"Finally, concomitant steroid use in patients receiving hydroxychloroquine was more than double the non-treated group
. This is relevant considering the recent RECOVERY trial that showed a mortality benefit with dexamethasone." The steroid dexamethasone can reduce inflammation in seriously ill patients.

Rosenberg also pointed out that the Detroit paper excluded 267 patients -- nearly 10% of the study population -- who had not yet been discharged from the hospital. He said this might have skewed the results to make hydroxychloroquine look better than it really was. Those patients might have still been in the hospital because they were very sick, and if they died, excluding them from the study made hydroxychloroquine look like more of a lifesaver than it really was.

"There's a little bit of loosey-goosiness here in all this,"

Both the Detroit and New York studies were observational: they looked back at how patients did when doctors prescribed hydroxychloroquine.

While helpful, observational studies are not as valuable as controlled clinical trials. Considered the gold standard in medicine, patients in a clinical trial are randomly assigned to take either the drug or a placebo, which is a treatment that does nothing. Doctors then follow the patients to see how they fare.

Two clinical trials on hydroxychloroquine for Covid-19, one in the US and one in the UK, were stopped early because their data suggested hydroxychloroquine wasn't helpful.
 
Researchers not involved with the study were critical. They noted that the Henry Ford team did not randomly treat patients but selected them for various treatments based on certain criteria.

"As the Henry Ford Health System became more experienced in treating patients with COVID-19, survival may have improved, regardless of the use of specific therapies," Dr. Todd Lee of the Royal Victoria Hospital in Montreal, Canada, and colleagues wrote in a commentary in the same journal.

"Finally, concomitant steroid use in patients receiving hydroxychloroquine was more than double the non-treated group
. This is relevant considering the recent RECOVERY trial that showed a mortality benefit with dexamethasone." The steroid dexamethasone can reduce inflammation in seriously ill patients.

Rosenberg also pointed out that the Detroit paper excluded 267 patients -- nearly 10% of the study population -- who had not yet been discharged from the hospital. He said this might have skewed the results to make hydroxychloroquine look better than it really was. Those patients might have still been in the hospital because they were very sick, and if they died, excluding them from the study made hydroxychloroquine look like more of a lifesaver than it really was.

"There's a little bit of loosey-goosiness here in all this,"

Both the Detroit and New York studies were observational: they looked back at how patients did when doctors prescribed hydroxychloroquine.

While helpful, observational studies are not as valuable as controlled clinical trials. Considered the gold standard in medicine, patients in a clinical trial are randomly assigned to take either the drug or a placebo, which is a treatment that does nothing. Doctors then follow the patients to see how they fare.

Two clinical trials on hydroxychloroquine for Covid-19, one in the US and one in the UK, were stopped early because their data suggested hydroxychloroquine wasn't helpful.
XiNN....All the agitprop fake nooz that's fit to regurgitate to the proles.
 
Researchers not involved with the study were critical. They noted that the Henry Ford team did not randomly treat patients but selected them for various treatments based on certain criteria.

"As the Henry Ford Health System became more experienced in treating patients with COVID-19, survival may have improved, regardless of the use of specific therapies," Dr. Todd Lee of the Royal Victoria Hospital in Montreal, Canada, and colleagues wrote in a commentary in the same journal.

"Finally, concomitant steroid use in patients receiving hydroxychloroquine was more than double the non-treated group
. This is relevant considering the recent RECOVERY trial that showed a mortality benefit with dexamethasone." The steroid dexamethasone can reduce inflammation in seriously ill patients.

Rosenberg also pointed out that the Detroit paper excluded 267 patients -- nearly 10% of the study population -- who had not yet been discharged from the hospital. He said this might have skewed the results to make hydroxychloroquine look better than it really was. Those patients might have still been in the hospital because they were very sick, and if they died, excluding them from the study made hydroxychloroquine look like more of a lifesaver than it really was.

"There's a little bit of loosey-goosiness here in all this,"

Both the Detroit and New York studies were observational: they looked back at how patients did when doctors prescribed hydroxychloroquine.

While helpful, observational studies are not as valuable as controlled clinical trials. Considered the gold standard in medicine, patients in a clinical trial are randomly assigned to take either the drug or a placebo, which is a treatment that does nothing. Doctors then follow the patients to see how they fare.

Two clinical trials on hydroxychloroquine for Covid-19, one in the US and one in the UK, were stopped early because their data suggested hydroxychloroquine wasn't helpful.
Why would they include people still hospitalized since they can’t conclude if it helps them fully recover versus death?
 
Fauci never said it didn't work. He warned against calling it fairly effective, since it had never been tested in clinical trials. According to this GWP article that constitutes a "jihad against hydroxychloroquine".
 
The craziest part of this whole story, which remains unsaid, is that the liberals are all crying in their beer about this.

Libs are rooting for the virus.
The radical left doesn’t benefit from good news in treating the virus or ending the pandemic soon. They only benefit from prolonging the pandemic.

In fact, they will most likely try to sabotage vaccine efforts if it looks like it might happen before the election. If next month President Trump announces that we can begin vaccinations for the public, the MSM will call him reckless and endangering the public without further studying and testing.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: 007
There's more than enough evidence Hydroxy works. The reason fascist fauci and the left are poo-pooing it is because fauci and his cohorts are heavily invested in it NOT working, because they want THEIR drug to be the cure so they all get rich, and the fascist left, well they just want to drag out the virus as long as they can because they believe ruining America will hurt Trumps reelection chances.

 
Fauci's work with Xi Jinping and the Chinese and their bio research into weaponizing bat, pig, frog viruses
etc. should have ended his career long ago. He's cozy with the WHO, who are cozy with Jinping and the Chinese who are the source of this whole modern plague.

Why Fauci isn't doing time in a federal prison instead of sending out mixed Covid messages from his place in the federal bureacracy is beyond me.
 
It does not vindicate him. 66 people in the test died without any treatment. 34 people still died when given the drug. The funny part is when combined with another drug 57 people still died. IF the drug was that effective then even when used with another drug the results should have been in the same range as using it alone.

Its a beginning but when FOX runs the story as a vindication then it begs the question, what is the real story behind these test.. Is the testing just to vindicate Trump.

Dr. Zervos also pointed out, as does the paper, that the study results should be interpreted with some caution, should not be applied to patients treated outside of hospital settings and require further confirmation in prospective, randomized controlled trials that rigorously evaluate the safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine therapy for COVID-19.

Trump said he took it but he did not say that he had COVID-19 but seems to say it was a way to prevent whatever. Still this is a ongoing study. FOX should not be taunting vindication until the final results are in. Obviously for political purposes. It is not a cure. People still died.

At best it shows that at least 75 percent of people in this study who had the disease and with no treatment did
survive. Those with problems with heart and lung problems still died. Stuff already known.

Also Dr Fauci never fought against it use.

All he said was don't assume that it was a knockout drug. He said testing and studies still need to be done first.

 
Last edited:
It does vindicate him. 66 people in the test died without any treatment. 34 people still died when given the drug. The funny part is when combined with another drug 57 people still died. IF the drug was that effective then even when used with another drug the results should have been in the same range as using it alone.

Its a beginning but when FOX runs the story as a vindication then it begs the question, what is the real story behind these test.. Is the testing just to vindicate Trump.

Dr. Zervos also pointed out, as does the paper, that the study results should be interpreted with some caution, should not be applied to patients treated outside of hospital settings and require further confirmation in prospective, randomized controlled trials that rigorously evaluate the safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine therapy for COVID-19.

Trump said he took it but he did not say that he had COVID-19 but seems to say it was a way to prevent whatever. Still this is a ongoing study. FOX should not be taunting vindication until the final results are in. Obviously for political purposes. It is not a cure. People still died.


Its not just President Trump that takes hydroxychloroquine as a prophylactic for the Chinese Kung flue.

Most world leaders do, including the President of El Salvador, President Bukele.

why the disrespect for great world leaders like Bukele?
 
New Hydroxychloroquine Study Vindicates President Trump and Should End Dr. Fauci’s Career at NIAID and in Medicine

3 Juky 2020 ~~ By Jim Hoft
A new Hydroxychloroquine study conducted by Henry Ford Health System revealed hydroxychloroquine successfully lowered the death rate among hospitalized COVID-19 patients by a significant margin.
According to Just The News the use of hydroxychloroquine cut the mortality rate of coronavirus victims in half.
The study examined 2,541 patients who had been hospitalized in six hospitals between March 10 and May 2, 2020.
More than twenty-six percent (26.4%) of patients who did not receive hydroxychloroquine died.
But among those who received hydroxychloroquine, fewer than half that number — 13% — died.
More than 90% of the patients received hydroxychloroquine within 48 hours of admission to the hospital. Scientists say giving the drug early during illness may be a key to success.
Now it is clear in the Henry Ford study along with several international studies that hydroxychloroquine saves lives.
This study should also end Dr. Fauci’s career in medicine.
Dr. Fauci has fought against the use of hydroxychloroquine in treating coronavirus since it was first discovered as a successful treatment to the disease.



Comment:
Until the administration was apprised of the Covid-19 epidemic, I doubt if PDJT ever spoke to Dr. Fauci. PDJT went to war against the Wuhan Covid-19 with the weapons he had.
Dr. Fauci is a product of Obama administration and from what he's previous said to the nation there is obvious bias in his actions.
I'm all for the advancement of medicine and development of new drugs, however in a case like this where a treatment is found to work, all hospitals should be using thattreatment until and if a better treatment becomes available.
Remdesivir may be good but before it was used the HCQ cocktail w/Zinc available and would have saved countless lives. The deaths of those not treated with the HCQ cocktail after it was reported that it worked should be attributed to his decisions.
Please note that Fauci was involved in the development of 'Remdesivir" during the obama importation of Ebola. The drug was never approved because it didn't work and all of the research money was down the tubes. Fauci is also the guy that touted the testing of Remdesivir against Wuhan Covid-19, During his tenure he's diverted a lot of funds and energy toward development of many of the drugs making it possible for people to enjoy Aids as seen on tv commercials.

A. From the gateway pundit so almost certainly not true.
B. More studies say the opposite is true.
 
Fauci is a Democrat hack so he will never be held accountable just like the rest of the hacks.
 
It does vindicate him. 66 people in the test died without any treatment. 34 people still died when given the drug. The funny part is when combined with another drug 57 people still died. IF the drug was that effective then even when used with another drug the results should have been in the same range as using it alone.

Its a beginning but when FOX runs the story as a vindication then it begs the question, what is the real story behind these test.. Is the testing just to vindicate Trump.

Dr. Zervos also pointed out, as does the paper, that the study results should be interpreted with some caution, should not be applied to patients treated outside of hospital settings and require further confirmation in prospective, randomized controlled trials that rigorously evaluate the safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine therapy for COVID-19.

Trump said he took it but he did not say that he had COVID-19 but seems to say it was a way to prevent whatever. Still this is a ongoing study. FOX should not be taunting vindication until the final results are in. Obviously for political purposes. It is not a cure. People still died.


Its not just President Trump that takes hydroxychloroquine as a prophylactic for the Chinese Kung flue.

Most world leaders do, including the President of El Salvador, President Bukele.

why the disrespect for great world leaders like Bukele?


Yeah as the president of el Salvador he should know if world leaders are taking the drug. His country has 2109 confirmed cases. I guess he was just grateful for those 250 masks Trump gave him. Sounds like it is just beginning for them

Bukele said the drug was no longer part of El Salvador's coronavirus treatment protocol, but that it would remain available for "those who wish to use it as prophylaxis" or by a doctor's prescription.

Wow what a leader and destined to become a great world leader.
 

Forum List

Back
Top