The Paper on Which the Worldwide COVID "Lockdowns" Were Based Was Non-Peer-Reviewed, One of the "Most Wrong" and Was Funded by Bill Gates

munkle

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
6,182
Reaction score
10,843
Points
2,130
The receipts, since taken down by the Imperial College website where Prof. Neil Ferguson, author of the paper, worked, but available at archives.


1779576270743.webp



"In March and April of 2020, just before unprecedented “lockdowns” were announced in countries around the world, Bill Gates directly funded the British professor who created the discredited “lockdown” theory, to the tune of $8 million. Although not peer-reviewed and mocked in science circles, “Report 9” was used by governments to justify vastly expanded powers over individuals in the name of public health.

Following the money trail also shows Gates money and influence behind a bat coronavirus “simulation” exercise “Event 201,” which planned for a novel bat coronavirus pandemic nearly two months before the first reports of COVID emerged out of China, as well as a Bird Flu simulation and a Monkeypox simulation, similarly long before any news of spread of the respective diseases had hit the news.

The non-peer reviewed paper “Report 9” was authored by Imperial College professor Neil Ferguson, a statistician who was mocked in science circles as the “Master of Disaster.”

The National Review writes:

“Johan Giesecke, the former chief scientist for the European Center for Disease Control and Prevention, has called Ferguson’s model “the most influential scientific paper” in memory. He also says it was, sadly, “one of the most wrong.””

The figure of possibly 2.2 million Americans dead by the end of 2020 if there were no lockdowns came from Report 9...."
 
Back
Top Bottom