Human Evolution Is Not Taught In Public Schools

Evolution is not Abiogenesis.
If its not abiogenesis.......please explain where the 1st of each living creature came from, of course using the scientific method (since you profess to be working with science and its application of the laws of physics)......please present the experiment based upon the application of science that demonstrates how life evolved from the basic elements common to earth from non living to living. Just one experiment where Evolution has reproduced life outside the species of like kind.......there is no evidence in the fossil record. What is found in the fossil records are isolated examples of inbreeding humans who have incestuously reproduced within the same isolated family unit........and then called humans caught in transition from some lower lifeform. Just like they find mutated fish and call it EVOLUTION because the fish is deformed. ALL ARE FROM THE SPECIES OF MAN OR THE SPECIES OF FISH, ANIMAL....ETC.

Every few years the pseudo intellectuals claim to have found the missing link in one form or another.........but all turn out to be like the piltdown man.......misrepresented examples of all out fraud, or simply the skeletal remains of an infirmed human being in a state of deformity caused by disease, such as LUCY was mispresented as a primate when in reality it turns out the remains are human.....turns out that Baboon bones where mixed in with human bones and misrepresented as LUCKY the missing link........who has HUMAN TEETH and is found to be suffering from degenerative bone disease. But.......still, they make the false claims of a transitory example of evolution. The fraud never ceases as these fraudsters get their funding from WE THE PEOPLE via grants. The grants dry up void of the Yellow Journalism that goes along with these con artists.

If you cannot not reproduce life void of pre-existing life within the same species..then you must (by the laws of logic and science accept CREATION as the cause to all biological life).....there are but 2 possibilities. Life created itself from non living matter/mass/energy...........or it is the product of a SUPER (superior) Natural (to nature) Cause. Its called the law of causality.

I know that you know that Science cannot reproduce life void of pre-existing life within the same species. If not.........show us any evolution where one creature (its called a creature for reason.......i.e., it was first created) has evolved to produce a totally new example of life form that is not common to that lineage of species (creatures).

Show me the evidence. And do not say, 'LOOK SQUIRREL.....err........finch'.
 
Last edited:
If its not abiogenesis.......please explain where the 1st of each living creature came from, of course using the scientific method (since you profess to be working with science and its application of the laws of physics)......please present the experiment based upon the application of science that demonstrates how life evolved from the basic elements common to earth from non living to living. Just one experiment where Evolution has reproduced life outside the species of like kind.......there is no evidence in the fossil record. What is found in the fossil records are isolated examples of inbreeding humans who have incestuously reproduced within the same isolated family unit........and then called humans caught in transition from some lower lifeform. Just like they find mutated fish and call it EVOLUTION because the fish is deformed. ALL ARE FROM THE SPECIES OF MAN OR THE SPECIES OF FISH, ANIMAL....ETC.

Every few years the pseudo intellectuals claim to have found the missing link in one form or another.........but all turn out to be like the piltdown man.......misrepresented examples of all out fraud, of simply skeletal remains of an infirmed human being in a state of deformity.

If you cannot not...then you must (by the laws of logic and science accept CREATION as the cause to all biological life).....there are but 2 possibilities. Life created itself from non living matter/mass/energy...........or it is the product of a SUPER (superior) Natural (to nature) Cause.

I know that you know that Science cannot reproduce life void of pre-existing life within the same species. If not.........show us any evolution where one creature (its called a creature for reason.......i.e., it was first created) has evolved to produce a totally new example of life form that is not common to that lineage of species (creatures).

Show me the evidence.
Darwin didn't address Abiogenesis. They don't know. What NEW life form?
 
 
Abiogenesis is a theory. But not addressed by Darwin's adaptive evolution. A duck doesn't become a bunny.
Abiogenesis is fiction as we do not observe it at all. Atheists and their scientists want it to help nature lead to evolution, but they can't have make believe and fairy tales in science.
 
Abiogenesis is a theory. But not addressed by Darwin's adaptive evolution. A duck doesn't become a bunny.
Abiogenesis is fiction; It's not even science. We have never observed life from non-life. I'm not sure if anyone here advocates it.

OTOH, I LOVE TO TELL the atheists here that macroevolution is a LIE and beat them over the head with it.
 
Last edited:
Darwin didn't address Abiogenesis. They don't know. What NEW life form?

How many more times are you going to enjoy the taste of your own foot in your mouth?

That's the problem with those less than reputable.....no? They present "the human process of thinking (even if its wrong)" as science....when its nothing more than a personal philosophy. Science can be tested......philosophy cannot. You have been caught thinking LIE AFTER LIE. Why? You attempt to justify your indoctrination into the Darwinian Cult.
Darwin did not address ABIGENESIS? :abgg2q.jpg: As was stated previously.........your guild must consider blatant lying as righteous when used against the infidel.

According to you Darwin never propagated Abiogenesis? Strange is it not that Darwin is quoted in his Origins of Species the hypothesis "........life could arise from non-organic matter in a "warm little pond".....:disbelief:


And of course........a real scientist (one that works within the scope of the Scientific Method of Application)........Louis Pasteur contradicts this idiotic hypothesis through his experimentation concerning biological reproduction through "Biogenesis".....the accepted facts of science regarding biology. Biological Life can only be reproduced by pre-existing life within the same species. Its a fact of science that has never been falsified by the scientific method.

Darwin was nothing but a philosopher........a snake oil salesman that lived in the empty space between his ears. While Pasteur offered very much advancement in the fields of biology, medicine and applied science.

Pasteur actually taught and instructed in the fields of Physics, Chemistry, Held the position as Dean of Science at a major institute, Director of Science, taught geology. Cured such disease as Rabies, purified our modern diary industries....etc.

What did Darwin do? What contributions did he make to humanity? :dunno: Progressive politics based upon Human Secularism. A dogmatic religion in and by itself, as its tenets can never be proven factual.
 
Last edited:
Darwin did not address ABIGENESIS? :abgg2q.jpg: As was stated previously.........your guild must consider blatant lying as righteous when used against the infidel.

According to you Darwin never propagated Abiogenesis? Strange is it not that Darwin is quoted in his Origins of Species the hypothesis "........life could arise from non-organic matter in a "warm little pond".....:disbelief:

Do you think that is the best of his theory?
 
Darwin did not address ABIGENESIS? :abgg2q.jpg: As was stated previously.........your guild must consider blatant lying as righteous when used against the infidel.

According to you Darwin never propagated Abiogenesis? Strange is it not that Darwin is quoted in his Origins of Species the hypothesis "........life could arise from non-organic matter in a "warm little pond".....:disbelief:


And of course........a real scientist (one that works withing the scope of the Scientific Method of Application)........Louis Pasteur contradict this idiotic hypothesis through his experimentation concerning biological reproduction through "Biogenesis".....the accepted facts of science regarding biology.

Darwin was nothing but a philosopher........a snake oil salesman that lived in the empty space between his ears. While Pasteur offered very much advancement in the fields of biology, medicine and applied science.

Pasteur actually taught and instructed in the fields of Physics, Chemistry, Held the position as Dean of Science at a major institute, Director of Science, taught geology. Cured such disease as Rabies, purified our modern diary industries....etc.

What did Darwin do? What contributions did he make to humanity? :dunno:
A favorite tactic of religious extremists is to cut and paste a snipped sentence from an entire paragraph and fraudulently represent that as a legitimate representation of the person they hope to misrepresent.

The snipped "quote" you used to fraudulently misrepresent Darwin is one I've seen before. Here is the unedited version that was from a letter Darwin wrote to his longstanding friend, Joseph Hooker, on 1 February 1871:

“It is often said that all the conditions for the first production of a living organism are now present, which could ever have been present. But if (and oh! what a big if!) we could conceive some warm little pond, with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, light, heat, electricity, &c. present, that a proteine [sic] compound was chemically formed ready to undergo still more complex changes, at the present day such matter would be instantly devoured or absorbed, which would not have been the case before living creatures were formed.” [quoted from Janet Browne's The Power of Place, New York, Knopf, 2002, 392f]



Stop being a fraud.

Thanks.
 

Abiogenesis

In “Temple of Nature” (1806), Eramus Darwin wrote “…without parent by spontaneous birth rise the first specks of animate earth.” Eramus, like many great thinkers pondered the orig…
biol4141.wordpress.com
biol4141.wordpress.com

"Erasmus Darwin wrote" (1806) is NOT Charles Darwin who lived from (1809-1882) and wrote 50-60 years later.
`
 
Do you think that is the best of his theory?
Again...........you lie, then you attempt to deflect. Which is the quint essential response presented by all Darwinian Cultists. You present a Finch as proving evolution because it has adapted to its natural surroundings. Is it evolution if I go from a clean shave type warm climate into artic conditions.......and GROW A BEARD or longer hair on my head....etc.? The DNA has been there all along, all it takes is the proper prompting by the correct Genes to adapt. The DNA in Birds has been present all along to change in order to survive.......as evidenced by all the different sub species of the same root species. Any way you slice up the information...........a BIRD is still a Bird, it has not changed from a reptile into a bird, no more than a cat can change into a dog. Its all philosophy pretending to be science as the only place it exists is between ears of those foolish enough to accept something as a fact void of the evidence to prove it as such.

There is no BEST anything about his idiotic "philosophy"......it cannot be supported by the Scientific Method as demonstrated by the great scientist ......Louis Pasteur. There has never been Evolution as defined by Darwin OBSERVED IN NATURE. While Pasteur's experiments concerning biological life have never been falsified by the Scientific Method.

Anyone that has posted on this thread.........show us the experiment that has confirmed Darwinian Evolution OUTSIDE OF SPECIES as claimed. Anyone? What you get is the usual response from "feigned laughter" because there is no defense of their argument to personal insults. Its typical of the Philosophers that label themselves as "working with Science". Nothing is presented but pretty, pretty adj. and adverbs with a declaration that science works with such language as......Suggests, Points Too, Could Have, Might Have........etc., Real Objective Science you profess.

Its dogmatic comedy to watch you characters cry and whine like little children. :auiqs.jpg:
 
Last edited:
Again...........you lie, then you attempt to deflect. Which is the quint essential response presented by all Darwinian Cultists. You present a Finch as proving evolution because it has adapted to its natural surroundings. Is it evolution if I go from a clean shave type warm climate into artic conditions.......and GROW A BEARD or longer hair on my head....etc.? The DNA has been there all along, all it takes is the proper prompting by the correct Genes to adapt. The DNA in Birds has been present all along to change in order to survive.......as evidenced by all the different sub species of the same root species. Any way you slice up the information...........a BIRD is still a Bird, it has not changed from a reptile into a bird, no more than a cat can change into a dog. Its all philosophy pretending to be science as the only place it exists is between ears of those foolish enough to accept something as a fact void of the evidence to prove it as such.

There is no BEST anything about his idiotic "philosophy"......it cannot be supported by the Scientific Method as demonstrated by the great scientist ......Louis Pasteur. There has never been Evolution as defined by Darwin OBSERVED IN NATURE. While Pasteur's experiments concerning biological life have never been falsified by the Scientific Method.

Anyone that has posted on this thread.........show us the experiment that has confirmed Darwinian Evolution OUTSIDE OF SPECIES as claimed. Anyone? What you get is the usual response from "feigned laughter" because there is no defense of their argument to personal insults. Its typical of the Philosophers that label themselves as "working with Science". Nothing is presented but pretty, pretty adj. and adverbs with a declaration that science works with such language as......Suggests, Points Too, Could Have, Might Have........etc., Real Objective Science you profess.

Its dogmatic comedy to watch you characters cry and whine like little children. :auiqs.jpg:
I'm not a Darwin cultist. Birds lay eggs. So did dinosaurs and all of them weren't reptiles. Do you also believe humans lived hundreds of years and the earth is less than 6000 years old?
 
finch is still a finch .........all birds are birds, just like all cats are felines, etc. All k-9s are still canine regardless of how they have adapted, Wolves, Dogs, Coyotes, fox etc. are members of the "Canids" family species.
More made up shit. Notice you have no references from any science institute at all.
 
More made up shit. Notice you have no references from any science institute at all.
A bird is a bird........and it takes a rocket scientist to know this? :abgg2q.jpg: Birds range in size from the humming bird to the Ostrich. The scientific name for ALL BIRDS is "Aves". Dumb Ass. Bird - Wikipedia

I can see why you subscribe to Darwinian Cultism. It takes a gullible individual with no capacity for critical independent thinking and reasoning. They require being told what to think. I call your guild "SHEEPels".

FYI: Louis Pasteur: A real scientist, chemist, biologist. That has never been falsified with his experiment on biological reproduction of life as coming only from pre-existing life within the same species. Louis Pasteur - Wikipedia

As pointed out........your guild attempts to DEFLECT when they cannot defend their own arguments. Where is the evidence of any Experiment that demonstrated life to evolve OUTSIDE of the same species, with life originating from non organic mass/matter? Present the experiment within the Scientific method that falsifies Louis Pasteur and Biogenesis.

You could produce this evidence...thus, you deflect in the attempt within the sphere of your own stupidity by not knowing what the hell you are even arguing about. Sheepel. :blahblah: A bird is a bird.......all classified within the family of AVES.

With logic such as yours.....or rather the lack thereof........you would consider the growing of fingernails as a type of evolution. Again........dumb ass.
 
Last edited:
Again...........you lie, then you attempt to deflect. Which is the quint essential response presented by all Darwinian Cultists. You present a Finch as proving evolution because it has adapted to its natural surroundings. Is it evolution if I go from a clean shave type warm climate into artic conditions.......and GROW A BEARD or longer hair on my head....etc.? The DNA has been there all along, all it takes is the proper prompting by the correct Genes to adapt. The DNA in Birds has been present all along to change in order to survive.......as evidenced by all the different sub species of the same root species. Any way you slice up the information...........a BIRD is still a Bird, it has not changed from a reptile into a bird, no more than a cat can change into a dog. Its all philosophy pretending to be science as the only place it exists is between ears of those foolish enough to accept something as a fact void of the evidence to prove it as such.

There is no BEST anything about his idiotic "philosophy"......it cannot be supported by the Scientific Method as demonstrated by the great scientist ......Louis Pasteur. There has never been Evolution as defined by Darwin OBSERVED IN NATURE. While Pasteur's experiments concerning biological life have never been falsified by the Scientific Method.

Anyone that has posted on this thread.........show us the experiment that has confirmed Darwinian Evolution OUTSIDE OF SPECIES as claimed. Anyone? What you get is the usual response from "feigned laughter" because there is no defense of their argument to personal insults. Its typical of the Philosophers that label themselves as "working with Science". Nothing is presented but pretty, pretty adj. and adverbs with a declaration that science works with such language as......Suggests, Points Too, Could Have, Might Have........etc., Real Objective Science you profess.

Its dogmatic comedy to watch you characters cry and whine like little children. :auiqs.jpg:
Instead of just screeching out ID’iot creationer nonsense, you might want to offer some facts.

Transitional fossils from reptiles to birds are abundant.



Claim CC214:​

There are no transitional fossils between reptiles and birds.

Source:​

Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, 1985. Life--How Did It Get Here? Brooklyn, NY, 75.

Response:​

  1. Many new bird fossils have been discovered in the last couple of decades, revealing several intermediates between theropod dinosaurs (such as Allosaurus) and modern birds:
    • Sinosauropteryx prima. A dinosaur covered with primitive feathers, but structurally similar to unfeathered dinosaurs Ornitholestes and Compsognathus (Chen et al. 1998; Currie and Chen 2001).

    • Ornithomimosaurs, therizinosaurs, and oviraptorosaurs. The oviraptorosaur Caudipteryx had a body covering of tufted feathers and had feathers with a central rachis on its wings and tail (Ji et al. 1998). Feathers are also known from the therizinosaur Beipiaosaurus (Xu et al. 1999a). Several other birdlike characters appear in these dinosaurs, including unserrated teeth, highly pneumatized skulls and vertebrae, and elongated wings. Oviraptorids also had birdlike eggs and brooding habits (Clark et al. 1999).

    • Deinonychosaurs (troodontids and dromaeosaurs). These are the closest known dinosaurs to birds. Sinovenator, the most primitive troodontid, is especially similar to Archaeopteryx (Xu et al. 2002). Byronosaurus, another troodontid, had teeth nearly identical to primitive birds (Makovicky et al. 2003). Microraptor, the most primitive dromaeosaur, is also the most birdlike; specimens have been found with undisputed feathers on their wings, legs, and tail (Hwang et al. 2002; Xu et al. 2003).Sinornithosaurus also was covered with a variety of feathers and had a skull more birdlike than later dromaeosaurs (Xu, Wang, and Wu 1999; Xu and Wu 2001; Xu et al. 2001).

    • Protarchaeopteryx, alvarezsaurids, Yixianosaurus and Avimimus. These are birdlike dinosaurs of uncertain placement, each potentially closer to birds than deinonychosaurs are. Protarchaeopteryx has tail feathers, uncompressed teeth, and an elongated manus (hand/wing) (Ji et al. 1998). Yixianosaurus has an indistinctly preserved feathery covering and hand/wing proportions close to birds (Xu and Wang 2003). Alvarezsaurids (Chiappe et al. 2002) and Avimimus (Vickers-Rich et al. 2002) have other birdlike features.

    • Archaeopteryx. This famous fossil is defined to be a bird, but it is actually less birdlike in some ways than some genera mentioned above (Paul 2002; Maryanska et al. 2002).

    • Shenzhouraptor (Zhou and Zhang 2002), Rahonavis (Forster et al. 1998), Yandangornis and Jixiangornis. All of these birds were slightly more advanced than Archaeopteryx, especially in characters of the vertebrae, sternum, and wing bones.

    • Sapeornis (Zhou and Zhang 2003), Omnivoropteryx, and confuciusornithids (e.g., Confuciusornis and Changchengornis; Chiappe et al. 1999). These were the first birds to possess large pygostyles (bone formed from fused tail vertebrae). Other new birdlike characters include seven sacral vertebrae, a sternum with a keel (some species), and a reversed hallux (hind toe).

    • Enantiornithines, including at least nineteen species of primitive birds, such as Sinornis (Sereno and Rao 1992; Sereno et al. 2002), Gobipteryx (Chiappe et al. 2001), and Protopteryx (Zhang and Zhou 2000). Several birdlike features appeared in enantiornithines, including twelve or fewer dorsal vertebrae, a narrow V-shaped furcula (wishbone), and reduction in wing digit bones.

    • Patagopteryx, Apsaravis, and yanornithids (Chiappe 2002; Clarke and Norell 2002). More birdlike features appeared in this group, including changes to vertebrae and development of the sternal keel.

    • Hesperornis, Ichthyornis, Gansus, and Limenavis. These birds are almost as advanced as modern species. New features included the loss of most teeth and changes to leg bones.

    • Modern birds.


As to Pasteur, you simply don’t know what you’re screeching about. Louis Pasteur disproved the "spontaneous generation" of whole complex organisms (particularly flies & maggots) at one shot. His results are not applicable to the science of abiogenesis. Pasteur dealt only with large fully-formed organisms, whereas abiogenesis deals with the smallest possible molecular life forms. Your Pasteur argument against abiogenesis has now been falsified.
 
Instead of just screeching out ID’iot creationer nonsense, you might want to offer some facts.

Transitional fossils from reptiles to birds are abundant.



Claim CC214:​

There are no transitional fossils between reptiles and birds.

Source:​

Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, 1985. Life--How Did It Get Here? Brooklyn, NY, 75.

Response:​

  1. Many new bird fossils have been discovered in the last couple of decades, revealing several intermediates between theropod dinosaurs (such as Allosaurus) and modern birds:
    • Sinosauropteryx prima. A dinosaur covered with primitive feathers, but structurally similar to unfeathered dinosaurs Ornitholestes and Compsognathus (Chen et al. 1998; Currie and Chen 2001).

    • Ornithomimosaurs, therizinosaurs, and oviraptorosaurs. The oviraptorosaur Caudipteryx had a body covering of tufted feathers and had feathers with a central rachis on its wings and tail (Ji et al. 1998). Feathers are also known from the therizinosaur Beipiaosaurus (Xu et al. 1999a). Several other birdlike characters appear in these dinosaurs, including unserrated teeth, highly pneumatized skulls and vertebrae, and elongated wings. Oviraptorids also had birdlike eggs and brooding habits (Clark et al. 1999).

    • Deinonychosaurs (troodontids and dromaeosaurs). These are the closest known dinosaurs to birds. Sinovenator, the most primitive troodontid, is especially similar to Archaeopteryx (Xu et al. 2002). Byronosaurus, another troodontid, had teeth nearly identical to primitive birds (Makovicky et al. 2003). Microraptor, the most primitive dromaeosaur, is also the most birdlike; specimens have been found with undisputed feathers on their wings, legs, and tail (Hwang et al. 2002; Xu et al. 2003).Sinornithosaurus also was covered with a variety of feathers and had a skull more birdlike than later dromaeosaurs (Xu, Wang, and Wu 1999; Xu and Wu 2001; Xu et al. 2001).

    • Protarchaeopteryx, alvarezsaurids, Yixianosaurus and Avimimus. These are birdlike dinosaurs of uncertain placement, each potentially closer to birds than deinonychosaurs are. Protarchaeopteryx has tail feathers, uncompressed teeth, and an elongated manus (hand/wing) (Ji et al. 1998). Yixianosaurus has an indistinctly preserved feathery covering and hand/wing proportions close to birds (Xu and Wang 2003). Alvarezsaurids (Chiappe et al. 2002) and Avimimus (Vickers-Rich et al. 2002) have other birdlike features.

    • Archaeopteryx. This famous fossil is defined to be a bird, but it is actually less birdlike in some ways than some genera mentioned above (Paul 2002; Maryanska et al. 2002).

    • Shenzhouraptor (Zhou and Zhang 2002), Rahonavis (Forster et al. 1998), Yandangornis and Jixiangornis. All of these birds were slightly more advanced than Archaeopteryx, especially in characters of the vertebrae, sternum, and wing bones.

    • Sapeornis (Zhou and Zhang 2003), Omnivoropteryx, and confuciusornithids (e.g., Confuciusornis and Changchengornis; Chiappe et al. 1999). These were the first birds to possess large pygostyles (bone formed from fused tail vertebrae). Other new birdlike characters include seven sacral vertebrae, a sternum with a keel (some species), and a reversed hallux (hind toe).

    • Enantiornithines, including at least nineteen species of primitive birds, such as Sinornis (Sereno and Rao 1992; Sereno et al. 2002), Gobipteryx (Chiappe et al. 2001), and Protopteryx (Zhang and Zhou 2000). Several birdlike features appeared in enantiornithines, including twelve or fewer dorsal vertebrae, a narrow V-shaped furcula (wishbone), and reduction in wing digit bones.

    • Patagopteryx, Apsaravis, and yanornithids (Chiappe 2002; Clarke and Norell 2002). More birdlike features appeared in this group, including changes to vertebrae and development of the sternal keel.

    • Hesperornis, Ichthyornis, Gansus, and Limenavis. These birds are almost as advanced as modern species. New features included the loss of most teeth and changes to leg bones.

    • Modern birds.


As to Pasteur, you simply don’t know what you’re screeching about. Louis Pasteur disproved the "spontaneous generation" of whole complex organisms (particularly flies & maggots) at one shot. His results are not applicable to the science of abiogenesis. Pasteur dealt only with large fully-formed organisms, whereas abiogenesis deals with the smallest possible molecular life forms. Your Pasteur argument against abiogenesis has now been falsified.


Yeah..........that proves it. SIMILAR/BIRDLIKE/UNCERTAIN PLACEMENT/BIRD LIKE FEATURES/ DEFINED AS A BIRD BUT IS ACTUALLY LESS BIRDLIKE is very objective evidence. LMAO :abgg2q.jpg: Where is the evidence? Its all subjective, conjecture, speculation and assumptions void of any physical evidence.

The entire........Hypothesis, as that is what you are presenting, Hypothesis (philosophy) dressed as science. Again.......show me the experiment that falsifies Louis Pasteur. Bull Shit does not count as evidence.

And then prove through the scientific method that dino's are actually warm blooded creatures not cold blooded......and explain how a cold blooded creature can suddenly become a warm blooded creature.

Surf the web again for some false intelligence concerning the fact of Dino's being warm blooded or cold blooded.......the new spin is......they were neither, they were in the middle. Why? To justify the hypothesis that dino's evolved into BIRDS.
 
Last edited:
Yeah..........that proves it. SIMILAR/BIRDLIKE/UNCERTAIN PLACEMENT/BIRD LIKE FEATURES/ DEFINED AS A BIRD BUT IS ACTUALLY LESS BIRDLIKE is very objective evidence. LMAO :abgg2q.jpg: Where is the evidence? Its all subjective, conjecture, speculation and assumptions void of any physical evidence.

The entire........Hypothesis, as that is what you are presenting, Hypothesis (philosophy) dressed as science. Again.......show me the experiment that falsifies Louis Pasteur. Bull Shit does not count as evidence.

And then prove through the scientific method that dino's are actually warm blooded creatures not cold blooded......and explain how a cold blooded creature can suddenly become a warm blooded creature.

Fossil evidence isn’t hypothesis.

Otherwise, your shrill screeching is just the standard response that anyone can read at any of the ID’iot creationer ministries. Your flaming tirades are absent fact or evidence.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top