The Executive Order does no such thing. It’s a petition to the FCC to clarify the section in existing law about platforms and liability.The President cannot order that private entities be forced to provide forums for free speech.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The Executive Order does no such thing. It’s a petition to the FCC to clarify the section in existing law about platforms and liability.The President cannot order that private entities be forced to provide forums for free speech.
It's not an executive order against censorship.Uhh... An executive order against censorship is censorship? What?And it's exactly what tRump is trying to do.Censorship is fascist. Right, ANTIFA??
What is “illegal” or “unconstitutional” about the President petitioning the FCC to clarify existing law?I
Ya illegal and unconstitutional.Trump went even further than I expected. The SJWs will be livid.
HUGE! Trump White House Implements Executive Order on Online Censorship: Prevents Tech Giants from Altering Users’ Free Speech – Demands Transparency of Moderation PracticesThis Is Big!On Wednesday Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, Google’s Sundar Pichai and Apple’s Tim Cook testified before Congress in the House Judiciary subcommittee on antitrust.Since 2016 and the election of Donald Trump the tech giants have been censoring and banning conservative voices online. The Gateway Pundit has been a huge target of these liberal tech giants.Of course, the CEOs dismissed allegations that they are targeting and censoring conservative users despite ALL of the evidence to the contrary.
It will.go no-where. Particularly not in the few months he has left.
I
Ya illegal and unconstitutional.Trump went even further than I expected. The SJWs will be livid.
HUGE! Trump White House Implements Executive Order on Online Censorship: Prevents Tech Giants from Altering Users’ Free Speech – Demands Transparency of Moderation PracticesThis Is Big!On Wednesday Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, Google’s Sundar Pichai and Apple’s Tim Cook testified before Congress in the House Judiciary subcommittee on antitrust.Since 2016 and the election of Donald Trump the tech giants have been censoring and banning conservative voices online. The Gateway Pundit has been a huge target of these liberal tech giants.Of course, the CEOs dismissed allegations that they are targeting and censoring conservative users despite ALL of the evidence to the contrary.
It will.go no-where. Particularly not in the few months he has left.
Amen!!! Treat them like the were a Christian owned bakery!!Trump went even further than I expected. The SJWs will be livid.
HUGE! Trump White House Implements Executive Order on Online Censorship: Prevents Tech Giants from Altering Users’ Free Speech – Demands Transparency of Moderation PracticesThis Is Big!On Wednesday Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, Google’s Sundar Pichai and Apple’s Tim Cook testified before Congress in the House Judiciary subcommittee on antitrust.Since 2016 and the election of Donald Trump the tech giants have been censoring and banning conservative voices online. The Gateway Pundit has been a huge target of these liberal tech giants.Of course, the CEOs dismissed allegations that they are targeting and censoring conservative users despite ALL of the evidence to the contrary.
Or you haven’t figured out the President does have authority over the executive branch of government, which includes the FCC.I
Ya illegal and unconstitutional.Trump went even further than I expected. The SJWs will be livid.
HUGE! Trump White House Implements Executive Order on Online Censorship: Prevents Tech Giants from Altering Users’ Free Speech – Demands Transparency of Moderation PracticesThis Is Big!On Wednesday Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, Google’s Sundar Pichai and Apple’s Tim Cook testified before Congress in the House Judiciary subcommittee on antitrust.Since 2016 and the election of Donald Trump the tech giants have been censoring and banning conservative voices online. The Gateway Pundit has been a huge target of these liberal tech giants.Of course, the CEOs dismissed allegations that they are targeting and censoring conservative users despite ALL of the evidence to the contrary.
It will.go no-where. Particularly not in the few months he has left.
They haven’t figured out that Trump is not, in fact, an emperor.
Negative... This is the first step to allow the people to sue current "platforms". First, you need to know WHY you were banned, and by what procedures were used.They haven’t figured out that Trump is not, in fact, an emperor.
While I agree with you in theory, most of those huge corporations that dominate the top of silicon valley's food chain and monopolize the industry, were made possible by the tax payer, and are in bed with the government and the intelligence agencies.Interesting. I've kinda toyed around with that idea. The fact that these online giants are suppressing opposing viewpoints, and considering how big and influential they have become, it could be tantamount to influencing an election. And as you said, an "in kind" donation to the democratic candidate.These rats are censoring conservatives.
It is also an in-kind donation to the Democratic Party. Therefore in violation of campaign finance laws.
Having said that, I struggle with this, because I believe private business should be free to operate, legally, without interference from the government. These big companies should be allowed to operate as they see fit, no? If they want to only allow one viewpoint, should they be denied that? If the other side doesn't like it, then they should create a competing company to allow their viewpoints. As long as those other companies do not throw obstacles in their way that is.
Of course, if those companies are receiving some kind of benefit from the government because they claim to be arbiters of free speech and fair expression of different views, and they are not doing that, then the benefit needs to be removed.
Uhh... An executive order against censorship is censorship? What?And it's exactly what tRump is trying to do.Censorship is fascist. Right, ANTIFA??
Trump went even further than I expected. The SJWs will be livid.
HUGE! Trump White House Implements Executive Order on Online Censorship: Prevents Tech Giants from Altering Users’ Free Speech – Demands Transparency of Moderation PracticesThis Is Big!On Wednesday Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, Google’s Sundar Pichai and Apple’s Tim Cook testified before Congress in the House Judiciary subcommittee on antitrust.Since 2016 and the election of Donald Trump the tech giants have been censoring and banning conservative voices online. The Gateway Pundit has been a huge target of these liberal tech giants.Of course, the CEOs dismissed allegations that they are targeting and censoring conservative users despite ALL of the evidence to the contrary.
Did you read the EO? He has the authority to instruct the FCC, which is in the Executive Branch. He is not trying to impose anything on private companies. They can censor all they want, but if they do, they scan also be held liable for their content.Trump went even further than I expected. The SJWs will be livid.
HUGE! Trump White House Implements Executive Order on Online Censorship: Prevents Tech Giants from Altering Users’ Free Speech – Demands Transparency of Moderation PracticesThis Is Big!On Wednesday Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, Google’s Sundar Pichai and Apple’s Tim Cook testified before Congress in the House Judiciary subcommittee on antitrust.Since 2016 and the election of Donald Trump the tech giants have been censoring and banning conservative voices online. The Gateway Pundit has been a huge target of these liberal tech giants.Of course, the CEOs dismissed allegations that they are targeting and censoring conservative users despite ALL of the evidence to the contrary.
Trump has no power to do this. Free speech rights only apply to governments. The Supreme Court has already ruled on this.
A Supreme Court Decision Could Have Implications for Social Media Free Speech
The court ruled that First Amendment protections don't apply to a corporation that operates a public access channel in New York.psmag.com
While I agree with you in theory, most of those huge corporations that dominate the top of silicon valley's food chain and monopolize the industry, were made possible by the tax payer, and are in bed with the government and the intelligence agencies.Interesting. I've kinda toyed around with that idea. The fact that these online giants are suppressing opposing viewpoints, and considering how big and influential they have become, it could be tantamount to influencing an election. And as you said, an "in kind" donation to the democratic candidate.These rats are censoring conservatives.
It is also an in-kind donation to the Democratic Party. Therefore in violation of campaign finance laws.
Having said that, I struggle with this, because I believe private business should be free to operate, legally, without interference from the government. These big companies should be allowed to operate as they see fit, no? If they want to only allow one viewpoint, should they be denied that? If the other side doesn't like it, then they should create a competing company to allow their viewpoints. As long as those other companies do not throw obstacles in their way that is.
Of course, if those companies are receiving some kind of benefit from the government because they claim to be arbiters of free speech and fair expression of different views, and they are not doing that, then the benefit needs to be removed.
. . . thus, should they have a monopoly over propaganda and influencing the debate?
Front Page Featured | MRCTV
www.cnsnews.com
How the CIA made Google
Inside the secret network behind mass surveillance, endless war, and Skynet — part 1medium.com
Meet In-Q-Tel, the CIA’s Venture Capital Firm (Preview) | The Corbett Report
www.corbettreport.com
Hey, they love their big, centralized government, authoritarian strongman. This is what they want.And it's exactly what tRump is trying to do.Censorship is fascist. Right, ANTIFA??
I don't see that as an argument in good faith. Requiring a company to be open about it's procedures for banning doesn't seem like a overreach at all, or some kind of hostile government take over.Hey, they love their big, centralized government, authoritarian strongman. This is what they want.And it's exactly what tRump is trying to do.Censorship is fascist. Right, ANTIFA??
I am amazed at how many like you get this so fucking wrong. Have you ever fucking bothered to read the Supreme Court opinion where Justice Oliver Windell Holmes Jr. made the anaology?Is calling "FIRE!" in a crowded auditorium censorship?Censorship is fascist. Right, ANTIFA??
Or shouting "BOMB" IN an airplane?I
Free speech cannot cause damage or injury to others.
Fake news and outright lies are damaging to rational communications, especially when ignorant people like you are involved.
Most of the discussion in Yesterday's hearing was about the government-provided monopoly these corporations enjoy.Hey, they love their big, centralized government, authoritarian strongman. This is what they want.And it's exactly what tRump is trying to do.Censorship is fascist. Right, ANTIFA??
IOW, Baby Donald got his diaper in a twist over being humiliated when he re-tweeted those batshyte crazy nitwits promoting hydroxychloroquine as a cure for COVID. Not to mention that Jr got his wrist slapped pretty hard since he too re-tweeted the nonsense. So.........President Petulance took it personally. He thinks he and all the other right wing crazies should have the freedom to post lies, misinformed, and recklessly dangerous things for people's health.Trump went even further than I expected.