HUGE! Trump White House Implements Executive Order on Online Censorship: Prevents Tech Giants from Altering Users’ Free Speech

[L.K.Eder]

It's not an executive order against censorship.

That's exactly what it is ChiCom.

A "platform" so defined must provide equal access. By exerting editorial control through censorship, the Twazis, Fascistbook, and YouTube are in fact publishers and civilly liable for the content THEY publish.

Twitter is no different than CNN in the radical leftist propaganda they publish. As such, they can and will be sued by a Nick Sandman or others they have defamed, slandered, and libeled.

what would you do if you were no longer protected by the CDA section 230? you would surely not want to be sued for morons queefing around on your platform, eh? so, you would most probably delete a lot if the alternative was to be sued, eh?

 

[Jitss617]

It's not an executive order against censorship.

That's exactly what it is ChiCom.

A "platform" so defined must provide equal access. By exerting editorial control through censorship, the Twazis, Fascistbook, and YouTube are in fact publishers and civilly liable for the content THEY publish.

Twitter is no different than CNN in the radical leftist propaganda they publish. As such, they can and will be sued by a Nick Sandman or others they have defamed, slandered, and libeled.

what would you do if you were no longer protected by the CDA section 230? you would surely not want to be sued for morons queefing around on your platform, eh? so, you would most probably delete a lot if the alternative was to be sued, eh?

If you sued us all where would you hide when we come to take it back? Lol

 

[Uncensored2008]

Trump has no power to do this. Free speech rights only apply to governments. The Supreme Court has already ruled on this.

A Supreme Court Decision Could Have Implications for Social Media Free Speech

The court ruled that First Amendment protections don't apply to a corporation that operates a public access channel in New York.

psmag.com

False.

Potentate Mugabe had no right to create the DACA law - but the legitimate President has every right to force platforms to comply with the law or lose the special privilege they have.

 

[Uncensored2008]

It's not an executive order against censorship.

That's exactly what it is ChiCom.

A "platform" so defined must provide equal access. By exerting editorial control through censorship, the Twazis, Fascistbook, and YouTube are in fact publishers and civilly liable for the content THEY publish.

Twitter is no different than CNN in the radical leftist propaganda they publish. As such, they can and will be sued by a Nick Sandman or others they have defamed, slandered, and libeled.

what would you do if you were no longer protected by the CDA section 230? you would surely not want to be sued for morons queefing around on your platform, eh? so, you would most probably delete a lot if the alternative was to be sued, eh?

Again, apply the TOS to all and you have no problem. Twitter is a leftist propaganda outfit, not a public forum. They publish, they don't host.

 

[L.K.Eder]

It's not an executive order against censorship.

That's exactly what it is ChiCom.

A "platform" so defined must provide equal access. By exerting editorial control through censorship, the Twazis, Fascistbook, and YouTube are in fact publishers and civilly liable for the content THEY publish.

Twitter is no different than CNN in the radical leftist propaganda they publish. As such, they can and will be sued by a Nick Sandman or others they have defamed, slandered, and libeled.

what would you do if you were no longer protected by the CDA section 230? you would surely not want to be sued for morons queefing around on your platform, eh? so, you would most probably delete a lot if the alternative was to be sued, eh?

Again, apply the TOS to all and you have no problem. Twitter is a leftist propaganda outfit, not a public forum. They publish, they don't host.

you did not answer the question.

 

[Uncensored2008]

If you sued us all where would you hide when we come to take it back? Lol

Funny thing, USMB already complies with every single element of what Trump proposed.

Why? Because USMB is legitimately a public forum - Twitter and Facebook are publishers.

 

[L.K.Eder]

If you sued us all where would you hide when we come to take it back? Lol

Funny thing, USMB already complies with every single element of what Trump proposed.

Why? Because USMB is legitimately a public forum - Twitter and Facebook are publishers.

are you sure, given the completely arbitrary moderation on this board? LOL

 

[Uncensored2008]

you did not answer the question.

Of course I did. You can't sue because I didn't violate the provisions by promoting a particular view. Twitter publishes far left propaganda. Users who don't promote what Twitter wants are banned. The TOS is meaningless, pedophiles have a platform on Twitter, provided they promote leftism. Anyone right of Mao who is not a celebrity is instantly banned.

 

[Jitss617]

If you sued us all where would you hide when we come to take it back? Lol

Funny thing, USMB already complies with every single element of what Trump proposed.

Why? Because USMB is legitimately a public forum - Twitter and Facebook are publishers.

are you sure, given the completely arbitrary moderation on this board? LOL

Awww are your feelings hurt? Lol

 

[L.K.Eder]

you did not answer the question.

Of course I did. You can't sue because I didn't violate the provisions by promoting a particular view. Twitter publishes far left propaganda. Users who don't promote what Twitter wants are banned. The TOS is meaningless, pedophiles have a platform on Twitter, provided they promote leftism. Anyone right of Mao who is not a celebrity is instantly banned.

my question was clear. it was about what happens if the legal shield provided by 230 CDA no longer applies. don't bother. i did not expect a responsive, honest, intelligent, and/or interesting reply from you.

 

[Brain357]

Presidents shouldn’t rule by executive order, right republicans?

 

[bripat9643]

Trump went even further than I expected. The SJWs will be livid.

HUGE! Trump White House Implements Executive Order on Online Censorship: Prevents Tech Giants from Altering Users' Free Speech - Demands Transparency of Moderation Practices​

​

HUGE! Trump White House Implements Executive Order on Online Censorship: Prevents Tech Giants from Altering Users’ Free Speech – Demands Transparency of Moderation Practices​

​

This Is Big!​

​

On Wednesday Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, Google’s Sundar Pichai and Apple’s Tim Cook testified before Congress in the House Judiciary subcommittee on antitrust.​

​

Since 2016 and the election of Donald Trump the tech giants have been censoring and banning conservative voices online. The Gateway Pundit has been a huge target of these liberal tech giants.​

​

Of course, the CEOs dismissed allegations that they are targeting and censoring conservative users despite ALL of the evidence to the contrary.​

Trump has no power to do this. Free speech rights only apply to governments. The Supreme Court has already ruled on this.

A Supreme Court Decision Could Have Implications for Social Media Free Speech

The court ruled that First Amendment protections don't apply to a corporation that operates a public access channel in New York.

psmag.com

Did you read the EO? He has the authority to instruct the FCC, which is in the Executive Branch. He is not trying to impose anything on private companies. They can censor all they want, but if they do, they scan also be held liable for their content.

and what power in the constitution does the president have to do that to a private social media board? The rules and law, says they are not held liable for what posters post.... it does not say, they can not have rules or moderate, in order to get this protection.... sheesh....

create your own message board/social media site....THAT IS CAPITALISM!!!!

Are you one of the morons who opposes Citizens United?

 

[Brain357]

Trump went even further than I expected. The SJWs will be livid.

HUGE! Trump White House Implements Executive Order on Online Censorship: Prevents Tech Giants from Altering Users' Free Speech - Demands Transparency of Moderation Practices​

​

HUGE! Trump White House Implements Executive Order on Online Censorship: Prevents Tech Giants from Altering Users’ Free Speech – Demands Transparency of Moderation Practices​

​

This Is Big!​

​

On Wednesday Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, Google’s Sundar Pichai and Apple’s Tim Cook testified before Congress in the House Judiciary subcommittee on antitrust.​

​

Since 2016 and the election of Donald Trump the tech giants have been censoring and banning conservative voices online. The Gateway Pundit has been a huge target of these liberal tech giants.​

​

Of course, the CEOs dismissed allegations that they are targeting and censoring conservative users despite ALL of the evidence to the contrary.​

Trump has no power to do this. Free speech rights only apply to governments. The Supreme Court has already ruled on this.

A Supreme Court Decision Could Have Implications for Social Media Free Speech

The court ruled that First Amendment protections don't apply to a corporation that operates a public access channel in New York.

psmag.com

Did you read the EO? He has the authority to instruct the FCC, which is in the Executive Branch. He is not trying to impose anything on private companies. They can censor all they want, but if they do, they scan also be held liable for their content.

and what power in the constitution does the president have to do that to a private social media board? The rules and law, says they are not held liable for what posters post.... it does not say, they can not have rules or moderate, in order to get this protection.... sheesh....

create your own message board/social media site....THAT IS CAPITALISM!!!!

Are you one of the morons who opposes Citizens United?

Everyone should. Made politicians even easier to buy.

 

[bripat9643]

Trump went even further than I expected. The SJWs will be livid.

HUGE! Trump White House Implements Executive Order on Online Censorship: Prevents Tech Giants from Altering Users' Free Speech - Demands Transparency of Moderation Practices​

​

HUGE! Trump White House Implements Executive Order on Online Censorship: Prevents Tech Giants from Altering Users’ Free Speech – Demands Transparency of Moderation Practices​

​

This Is Big!​

​

On Wednesday Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, Google’s Sundar Pichai and Apple’s Tim Cook testified before Congress in the House Judiciary subcommittee on antitrust.​

​

Since 2016 and the election of Donald Trump the tech giants have been censoring and banning conservative voices online. The Gateway Pundit has been a huge target of these liberal tech giants.​

​

Of course, the CEOs dismissed allegations that they are targeting and censoring conservative users despite ALL of the evidence to the contrary.​

Trump has no power to do this. Free speech rights only apply to governments. The Supreme Court has already ruled on this.

A Supreme Court Decision Could Have Implications for Social Media Free Speech

The court ruled that First Amendment protections don't apply to a corporation that operates a public access channel in New York.

psmag.com

Did you read the EO? He has the authority to instruct the FCC, which is in the Executive Branch. He is not trying to impose anything on private companies. They can censor all they want, but if they do, they scan also be held liable for their content.

and what power in the constitution does the president have to do that to a private social media board? The rules and law, says they are not held liable for what posters post.... it does not say, they can not have rules or moderate, in order to get this protection.... sheesh....

create your own message board/social media site....THAT IS CAPITALISM!!!!

Are you one of the morons who opposes Citizens United?

Everyone should. Made politicians even easier to buy.

it repealed censorship, moron. Now you're attacking Trump for what you call censorship.

You're an idiot.

 

[Brain357]

Trump went even further than I expected. The SJWs will be livid.

HUGE! Trump White House Implements Executive Order on Online Censorship: Prevents Tech Giants from Altering Users' Free Speech - Demands Transparency of Moderation Practices​

​

HUGE! Trump White House Implements Executive Order on Online Censorship: Prevents Tech Giants from Altering Users’ Free Speech – Demands Transparency of Moderation Practices​

​

This Is Big!​

​

On Wednesday Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, Google’s Sundar Pichai and Apple’s Tim Cook testified before Congress in the House Judiciary subcommittee on antitrust.​

​

Since 2016 and the election of Donald Trump the tech giants have been censoring and banning conservative voices online. The Gateway Pundit has been a huge target of these liberal tech giants.​

​

Of course, the CEOs dismissed allegations that they are targeting and censoring conservative users despite ALL of the evidence to the contrary.​

Trump has no power to do this. Free speech rights only apply to governments. The Supreme Court has already ruled on this.

A Supreme Court Decision Could Have Implications for Social Media Free Speech

The court ruled that First Amendment protections don't apply to a corporation that operates a public access channel in New York.

psmag.com

Did you read the EO? He has the authority to instruct the FCC, which is in the Executive Branch. He is not trying to impose anything on private companies. They can censor all they want, but if they do, they scan also be held liable for their content.

and what power in the constitution does the president have to do that to a private social media board? The rules and law, says they are not held liable for what posters post.... it does not say, they can not have rules or moderate, in order to get this protection.... sheesh....

create your own message board/social media site....THAT IS CAPITALISM!!!!

Are you one of the morons who opposes Citizens United?

Everyone should. Made politicians even easier to buy.

it repealed censorship, moron. No you're attacking Trump for what you call censorship.

You're an idiot.

It opened the door to buying politicians even farther. Look at how much is spent.

 

[Billy_Bob]

The President cannot order that private entities be forced to provide forums for free speech.

Wrong!

Just as Obama did the policies and regulations can be changed by anyone. Trump simply changed the regulations as Obama did. The shoe is now on the other foot... How does it feel?

 

[bripat9643]

Trump went even further than I expected. The SJWs will be livid.

HUGE! Trump White House Implements Executive Order on Online Censorship: Prevents Tech Giants from Altering Users' Free Speech - Demands Transparency of Moderation Practices​

​

HUGE! Trump White House Implements Executive Order on Online Censorship: Prevents Tech Giants from Altering Users’ Free Speech – Demands Transparency of Moderation Practices​

​

This Is Big!​

​

On Wednesday Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, Google’s Sundar Pichai and Apple’s Tim Cook testified before Congress in the House Judiciary subcommittee on antitrust.​

​

Since 2016 and the election of Donald Trump the tech giants have been censoring and banning conservative voices online. The Gateway Pundit has been a huge target of these liberal tech giants.​

​

Of course, the CEOs dismissed allegations that they are targeting and censoring conservative users despite ALL of the evidence to the contrary.​

Trump has no power to do this. Free speech rights only apply to governments. The Supreme Court has already ruled on this.

A Supreme Court Decision Could Have Implications for Social Media Free Speech

The court ruled that First Amendment protections don't apply to a corporation that operates a public access channel in New York.

psmag.com

Did you read the EO? He has the authority to instruct the FCC, which is in the Executive Branch. He is not trying to impose anything on private companies. They can censor all they want, but if they do, they scan also be held liable for their content.

and what power in the constitution does the president have to do that to a private social media board? The rules and law, says they are not held liable for what posters post.... it does not say, they can not have rules or moderate, in order to get this protection.... sheesh....

create your own message board/social media site....THAT IS CAPITALISM!!!!

Are you one of the morons who opposes Citizens United?

Everyone should. Made politicians even easier to buy.

it repealed censorship, moron. No you're attacking Trump for what you call censorship.

You're an idiot.

It opened the door to buying politicians even farther. Look at how much is spent.

How could that be when all it did was repeal part of McCain-Feingold?

As H.L Mencken once said "an election is a present auction on future goods." Politicians have always sold themselves to the highest bidder.

 

[Brain357]

Trump went even further than I expected. The SJWs will be livid.

HUGE! Trump White House Implements Executive Order on Online Censorship: Prevents Tech Giants from Altering Users' Free Speech - Demands Transparency of Moderation Practices​

​

HUGE! Trump White House Implements Executive Order on Online Censorship: Prevents Tech Giants from Altering Users’ Free Speech – Demands Transparency of Moderation Practices​

​

This Is Big!​

​

On Wednesday Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, Google’s Sundar Pichai and Apple’s Tim Cook testified before Congress in the House Judiciary subcommittee on antitrust.​

​

Since 2016 and the election of Donald Trump the tech giants have been censoring and banning conservative voices online. The Gateway Pundit has been a huge target of these liberal tech giants.​

​

Of course, the CEOs dismissed allegations that they are targeting and censoring conservative users despite ALL of the evidence to the contrary.​

Trump has no power to do this. Free speech rights only apply to governments. The Supreme Court has already ruled on this.

A Supreme Court Decision Could Have Implications for Social Media Free Speech

The court ruled that First Amendment protections don't apply to a corporation that operates a public access channel in New York.

psmag.com

Did you read the EO? He has the authority to instruct the FCC, which is in the Executive Branch. He is not trying to impose anything on private companies. They can censor all they want, but if they do, they scan also be held liable for their content.

and what power in the constitution does the president have to do that to a private social media board? The rules and law, says they are not held liable for what posters post.... it does not say, they can not have rules or moderate, in order to get this protection.... sheesh....

create your own message board/social media site....THAT IS CAPITALISM!!!!

Are you one of the morons who opposes Citizens United?

Everyone should. Made politicians even easier to buy.

it repealed censorship, moron. No you're attacking Trump for what you call censorship.

You're an idiot.

It opened the door to buying politicians even farther. Look at how much is spent.

How could that be when all it did was repeal part of McCain-Feingold?

As H.L Mencken once said "an election is a present auction on future goods." Politicians have always sold themselves to the highest bidder.

Ten Years After Citizens United - Public Citizen

A huge change happened on Jan. 21, 2010, with the Citizens United ruling. Here are 9 ways the case has eroded democracy and 1 place where it's helped.

www.citizen.org

 

[Crepitus]

Censorship is fascist. Right, ANTIFA??

And it's exactly what tRump is trying to do.

Hey, they love their big, centralized government, authoritarian strongman. This is what they want.

I don't see that as an argument in good faith. Requiring a company to be open about it's procedures for banning doesn't seem like a overreach at all, or some kind of hostile government take over.

The company can do as it pleases, just like Facebook. It can be as ideologically closed or biased as it wants to be. If people don't like it, there are other options, as small as they may be.

Unless and until it's officially made a utility, it can operate as it sees fit under the law, and the market will decide.

FOX and MSNBC can, too.

Funny how these supposed "constitutionalists" don't seem to understand how it actually works.

 

[bripat9643]

Trump went even further than I expected. The SJWs will be livid.

HUGE! Trump White House Implements Executive Order on Online Censorship: Prevents Tech Giants from Altering Users' Free Speech - Demands Transparency of Moderation Practices​

​

HUGE! Trump White House Implements Executive Order on Online Censorship: Prevents Tech Giants from Altering Users’ Free Speech – Demands Transparency of Moderation Practices​

​

This Is Big!​

​

On Wednesday Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, Google’s Sundar Pichai and Apple’s Tim Cook testified before Congress in the House Judiciary subcommittee on antitrust.​

​

Since 2016 and the election of Donald Trump the tech giants have been censoring and banning conservative voices online. The Gateway Pundit has been a huge target of these liberal tech giants.​

​

Of course, the CEOs dismissed allegations that they are targeting and censoring conservative users despite ALL of the evidence to the contrary.​

Trump has no power to do this. Free speech rights only apply to governments. The Supreme Court has already ruled on this.

A Supreme Court Decision Could Have Implications for Social Media Free Speech

The court ruled that First Amendment protections don't apply to a corporation that operates a public access channel in New York.

psmag.com

Did you read the EO? He has the authority to instruct the FCC, which is in the Executive Branch. He is not trying to impose anything on private companies. They can censor all they want, but if they do, they scan also be held liable for their content.

and what power in the constitution does the president have to do that to a private social media board? The rules and law, says they are not held liable for what posters post.... it does not say, they can not have rules or moderate, in order to get this protection.... sheesh....

create your own message board/social media site....THAT IS CAPITALISM!!!!

Are you one of the morons who opposes Citizens United?

Everyone should. Made politicians even easier to buy.

it repealed censorship, moron. No you're attacking Trump for what you call censorship.

You're an idiot.

It opened the door to buying politicians even farther. Look at how much is spent.

How could that be when all it did was repeal part of McCain-Feingold?

As H.L Mencken once said "an election is a present auction on future goods." Politicians have always sold themselves to the highest bidder.

Ten Years After Citizens United - Public Citizen

A huge change happened on Jan. 21, 2010, with the Citizens United ruling. Here are 9 ways the case has eroded democracy and 1 place where it's helped.

www.citizen.org

What you're saying is that democracy is incompatible with freedom of speech.