How to save inner city schools.

OK….so the Court Order determines the DNA sample is reasonable. Apparently, it doesn’t got against the 4th Amendment.

So the guy has to submit, and if he’s not the father, he’s home free. If he is, he has to cough up child support.

Stop trying to let irresponsible men off the hook, and put it all on the women. As you said, it takes two to tango.
Great grammar.

Take your scenario. "Baby daddy" is ordered to pay child support. He doesn't. What do you do to force the issue? Lock him up? Garnish his pay that he doesn't get because he is unemployed? What is your answer?

Even with child support, "Baby momma" will still qualify for WIC, TANF, and probably section 8. What did you accomplish?
 
Great grammar.
Big deal. It was a typo.

Take your scenario. "Baby daddy" is ordered to pay child support. He doesn't. What do you do to force the issue? Lock him up? Garnish his pay that he doesn't get because he is unemployed? What is your answer?
Yes, we garnish the wages of the 90%+ fathers who ARE employed. Just because a small minority are unemployed, that means the 90% who are gainfully employed get to shirk their responsibilities?

Even with child support, "Baby momma" will still qualify for WIC, TANF, and probably section 8. What did you accomplish?
But with fathers pitching in, Baby Momma will qualify for LESS government charity (i.e., other people’s money) since her household income is higher.

Why do you want fathers off the hook and instead foist the entire cost of raising children on responsible people who already pay for their OWN children?

Just because your daughter ended up with a deadbeat dad for her kids doesn’t mean that ALL dads get to shirk their responsibility. What are you afraid of? If more fathers are made to support their children, but your daughter’s Deadbeat won’t, she’ll look bad for choosing such a loser?
 
Segregation is illegal. You can't snap your fingers and conjure a perfect society.
Students are already separated by ability as revealed by the different courses. In my high school we had,

College prep
General course
Trades course.

We had the choice between the General course and the Trades course but had to qualify academically for the College prep course.
 
Big deal. It was a typo.


Yes, we garnish the wages of the 90%+ fathers who ARE employed. Just because a small minority are unemployed, that means the 90% who are gainfully employed get to shirk their responsibilities?


But with fathers pitching in, Baby Momma will qualify for LESS government charity (i.e., other people’s money) since her household income is higher.

Why do you want fathers off the hook and instead foist the entire cost of raising children on responsible people who already pay for their OWN children?

Just because your daughter ended up with a deadbeat dad for her kids doesn’t mean that ALL dads get to shirk their responsibility. What are you afraid of? If more fathers are made to support their children, but your daughter’s Deadbeat won’t, she’ll look bad for choosing such a loser?
False.

I am just telling you that you have pie in the sky hopes. It never works out as you intend. We do not live in a perfect world.
 
Inner city schools don’t need saving. They need improvements. They can’t do that when standards of disciple and academic achievement is impossible.
 
Inner city schools don’t need saving. They need improvements. They can’t do that when standards of disciple and academic achievement is impossible.
??????????????????
 
Bullshit. How do you imagine that nonsense?
Tell me where I’m wrong.

Do you think academic achievement and discipline is promoted in inner city schools? Do you think more funding is the answer?
 
Last edited:
Of course.
Academic achievement is not promoted. The majority of graduating students in inner city schools can’t read, write or do general math at grade level
 
Last edited:
15th post
Of course it is.
If it was they would not have a majority of students who can’t read, write and do general math at grade level. These inner city schools graduate kids who are functionally illiterate.
 
Back
Top Bottom