How to save inner city schools.

[Unkotare]

Primarily, .....

Wrong.

 

[GMCGeneral]

Wrong.

Why do you say that? If people don't want to live in urban shitholes and have the suburban option, why should they be forced to stay?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Why do you say that? If people don't want to live in urban shitholes and have the suburban option, why should they be forced to stay?

He was disagreeing with him saying "primarily ..."

It isn't! He was not talking about blacks moving to the suburbs.

 

[GMCGeneral]

He was disagreeing with him saying "primarily ..."

It isn't! He was not talking about blacks moving to the suburbs.

The point I was alluding to is the whites that left I believe had the right idea getting out of Dodge before the shit really hit the fan.

 

[Unkotare]

Why do you say that? If people don't want to live in urban shitholes and have the suburban option, why should they be forced to stay?

Who said anything about being "forced" to stay?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

The point I was alluding to is the whites that left I believe had the right idea getting out of Dodge before the shit really hit the fan.

There were still white kids in my inner-city school. There were lots of minorities in my suburban high schools. There was a total of 5 minorities in my rural high school of over 1000 students. It varies.

 

[tahuyaman]

First I would provide effective security.

Then I would discontinue the process of simply passing failing students to the next grad level just to get rid of them.

I would reward successful teachers with financial incentives.


You seem to be willing to accept throwing thousands of young people away because it would take effort to restore public education in these inner city schools filled primarily filled with young black kids.


You obviously have no issue with perpetuating the dependent class.



No one advocated physical bestimgs you idiot.

Why would anyone disagree with that? Of course they would if they’re an idiot.

 

[tahuyaman]

There were still white kids in my inner-city school. There were lots of minorities in my suburban high schools. There was a total of 5 minorities in my rural high school of over 1000 students. It varies.

Of course there are white kids in inner city schools. You idiot.

 

[tahuyaman]

That's pretty specific. How the hell would you know that? (awaiting some painfully stupid bullshit).

By seeing their test scores you moron.

 

[IM2]

The point I was alluding to is the whites that left I believe had the right idea getting out of Dodge before the shit really hit the fan.

The whites who left helped create the problem.

 

[tahuyaman]

The whites who left helped create the problem.

The American left created the problem by creating and building a dependent class in America. Liberalism is the reason 70+ of black children reborn into a fatherless single family home.

That was by design.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Of course there are white kids in inner city schools. You idiot.

You claimed they all left!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

By seeing their test scores you moron.

You have seen the individual test scores? That's illegal!

 

[IM2]

The American left created the problem by creating and building a dependent class in America. Liberalism is the reason 70+ of black children reborn into a fatherless single family home.

That was by design.

The white dependency class was created beginning in the late 1700's. Those black women who have unwed births have boyfriends and that has nothing to do with whatever problem your white racist ass thinks exists in inner city schools. The main problem, speaking from someone who worked with kids from those schools, is the lack of resources in the schools and communities.

Everything you morns think is the problem in the black community always starts with your punk asses mouthing off about unwed births. Understand that unwed births do not mean there is no man in the home or as part of the family. Furthermore, whites lead the nation annually in crimes against families and children. So then whites have fathers in the home who abuses his wife an children.

The American left didn't do what you claim.

Let’s talk about the assistance to single women with children part of the Social Security Act. Title IV provided grants to states as Aid To Dependent Children. Eventually, the name of the program was changed to Aid to Families with Dependent Children. This was welfare folks. Assistance for single moms with children and no daddy at home. In 1935. Blacks were excluded. Aid to Dependent Children functioned mainly to provide federal grants to help the states with mothers’ aid laws that began in 1910.

The ADC plan was written by two ladies who had been former directors of what was at the time called the U.S. Children’s Bureau. The Children’s Bureau’s goal was to provide aid to all children whose mothers had no support from a husband, no matter how they got into that position. From the Children’s Bureau in 1910 until 1965, no one talked about how the welfare state was wrong and created the disintegration of the white family. I read no lectures about the irresponsible white father. The program was not denigrated as something creating dependence on government; it was seen as essential assistance needed to help women without husbands who had children. Only when the law required that others besides whites be included did the story change to how the welfare state was wrong and destructive.

This is how evil whites have been, and don't even try whining about me being racist. I m stating the truth based on pubic policy as a counter to the racist garbage you post. It was fine for white men to walk away from their children; the government would take care of the woman, no matter hw many children she had, but when others besides whites were allowed the same rights, suddenly the government created a dependency class.

It was white racists who decided to make the man in the house rule when the AFC opened up to other races. It was a black woman who ended the no man in the house rule in 1968. So you really need to stop repeating lies.

This case killed it:
King v. Smith, 392 U.S. 309, 88 S. Ct. 2128, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1118 (1968)

Look it up and read it.

 

[tahuyaman]

The white dependency class was created beginning in the late 1700's. Those black women who have unwed births have boyfriends and that has nothing to do with whatever problem your white racist ass thinks exists in inner city schools. The main problem, speaking from someone who worked with kids from those schools, is the lack of resources in the schools and communities.

Everything you morns think is the problem in the black community always starts with your punk asses mouthing off about unwed births. Understand that unwed births do not mean there is no man in the home or as part of the family. Furthermore, whites lead the nation annually in crimes against families and children. So then whites have fathers in the home who abuses his wife an children.

The American left didn't do what you claim.

Let’s talk about the assistance to single women with children part of the Social Security Act. Title IV provided grants to states as Aid To Dependent Children. Eventually, the name of the program was changed to Aid to Families with Dependent Children. This was welfare folks. Assistance for single moms with children and no daddy at home. In 1935. Blacks were excluded. Aid to Dependent Children functioned mainly to provide federal grants to help the states with mothers’ aid laws that began in 1910.

The ADC plan was written by two ladies who had been former directors of what was at the time called the U.S. Children’s Bureau. The Children’s Bureau’s goal was to provide aid to all children whose mothers had no support from a husband, no matter how they got into that position. From the Children’s Bureau in 1910 until 1965, no one talked about how the welfare state was wrong and created the disintegration of the white family. I read no lectures about the irresponsible white father. The program was not denigrated as something creating dependence on government; it was seen as essential assistance needed to help women without husbands who had children. Only when the law required that others besides whites be included did the story change to how the welfare state was wrong and destructive.

This is how evil whites have been, and don't even try whining about me being racist. I m stating the truth based on pubic policy as a counter to the racist garbage you post. It was fine for white men to walk away from their children; the government would take care of the woman, no matter hw many children she had, but when others besides whites were allowed the same rights, suddenly the government created a dependency class.

It was white racists who decided to make the man in the house rule when the AFC opened up to other races. It was a black woman who ended the no man in the house rule in 1968. So you really need to stop repeating lies.

This case killed it:
King v. Smith, 392 U.S. 309, 88 S. Ct. 2128, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1118 (1968)

Look it up and read it.

Lol.

 

[tahuyaman]

Why has the black family structure crumbled? What side of the politic aisle did that?

 

[Unkotare]

First I would provide effective security.
...

Almost all inner city schools have pretty good security, for what it's worth. Passcards to enter any building, security and cameras at all points of entrance and egress, campus security teams, permanently stationed resource officers (police), designated staff rotating throughout the hallways during the day, drug/weapon sniffing dogs run through the building at least once a week, etc.

 

[Unkotare]

By seeing their test scores you moron.

Thanks for confirming you have no idea what you're talking about, fool.

 

[tahuyaman]

Almost all inner city schools have pretty good security, for what it's worth. Passcards to enter any building, security and cameras at all points of entrance and egress, campus security teams, permanently stationed resource officers (police), designated staff rotating throughout the hallways during the day, drug/weapon sniffing dogs run through the building at least once a week, etc.

Their security inside the doors is not adequate. Inner city teachers are unmotivated. They just want to get through the day.

They just pass kids on to the next grade regardless of academic achievement.

Liberalism is a disease which has ruined our public education systems. You seem to approve.

 

[tahuyaman]

Thanks for confirming you have no idea what you're talking about, fool.

Between you and I, I’m the only who knows what he’s talking about. You’re just talking shit saying nothing.

I always suspected you were an idiot liberal