What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

How the Democrats rigged the 2020 election

Muhammed

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
24,647
Reaction score
10,824
Points
950
Location
North Coast, USA
^^^ same edited video
It's a 100% authentic video.

So is this one where Quid Pro Joe confesses to getting Ukraine's Prosecutor General, Viktor Shokin, who raided Burisma, Removed from office by threatening to withhold a treasury department loan guarantee.


Burisma was paying Hunter Biden $83,000/month.

Sick people such as Joe Biden who are suffering from dementia often say things that they wouldn't normally say in public.
 
Last edited:

Fort Fun Indiana

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
57,091
Reaction score
11,442
Points
2,070
It's a 100% authentic video.

So is this one where Quid Pro Joe confesses to getting Ukraine's Prosecutor General, Viktor Shokin, who raided Burisma, Removed from office by threatening to withhold a treasury department loan guarantee.


Burisma was paying Hunter Biden $83,000/month.
Haha, doubles down on the lie, then pulls out another lie. Such freakish behavior.
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
85,310
Reaction score
19,708
Points
2,210
It's a 100% authentic video.
And edited to remove Biden speaking about how that organization was being utilized to protect voters from fraud and intimidation.

So is this one where Quid Pro Joe confesses to getting Ukraine's Prosecutor General, Viktor Shokin, who raided Burisma, Removed from office by threatening to withhold a treasury department loan guarantee.


Burisma was paying Hunter Biden $83,000/month.
Correct, that video shows Biden successfully getting a corrupt prosecutor removed from office.

You prolly won't get this, but that video helped Biden get elected as president. It showed he was tough on corruption.
 

Muhammed

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
24,647
Reaction score
10,824
Points
950
Location
North Coast, USA

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
85,310
Reaction score
19,708
Points
2,210
What lie? Are you claiming the Quid Pro Joe was lying in that video?
No, Fort Fun Indiana was speaking about the lie the right invented to make it sound like Biden was corrupt for getting Shokin removed from office.

How do you not know that?
 

Fort Fun Indiana

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
57,091
Reaction score
11,442
Points
2,070
No, Fort Fun Indiana was speaking about the lie the right invented to make it sound like Biden was corrupt for getting Shokin removed from office.

How do you not know that?
He does know. He knew exactly what I meant. That was his reflexive defensive action. he does not care that it made him seem mentally challenged. he is acting like this to soothe himself.
 

Muhammed

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
24,647
Reaction score
10,824
Points
950
Location
North Coast, USA
Correct, that video shows Biden successfully getting a corrupt prosecutor removed from office.
And of course a low IQ scumbag like you, will not, because you cannot, present any fucking shred of evidence to back up your stupid debunked accusation that Shokin was corrupt.

Biden had Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin, who had recently raided Burisma, removed and replaced with Lutsenko. Lutsenko is a man with no law degree, who was never a lawyer, who never even went to law school, and was notorious for being a corrupt politician who had recently got out of prison after he was busted for corruption.


Where is your evidence that Shokin was corrupt?

It simply doesn't exist. You're an idiot.
 
Last edited:

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
85,310
Reaction score
19,708
Points
2,210
And of course a low IQ scumbag like you will not because you cannot present any shred of evidence whatsoever that
Shokin was corrupt.

Biden had Shokin, who raided Burisma, removed and replaced with Lutsenko. Lutsenko is a man with no law degree, was never a lawyer, was notorious for being corrupt politician, who had recently got out of prison after he was busted for corruption.

I didn't find it necessary to repost what's been posted 1000 times and is now common knowledge.

But if nothing else, you just proved Fort Fun Indiana 100% right when he pointed out you were lying.

In reality, Shokin was protecting Zlochevsky, not prosecuting him. For a year as Prosecutor General, shokin sat on the investigation of Zlochevsky and Burisma Holdings; even while others under him were getting caught taking bribes.

And for the year before that, as Deputy Prosecutor General, he caused the U.K. to drop an investigation into Zlochevsky, and release $23 million in Zlochevsky's assets they had frozen for that case; because Shokin refused to cooperate.

And though you criticize Shokin's replacement, Lutsenko, he actually did what Shokin refused to do. He successfully prosecuted Zlochevsky and nailed him for millions in unpaid taxes.

So while try to attack Biden for getting Shokin removed, the truth is, Biden was right for doing that. Biden didn't do it to protect Burisma or his son, Hunter, as he got a corrupt prosecutor removed who spent two years protecting Zlochevsky and Burisma; who wasn't prosecuted until after Shokin was removed from office. And that was just one example of Shokin's corruption.

So I was right. You don't understand how that video of Biden helped him get elected as president.
 

Muhammed

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
24,647
Reaction score
10,824
Points
950
Location
North Coast, USA
In reality, Shokin was protecting Zlochevsky, not prosecuting him.
:cuckoo:

How did you come to that stupid conclusion?


The movable and immovable property of former Minister of Ecology and Natural Resources of Ukraine Mykola Zlochevsky in Ukraine has been seized, according to the press service of the Prosecutor General's Office of Ukraine (PGO).

"The PGO filed a petition to court to arrest the property of the ex-Minister of Ecology and Natural Resources of Ukraine, the Deputy Secretary of the National Security and Defence Council of Ukraine, Mykola Zlochevsky, from which arrest was withdrawn, and other property he actually uses, namely housing estate with a total area of 922 square meters, a land plot of 0.24 hectares, a garden house with a total area of 299.8 square meters, a garden house in the territory of Vyshgorod district, a garden house of 2,312 square meters, a land plot of 0.0394 hectares, a Rolls-Royce Phantom car, a Knott 924-5014 trainer," reads the report.

The PGO clarifies that the court satisfied the petition on February 2, 2016.

"Thus, none of the objects of movable and immovable property, which was seized under the previous court ruling, has not been excluded from Zlochevsky's property," the press service said.

Zlochevsky is suspected of committing a criminal offense under Part 3 of Article 368-2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (illicit enrichment).
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
85,310
Reaction score
19,708
Points
2,210
:cuckoo:

How did you come to that stupid conclusion?


The movable and immovable property of former Minister of Ecology and Natural Resources of Ukraine Mykola Zlochevsky in Ukraine has been seized, according to the press service of the Prosecutor General's Office of Ukraine (PGO).

"The PGO filed a petition to court to arrest the property of the ex-Minister of Ecology and Natural Resources of Ukraine, the Deputy Secretary of the National Security and Defence Council of Ukraine, Mykola Zlochevsky, from which arrest was withdrawn, and other property he actually uses, namely housing estate with a total area of 922 square meters, a land plot of 0.24 hectares, a garden house with a total area of 299.8 square meters, a garden house in the territory of Vyshgorod district, a garden house of 2,312 square meters, a land plot of 0.0394 hectares, a Rolls-Royce Phantom car, a Knott 924-5014 trainer," reads the report.

The PGO clarifies that the court satisfied the petition on February 2, 2016.

"Thus, none of the objects of movable and immovable property, which was seized under the previous court ruling, has not been excluded from Zlochevsky's property," the press service said.

Zlochevsky is suspected of committing a criminal offense under Part 3 of Article 368-2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (illicit enrichment).
Those were assets already seized. A new law had been passed which Zlochevsky was trying to use get his stuff back. All Shokin's office did was re-file the seizure. He still didn't try to prosecute Zlochevsky for any charges dating back years. That didn't happen until Shokin was replaced.
 

Muhammed

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
24,647
Reaction score
10,824
Points
950
Location
North Coast, USA
Those were assets already seized. A new law had been passed which Zlochevsky was trying to use get his stuff back. All Shokin's office did was re-file the seizure. He still didn't try to prosecute Zlochevsky for any charges dating back years. That didn't happen until Shokin was replaced.
You're simply lying again, as usual.

The only reason that Shokin couldn't criminally prosecute Zlochevsky is because he fled to Moscow. Zlochevsky's Burisma got Lutsenko out of prison and installed him as PG for a reason.

After Burisma got him pardoned from prison, Lutsenko pressed no criminal charges against Zlochevsky. Let him off with a ridiculously insignificant small fine, and zero time in prison.

Saying that he "successfully prosecuted" Zlochevsky is extremely disingenuous.
 
Last edited:

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
85,310
Reaction score
19,708
Points
2,210
You're simply lying again, as usual.

The only reason that Shokin couldn't criminally prosecute Zlochevsky is because he fled to Moscow. Zlochevsky's Burisma got Lutsenko out of prison and installed him as PG for a reason.

After Burisma got him pardoned from prison, Lutsenko pressed no criminal charges against Zlochevsky. Let him off with a ridiculously insignificant small fine, and zero time in prison.

Saying that he "successfully prosecuted" Zlochevsky is extremely disingenuous.
It's on the record. You denying it doesn't change anything. Shokin shielded Zlochevsky for 2 years. Zlochevsky only faced prosecution by Shokin's replacement.
 

g5000

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2011
Messages
97,361
Reaction score
18,116
Points
2,180
TLDR. If it can't be summed up in 3 sentences, I never bother to read it. My opinion would be the same without reading it. So I give opinions on OPs that are 3 sentences long.
That's why Trump tweets. He knows the rube herd has the intellectual bandwidth of a bumper sticker.
 

g5000

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2011
Messages
97,361
Reaction score
18,116
Points
2,180
This is a serious thread, opened (and hopefully kept) in the Clean Debate Zone so that we can have some serious and thoughtful clarity on this whole controversy.

Obviously this is a complicated topic, but what I'm after here is focus, clarity, and conciseness. Your shortest, clearest, most succinct responses.

From what I'm reading, seeing and hearing, this is what Trump supporters believe happened before, during and after the 2020 elections, in three parts:

1. Fearing that President Donald Trump would win re-election in 2020, the Democrats approached and worked with the Chinese government to release a deadly virus that would disrupt the 2020 American election process and provide an excuse for the Democrats to revise/ease voting requirements. These looser requirements would provide the cover they needed to (among other things) insert doctored ballots (some of which may have been doctored by the Chinese themselves), hide/destroy ballots, and count legal ballots multiple times. Dr Anthony Fauci, a key member of the government's health system, was recruited to spread false and misleading information to the public and advance this effort.

2. A large number of individuals and organizations successfully pulled off the fraud, either working in concert or alone. Providing cover and aid in this endeavor were China, the American major media, American local media, the Democratic Party, SmartMatic and Dominion Software.

3. Once the fraud was detected, the following individuals and groups purposely and actively participated in its coverup in some way, either through dishonesty or the refusal to examine the clear and voluminous evidence of fraud that was provided: The US Supreme Court, Trump-appointed judges, GOP state election officials, GOP governors, GOP state legislatures, the FBI, the CIA, Trump's Justice Department, Trump's Attorney General, Vice President Mike Pence, the Democratic Party, the American major media and Republican congresspeople. To date, these individuals and groups have been successful in holding off the exposure of the evidence.

As I understand it, that is the issue, in a nutshell, as succinct as I can make it.

Is this fair and accurate? Please comment and make your best effort to keep this focused, clear and concise.
It took a YUGE army of conspirators across the entire country to pull off the steal. And not one of them has leaked a single word about it, even though a blowjob in the sanctity of the Oval Office can't even be kept a secret!

Just like not one of the five million illegal Mexicans who voted in 2016 was caught.
 

Muhammed

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
24,647
Reaction score
10,824
Points
950
Location
North Coast, USA
It's on the record. You denying it doesn't change anything. Shokin shielded Zlochevsky for 2 years. Zlochevsky only faced prosecution by Shokin's replacement.
Of course you are lying to the USMB forum again, as usual, bitch.

Why are you lying to the USMB forum?

 

Muhammed

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
24,647
Reaction score
10,824
Points
950
Location
North Coast, USA
No, obviously you are the liar.
Can you quote the alleged lie and prove that it is a lie? Of course you cannot.

You can freely search through all 24,370 of my posts at USMB and you will not find a single lie, because unlike yourself, I never base any of my political opinions on lies.

Fuck off, cowardly scumbag.
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
85,310
Reaction score
19,708
Points
2,210
Of course you are lying to the USMB forum again, as usual, bitch.

Why are you lying to the USMB forum?

I documented everything I claimed with links. You quoted you.
 

Muhammed

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
24,647
Reaction score
10,824
Points
950
Location
North Coast, USA
I documented everything I claimed with links. You quoted you.
You are lying to the USMB forum, as usual.

The fact of the matter is that you have not provided any links in this thread.

Why are you lying to your fellow USMB forumers again?
 

Colin norris

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2021
Messages
6,238
Reaction score
2,443
Points
908
Quid Pro Joe himself bragged about conspiracy to commit massive voter fraud.

Pedo Joe is on video bragging about having a historical voter fraud organization during an interview with the aptly named extremist Crooks and Liars livestreamed podcast.

If it's so well known you won't mind posting the video will you?
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$142.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top