- Dec 20, 2010
- Reaction score
- North Coast, USA
It's not semantics, it's a blatant lie.First off - Mohammed, remember you are in CDZ, ok?
No, I didn't claim "no fraud" - everyone acknowledges that there is always some fraud, they just don't put in the disclaimer every time of "significant fraud". There will always be some fraud, even if it's one guy, voting in the name of his dead mother - but we have good laws and procedure in place. But no fraud significant enough to affect a national election was found, nor any sort of conspiracy on a national level. So why play semantical games?