Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 110,301
- 99,392
- 3,645
No it isn't. Thank you for proving my point for me, though. How embarrassing for you.Advocacy?
That's like call jim crow just advocacy for white people
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No it isn't. Thank you for proving my point for me, though. How embarrassing for you.Advocacy?
That's like call jim crow just advocacy for white people
You point was not proven by you or meThank you for proving my point for me, though. How embarrassing for you.
Perhaps but the whole situation needs to be viewed in context. If blacks were more severely impacted that would justify a greater effort to provide them relief. Just as affirmative action wouldn't be considered racial discrimination after the civil rights act as an oppressive wrong was being correctedWhen government targets blacks for subsidies and denys whites thats racial discriminationSure I would have a problem with
racial discrimination.
There will be a lot more. And their voters are hyper-political and will vote, for sure.Just was reading 19 supporters of QANON are making a run for the House and Senate Thanks Repubs Hopefully you get all you deserve
No it doesentIf blacks were more severely impacted that would justify a greater effort to provide them relief.
Do you also consider it discrimination when places like NOLA and New York and Florida receive disaster relief? Shouldn’t the rest of the country also receive money?No it doesentIf blacks were more severely impacted that would justify a greater effort to provide them relief.
Everyone should be equally eligible for help
You are defending jim crow in reverse
Since you brought it up liberals cried RACISM when they thought Puerto Rico didnt receive diaster relief funds as quickly as they wantedyou also consider it discrimination when places like NOLA and New York and Florida receive disaster relief? Shouldn’t the rest of the country also receive money?
Regardless of what others would be upset about, why don’t you answer the question I asked?Since you brought it up liberals cried RACISM when they thought Puerto Rico didnt receive diaster relief funds as quickly as they wantedyou also consider it discrimination when places like NOLA and New York and Florida receive disaster relief? Shouldn’t the rest of the country also receive money?
Or consider your reaction if only white people were eligible for food stamps
You would go ballistic
I agree. Democrats won because they voted.Simple and sweet.
Democrats won, because they voted. They voted like their lives and survival of their democratic Nation, depended on it!
No rigging required.
OkRegardless of what others would be upset about, why don’t you answer the question I asked?
Thank you, is it discrimination? Why or why not?OkRegardless of what others would be upset about, why don’t you answer the question I asked?
In plain English its not racial discrimination when some states get diaster relief while others do not
Thank you, is it discrimination? Why or why not?
You said it wasn't racial discrimination, I wanted to clarify if you thought it was discrimination at all... What is your reasoning why it isn't discrimination?? One state is getting money while the others aren't. Answer that and then I'll gladly respond and make my points/answer your questions.Thank you, is it discrimination? Why or why not?
I just told you in post #390 it is not discrimination
Now enough of this game of 20 Questions
I answered you
now tell us what you think
what ou want and what you get are not the same.I wanted to clarify if you thought it was discrimination at all...
What I want is a direct answer and straight forward and honest discussion but you’re right. I’m obviously not getting that from you.what ou want and what you get are not the same.I wanted to clarify if you thought it was discrimination at all...
You raised the issue of states getting relief so you tell me
YesIt is being done because there is reason and a need. Do you agree?
Agreed. But the concept is the same. Support given to groups in need. States suffering natural disasters creat a justified need. If demographic groups are more negatively impacted by a pandemic then that would create a justified need for more focused support. Do you agree?YesIt is being done because there is reason and a need. Do you agree?
But the states include persons of all the demographics in America and should not to be confused with race based subsidies
after slavery, the civil war, 400 years of black bitching, and 40 years of upheaval over race and civil rights I expect the government to be color blind at all timesDo you agree?
That has nothing to do with our conversation about discriminationafter slavery, the civil war, 400 years of black bitching, and 40 years of upheaval over race and civil rights I expect the government to be color blind at all timesDo you agree?
So, you are just an adolescent....? Come back and debate me when you've reached adulthood....!!!!!I agree. Democrats won because they voted.Simple and sweet.
Democrats won, because they voted. They voted like their lives and survival of their democratic Nation, depended on it!
No rigging required.
Some democrats voted and voted and voted.
The dead rose up from the grave and voted.
In some states the ballots themselves voted as they were preprinted.
Republicans lost because they voted legally.