How the Democrats rigged the 2020 election

But the ballot has to be from a registered voter
The voting rolls are public knowledge

Where there is a will there is a way
Swing.....and a miss!

That mail in ballot has a bar code identifying the registered voter.
Fake that
Yeah, and not clearing people that moved or died off the list of registered voters is always opposed by the Democrat party. Gee, I wonder why?
Who cares?
Ballots not cast

Start showing me people voting in two places or people voting in the place of dead people and I may give a shit
Damn, you're dumb.
 
But the ballot has to be from a registered voter
The voting rolls are public knowledge

Where there is a will there is a way
Swing.....and a miss!

That mail in ballot has a bar code identifying the registered voter.
Fake that
Yeah, and not clearing people that moved or died off the list of registered voters is always opposed by the Democrat party. Gee, I wonder why?
Who cares?
Ballots not cast

Start showing me people voting in two places or people voting in the place of dead people and I may give a shit
Damn, you're dumb.
really?

I’m not the one who can’t back up his claims
 
and start a thread about it. I can equally point out the things you Trump voters voted for that aren't too pretty and were turned down by federal judges. This protects from unconstitutional extremes.
I dont think I would agree with many of your examples

But how can even the most jaded lib defend biden handing out relief funds based on skin color?
Which relief initiative are you talking about? Can you post a link?
and start a thread about it. I can equally point out the things you Trump voters voted for that aren't too pretty and were turned down by federal judges. This protects from unconstitutional extremes.
I dont think I would agree with many of your examples

But how can even the most jaded lib defend biden handing out relief funds based on skin color?
Which relief initiative are you talking about? Can you post a link?
I could not find the ruling about farmers but this one is just as bad

Agree. I get what he's trying to do - Covid affected some groups much worse than others, but you can't make relief dependent on class, that's wrong.

But I'm also unhappy about how the previous Covid relief was distributed. There has to be a better way.
 
and start a thread about it. I can equally point out the things you Trump voters voted for that aren't too pretty and were turned down by federal judges. This protects from unconstitutional extremes.
I dont think I would agree with many of your examples

But how can even the most jaded lib defend biden handing out relief funds based on skin color?
Which relief initiative are you talking about? Can you post a link?
and start a thread about it. I can equally point out the things you Trump voters voted for that aren't too pretty and were turned down by federal judges. This protects from unconstitutional extremes.
I dont think I would agree with many of your examples

But how can even the most jaded lib defend biden handing out relief funds based on skin color?
Which relief initiative are you talking about? Can you post a link?
I could not find the ruling about farmers but this one is just as bad

Agree. I get what he's trying to do - Covid affected some groups much worse than others, but you can't make relief dependent on class, that's wrong.

But I'm also unhappy about how the previous Covid relief was distributed. There has to be a better way.
You can make relief dependent on race. That is what Biden has already done.
 
when challenged, you can’t identify any fraud
We have id’d plenty of fraud

Even libs concede that but argue it wasnt enough to overturn tje election

But thats based only on what has been found

I think there is far more than may never be proven
Actually they don't "concede" "plenty of fraud" - they agree there has been fraud, just as there has been in ANY OTHER election but it's small potatos.

I believe in terms of fraud, this election had significantly less than other recent elections. I'll have to check that though.
 
and start a thread about it. I can equally point out the things you Trump voters voted for that aren't too pretty and were turned down by federal judges. This protects from unconstitutional extremes.
I dont think I would agree with many of your examples

But how can even the most jaded lib defend biden handing out relief funds based on skin color?
Which relief initiative are you talking about? Can you post a link?
and start a thread about it. I can equally point out the things you Trump voters voted for that aren't too pretty and were turned down by federal judges. This protects from unconstitutional extremes.
I dont think I would agree with many of your examples

But how can even the most jaded lib defend biden handing out relief funds based on skin color?
Which relief initiative are you talking about? Can you post a link?
I could not find the ruling about farmers but this one is just as bad

Agree. I get what he's trying to do - Covid affected some groups much worse than others, but you can't make relief dependent on class, that's wrong.

But I'm also unhappy about how the previous Covid relief was distributed. There has to be a better way.
You can make relief dependent on race. That is what Biden has already done.
I agree - in fact that's what I said. You can't make relief dependent on class, or preferencing a class, that's just wrong - it should based on need alone.

He's trying to use it to address past inequalities in relief and you can't do that that way.
 
when challenged, you can’t identify any fraud
We have id’d plenty of fraud

Even libs concede that but argue it wasnt enough to overturn tje election

But thats based only on what has been found

I think there is far more than may never be proven
Actually they don't "concede" "plenty of fraud" - they agree there has been fraud, just as there has been in ANY OTHER election but it's small potatos.

I believe in terms of fraud, this election had significantly less than other recent elections. I'll have to check that though.
The small potato here is in your head calling itself a brain. Everything points to fraud. It could not have been more obvious. And it is more obvious now.
 
Leave China out of it. The pandemic was grotesquely exploited by the Media/Left to slander the President - as new details make abundantly clear - but it was not created for this purpose. It was truly just a fuck-up, and not a planned assault by the CCP.

America's Left used the Pandemic and inflammatory coverage of the dangers to instill irrational fear in the voting population - mainly ignorant fools - so that they could claim that voting-in-person was taking an unreasonable personal risk. Then they conspired in the key swing states to water down any rational attempts to bring vote security to the mail-in votes, in many cases employing illegal and unconstitutional means to do so (under the Constitution, only the STATE LEGISLATURES had the power to modify voting requirements). Had they merely made the Mail-In security requirements comparable to Absentee Ballot requirements, the theft could not have occurred.

But they set up voting systems and parameters that not only facilitated massive fraud, but at the same time made it impossible to document, because the documents themselves (the written ballots) were compromised, mixed with legitimate ballots, or destroyed.

And none of this was a revelation after-the-fact. The Trump team was screaming about it in the run-up to the election, but the Media poo-poohed it unanimously, rendering it nothing more than "Fox News Hysteria."

And this is how the election was stolen, without a trace. All that is left is inferential evidence. Virtually every key indicator indicated a Trump win, and in fact he won the swing states, which would have given him the Electoral College, despite losing the mythical "popular election." Just like in 2016.

Ironically and humorously, the evidence of a stolen election is infinitely more compelling than the evidence of "systemic racism," which Leftists accept as "gospel."
Dude, you got to back up that claim that "virtually every key indicator indicated a Trump win", because I ain't seeing it. No president in modern history has been reelected with Trump's approval numbers. So what indicators were projecting a Trump victory.
Remember the context: The "key indicators" that were/are provided to them within their separate, closed circuit informational ecosystem.

This stuff is easier to understand if you translate for context.
In other words Sean Hannity told them trump would win.
 
But the ballot has to be from a registered voter
The voting rolls are public knowledge

Where there is a will there is a way
Swing.....and a miss!

That mail in ballot has a bar code identifying the registered voter.
Fake that
Yeah, and not clearing people that moved or died off the list of registered voters is always opposed by the Democrat party. Gee, I wonder why?
Who cares?
Ballots not cast

Start showing me people voting in two places or people voting in the place of dead people and I may give a shit
Damn, you're dumb.
really?

I’m not the one who can’t back up his claims
You're either playing dumb or you really are. Democrats resist the purging of voter registration rolls of dead people and people that moved.
 
and start a thread about it. I can equally point out the things you Trump voters voted for that aren't too pretty and were turned down by federal judges. This protects from unconstitutional extremes.
I dont think I would agree with many of your examples

But how can even the most jaded lib defend biden handing out relief funds based on skin color?
Which relief initiative are you talking about? Can you post a link?
and start a thread about it. I can equally point out the things you Trump voters voted for that aren't too pretty and were turned down by federal judges. This protects from unconstitutional extremes.
I dont think I would agree with many of your examples

But how can even the most jaded lib defend biden handing out relief funds based on skin color?
Which relief initiative are you talking about? Can you post a link?
I could not find the ruling about farmers but this one is just as bad

Agree. I get what he's trying to do - Covid affected some groups much worse than others, but you can't make relief dependent on class, that's wrong.

But I'm also unhappy about how the previous Covid relief was distributed. There has to be a better way.
You can make relief dependent on race. That is what Biden has already done.
I agree - in fact that's what I said. You can't make relief dependent on class, or preferencing a class, that's just wrong - it should based on need alone.

He's trying to use it to address past inequalities in relief and you can't do that that way.
Someone needs to tell the senile illegitimate asshole that past belongs to God.
 
But the ballot has to be from a registered voter
The voting rolls are public knowledge

Where there is a will there is a way
Swing.....and a miss!

That mail in ballot has a bar code identifying the registered voter.
Fake that
Yeah, and not clearing people that moved or died off the list of registered voters is always opposed by the Democrat party. Gee, I wonder why?
Yet the only dead people voted for Trump.
 
But the ballot has to be from a registered voter
The voting rolls are public knowledge

Where there is a will there is a way
Swing.....and a miss!

That mail in ballot has a bar code identifying the registered voter.
Fake that
Yeah, and not clearing people that moved or died off the list of registered voters is always opposed by the Democrat party. Gee, I wonder why?
Yet the only dead people voted for Trump.
You are going to end up in Conspiracy Theories, wait, never mind.
 
In other words Sean Hannity told them trump would win.
Polls said that Hillary was going to win in 2016. But when she lost, democrats stepped back, and tried to figure out why they lost.

In 2020 Trump was supposed to win, but when he lost republicans denied reality and insisted Trump actually won in 2020. If only they could prove how.
 
and start a thread about it. I can equally point out the things you Trump voters voted for that aren't too pretty and were turned down by federal judges. This protects from unconstitutional extremes.
I dont think I would agree with many of your examples

But how can even the most jaded lib defend biden handing out relief funds based on skin color?
Which relief initiative are you talking about? Can you post a link?
and start a thread about it. I can equally point out the things you Trump voters voted for that aren't too pretty and were turned down by federal judges. This protects from unconstitutional extremes.
I dont think I would agree with many of your examples

But how can even the most jaded lib defend biden handing out relief funds based on skin color?
Which relief initiative are you talking about? Can you post a link?
I could not find the ruling about farmers but this one is just as bad

Agree. I get what he's trying to do - Covid affected some groups much worse than others, but you can't make relief dependent on class, that's wrong.

But I'm also unhappy about how the previous Covid relief was distributed. There has to be a better way.
You can make relief dependent on race. That is what Biden has already done.
I agree - in fact that's what I said. You can't make relief dependent on class, or preferencing a class, that's just wrong - it should based on need alone.

He's trying to use it to address past inequalities in relief and you can't do that that way.
I believe the main point in that objective was to address those most impacted by the pandemic which happened to be women and minority businesses. I agree with you though the efforts should not be strictly dependent on race
 
In other words Sean Hannity told them trump would win.
Polls said that Hillary was going to win in 2016. But when she lost, democrats stepped back, and tried to figure out why they lost.

In 2020 Trump was supposed to win, but when he lost republicans denied reality and insisted Trump actually won in 2020. If only they could prove how.
He did win.
 
You're either playing dumb or you really are. Democrats resist the purging of voter registration rolls of dead people and people that moved.
Because when Florida ran such a voter purge, they found that over 10,000 legitimate voters had been "purged". Because the criteria didn't require an exact match, and people with similar names were purged.

One example was a florida reverend, who had the same first and last name (different middle name) of a convicted felon. And his name was purged.
 
In other words Sean Hannity told them trump would win.
Polls said that Hillary was going to win in 2016. But when she lost, democrats stepped back, and tried to figure out why they lost.

In 2020 Trump was supposed to win, but when he lost republicans denied reality and insisted Trump actually won in 2020. If only they could prove how.
Prove you have a brain.
 
You're either playing dumb or you really are. Democrats resist the purging of voter registration rolls of dead people and people that moved.
Because when Florida ran such a voter purge, they found that over 10,000 legitimate voters had been "purged". Because the criteria didn't require an exact match, and people with similar names were purged.

One example was a florida reverend, who had the same first and last name (different middle name) of a convicted felon. And his name was purged.
Do you have a link to that story?
 
and start a thread about it. I can equally point out the things you Trump voters voted for that aren't too pretty and were turned down by federal judges. This protects from unconstitutional extremes.
I dont think I would agree with many of your examples

But how can even the most jaded lib defend biden handing out relief funds based on skin color?
Which relief initiative are you talking about? Can you post a link?
and start a thread about it. I can equally point out the things you Trump voters voted for that aren't too pretty and were turned down by federal judges. This protects from unconstitutional extremes.
I dont think I would agree with many of your examples

But how can even the most jaded lib defend biden handing out relief funds based on skin color?
Which relief initiative are you talking about? Can you post a link?
I could not find the ruling about farmers but this one is just as bad

Agree. I get what he's trying to do - Covid affected some groups much worse than others, but you can't make relief dependent on class, that's wrong.

But I'm also unhappy about how the previous Covid relief was distributed. There has to be a better way.
You can make relief dependent on race. That is what Biden has already done.
I agree - in fact that's what I said. You can't make relief dependent on class, or preferencing a class, that's just wrong - it should based on need alone.

He's trying to use it to address past inequalities in relief and you can't do that that way.
Someone needs to tell the senile illegitimate asshole that past belongs to God.
Why would anybody tell him that nonsense?!
 
In 2020 Trump was supposed to win, but when he lost republicans denied reality and insisted Trump actually won in 2020. If only they could prove how.
He did win.
The insanity of that statement is there has been absolutely zero proof to support it. And every time somebody claims they have proof, that proof magically never manifests.

How you're down to watermarks, bamboo and cheeto dust.
 
Back
Top Bottom