How much better would be with Romney?

Yep. If Willard had won,he could have come in bought up companies and laid everyone off and profited from it! :D

Coming from a nazi to like you that's pretty f****** funny

tapatalk post
Glad I could amuse you.
Yep. If Willard had won,he could have come in bought up companies and laid everyone off and profited from it! :D

thats not what Bain did, but you get credit for accurately parroting the false talking point :eusa_boohoo:
Really then tell us what he did since ya know those workers that made the videos were just lying through their teeth about being laid off.
 
The Democrats and their mangare of supporters have had a problem of over reach when gaining power. The one exception was Clinton who wisely adopted the "third way" and didn't fall in line with his left wing or his wife. Unfortunately, Obama has neither the intellect nor the savvy to do the same.

The country would be far better off today with Romney, a competent and pragmatic man with few populist tendencies.
 
Yep. If Willard had won,he could have come in bought up companies and laid everyone off and profited from it! :D

Do you ever think on your own or do you simply repeat ridiculous talking points?

Bain capital would invest into companies that otherwise would have closed their doors.

It saw these companies as sound ideas but with faulty business plans and as opposed to let them shut their doors they did their best to revitalize them, save the jobs, and, yes, make a profit.

And you see that as a bad thing?

Why?

Because the word "profit" is part of it?
 
Yep. If Willard had won,he could have come in bought up companies and laid everyone off and profited from it! :D

Coming from a nazi to like you that's pretty f****** funny

tapatalk post
Glad I could amuse you.
Yep. If Willard had won,he could have come in bought up companies and laid everyone off and profited from it! :D

thats not what Bain did, but you get credit for accurately parroting the false talking point :eusa_boohoo:
Really then tell us what he did since ya know those workers that made the videos were just lying through their teeth about being laid off.

They would have been fired if Bain DIDNT take them over for they would have closed their doors.

At lest Bain gave them a fighting chance.

Are you uneducated?

You must be.

You seem clueless as to how the business world works.
 
Yep. If Willard had won,he could have come in bought up companies and laid everyone off and profited from it! :D

Coming from a nazi to like you that's pretty f****** funny

tapatalk post
Glad I could amuse you.
Yep. If Willard had won,he could have come in bought up companies and laid everyone off and profited from it! :D

thats not what Bain did, but you get credit for accurately parroting the false talking point :eusa_boohoo:
Really then tell us what he did since ya know those workers that made the videos were just lying through their teeth about being laid off.

Do you not grasp the concept that the majority of the companies that Bain bought and restructured were teetering on the edge of bankruptcy before Bain ever came near them which means that the majority of those "workers" blaming Romney for getting laid off would have been laid off anyways because the company they worked for was about to go belly up?
So many of you have absolutely no concept of what venture capitalists DO and yet you're here on this board pretending that you do. Go to school...read a book...EDUCATE YOURSELF!!!
 
Coming from a nazi to like you that's pretty f****** funny

tapatalk post
Glad I could amuse you.
thats not what Bain did, but you get credit for accurately parroting the false talking point :eusa_boohoo:
Really then tell us what he did since ya know those workers that made the videos were just lying through their teeth about being laid off.

Do you not grasp the concept that the majority of the companies that Bain bought and restructured were teetering on the edge of bankruptcy before Bain ever came near them which means that the majority of those "workers" blaming Romney for getting laid off would have been laid off anyways because the company they worked for was about to go belly up?
So many of you have absolutely no concept of what venture capitalists DO and yet you're here on this board pretending that you do. Go to school...read a book...EDUCATE YOURSELF!!!

Mitt paid venture cap taxes, but what Bain did had nothing to do with venture capitalism. they bought failing biz, stripped out whatever activity was profitable, and recapitalized that, and put a price on the remainder that was low ball. Bain then resold the new entity to its own partners at bargain rates, and then resold it again to third parties, reaping profits.

Venture capital actually invents new stuff, as opposed to being vultures. Not that vultures are without societal use, but do you really want the vulture to protect the canaries.
 
Yep. If Willard had won,he could have come in bought up companies and laid everyone off and profited from it! :D

Do you ever think on your own or do you simply repeat ridiculous talking points?

Bain capital would invest into companies that otherwise would have closed their doors.

It saw these companies as sound ideas but with faulty business plans and as opposed to let them shut their doors they did their best to revitalize them, save the jobs, and, yes, make a profit.

And you see that as a bad thing?

Why?

Because the word "profit" is part of it?

Profit isn't a bad thing unless its done by exploiting others which is EXACTLY what Willard and company did.
 
Better question.

Since Obama has not had the political courage to unwind the Bush Surveillance State, how much better would we be with Ron Paul?

My answer is: better, especially in Foreign Policy.

Ron Paul would have found a way to get rid of all the anti-Constitutional powers Bush gave to Government through the Patriot Act and Department of Homeland Security.

Ron Paul would have exposed the War on Terrorism for what it is - a means of scaring morons into giving up their privacy, and a means giving Big Government the ability to bankrupt future generations with the harebrained scheme of saving the world from evil. (FYI: Only a Republican would trust in the power of Washington to this degree. Don't they fucking get it? The biggest danger of all is the growth of unchecked government power and budgets to fix BIG problems. You can't fix evil. You can't change the fact that there will always be radical muslims who want Americans to stop controlling their energy resources. Government doesn't have the competence to run a laundromat, yet Republicans want to give it the power and budget to rebuild whole Arab nations. Are you fucking kidding me? Grab your fucking wallets because the GOP is coming back in 2016. If you thought the Iraq War was an expensive disaster - than you ain't seen nothing yet.)

It will take years to unwind the damage Bush has done to the Constitution and economy. A man like Ron Paul would at least shake things up.
 
Last edited:
Better question.

Since Obama has not had the political courage to unwind the Bush Surveillance State, how much better would we be with Ron Paul?

My answer is: better, especially in Foreign Policy.

Ron Paul would have found a way to get rid of all the anti-Constitutional powers Bush gave to Government through the Patriot Act and Department of Homeland Security.

Ron Paul would have exposed the War on Terrorism for what it is - a means of scaring morons into giving up their privacy, and a means giving Big Government the ability to bankrupt future generations with the harebrained scheme of saving the world from evil. (FYI: Only a Republican would trust in the power of Washington to this degree. Don't they fucking get it? The biggest danger of all is the growth of unchecked government power and budgets to fix BIG problems. You can't fix evil. You can't change the fact that there will always be radical muslims who want Americans to stop trying to control their energy resources. But you can spend of trillion of dollars making things worse)

It will take years to unwind the damage Bush has done to the Constitution and economy. A man like Ron Paul would at least shake things up.

Because Ron Paul has done such a fantastic job in his 30 plus years of making change right? Get real the man was a f****** lying sack of s*** who did nothing but to give lip service to the conservative cause.

tapatalk post
 
What are YOU saying about it, Synth! Your "doofus loser" along with Patty Murray did the adult thing of sitting down at a table and hammering out a budget that passed in the House by a wide margin. Now contrast THAT to what Barack Obama & Joe Biden have given us in the five years they have been our leaders.

Leadership is what we would have gotten with a Romney/Ryan White House. Despite the full court press by the Left to paint both Romney & Ryan as "hard" right extremists, the truth is that both are moderates with a history of working across the aisle for the good of the people.

Guess you folks hated that Bin Laden thingie..along with the offing on Al-Alwaki (The new conservative favorite terrorist) who's followers STILL try terrorist attacks.

Here..take a gander.

It comes complete with full paragraphs..you've been warned.

Obama’s Top 50 Accomplishments by Paul Glastris, Ryan Cooper, and Siyu Hu | The Washington Monthly

Oh God...someone's STILL trotting out that nonsense to show this President has been a "success"?

There is a reason why Barack Obama's approval numbers are plummeting with younger voters, Sallow. They finally stopped paying attention to fluffer pieces like that one and taken a good hard look at how Obama's policies have affected their lives.

His approval ratings have gone down because of all the negativity in general.

Mark my words here. By the end of next year? They will be better than Clinton's when he hit his peak.
 
Glad I could amuse you.

Really then tell us what he did since ya know those workers that made the videos were just lying through their teeth about being laid off.

Do you not grasp the concept that the majority of the companies that Bain bought and restructured were teetering on the edge of bankruptcy before Bain ever came near them which means that the majority of those "workers" blaming Romney for getting laid off would have been laid off anyways because the company they worked for was about to go belly up?
So many of you have absolutely no concept of what venture capitalists DO and yet you're here on this board pretending that you do. Go to school...read a book...EDUCATE YOURSELF!!!

Mitt paid venture cap taxes, but what Bain did had nothing to do with venture capitalism. they bought failing biz, stripped out whatever activity was profitable, and recapitalized that, and put a price on the remainder that was low ball. Bain then resold the new entity to its own partners at bargain rates, and then resold it again to third parties, reaping profits.

Venture capital actually invents new stuff, as opposed to being vultures. Not that vultures are without societal use, but do you really want the vulture to protect the canaries.

Venture capitalists don't as a rule invent new stuff, Ben...they provide capital for the people who do invent of new stuff. That was what Bain did when it provided start up capital to the two supermarket men who got the idea for Staples.

I don't have the faintest idea what you're talking about with the whole vultures and canaries thing...
 
Guess you folks hated that Bin Laden thingie..along with the offing on Al-Alwaki (The new conservative favorite terrorist) who's followers STILL try terrorist attacks.

Here..take a gander.

It comes complete with full paragraphs..you've been warned.

Obama’s Top 50 Accomplishments by Paul Glastris, Ryan Cooper, and Siyu Hu | The Washington Monthly

Oh God...someone's STILL trotting out that nonsense to show this President has been a "success"?

There is a reason why Barack Obama's approval numbers are plummeting with younger voters, Sallow. They finally stopped paying attention to fluffer pieces like that one and taken a good hard look at how Obama's policies have affected their lives.

His approval ratings have gone down because of all the negativity in general.

Mark my words here. By the end of next year? They will be better than Clinton's when he hit his peak.

Gee, Sallow...the REASON for "all the negativity in general" is that this Administration doesn't have a clue what they are doing and people have finally wised up to it. A year from now millions more Americans will understand just how bad ObamaCare is screwing them. You think THAT is going to give Barry better poll numbers? Too funny...

Clinton's numbers got better because Clinton pivoted to the center after he got his ass handed to him in the first mid-term election of his initial term. Slick Willie actually understood economics. Barry and his gang don't have the faintest idea what to do to fix an economy. This isn't going to get better for Obama...it's going to get worse as people see what the cost of the ACA is going to be for THEM!

Barry, Harry and Nancy sold the ACA as healthcare reform that would lower the healthcare costs for Middle Class people. All three of them lied their asses off when they made that claim.
 

Forum List

Back
Top