If unions didn't advance overpaying employees, then what did unions actually do?
You see, the problem is you work on the assumption that employees were "overpaid" when they got to live a middle class lifestyle.
Nope, the only people who are 'overpaid' are the CEO's.
Remember? I’m from this country. I’ve been in industry most of my adult life. Don’t tell me workers weren’t overpaid in the union days. It’s a wonder why we didn’t lose all those jobs many years ago. You don’t know what lazy is until you’ve made deliveries to a UAW run plant.
Sent from my iPhone using
USMessageBoard.com
Union workers never got rich or retired wealthy
They did earn enough to buy a home, support a family, have health insurance, send their kids to college
What used to be known as the American Dream
The American dream is alive and well for those that pursue it. But things are different today and you just can't walk into a business with no skills and no experience at anything and make a great living.
Back in the late 70's guys would ride around on a floor sweeping machine making 50K a year plus benefits. That's a job you can train a monkey to do.
The problem with unions is it gave many false hopes. It was a bubble that was bound to burst in the end. So when I was younger, nobody looked ahead and thought about an advanced education or learning a trade. You walked into the steel mills, the auto plants, UPS, and got a great job doing non-skilled labor. When the bottom fell out, middle-aged people found themselves with no job and no skills. It was too late to start over. Those people already had a house and kids--many whom were in college. In the end, they got screwed.