How Democrats Exploit Minorities

Stephanie

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2004
70,230
10,864
2,040
this is so true...with blacks they crow how 95% of them vote for them, with women they are used as vaginia and uterures for their love of abortion..now they working on Hispanic and they call them, brown people...a shame that people fall for it...

SNIP:
How Democrats Exploit Minorities
By Michael Bargo Jr.




Democrats have portrayed themselves as the only political party that cares for the needs of minorities, that somehow they are uniquely qualified to help them. But a state senator from Louisiana, Elbert Guillory, recently left the Democratic Party and became a Republican, citing the recent policies of Democrats.

A close look at how the poor fare under Democratic Party control reveals that the Party has not only done very little to improve the long-term economic conditions of minorities but that its policies have a history of destroying the black family and the social conditions under which they live, as long noted by authors and economists Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams.

The American city that has been most completely controlled by Democrats is Chicago. It is a case study of the effects of Democratic policies upon minorities. In a matter of just a few decades Chicago went from being a city that provided great opportunities for blacks to being the most racially segregated and oppressive city in America.

From its very beginning Chicago provided opportunity for blacks. The first non-native American settler in the area was a Haitian black named DuSable. Chicago never had slavery. It had an early abolitionist movement and showcased Abraham Lincoln, who freed the slaves, in debates with Stephen Douglas. The most prominent black magazines, Ebony and Jet, were founded in Chicago. They celebrated black culture and fashion. Oprah Winfrey became a billionaire anchoring her TV show in the City of Chicago.

When blacks first moved to Chicago during WW I in the great migration north they wore black armbands in memory of Lincoln and voted for Republicans, the party of Lincoln. But soon the black attitude toward Republicans changed. By 1920 thousands of blacks worked in Chicago in city and county jobs. But when Anton Cermak was elected mayor, he fired all the blacks and rehired only black Democrats. Black residents were funneled by the Chicago Democratic machine into highly segregated black-only neighborhoods. This segregation and racism has lasted one hundred years and persists to this day.

The Chicago Democratic Machine institutionalized housing segregation more than any American city. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. noted that Chicago's housing segregation was the major cause of poverty among blacks. Mayor Daley I doubled the number of residents in low-income housing from 1960 to 1970 at a time when the population fell by eight percent. Those high-rise buildings allowed Democratic precinct captains to intimidate black voters into voting for Democrats by threatening to take away their apartments. The era of high-rise low-income buildings, portrayed in the TV comedy show Good Times, only ended when a courageous black woman named Dorothy Gautreaux sued the Chicago Housing Authority for racial discrimination. Since then the high-rise buildings have been gradually torn down and blacks are moving to suburbs or out of Illinois entirely.

This segregation was practiced in all major northern cities run by Democrats including Philadelphia, Boston, Baltimore, Boston, D.C., New York, Cleveland, Detroit and many others. While pursuing his civil rights movement in the mid-1960s, Dr. King marched in Chicago and was stunned by the racial hatred he experienced there. In a city that never hosted slavery, Dr. King said "I think people in Mississippi ought to come to Chicago to learn how to hate."

The 2000 Census found that for Chicago to be integrated 90% of the blacks would have to move. And remarkably, of the 10 poorest census tracts in the entire United States, nine of them were located in Chicago's black Congressional Districts of black Congressmen Bobby Rush and Jesse Jackson Jr. When Jesse Jackson Jr. resigned his Congressional seat, Democrats said that he must be replaced by another black. This could serve no other purpose than to preserve Democratic power and maintain the segregationist status quo.

Nothing has improved for black residents in these segregated areas even with the assistance of black politicians of their own race, who campaign that they will improve things. The Chicago Public School system is so bad that it has one of the shortest school days of any major city. This holds back the poor of all ethnic groups from excelling in academics and moving out of the City.

ALL of it here
Read more: Articles: How Democrats Exploit Minorities
Follow us: [MENTION=20123]American[/MENTION]Thinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
 
this is so true...with blacks they crow how 95% of them vote for them, with women they are used as vaginia and uterures for their love of abortion..now they working on Hispanic and they call them, brown people...a shame that people fall for it...

SNIP:
How Democrats Exploit Minorities
By Michael Bargo Jr.




Democrats have portrayed themselves as the only political party that cares for the needs of minorities, that somehow they are uniquely qualified to help them. But a state senator from Louisiana, Elbert Guillory, recently left the Democratic Party and became a Republican, citing the recent policies of Democrats.

A close look at how the poor fare under Democratic Party control reveals that the Party has not only done very little to improve the long-term economic conditions of minorities but that its policies have a history of destroying the black family and the social conditions under which they live, as long noted by authors and economists Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams.

The American city that has been most completely controlled by Democrats is Chicago. It is a case study of the effects of Democratic policies upon minorities. In a matter of just a few decades Chicago went from being a city that provided great opportunities for blacks to being the most racially segregated and oppressive city in America.

From its very beginning Chicago provided opportunity for blacks. The first non-native American settler in the area was a Haitian black named DuSable. Chicago never had slavery. It had an early abolitionist movement and showcased Abraham Lincoln, who freed the slaves, in debates with Stephen Douglas. The most prominent black magazines, Ebony and Jet, were founded in Chicago. They celebrated black culture and fashion. Oprah Winfrey became a billionaire anchoring her TV show in the City of Chicago.

When blacks first moved to Chicago during WW I in the great migration north they wore black armbands in memory of Lincoln and voted for Republicans, the party of Lincoln. But soon the black attitude toward Republicans changed. By 1920 thousands of blacks worked in Chicago in city and county jobs. But when Anton Cermak was elected mayor, he fired all the blacks and rehired only black Democrats. Black residents were funneled by the Chicago Democratic machine into highly segregated black-only neighborhoods. This segregation and racism has lasted one hundred years and persists to this day.

The Chicago Democratic Machine institutionalized housing segregation more than any American city. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. noted that Chicago's housing segregation was the major cause of poverty among blacks. Mayor Daley I doubled the number of residents in low-income housing from 1960 to 1970 at a time when the population fell by eight percent. Those high-rise buildings allowed Democratic precinct captains to intimidate black voters into voting for Democrats by threatening to take away their apartments. The era of high-rise low-income buildings, portrayed in the TV comedy show Good Times, only ended when a courageous black woman named Dorothy Gautreaux sued the Chicago Housing Authority for racial discrimination. Since then the high-rise buildings have been gradually torn down and blacks are moving to suburbs or out of Illinois entirely.

This segregation was practiced in all major northern cities run by Democrats including Philadelphia, Boston, Baltimore, Boston, D.C., New York, Cleveland, Detroit and many others. While pursuing his civil rights movement in the mid-1960s, Dr. King marched in Chicago and was stunned by the racial hatred he experienced there. In a city that never hosted slavery, Dr. King said "I think people in Mississippi ought to come to Chicago to learn how to hate."

The 2000 Census found that for Chicago to be integrated 90% of the blacks would have to move. And remarkably, of the 10 poorest census tracts in the entire United States, nine of them were located in Chicago's black Congressional Districts of black Congressmen Bobby Rush and Jesse Jackson Jr. When Jesse Jackson Jr. resigned his Congressional seat, Democrats said that he must be replaced by another black. This could serve no other purpose than to preserve Democratic power and maintain the segregationist status quo.

Nothing has improved for black residents in these segregated areas even with the assistance of black politicians of their own race, who campaign that they will improve things. The Chicago Public School system is so bad that it has one of the shortest school days of any major city. This holds back the poor of all ethnic groups from excelling in academics and moving out of the City.

Politics is all about manipulation of factions, and minority groups are prime targets by both major political parties.
 
Allow me to be pragmatic. Neither party gives a shit about brown people. I'm not talking about the average Joe six pack, but the higher ups. Simple stuff.

^This. As someone who studies and works in Washington, DC, I see the game of hardball play out all the time. You are not going to find a politician, and likely not a political operative who genuinely cares for his constituency.
 
this is so true...with blacks they crow how 95% of them vote for them, with women they are used as vaginia and uterures for their love of abortion..now they working on Hispanic and they call them, brown people...a shame that people fall for it...

SNIP:
How Democrats Exploit Minorities
By Michael Bargo Jr.

Democrats have portrayed themselves as the only political party that cares for the needs of minorities, that somehow they are uniquely qualified to help them. But a state senator from Louisiana, Elbert Guillory, recently left the Democratic Party and became a Republican, citing the recent policies of Democrats...

etc., etc., blah blah blah

Anyone can find something in the internet he or she agrees with. That is boring. If I want to find right wing hot air i will find it myself. If you cannot compose original arguments, don't waste computer memory.
 
Do Republicans exploit minorities?

Al we know is most minorities would rather die than join the GOP

10% Blacks
30% Hispanic
 
Black people are screwed.
They are like addicts.
Hooked on Democrat government programs.
In return they have to keep Democrats in power in order to get their next fix.

So yes they do know better then to vote Republican.

Too bad.
 
Last edited:
Technically speaking, as a pure white guy I am the minority. Where's my free shit? When can I start a riot?

Worldwide? Yes. In the US? No. 'Whites' have a couple more decades of being the majority in the US.

Maybe we should adopt Mexico's racial immigration policies.

Only a specified percentage of non-Mexicans are allowed to immigrate to Mexico.


Sucks that we have such a decent country that other folks want to immigrate here.


The point should be anyone who lives here can be an American. I don't care what color you are. That's the cool thing about America
 
Technically speaking, as a pure white guy I am the minority. Where's my free shit? When can I start a riot?

Worldwide? Yes. In the US? No. 'Whites' have a couple more decades of being the majority in the US.

I'm talking about mixed races vs pure white. This isn't a white pride thing, but this year for the first time we the white skinned people became a minority.

Now where is my free shit?
 
Technically speaking, as a pure white guy I am the minority. Where's my free shit? When can I start a riot?

Worldwide? Yes. In the US? No. 'Whites' have a couple more decades of being the majority in the US.

I'm talking about mixed races vs pure white. This isn't a white pride thing, but this year for the first time we the white skinned people became a minority.

Now where is my free shit?

Obama outsourced it.
 
Technically speaking, as a pure white guy I am the minority. Where's my free shit? When can I start a riot?

Worldwide? Yes. In the US? No. 'Whites' have a couple more decades of being the majority in the US.

I'm talking about mixed races vs pure white. This isn't a white pride thing, but this year for the first time we the white skinned people became a minority.

Now where is my free shit?

Define 'pure white'. Honestly speaking, the description of an individual by an over-generalization of their skin pigmentation in accordance with the subjective, normative, arbitrary, antiquated, divisive, and illusionary 'biological classification' (but actually social construct) of race is ridiculous in of itself. Now that someone is designating who is 'pure white', I am interested as to what that actually means. By the way, I am just speaking in terms of general demographics, not white pride or supremacy.
 
Technically speaking, as a pure white guy I am the minority. Where's my free shit? When can I start a riot?

Worldwide? Yes. In the US? No. 'Whites' have a couple more decades of being the majority in the US.

Maybe we should adopt Mexico's racial immigration policies.

Only a specified percentage of non-Mexicans are allowed to immigrate to Mexico.


Sucks that we have such a decent country that other folks want to immigrate here.


The point should be anyone who lives here can be an American. I don't care what color you are. That's the cool thing about America

We already have a quota-based immigration system. The only difference is that it is no longer explicitly codified under federal immigration law, and currently uses 'national origins' as opposed to 'race'.
 
You guys need to pay attention. What the OP is saying is that minorities are too stupid to know that they are being exploited by the democrats, which is why they vote for our candidates.

I can't for the life of me understand why the minorities are offended by republicans saying that....
 

Forum List

Back
Top