Why does 1.0 not mention pericarditis?1. Is this not a thread on the COVID 19 vaccine? Did this conversation not start out with me stating 6 year olds and myocarditis don’t mix? Did you not respond with something along the lines of “well they’ll get myocarditis from COVID 19 too”? In which I pointed out that they indeed do not. So explain to me how the VAERS data on people under 24 getting myocarditis as an adverse event from the COVID vaccine is not relevant?
2. I posted, and stated that I posted, that particular paper because it was literally the first search result that came up. Why might I do something like that? Probably to suggest or hint at something like...instead of making appeals to ignorance, why not actually search this stuff yourself and try to disprove me. If I’m a cOnSpIrAcY nutter, then that should be pretty easy to do. Should it not? It would also be an immensely better argument than the logical fallacy of an appeal to ignorance. Whatever. To satisfy the ever shifting goal posts. Here’s an article with the Israel data, and the EU data showing that natural immunity is holding up but the vaccine isn’t. It also has a researcher explaining why natural immunity is better. It might sound familiar to you, someone, though I don’t remember who, said exactly the same thing in a previous post. Horowitz: Israeli government data shows natural immunity from infection much stronger than vaccine-induced immunity
Let me just say, this author sounds like a man after my own heart. He brought many a smile to my face by actually connecting some very simple dots. That seems to be missing in today’s society.
3. Wait, I truly hope you’re not referring too the study I explicitly provided as an example of the fuckery in trying to discredit ivermectin? And then immediately after I posted that I posted a letter from 120 docs explaining why that study was bullshit. You know the whole average age of 35, and the fact ivermectin is sold over the counter, was widely searched on google and widely used in Columbia. The whole fact they didn’t tell the subjects that they were using ivermectin in the study? It certainly sounds like that’s the study you are referring too. Is it this one?
You really need to go back and read the damn letter. And learn to read while your at it, because that was a pretty bad mistake on your partAlso, here’s a bunch of other study’s that say otherwise. That I’ve already posted. Multiple times. Funny how y’all ask for evidence, and then don’t even read it when it is abundantly provided. Then you just jump to CoNsPiRaCy ThEoRy.Effect of Ivermectin on Time to Resolution of Symptoms Among Adults With Mild COVID-19
This randomized trial compares the effects of ivermectin vs placebo on time to symptom resolution within 21 days among patients with mild COVID-19.jamanetwork.com
Also, tHe CoLuMbIa StUdY iSnT dOuBlE bLiNd.Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time analysis of all 172 studies
Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time analysis of all 172 studiesc19ivermectin.com
Yes it is a strawman argument to suggest that I do not want drugs, in particular ivermectin, tested with clinical trials WHEN I AM POSTING 50 DIFFERENT CLINICAL TRIALS ON IVERMECTIN. A strawman argument does not even do a justice. Maybe strawgiant argument?
Apparently you’re not looking at Israel. OP showing vaccine at 60% effectiveness (mind you it’s not factoring in how many people who already recovered from COVID and got the vaccine). While natural immunity still holding up at at least 96% effectiveness. Look at the article I posted above on this reply. No statistical difference in the EU between the highly vaccinated countries and the nons. If you want to do a little digging yourself, look into the UK. I believe they are at 80% vaccinated. Remember fauci saying 70% vaccinations for herd immunity? How’s that vaccine thing going for them now?
Acute pericarditis as a primary presentation of COVID-19 - PubMed
The COVID-19 pandemic is a highly contagious viral illness which conventionally manifests primarily with respiratory symptoms. We report a case whose first manifestation of COVID-19 was pericarditis, in the absence of respiratory symptoms, without any serious complications. Cardiac involvement...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov