Likkmee
Gold Member
Amazon Prime
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I think this is an interesting idea, sort of a puzzle kind of thing.
Andrew Yang suggested a block chain scheme for voting, but that penalizes those without internet access, so it wouldnt be Constitutional on those grounds, I think.
So I got my wife to spitball some ideas and here is what we came up with:
1) Because of the problem with ballot printing/forgery vulnerabilities the ballot would have to be requested by a resident of the state or municipality to show that they are a real voter. They would also list any adult residents that might live at the same address. Any application that has more than 6 adults living there would flag the ballot request for a phone follow up by the mail-in poll worker.
2) The information would be used to generate a seven digit confirmation code that would be sent either by registered mail or by email, but separate from the ballot itself.
3) When the ballot arrives, the fields are filled in on a bubble scan sheet with a blue impression carbon copy with it. The voter keeps the carbon copy. The voter also enters their confirmation code with the ballot.
4) At the precinct mail-in voting center, the confirmation code is checked as well as the count of ballots from that address. Screening is done well before vote day.
5) if there are any questions about the vote, the voter is contacted and asked to refill a second ballot with the same information, but a new confirmation code is sent.
I dont see how this can be subject to fraud or counterfeiting if the workers are honest and diligent.
you can NEVER secure a mail in vote,,,vote in person is as close as you can get to secure,,,I think this is an interesting idea, sort of a puzzle kind of thing.
Andrew Yang suggested a block chain scheme for voting, but that penalizes those without internet access, so it wouldnt be Constitutional on those grounds, I think.
So I got my wife to spitball some ideas and here is what we came up with:
1) Because of the problem with ballot printing/forgery vulnerabilities the ballot would have to be requested by a resident of the state or municipality to show that they are a real voter. They would also list any adult residents that might live at the same address. Any application that has more than 6 adults living there would flag the ballot request for a phone follow up by the mail-in poll worker.
2) The information would be used to generate a seven digit confirmation code that would be sent either by registered mail or by email, but separate from the ballot itself.
3) When the ballot arrives, the fields are filled in on a bubble scan sheet with a blue impression carbon copy with it. The voter keeps the carbon copy. The voter also enters their confirmation code with the ballot.
4) At the precinct mail-in voting center, the confirmation code is checked as well as the count of ballots from that address. Screening is done well before vote day.
5) if there are any questions about the vote, the voter is contacted and asked to refill a second ballot with the same information, but a new confirmation code is sent.
I dont see how this can be subject to fraud or counterfeiting if the workers are honest and diligent.
not to mention mail in vote in not secret and violates voting rights as well as leaves you in danger of retribution for voting for the wrong person,,,
every person receiving them should have a unique code on the ballot and have to verify their identity by 2 step authentication.
Who the person actually votes for need not be tracked to preserve anonymity
People have been voting by mail for about a century. It's quite secure.
Let me guess; you're scared of this too.People have been voting by mail for about a century. It's quite secure.
Wrong......we aren't talking about a minority of people who can't actually vote in person.....the democrat party wants everyone to vote by mail, you can't secure that.
You're afraid of a lot of things.
As for the Democratic Party, as far as I know, they want everyone to be able to vote by mail if they choose. Freedom of choice is an American value. What's your value?
I think this is an interesting idea, sort of a puzzle kind of thing.
Andrew Yang suggested a block chain scheme for voting, but that penalizes those without internet access, so it wouldnt be Constitutional on those grounds, I think.
So I got my wife to spitball some ideas and here is what we came up with:
1) Because of the problem with ballot printing/forgery vulnerabilities the ballot would have to be requested by a resident of the state or municipality to show that they are a real voter. They would also list any adult residents that might live at the same address. Any application that has more than 6 adults living there would flag the ballot request for a phone follow up by the mail-in poll worker.
2) The information would be used to generate a seven digit confirmation code that would be sent either by registered mail or by email, but separate from the ballot itself.
3) When the ballot arrives, the fields are filled in on a bubble scan sheet with a blue impression carbon copy with it. The voter keeps the carbon copy. The voter also enters their confirmation code with the ballot.
4) At the precinct mail-in voting center, the confirmation code is checked as well as the count of ballots from that address. Screening is done well before vote day.
5) if there are any questions about the vote, the voter is contacted and asked to refill a second ballot with the same information, but a new confirmation code is sent.
I dont see how this can be subject to fraud or counterfeiting if the workers are honest and diligent.
That's absolutely true but fair and accurate voting is what Democrats have been fighting against for years. They need their illegal voter constituency. This whole issue has nothing to do with voter suppression and everything to do with Democrats ability to manipulate voting.No.It could not. What we need is PROVEN ID's for voting. No ID.No vote. And all Ballots in English only.The use of checksums and separate routes of delivery can alleviate much of that.There will always be a chain of custody issue with mail-in ballots/voting.
None of it can be trusted.
PS: Republicans can vote in person and avoid having the incinerator happen to their ballots, right?Let me guess; you're scared of this too.People have been voting by mail for about a century. It's quite secure.
Wrong......we aren't talking about a minority of people who can't actually vote in person.....the democrat party wants everyone to vote by mail, you can't secure that.
You're afraid of a lot of things.
As for the Democratic Party, as far as I know, they want everyone to be able to vote by mail if they choose. Freedom of choice is an American value. What's your value?
Nope....... election integrity is put in danger with mail in voting. When the envelopes of Republican counties and postal codes end up in incinerators and dead people send in envelopes for the democrat party......then a fascist like you will be happy.
People have been voting by mail for about 100 years. Few if any ever end up in incinerators. Stop lying.
Which they always do. Democrats always cheat. And lie. And use violence. They are Bolsheviks.That's absolutely true but fair and accurate voting is what Democrats have been fighting against for years. They need their illegal voter constituency. This whole issue has nothing to do with voter suppression and everything to do with Democrats ability to manipulate voting.No.It could not. What we need is PROVEN ID's for voting. No ID.No vote. And all Ballots in English only.The use of checksums and separate routes of delivery can alleviate much of that.There will always be a chain of custody issue with mail-in ballots/voting.
None of it can be trusted.
Says the guy who has never had a mail in ballot or used one or seen them work, like I have in my state for 10 years.There needs to be a code for the ballot that is unique and registered on a database run by the state, plus a separate code for the voter that is filled in with the ballot to confirm they are the right person voting.But is that code matched to the person casting the ballot? Does the person have to verify his identity and eligibility to vote?There is a code on mail in ballots
The voters code should be some kind of checksum based on their information so it is unique.
And Al Gore tried to have the military vote thrown out...Mail in voting been going on for ever (US MILLITARY over seas ) Just one more ploy to disadvantage voting.
There is no way to 100% ensure that a ballot would not be tampered with. You answered your own question when you said “...If the workers are honest and diligent.”I think this is an interesting idea, sort of a puzzle kind of thing.
Andrew Yang suggested a block chain scheme for voting, but that penalizes those without internet access, so it wouldnt be Constitutional on those grounds, I think.
So I got my wife to spitball some ideas and here is what we came up with:
1) Because of the problem with ballot printing/forgery vulnerabilities the ballot would have to be requested by a resident of the state or municipality to show that they are a real voter. They would also list any adult residents that might live at the same address. Any application that has more than 6 adults living there would flag the ballot request for a phone follow up by the mail-in poll worker.
2) The information would be used to generate a seven digit confirmation code that would be sent either by registered mail or by email, but separate from the ballot itself.
3) When the ballot arrives, the fields are filled in on a bubble scan sheet with a blue impression carbon copy with it. The voter keeps the carbon copy. The voter also enters their confirmation code with the ballot.
4) At the precinct mail-in voting center, the confirmation code is checked as well as the count of ballots from that address. Screening is done well before vote day.
5) if there are any questions about the vote, the voter is contacted and asked to refill a second ballot with the same information, but a new confirmation code is sent.
I dont see how this can be subject to fraud or counterfeiting if the workers are honest and diligent.
That's absolutely true but fair and accurate voting is what Democrats have been fighting against for years. They need their illegal voter constituency. This whole issue has nothing to do with voter suppression and everything to do with Democrats ability to manipulate voting.No.It could not. What we need is PROVEN ID's for voting. No ID.No vote. And all Ballots in English only.The use of checksums and separate routes of delivery can alleviate much of that.There will always be a chain of custody issue with mail-in ballots/voting.
None of it can be trusted.
Yeah. Sure. And Repubs shove granny over a cliff. I heard that before. Here is the truth. Anyone STUPID enough not to be able to find a polling place is to stupid to vote.That's absolutely true but fair and accurate voting is what Democrats have been fighting against for years. They need their illegal voter constituency. This whole issue has nothing to do with voter suppression and everything to do with Democrats ability to manipulate voting.No.It could not. What we need is PROVEN ID's for voting. No ID.No vote. And all Ballots in English only.The use of checksums and separate routes of delivery can alleviate much of that.There will always be a chain of custody issue with mail-in ballots/voting.
None of it can be trusted.
And the Republicans are pretty successful in closing down polling areas in Democratic strongholds and making sure the ones available to the Dems have long lines where it takes hours to vote. If that doesn't work, they start shutting down specific polling places for reasons like Machine breakdowns or lack of poll workers.
And they all must be APPLIED for. Not sent out. All "Harvested" ballots should be burned.In fact, they can't.The use of checksums and separate routes of delivery can alleviate much of that.There will always be a chain of custody issue with mail-in ballots/voting.
None of it can be trusted.
There is ONLY one solution. The vote is cast in such a manner that no other living soul can touch it and is tallied without human intervention.
That is the ONLY trustworthy means.