Carl in Michigan
Diamond Member
- Aug 15, 2016
- 59,395
- 44,627
- 3,615
I guess the first invaders will be robots who will build the habitat for these biological creatures
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was covered in the videoNot one word about what will be used to make all those windows, or where the resources will come from
I think you lack imagination. Besides the initial 3D printers and robots, what stuff will have to be transported to Mars? Most of the raw material is there, all we need is energy.Not one word about what will be used to make all those windows, or where the resources will come from.
Very impractical.
Nice thought, but won't work.
The rocket used to launch this would be too heavy, and be too large. It would either be too massive to lift off from the weight of all that stuff, or be too large in order to contain all the rocket fuel necessary for something of this size to be launched and travel to Mars.
I'm just wondering how you heat a large structure on Mars long term. It's colder than Antarctica. There are no hydrocarbons or oxygen. Nuclear?I think you lack imagination. Besides the initial 3D printers and robots, what stuff will have to be transported to Mars? Most of the raw material is there, all we need is energy.
HDPE plastic. It was covered.Not one word about what will be used to make all those windows, or where the resources will come from
HDPE plastic. It was covered.
NASA better hire you quickPlastic won't work.
The sandstorms on Mars would make Swiss Cheese out of any type of plastic used.
NASA better hire you quick
I think it's a suicide mission. If ANYTHING goes wrong they're dead.Not appealing living your life in such a small area.
Insulation with solar and/or nuclear. Not sure about hydrocarbons but there is plenty of oxygen, the poles are mostly CO2 and H2O.I'm just wondering how you heat a large structure on Mars long term. It's colder than Antarctica. There are no hydrocarbons or oxygen. Nuclear?
No free oxygen. Creating it takes power too. Nothing burns in Mars' near vacuum atmosphere of CO2. Besides, there's nothing to burn on MarsInsulation with solar and/or nuclear. Not sure about hydrocarbons but there is plenty of oxygen, the poles are mostly CO2 and H2O.
Everything takes energy. So? An enormous solar collector in space could supply microwave energy to antennas on the ground. Just one of many options.No free oxygen. Creating it takes power too. Nothing burns in Mars' near vacuum atmosphere of CO2. Besides, there's nothing to burn on Mars
Depends how you define 'god' but IMHO, we are already there. The difference between God and the animals is knowledge, the Biblical Tree. Animals only react to the world, only man can understand it, so we are above the animals and Genesis supports that.At that point in our human evolution, will we in essence become gods too?
I don't. I'm wondering hor they intend to heat a large space in temperatures far below Antarctica. Best option seems nuclear. Heat would be a great byproduct in the production of electrical energyEverything takes energy. So? An enormous solar collector in space could supply microwave energy to antennas on the ground. Just one of many options.
Why do you want to burn things anyway?
Thick soil insulation.I don't. I'm wondering hor they intend to heat a large space in temperatures far below Antarctica.
I doubt there are radioactive ores on Mars, too geologically quiet. Sending radioactive material from Earth into space seems way too dangerous. Solar is everywhere.Best option seems nuclear. Heat would be a great byproduct in the production of electrical energy