How about word maximum for OP?

[todd down under]

Nowhere CLOSE the example I gave.

Your posts are nothing but this.

 

[todd down under]

You’re nuts.

I'm accurate, karen.

 

[Lisa558]

I'm accurate, karen.

Just letting you know you may as well stop trolling me because I’m putting your ass on ignore.

 

[todd down under]

Just letting you know you may as well stop trolling me because I’m putting your ass on ignore.

You made the thread, and now you hide. Typical big mouth karen.

 

[Zebra]

some posts are so long that it takes ages to scroll them away.

A thousand words should be the max

 

[Zebra]

some postings take ages just for scrollling down
there should be a rule for the maximum

 

[justoffal]

some postings take ages just for scrollling down
there should be a rule for the maximum

ABSOLUTELY....

 

[Lisa558]

some postings take ages just for scrollling down
there should be a rule for the maximum

I end up skipping them.

 

[Delldude]

some postings take ages just for scrollling down
there should be a rule for the maximum

Kinda sorta.....

Copyright: Link each "Copy & Paste" to its source. Only paste a small to medium section of the material.

There's also copyright infringement issues, I've been on other boards where that is a big issue.

 

[Zebra]

Kinda sorta.....

Copyright: Link each "Copy & Paste" to its source. Only paste a small to medium section of the material.

There's also copyright infringement issues, I've been on other boards where that is a big issue.

yes, endless quotes are also a misery

 

[Lisa558]

yes, endless quotes are also a misery

What is needed is two or three paragraphs summarizing it, and then a link to the rest.

 

[Grau]

"EVEN BETTER..."

We have a requirement that OPs have at least two sentences. How about a maximum of, say, seven or eight paragraphs? The OP could SUMMARIZE the content and then link to the full description rather than post an entire book chapter (that is copied and pasted.)

This one is an example of what I mean:

Thread 'The exec branch is at war with the judiciary.'

Mar 21, 2025

History is repeating itself as I write this. The exec branch is at war with the judiciary. The headlines are replete with how Trump is trying to undermine the judiciary who is simply trying to constrain his authoritarian maneuvers. The very fact that Trump is doing this, is further evidence that the judiciary is correct, that Trump is trying to usurp the independence of the judiciary to acquire absolute power.

The founders created three co-equal branches of government precisely to prevent one of the branches from dominating the country where, if that would happen, fascism (tyranny) would...

• Rumpole

• 
• 
• 

Even better, how about a limit on the number of times you can howl:

"ANTI SEMITE"!

After all, without the meaningless term "anti Semite", our full time Zionist shills would be speechless.


Thank goodness for the many ethical Jews who expose our gaggle of relentless Zionist propagandists and their lowly accusations:


“Don’t be caught out by ‘the trick’”

Don’t be caught out by ‘the trick'

In August 2002 former Israeli Minister of Education Shulamit Aloni was interviewed on the radio and television program Democracy Now .

www.scoop.co.nz

EXCERPTS "“Well, it’s a trick, we always use it. When from Europe somebody is criticizing Israel, then we bring up the Holocaust. When in this country people are criticizing Israel, then they are anti-Semitic.....

And it’s very easy to blame people who criticize certain acts of the Israeli government as anti-Semitic, and to bring up the Holocaust, and the suffering of the Jewish people, and that is to justify everything we do to the Palestinians.”CONTINUED
Shulamit Aloni

 

[Zebra]

I think we shouldn't allow certified retards to routinely use the board as their personal blog.

and write endless monologues, but ignore questions

 

[Zebra]

Grau please do not derail the topic

 

[pal]

We have a requirement that OPs have at least two sentences. How about a maximum of, say, seven or eight paragraphs? The OP could SUMMARIZE the content and then link to the full description rather than post an entire book chapter (that is copied and pasted.)

This one is an example of what I mean:

Thread 'The exec branch is at war with the judiciary.'

Mar 21, 2025

History is repeating itself as I write this. The exec branch is at war with the judiciary. The headlines are replete with how Trump is trying to undermine the judiciary who is simply trying to constrain his authoritarian maneuvers. The very fact that Trump is doing this, is further evidence that the judiciary is correct, that Trump is trying to usurp the independence of the judiciary to acquire absolute power.

The founders created three co-equal branches of government precisely to prevent one of the branches from dominating the country where, if that would happen, fascism (tyranny) would...

• Rumpole

• 
• 
• 

Fascism, tyranny, but Russians are most fascists.

And 10+ million or 20+ million communists.

It is explained that fascism works in Russia.

 

[Lisa558]

Grau please do not derail the topic

Grau is a Jew-hater who can’t resist derailing every topic with his venom.

 

[Zebra]

What is needed is two or three paragraphs summarizing it, and then a link to the rest.

so it should be!

 

[Zebra]

Or more recently, an avalanche of AI/Chat GPT paragraphs that go on for pages. Ugh talk about TL;DR.

yes, it is a nuisance

 

[justoffal]

My own thought.

Sometimes, when I want to write a long essay, this format is pretty good and I enjoy it.

If I am just posting a link to someone else's work, then I just post a link and then maybe copy the most important paragraph.

Almost all of your posts are brief, concise and get right to the point.

I appreciate that.

It offers a greater opportunity for interchange.

 

[Zebra]

some write endless monologues