How about word maximum for OP?

Here's an example of Google AI's accuracy.

I feed birds, suet cakes, bells and a seed hopper. Lot's of birds, including predators. Usually when the birds aren't actively feeding, someone is lurking looking for dinner. I go out to get the mail, a bird about the size of a Red tail hawk launches off the tree near the porch. Big gray one, only saw it for a couple seconds, only saw it flying away from me. Later I went out and sat on the porch, this time the same one must have been on the roof. Fly's away again. I'm thinking maybe an owl. Only grey one close was a Great Horned Owl....this one was on the small side.

So I go to Google AI, I asked about Pennsylvania hawks,it said Red tail hawk or a Goshawk.

So I asked if there were any Goshawks in Plasticville, it said no they like big northern woods. OK.

So then I asked if I could expect to see a Goshawk in Plasticville, it said yes I could.???

So today I was watching a cooking channel on YT called Sip and Feast, the host was talking about looking up recipes on the net and commented that you really can't trust the internet for accuracy much anymore, then he said " especially Google AI, it's wrong all the time".

Duh...
That's for sure. I don't claim to be any kind of expert, but I have been following and/or creating recipes for a lot of decades now. What we see posted/demonstrated on the internet is often very off track as to amounts, combining flavor profiles, time to cook--they never take into account altitude and other variables--etc.

Impressed that you were watching a cooking channel though. You're my kind of guy. :)
 
Anything over a thousand words is an abuse of the top posting privilege. Maybe it would be different if this was an online magazine where the posters aspired to catch a slot in the publication? Since it is an interactive online rap cage more or less...
Shorter and more concise offerings are definitely more applicable.
i agree
 
Back
Top Bottom