House Discharge Petition re Epstein Files Will Pass

[Chuz Life]

It has to be because you have high ranking republicans implicated.

That's the only reason Mike Johnson would shut down the house just to prevent a vote on releasing the Epstein files.

Yeah, I'm done speculating and finger pointing.

I only want the facts now.

 

[Dorian Mode]

I have ready many of the earlier trial affidavidts and several of the girls did name others, one named Trump, before pulling her case "out of fear."

If you are looking for Trump's involvement with Epstein's girls, maybe there's a small chance. But don't you think Trump, being from Manhattan, didn't already have access to the world's top escorts and really didn't need Epstein, who was already a shady character? I strongly suspect Trump had thousands of encounters with escorts, and maybe some were underage. Wealthy and powerful people are just like that.

 

[postman]

that makes absolutely no common sense. Either he did or he didn't. Not all of the sudden oops. no, not logical. Once said, it's said. prove it

We know Trumps m.o. against Stormy Daniels (an adult woman) sending people to intimidate them, threaten them with legal action or bribe them to shut them up.

I imagine pretty much the same happened with the then 13 year-old Jane Doe who filed the lawsuit against Trump.

 

[Mac-7]

House Discharge Petition re Epstein Files Will Pass​

Remember Geraldo Rivera and Al Capone’s vault

The Mystery of Al Capone's Vault Was the Greatest Letdown in Live TV History : The Retro Network

In all of television history, few events have blended lore, media spectacle, and anticlimax quite like The Mystery of Al Capone’s Vault. On April 21, 1986, millions of Americans tuned in to watch what was CONTINUE READING...

theretronetwork.com

 

[OldFlame]

It has to be because you have high ranking republicans implicated.

That's the only reason Mike Johnson would shut down the house just to prevent a vote on releasing the Epstein files.

And yet none of you with these theories can explain why Biden didn't go after them? You're saying they had the evidence and sat on it, all while screaming that 'democracy' was being destroyed. Laughable.

 

[postman]

Yeah, cause we can't do both.

Yeah, it's more important to catch somebody who's been living her lawfully for the last decade, than to stop people buying and selling underage girls into the sex trade.

Priorities are priorities.

 

[Chuz Life]

She died in April of 2025 and had settled a suit with Prince Andrew in civil court in February of 2022. She was not murdered.

My theory is that they publicly threaten to release names and then wait for offers to come in to stay quiet. Either way, it doesn't look good.

She released a video that said, "if you are watching this, I was murdered."

 

[OldFlame]

Yeah, it's more important to catch somebody who's been living her lawfully for the last decade, than to stop people buying and selling underage girls into the sex trade.

Priorities are priorities.

Yeah, they're all living here 'lawfully'.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Of course, with the names.

Then I go back to my question: the names of known Johns or alleged Johns?

If our government puts out a video with a picture of a man on Epstein island and the caption "Harold Jones of Shady Grove, Kansas," does Harold Jones get a forum to defend himself or is he guilty without indictment or trial?

 

[Dorian Mode]

She died in April of 2025 and had settled a suit with Prince Andrew in civil court in February of 2022. She was not murdered.

My theory is that they publicly threaten to release names and then wait for offers to come in to stay quiet. Either way, it doesn't look good.

Maybe she asked for more money or she would release even worse photos? We will never know the truth now, that's for sure.

 

[Lesh]

Yes we will. I hope she signs it so goes for a vote, then we'll see how many D's actually vote for it, it should pass and go to the Senate. Then we'll see how many D's vote for it there, it will be very interesting.

Virtually all of them.

How many Republicans vote for it will be revealing

 

[jc456]

We know Trumps m.o. against Stormy Daniels (an adult woman) sending people to intimidate them, threaten them with legal action or bribe them to shut them up.

what's this prove? you got nothing child.

I imagine pretty much the same happened with the then 13 year-old Jane Doe who filed the lawsuit against Trump.

not even Epstein ever was with a 13 year old. just go away, I grow tired of your lack of concern for children. You back demofks who are brutalizing children right now due to the children mental issues. Outside parental authority at that. Go play with yourself.

 

[Lesh]

I think if they did that they open themselves up to the whistleblower act and I say there is a few copies of it around the place...

The biggest issue if they are kept on servers (scans, emails....) they are consistently backed and each backup has a copy...

You would have to find all those back ups and erase them from each back up in a hyper consistent way... This has to be done by people who are good enough to do it and corrupt enough to not tell anyone...

It is very hard to keep a secret... The WH leaks like a sieve because of this, they have no discipline.. This because Trump chooses loyalty over professionalism...

Get caught doing that and wham…

 

[jc456]

Yeah, it's more important to catch somebody who's been living her lawfully for the last decade, than to stop people buying and selling underage girls into the sex trade.

Priorities are priorities.

who let in the sex traffickers in 2021 to 2024? yeah, again, fk you and go play with yourself.

 

[Chuz Life]

If you are looking for Trump's involvement with Epstein's girls, maybe there's a small chance. But don't you think Trump, being from Manhattan, didn't already have access to the world's top escorts and really didn't need Epstein, who was already a shady character? I strongly suspect Trump had thousands of encounters with escorts, and maybe some were underage. Wealthy and powerful people are just like that.

Trumps actions and inactions are the ONLY reason I suspect Trump had any involvement at all, well. . . besides the one underaged girl that "named" him in her affidavidt.

If Trump was completely forthcoming, since that affidavidt, I would have little curiosity at all - mainly because that Jane doe's attorney was a leftarded "Patent Attorney" and the whole thing COULD have been a political hit.

It's Trump's actions, since that makes me think there is something else to be revealed.

 

[Chuz Life]

Yeah, it's more important to catch somebody who's been living her lawfully for the last decade, than to stop people buying and selling underage girls into the sex trade.

Priorities are priorities.

/ignoring you now.

Click!

 

[Mac-7]

It has to be because you have high ranking republicans implicated.

That's the only reason Mike Johnson would shut down the house just to prevent a vote on releasing the Epstein files.

So why didnt biden release the files?

 

[leftwinger]

How TF is this a democrat witch hunt? If Biden had released all the information, it would've exposed the left as much as Trump. So they protect each other.

If one side spills the beans, when the other side gets the chance, they'll spill the beans on the other. So they protect each other.

Just like Trump protected Hillary about her emails and Benghazi.

The middlers lol! Lumping Trump in w/o any proof he was at the resort island or on any long plane flights like "others". You and your butt-buddies are as phony as a $3 bill.

 

[jc456]

Trumps actions and inactions are the ONLY reason I suspect Trump had any involvement at all, well. . . besides the one underaged girl that "named" him in her affidavidt.

If Trump was completely forthcoming, since that affidavidt, I would have little curiosity at all - mainly because that Jane doe's attorney was a leftarded "Patent Attorney" and the whole thing COULD have been a political hit.

It's Trump's actions, since that makes me think there is something else to be revealed.

like what? what trump actions are you referring to?

 

[Chuz Life]

Then I go back to my question: the names of known Johns or alleged Johns?

If our government puts out a video with a picture of a man on Epstein island and the caption "Harold Jones of Shady Grove, Kansas," does Harold Jones get a forum to defend himself or is he guilty without indictment or trial?

The names would be vetted/ verified by the authorities. The person accused would be brought in and questioned FIRST.