House Discharge Petition re Epstein Files Will Pass

[Dorian Mode]

Then I go back to my question: the names of known Johns or alleged Johns?

If our government puts out a video with a picture of a man on Epstein island and the caption "Harold Jones of Shady Grove, Kansas," does Harold Jones get a forum to defend himself or is he guilty without indictment or trial?

Can you imagine a prosecutor trying to get these Johns put in jail? The defense attorneys will have a blast shooting everything down, and until airtight conclusive evidence is presented it's all one's word against another's. So, there are most likely many people who went to Epstein for the girls, and there are many people who went with Epstein and didn't use the girls. How can we wreck the lives of the guilty without wrecking the lives of the innocent?

 

[jc456]

The middlers lol! Lumping Trump in w/o any proof he was at the resort island or on any long plane flights like "others". You and your butt-buddies are as phony as a $3 bill.

so far no one's been identified going to the island, not even slick willie.

 

[jc456]

The names would be vetted/ verified by the authorities. The person accused would be brought in and questioned FIRST.

massie already claimed he has the names, yet stays silent. that's embarrassing.

 

[Chuz Life]

like what? what trump actions are you referring to?

Saying he will release the files and then stalling it, tricking it out, etc.

Letting Maxwell be transferred to a Min security "Club Fed" facility to do her time, and the likelyhood that he will pardon her.

 

[postman]

how many fbi do you think we got?

name a name fker, name one person a victim has stated.

Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Document 4 Filed 10/03/16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------
JANE DOE, proceeding under a pseudonym,
Plaintiff,
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP and
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
Defendants.

COMPLAINT FOR RAPE, SEXUAL MISCONDUCT, CRIMINAL SEXUAL ACTS,
SEXUAL ABUSE, FORCIBLE TOUCHING, ASSAULT, BATTERY, INTENTIONAL
AND RECKLESS INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, DURESS, FALSE
IMPRISONMENT, AND DEFAMATION


Plaintiff was subject to acts of rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts,
sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and reckless infliction of emotional
distress, duress, false imprisonment, and threats of death and/or serious bodily injury by the
Defendants that took place at several parties during the summer months of 1994. The parties were held by Defendant Epstein at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant
Epstein at 9 E. 71st St. in Manhattan. During this period, Plaintiff was a minor of age 13 and was legally incapable under New York law of consenting to sexual intercourse and the other sexual contacts detailed herein. NY Penal L § 130.05(3)(a).

 

[Chuz Life]

Can you imagine a prosecutor trying to get these Johns put in jail? The defense attorneys will have a blast shooting everything down, and until airtight conclusive evidence is presented it's all one's word against another's. So, there are most likely many people who went to Epstein for the girls, and there are many people who went with Epstein and didn't use the girls. How can we wreck the lives of the guilty without wrecking the lives of the innocent?

We don't wreck the lives of the guilty.

They did that to themselves.

 

[jc456]

Saying he will release the files and then stalling it, tricking it out, etc.

Letting Maxwell be transferred to a Min security "Club Fed" facility to do her time, and the likelyhood that he will pardon her.

again, if there are no fking files how can he release what doesn't exist? How do you know there are any?

 

[Chuz Life]

so far no one's been identified going to the island, not even slick willie.

If we had a ******* media with any backbone, we would at least have reporters questioning those who we KNOW were on the flight logs.

 

[Chuz Life]

again, if there are no fking files how can he release what doesn't exist? How do you know there are any?

"They are on my desk" - Bondi

 

[OldFlame]

She released a video that said, "if you are watching this, I was murdered."

She posted that in 2019, and she had a very rough life from the time she was young, up until she died. She was suffering from renal failure and mental conditions from abuse by her husband when she died. Her family has said nothing about foul play, you can't even find anywhere that states how she killed herself.

 

[jc456]

Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Document 4 Filed 10/03/16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------
JANE DOE, proceeding under a pseudonym,
Plaintiff,
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP and
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
Defendants.

COMPLAINT FOR RAPE, SEXUAL MISCONDUCT, CRIMINAL SEXUAL ACTS,
SEXUAL ABUSE, FORCIBLE TOUCHING, ASSAULT, BATTERY, INTENTIONAL
AND RECKLESS INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, DURESS, FALSE
IMPRISONMENT, AND DEFAMATION


Plaintiff was subject to acts of rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts,
sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and reckless infliction of emotional
distress, duress, false imprisonment, and threats of death and/or serious bodily injury by the
Defendants that took place at several parties during the summer months of 1994. The parties were held by Defendant Epstein at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant
Epstein at 9 E. 71st St. in Manhattan. During this period, Plaintiff was a minor of age 13 and was legally incapable under New York law of consenting to sexual intercourse and the other sexual contacts detailed herein. NY Penal L § 130.05(3)(a).

so nothing. Where's Jane? Let's hear from her lawyer, let's hear where what when and who?

what happened to the case?

 

[Dorian Mode]

Trumps actions and inactions are the ONLY reason I suspect Trump had any involvement at all, well. . . besides the one underaged girl that "named" him in her affidavidt.

Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Document 4 Filed 10/03/16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------
JANE DOE, proceeding under a pseudonym,
Plaintiff,
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP and
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
Defendants.

COMPLAINT FOR RAPE, SEXUAL MISCONDUCT, CRIMINAL SEXUAL ACTS,
SEXUAL ABUSE, FORCIBLE TOUCHING, ASSAULT, BATTERY, INTENTIONAL
AND RECKLESS INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, DURESS, FALSE
IMPRISONMENT, AND DEFAMATION


Plaintiff was subject to acts of rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts,
sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and reckless infliction of emotional
distress, duress, false imprisonment, and threats of death and/or serious bodily injury by the
Defendants that took place at several parties during the summer months of 1994. The parties were held by Defendant Epstein at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant
Epstein at 9 E. 71st St. in Manhattan. During this period, Plaintiff was a minor of age 13 and was legally incapable under New York law of consenting to sexual intercourse and the other sexual contacts detailed herein. NY Penal L § 130.05(3)(a).

Are you talking about this? Look at the date. October 2016 right before the election. I think this was deposited to be an October Surprise and it was quickly identified as such and closed. Also, that Giuffre video has already been debunked as a fake.

 

[jc456]

"They are on my desk" - Bondi

Not sure what you think that meant?

 

[OldFlame]

The names would be vetted/ verified by the authorities. The person accused would be brought in and questioned FIRST.

I'm assuming that's already been done, and they don't have enough evidence for an indictment. If not, what then? Do they still release the names anyway?

 

[jc456]

If we had a ******* media with any backbone, we would at least have reporters questioning those who we KNOW were on the flight logs.

again, not sure what you think exists. What we do know today is the FBI didn't use a warrant when they went to Epstein NY home, so no video tapes were removed. When they finally did get a warrant, all the tapes were gone. Those are known facts today. So whatever video tapes you think anyone has, let's get passed the facts first.

 

[leftwinger]

/ignoring you now.

Click!

Why? Youre as bad or worse than postman.

 

[Chuz Life]

Are you talking about this? Look at the date. October 2016 right before the election. I think this was deposited to be an October Surprise and it was quickly identified as such and closed. Also, that Giuffre video has already been debunked as a fake.

Evidence of "it was quickly identified as such and closed" can be found, where?

The court proceedings claimed that the case was pulled under duress out of fear.

As for the Giuffre video, I will look into that. This is the first time I've see it alleged to be fake and NO community notes on X are saying that.

 

[Dorian Mode]

We don't wreck the lives of the guilty.

They did that to themselves.

But you can very easily wreck the lives of the innocent with a charge of sex predator.

 

[Chuz Life]

Why? Youre as bad or worse than postman.

So, put me on ignore.

I'm adding you now.

 

[leftwinger]

Can you imagine a prosecutor trying to get these Johns put in jail? The defense attorneys will have a blast shooting everything down, and until airtight conclusive evidence is presented it's all one's word against another's. So, there are most likely many people who went to Epstein for the girls, and there are many people who went with Epstein and didn't use the girls. How can we wreck the lives of the guilty without wrecking the lives of the innocent?

These boards Stain maggots dont want facts or legal information. They just want dirt on Trump. Or the story that he is hiding names. The court hid names during the Epstein trial, not Trump. Obiden 2 people had access also