Disagree. I have proven my claim. You changed my statements every time. You change the OP every time. Words have meaning. Changing the words changes the context. All I have to do to prove my claim is prove that a gun can't be used if it does not exist. Your claim is well they'll just find another one. That's not what I'm claiming. I'm not claiming that someone can't use a different weapon. I'm claiming that a gun can't be used if it does not exist.You refuse to prove your claim because you know you cannot.The tax stamp process includeS ENDING ALL SALES TO THE PEOPLE (PUBLIC) OF MACHINE GUNS BUILT AFTER A CERTAIN DATE, YA MORON. THOSE OLD WEAPONS THAT YOU ARE ALLOWED TO BUY... THEY ARE QUICKLY BECOMING HISTORICAL ARTIFACTS, ANCIENT HISTORY. THE TAX STAMP ITSELF IS JUST ONE SMALL ELEMENT OF THE PROCESS, YA MORON.You're a ******* moron that thinks guns can be used even when those guns do not ******* exist.You must be the dumbest human being on the planet.
Yeah says the stupid **** who thinks tax stamps keep criminals from getting "machine" guns.......you sir, are the stupid ****....
Really...who believes that.....You are the ******* moron who thinks putting a tax stamp on something makes them disappear.....you should try pixie dust next...it works just as well......
Fail: You.
Disagree?
Soundly respond to post # 850.
