SwimExpert
Gold Member
- Nov 26, 2013
- 16,247
- 1,680
- 280
- Banned
- #21
Yeah... not a chance
Then why did you say it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah... not a chance
It is a conversational or debate technique known as facetiousness.
It is a conversational or debate technique known as facetiousness.
So directly contradicting yourself and possibly lying is what you call being facetious? You need to make up your mind. Does global warming cause more ice or less ice?
Yeah... not a chance
Now this is impressive, I wonder how long it has been since the Antarctic sea ice was at this level?
You know that sea ice isn't pack ice, right? Sea ice is seasonal...and is not what has scientists concerned.
Oh, gee looky here. It's that falsified graph AGAIN!
A note:
This has sort of been talked around - someone pointed out that Antarctica's sea ice was seasonal but I'm not sure the actual meaning of that got through.
EVERY SHRED of Antarctica's sea ice MELTS each and every summer. That's one point (IanC, if your're reading this) that makes the Arctic ice more significant than the Antarctic. Most of the stuff up north used to hang around all year. None of it down south has EVER hung around the entire year.
Oh, gee looky here. It's that falsified graph AGAIN!
Oh, gee looky here. It's Westwalls insipid, unsubstantiated assertions. Where's your evidence?
Yeah... not a chance
EVERY SHRED of Antarctica's sea ice MELTS each and every summer. That's one point (IanC, if your're reading this) that makes the Arctic ice more significant than the Antarctic. Most of the stuff up north used to hang around all year. None of it down south has EVER hung around the entire year.
See that grey area on both sides of the solid grey line? Do you see that? That is the ANTARCTIC SEA ICE EXTENT with the light grey being the two standard deviations extent for the last 29 years.
Do you see any point there where there was NO ice?
Frank, why don't you save everyone a headache and just stay away from conversations for which you lack the background to make intelligent comments?
I'll give you a hint, though. Read the label on the vertical axis and think about it.
And why do you think it's doing that?
Not because the place is getting any colder. Perhaps because of a warmer ocean surrounding the place.
See that grey area on both sides of the solid grey line? Do you see that? That is the ANTARCTIC SEA ICE EXTENT with the light grey being the two standard deviations extent for the last 29 years.
Do you see any point there where there was NO ice?
Nope. Looks like I overspoke. I took an "almost no" to mean "no. Mea culpa.
However, AGW is still valid.