Steven_R
Tommy Vercetti Fan Club
- Jul 17, 2013
- 4,852
- 930
- 245
I'm not a sovereign citizen but when I walk into a courtroom, I AM The Sovereign.
You're a judge?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not a sovereign citizen but when I walk into a courtroom, I AM The Sovereign.
The Holocaust happened, but it was not an "evil" thing. Those who do not believe the Holocaust occurred are not "evil" or "immoral" either.
I believe America needs a Holocaust of its own. I would totally support it, and would convince others to support it as well. Instead of destroying Jews, however, it is time America initiated its own improved Eugenics program and culled the...
What can you do with a kid who comes home and tells you that the Holocaust didn't exist? Explain that the education system sometimes teaches falsehoods and he needs to think for himself?
Take him to the library.
If he continues to believe the Holocaust didn't happen, kick him to the curb because there's no curing stupid.
After WWII, Gen. Eisenhower, Churchiil, and Charles de Gaulle, all wrote multi-volumed books about their experiences in the war.
And yet there was not a single mention of the so called Holocaust or gas chambers in their exhaustive memoirs. ..![]()
I haven't read them, so I can't comment on them...yet, the Germans themselves kept meticulous records...for example the horrific human medical experiments done on children...and, there were the military members who liberated the concentration camps, discovered the mass graves (also documented photographically) and the gas chambers.
....just saying![]()
3,000 TONS of evidence introduced in the Nuremburg trials. Another ton of photos, human remains, and evidence collected by Allied toops. Some partially burned, the Nazis could not burn it all however; and thousands of eyewitnesses. The evil in human form at Nurenburg gave detailed confessions along with the finger pointing at each other.
How does a human address them? Is ignoring them immoral? Shouldn't they be confronted?
People who deny that Israel is massacring more Palestinians than they need to including civilians. How do you address them? Is ignoring them immoral? Shouldn't they be confronted?
The IDF has bombed over 3,000 buildings, yet has killed less than half that number of people.
If Hamas allowed people to respond to Israel's warnings even fewer Gazans would have been killed.
Either that or Israel really sucks when it comes to killing people.
People who deny that Israel is massacring more Palestinians than they need to including civilians. How do you address them? Is ignoring them immoral? Shouldn't they be confronted?
The IDF has bombed over 3,000 buildings, yet has killed less than half that number of people.
If Hamas allowed people to respond to Israel's warnings even fewer Gazans would have been killed.
Either that or Israel really sucks when it comes to killing people.
The Israelis are doing to the Gazans what the Nazis did to them.
'Never again' has become, 'ah well this is different'.
The IDF has bombed over 3,000 buildings, yet has killed less than half that number of people.
If Hamas allowed people to respond to Israel's warnings even fewer Gazans would have been killed.
Either that or Israel really sucks when it comes to killing people.
The Israelis are doing to the Gazans what the Nazis did to them.
'Never again' has become, 'ah well this is different'.
There are injustices and inequalities -- but it's not comparable to the Nazi's.
Gas chambers? no.
Inhuman medical experiments? no.
Concentration camps? no.
2/3rds of the Palistinian population slaughtered? no
not even close on either scale or intent
Does someone care to offer a precise description of "Holocaust denier"?
How does a human address them? Is ignoring them immoral? Shouldn't they be confronted?
With the simple phrase "Fuck you."
Added: I think the biggest problem with discussing people like Holocaust Deniers or Sovereign Citizens or Truthers isn't in trying to show them they are wrong, but rather it gives them some sense of legitimacy in the eyes of many people. Instead of simply dismissing them publically by saying "here are the facts, now go be crazy somewhere else" is that by having any dialog with them, it gives the impression that their ideas are worth discussing and publically debating in the first place.
Certainly the least stressful for rational humans. Thank you.
Does someone care to offer a precise description of "Holocaust denier"?
Still waiting for guidance on this.![]()
I watched a program on Netflix recently about a lamp alleged to have been made of human skin from one of the "death" camps. This Jewish journalist went through the process of DNA testing, even testing the metal framework of the shade as well as the stitching material to see if all of it would be consistent with materials common to the era of WW 2. During the program there was lots of archival footage of horrendous images of thousands of emaciated corpses, the kind of stuff we have all seen, real emotion-driving stuff, truly horrible.
As it turns out, the lampshade was made of cowhide, and upon hearing the discovery, you could see the disappointment in the journalist's face. This Jewish man WANTED this lamp to be human skin. Why?
Does someone care to offer a precise description of "Holocaust denier"?
Still waiting for guidance on this.![]()
It's anyone who questions anything about it. No matter how small or seemingly insignificant.
I watched a program on Netflix recently about a lamp alleged to have been made of human skin from one of the "death" camps. This Jewish journalist went through the process of DNA testing, even testing the metal framework of the shade as well as the stitching material to see if all of it would be consistent with materials common to the era of WW 2. During the program there was lots of archival footage of horrendous images of thousands of emaciated corpses, the kind of stuff we have all seen, real emotion-driving stuff, truly horrible.
As it turns out, the lampshade was made of cowhide, and upon hearing the discovery, you could see the disappointment in the journalist's face. This Jewish man WANTED this lamp to be human skin. Why?
WHY--because he wanted confirmation of the propaganda and because it would have been worth more money.
I watched a program on Netflix recently about a lamp alleged to have been made of human skin from one of the "death" camps. This Jewish journalist went through the process of DNA testing, even testing the metal framework of the shade as well as the stitching material to see if all of it would be consistent with materials common to the era of WW 2. During the program there was lots of archival footage of horrendous images of thousands of emaciated corpses, the kind of stuff we have all seen, real emotion-driving stuff, truly horrible.
As it turns out, the lampshade was made of cowhide, and upon hearing the discovery, you could see the disappointment in the journalist's face. This Jewish man WANTED this lamp to be human skin. Why?
WHY--because he wanted confirmation of the propaganda and because it would have been worth more money.
And you 'know' that exactly how?