Hit Them Hard..Now...Don'tHave Another December 7th

[fncceo]

Hit Them NOW! They are the enemy NOW!

Because they expelled a few journalists?

Hell. The Saudi's murdered a journalist and got a slap on the wrist.

Let's be fair, who hasn't wanted to murder a journalist?

 

[Uncensored2008]

[

No. He wasn't. Idiot.

Lie much?

Even the sleazy ******* NY Times admits as much.

For Khashoggi, a Tangled Mix of Royal Service and Islamist Sympathies

Nope. But you sure are. I read the article. Did you?

Part of it, even the Times acknowledged he was and islamist - like you.

{
This is not to suggest that the killing of Khashoggi is justified. It is, however, meant to observe that characterizations of him in the media are not fully accurate. He’s depicted as a “reformer,” a “democracy advocate” and a “journalist.” Yet these are half-truths that obscure the political role Khashoggi played.

Before anything else, he was a regime insider. He was a close associate of senior members of the royal family who were eclipsed by the new crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman.

Khashoggi was not merely a pen for hire. He represented a particular political perspective. An Islamist, his views on major issues consistently tracked with those of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Last September, for example, he lamented the crown prince’s new policy.

“Saudi Arabia,” Khashoggi said, “is the mother and father of political Islam.” But the Saudi government was forsaking this tradition. “Today,” the kingdom has turned against its very nature and is “fighting political Islam.” As a consequence, its “compass is lost.”}

https://nypost.com/2018/10/18/why-the-saudis-despised-jamal-khashoggi/

So why did you lie about him then?

What did I lie about? Be specific? Khashoggi was an Islamist, like you. Radical, Al Quids. Letting women walk alone, drive, shop, outraged him. He needed women repressed, as you obviously do.

 

[Coyote]

[

No. He wasn't. Idiot.

Lie much?

Even the sleazy ******* NY Times admits as much.

For Khashoggi, a Tangled Mix of Royal Service and Islamist Sympathies

Nope. But you sure are. I read the article. Did you?

Part of it, even the Times acknowledged he was and islamist - like you.

{
This is not to suggest that the killing of Khashoggi is justified. It is, however, meant to observe that characterizations of him in the media are not fully accurate. He’s depicted as a “reformer,” a “democracy advocate” and a “journalist.” Yet these are half-truths that obscure the political role Khashoggi played.

Before anything else, he was a regime insider. He was a close associate of senior members of the royal family who were eclipsed by the new crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman.

Khashoggi was not merely a pen for hire. He represented a particular political perspective. An Islamist, his views on major issues consistently tracked with those of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Last September, for example, he lamented the crown prince’s new policy.

“Saudi Arabia,” Khashoggi said, “is the mother and father of political Islam.” But the Saudi government was forsaking this tradition. “Today,” the kingdom has turned against its very nature and is “fighting political Islam.” As a consequence, its “compass is lost.”}

https://nypost.com/2018/10/18/why-the-saudis-despised-jamal-khashoggi/

So why did you lie about him then?

What did I lie about? Be specific? Khashoggi was an Islamist, like you. Radical, Al Quids. Letting women walk alone, drive, shop, outraged him. He needed women repressed, as you obviously do.

Now you are lying again. When you can achieve something close to truth, we will continue this discussion.

Later.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Lie much?

Even the sleazy ******* NY Times admits as much.

For Khashoggi, a Tangled Mix of Royal Service and Islamist Sympathies

Nope. But you sure are. I read the article. Did you?

Part of it, even the Times acknowledged he was and islamist - like you.

{
This is not to suggest that the killing of Khashoggi is justified. It is, however, meant to observe that characterizations of him in the media are not fully accurate. He’s depicted as a “reformer,” a “democracy advocate” and a “journalist.” Yet these are half-truths that obscure the political role Khashoggi played.

Before anything else, he was a regime insider. He was a close associate of senior members of the royal family who were eclipsed by the new crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman.

Khashoggi was not merely a pen for hire. He represented a particular political perspective. An Islamist, his views on major issues consistently tracked with those of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Last September, for example, he lamented the crown prince’s new policy.

“Saudi Arabia,” Khashoggi said, “is the mother and father of political Islam.” But the Saudi government was forsaking this tradition. “Today,” the kingdom has turned against its very nature and is “fighting political Islam.” As a consequence, its “compass is lost.”}

https://nypost.com/2018/10/18/why-the-saudis-despised-jamal-khashoggi/

So why did you lie about him then?

What did I lie about? Be specific? Khashoggi was an Islamist, like you. Radical, Al Quids. Letting women walk alone, drive, shop, outraged him. He needed women repressed, as you obviously do.

Now you are lying again. When you can achieve something close to truth, we will continue this discussion.

Later.

How unimpressive. If you're going to call me a liar, point out the specific lie? Ah but you can't. You're angry that your Islamist buddy is exposed for what he is.

Maybe you can spew some hatred of Jews to make yourself feel better....