Hillary "scrubbed" From Benghazi

Benghazi? 9/11? I thought PC was talking about THIS one that got a pass even though the Repub admin was warned to be vigilant:

5lZF73D.jpg

That was basically something else.

The worst intelligence failure in American History that resulted in the deaths of close to 3000 Americans, gets one investigation, nearly a year after 9/11, is done behind closed doors and blames no one. In fact a good amount of it that implicated the Saudis is redacted.

Benghazi?

What are we on the 9th "investigation"?
 
Benghazi has become a net win for the Democrats. Americans understand that the ME is a dangerous place and that attacks of Americans over there are old news. Each time it comes up, the voters will wonder why the witch hunt is going on.

It won't be a factor in 2014 or 2016.
This old voter is wondering why in hell our Army isn't over there killing terrorists like cockroaches. And BTW, the Democrats are only winning scorn and contempt from loyal Americans.



Take another look at who the President is, and his record vis-a-vis the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamists.
Obamessiah has a host of MB in the Administration and he has already stated if the world situation gets down to the nitty gritty, he is going to go with Islam. (That tells me the war is with Islam and not just with terrorist Islamists) I have a video of him saying that at a Muslim conference which I can post if the Left wingnuts doubt me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
post it, you know they will doubt you and call you a liar.

everyone knows (every one with a scintilla of a brain) liberals are liars, thus liberliars ! :up:
 
Why is Benghazi such an albatross to the administration?

Because of what they were doing there. Rumors that it was a rendition sight and even a stopping point for weapons headed to Syria that ended up going to ISIS.

Yeah, everyone in the Administration wants to avoid investigations that might bring to light exactly what was going on there.

It's an "albatross" because of a well funded media blitz and "in the pocket" politicians that take orders from obscenely rich guys.
 
Benghazi has become a net win for the Democrats. Americans understand that the ME is a dangerous place and that attacks of Americans over there are old news. Each time it comes up, the voters will wonder why the witch hunt is going on.

It won't be a factor in 2014 or 2016.




Benghazi has become a net win for the Democrats. Americans understand that the ME is a dangerous place and that attacks of Americans over there are old news. Each time it comes up, the voters will wonder why the witch hunt is going on.

It won't be a factor in 2014 or 2016.

You bet your ass the ME is a dangeruos place. You can also bet your ass the embassy Staff at Benghazi thought their bosses, The ******* State Department, had their backs. Guess not. They are now busily covering their own asses.

You might think Benghazi is a winner for the Dems but I doubt it.

Politically it is.

In the light of the Great Bush Iraqi misadventure where 4,000+ Americans died and tens of thousands were injured for absolutely zero real gain to our nation, the GOP fetish (I was going to say obsession but fetish is more appropriate...it's an obscene fixation that only they get pleasure out of) with Ben-Gotcha looks frankly stupid.

What will look stupid in 2016 (and frankly, 2014) is the constant refrain you have repeated again: "Blaming Bush."

Much more effective will be the Sound-bite of Hillary in front of a Congressional Committee wondering about their Benghazi Investigation in a somewhat hysterical tone; "Why does THIS EVEN MATTER?!" I'd make sure there were also plenty of footage of the burning embassy, flag draped ambassador's coffin, and weeping family.
 
Benghazi has become a net win for the Democrats. Americans understand that the ME is a dangerous place and that attacks of Americans over there are old news. Each time it comes up, the voters will wonder why the witch hunt is going on.

It won't be a factor in 2014 or 2016.




Benghazi has become a net win for the Democrats. Americans understand that the ME is a dangerous place and that attacks of Americans over there are old news. Each time it comes up, the voters will wonder why the witch hunt is going on.

It won't be a factor in 2014 or 2016.

You bet your ass the ME is a dangeruos place. You can also bet your ass the embassy Staff at Benghazi thought their bosses, The ******* State Department, had their backs. Guess not. They are now busily covering their own asses.

You might think Benghazi is a winner for the Dems but I doubt it.

Politically it is.

In the light of the Great Bush Iraqi misadventure where 4,000+ Americans died and tens of thousands were injured for absolutely zero real gain to our nation, the GOP fetish (I was going to say obsession but fetish is more appropriate...it's an obscene fixation that only they get pleasure out of) with Ben-Gotcha looks frankly stupid.

What will look stupid in 2016 (and frankly, 2014) is the constant refrain you have repeated again: "Blaming Bush."

Much more effective will be the Sound-bite of Hillary in front of a Congressional Committee wondering about their Benghazi Investigation in a somewhat hysterical tone; "Why does THIS EVEN MATTER?!" I'd make sure there were also plenty of footage of the burning embassy, flag draped ambassador's coffin, and weeping family.

I hope they run with that.

Seriously.

It will be a bigger landslide.

Watching conservatism utterly destroyed in 2016 will be a joy.
 
It really is appalling. When Nixon's abuses came to light, the GOP held him accountable - and he resigned.

What we have now in the Obama Administration is an Organized Crime Syndicate with Harry as a Fixer.

And in this era of complete mis-trust between the GOP and Obama, do you think for a second that there would be any hesitation from the House to impeach him if there was any evidence of high crimes being committed? The only one talking about impeachment is crazy old Sarah Palin and the GOP couldn't distance itself fast enough from her.

I can't recall another President who kicked off his relationship with leaders from the other party with "I Won". Obama has actually tried to work with Congress, let alone the GOP.
 
Benghazi has become a net win for the Democrats. Americans understand that the ME is a dangerous place and that attacks of Americans over there are old news. Each time it comes up, the voters will wonder why the witch hunt is going on.

It won't be a factor in 2014 or 2016.




Benghazi has become a net win for the Democrats. Americans understand that the ME is a dangerous place and that attacks of Americans over there are old news. Each time it comes up, the voters will wonder why the witch hunt is going on.

It won't be a factor in 2014 or 2016.

You bet your ass the ME is a dangeruos place. You can also bet your ass the embassy Staff at Benghazi thought their bosses, The ******* State Department, had their backs. Guess not. They are now busily covering their own asses.

You might think Benghazi is a winner for the Dems but I doubt it.

Politically it is.

In the light of the Great Bush Iraqi misadventure where 4,000+ Americans died and tens of thousands were injured for absolutely zero real gain to our nation, the GOP fetish (I was going to say obsession but fetish is more appropriate...it's an obscene fixation that only they get pleasure out of) with Ben-Gotcha looks frankly stupid.

What will look stupid in 2016 (and frankly, 2014) is the constant refrain you have repeated again: "Blaming Bush."

Much more effective will be the Sound-bite of Hillary in front of a Congressional Committee wondering about their Benghazi Investigation in a somewhat hysterical tone; "Why does THIS EVEN MATTER?!" I'd make sure there were also plenty of footage of the burning embassy, flag draped ambassador's coffin, and weeping family.

I hope they run with that.

Seriously.

It will be a bigger landslide.

Watching conservatism utterly destroyed in 2016 will be a joy.

Yep, it will be 2014 all over again!

:itsok:
 
Benghazi? 9/11? I thought PC was talking about THIS one that got a pass even though the Repub admin was warned to be vigilant:

5lZF73D.jpg

That was basically something else.

The worst intelligence failure in American History that resulted in the deaths of close to 3000 Americans, gets one investigation, nearly a year after 9/11, is done behind closed doors and blames no one. In fact a good amount of it that implicated the Saudis is redacted.

Benghazi?

What are we on the 9th "investigation"?




"The worst intelligence failure in American History...."

Absolutely!

And the provenance was the Liberals/Democrats in Congress.

Here...let me show you:


"The real aberration occurred in the mid-1970s when the United States granted its legislative branch the greatest control over intelligence matters of any Western nation, and overturned the system which had prevailed in the United States since the Founding.


The damage done to the CIA by this congressional oversight regime (Democrat-controlled Pike and Church Committees) is quite extensive. The committees increased the number of CIA officials subject to Senate confirmation, condemned the agency for its contacts with unscrupulous characters, prohibited any further contact with these bad characters, insisted that the United States not engage or assist in any coup which may harm a foreign leader, and overwhelmed the agency with interminable requests for briefings (some 600 alone in 1996).


[A]s Henry Kissinger once observed about the [Democrat] Church Committee, that it is an illusion that “tranquility can be achieved by an abstract purity of motive for which history offers no example.” It is precisely this illusion which has prevailed in congressional circles since the heyday of [Democrat] Frank Church and Otis Pike. As Church himself once argued, the United States should not “fight fire with fire . . . evil with evil.”


[Democrat] Senator Robert Torricelli of New Jersey, who led the charge in the mid-1990s to prevent the CIA from hiring unsavory characters. Torricelli rallied to the defense of State Department employee Robert Nuccio, who leaked classified material dealing with CIA operations in Guatemala to Torricelli, who in turn held a press conference and revealed the information to the media. It was these revelations that led to congressional restrictions on the ability of agents in the field to deal with “bad people.”

[C]hairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Joseph Biden,…[t]he Delaware Democrat was one of seventeen Senators who voted in 1974 to ban all covert operations, and proudly noted during his 1988 campaign for president that he had threatened to “go public” with covert action plans by the Reagan administration, causing them to cancel the operations."
History News Network Congressional Oversight and the Crippling of the CIA



And 3000 of our brothers and sisters paid with their live.
 
And 3000 of our brothers and sisters paid with their live.

Your histrionics are your greatest argumentative strength. Just omit the cut-n-paste babble.


I only post facts.

You actually have "3000 brothers and sisters?"

Are you an Amphibian?





Still smarting over the drubbing you took claiming that the Indians were 'peaceful'?

Get over it....I have much more to teach you.


Let's continue pointing out how Liberals/Democrats have weakened our intelligence agencies....



" Here at home, the Obama administration has gravely impaired our capability to gather human intelligence by declassifying hundreds of pages of documents that explain our interrogation techniques—information that is now probably in al-Qaeda training manuals."
https://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis/archive/issue.asp?year=2009&month=10
 
And 3000 of our brothers and sisters paid with their live.

Your histrionics are your greatest argumentative strength. Just omit the cut-n-paste babble.


I only post facts.

You actually have "3000 brothers and sisters?"

Are you an Amphibian?
Still smarting over the drubbing you took claiming that the Indians were 'peaceful'?

Get over it....I have much more to teach you.

White_lipped_tree_frog_cairns_jan_8_2006.jpg


I'll accept that as a "Yes," and the perfect explanation for your constant chirping, croaking, and hopping from one incoherent thread to another.
 
Last edited:
And 3000 of our brothers and sisters paid with their live.

Your histrionics are your greatest argumentative strength. Just omit the cut-n-paste babble.


I only post facts.

You actually have "3000 brothers and sisters?"

Are you an Amphibian?
Still smarting over the drubbing you took claiming that the Indians were 'peaceful'?

Get over it....I have much more to teach you.

I'll accept that as a "Yes," and the perfect explanation for your constant chirping, croaking, and hopping from one incoherent thread to another.



Ooooo....really wounded you, huh?

Good.
 
Benghazi? 9/11? I thought PC was talking about THIS one that got a pass even though the Repub admin was warned to be vigilant:

5lZF73D.jpg

That was basically something else.

The worst intelligence failure in American History that resulted in the deaths of close to 3000 Americans, gets one investigation, nearly a year after 9/11, is done behind closed doors and blames no one. In fact a good amount of it that implicated the Saudis is redacted.

Benghazi?

What are we on the 9th "investigation"?




"The worst intelligence failure in American History...."

Absolutely!

And the provenance was the Liberals/Democrats in Congress.

Here...let me show you:


"The real aberration occurred in the mid-1970s when the United States granted its legislative branch the greatest control over intelligence matters of any Western nation, and overturned the system which had prevailed in the United States since the Founding.


The damage done to the CIA by this congressional oversight regime (Democrat-controlled Pike and Church Committees) is quite extensive. The committees increased the number of CIA officials subject to Senate confirmation, condemned the agency for its contacts with unscrupulous characters, prohibited any further contact with these bad characters, insisted that the United States not engage or assist in any coup which may harm a foreign leader, and overwhelmed the agency with interminable requests for briefings (some 600 alone in 1996).


[A]s Henry Kissinger once observed about the [Democrat] Church Committee, that it is an illusion that “tranquility can be achieved by an abstract purity of motive for which history offers no example.” It is precisely this illusion which has prevailed in congressional circles since the heyday of [Democrat] Frank Church and Otis Pike. As Church himself once argued, the United States should not “fight fire with fire . . . evil with evil.”


[Democrat] Senator Robert Torricelli of New Jersey, who led the charge in the mid-1990s to prevent the CIA from hiring unsavory characters. Torricelli rallied to the defense of State Department employee Robert Nuccio, who leaked classified material dealing with CIA operations in Guatemala to Torricelli, who in turn held a press conference and revealed the information to the media. It was these revelations that led to congressional restrictions on the ability of agents in the field to deal with “bad people.”

[C]hairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Joseph Biden,…[t]he Delaware Democrat was one of seventeen Senators who voted in 1974 to ban all covert operations, and proudly noted during his 1988 campaign for president that he had threatened to “go public” with covert action plans by the Reagan administration, causing them to cancel the operations."
History News Network Congressional Oversight and the Crippling of the CIA



And 3000 of our brothers and sisters paid with their live.

:lol:

Even your cut and paste is delusional.
 
Why is Benghazi such an albatross to the administration?

Because of what they were doing there. Rumors that it was a rendition sight and even a stopping point for weapons headed to Syria that ended up going to ISIS.

Yeah, everyone in the Administration wants to avoid investigations that might bring to light exactly what was going on there.

It's an "albatross" because of a well funded media blitz and "in the pocket" politicians that take orders from obscenely rich guys.
No, it is a cover-up. That is why it's an albatross. Without the cover-up there's no corruption and thus no evidence of wrongdoing, only lapses in judgment.
 
15th post
Your histrionics are your greatest argumentative strength. Just omit the cut-n-paste babble.


I only post facts.

You actually have "3000 brothers and sisters?"

Are you an Amphibian?
Still smarting over the drubbing you took claiming that the Indians were 'peaceful'?

Get over it....I have much more to teach you.

I'll accept that as a "Yes," and the perfect explanation for your constant chirping, croaking, and hopping from one incoherent thread to another.



Ooooo....really wounded you, huh?

Good.

Naw.

He's a fan.
 
Why is Benghazi such an albatross to the administration?

Because of what they were doing there. Rumors that it was a rendition sight and even a stopping point for weapons headed to Syria that ended up going to ISIS.

Yeah, everyone in the Administration wants to avoid investigations that might bring to light exactly what was going on there.

It's an "albatross" because of a well funded media blitz and "in the pocket" politicians that take orders from obscenely rich guys.
No, it is a cover-up. That is why it's an albatross. Without the cover-up there's no corruption and thus no evidence of wrongdoing, only lapses in judgment.
There was no cover up or wrong doing. Quite the contrary. Every single point that the State Department made on the Sunday news shows proved to be TRUE. From the motivation of the attack (The video) to how it transpired to the FACT there was NO STAND DOWN ORDERS.



And this many investigations into the same exact topic? Only proves that it is politically motivated.
 
Your histrionics are your greatest argumentative strength. Just omit the cut-n-paste babble.


I only post facts.

You actually have "3000 brothers and sisters?"

Are you an Amphibian?
Still smarting over the drubbing you took claiming that the Indians were 'peaceful'?

Get over it....I have much more to teach you.

I'll accept that as a "Yes," and the perfect explanation for your constant chirping, croaking, and hopping from one incoherent thread to another.



Ooooo.....

White_lipped_tree_frog_cairns_jan_8_2006.jpg


:blahblah:

Your Amphibian Mating Calls don't work for me.

Perhaps one of your 3000 brothers and sisters will understand.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom