Hillary might have paid no taxes as she utilized a $700,000 loss to avoid paying taxes in 2015!

[healthmyths]

Well this is a little awkward. With the leaked 1995 Trump tax returns 'scandal' focused on the billionaire's yuuge "net operating loss" and how it might have 'legally' enabled him to pay no taxes for years, we now discover none other than Hillary Rodham Clinton utilized a $700,000 "loss" to avoid paying some taxes in 2015.

In the words of Hillary Clinton's campaign manager, "this bombshell report reveals [Hillary Clinton's] past business failures... and may show just how long [Hillary Clinton] may have avoided paying taxes."

Finally, as we noted previously, the NYT itself is also perfectly happy to take advantage of the US tax to minimize the amount of money it pays to the government: in 2014 the company got a tax refund of $3.6 million despite having a $29.9 million pretax profit, an effective negative tax rate for 2014, which it explained was favorably affected by approximately $21.1 million for the reversal of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the lapse of applicable statutes of limitations.

Clinton Campaign Admits Hillary Used Same Tax Avoidance "Scheme" As Trump | Zero Hedge

 

[healthmyths]

Plus Hillary took a $1 million donation to her OWN Clinton foundation as a tax write off!

Of which there is no William J. Clinton Foundation financial records from a cursory Google search!
Where are the William J. Clinton financial records?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Well this is a little awkward. With the leaked 1995 Trump tax returns 'scandal' focused on the billionaire's yuuge "net operating loss" and how it might have 'legally' enabled him to pay no taxes for years, we now discover none other than Hillary Rodham Clinton utilized a $700,000 "loss" to avoid paying some taxes in 2015.

In the words of Hillary Clinton's campaign manager, "this bombshell report reveals [Hillary Clinton's] past business failures... and may show just how long [Hillary Clinton] may have avoided paying taxes."

View attachment 91969

Finally, as we noted previously, the NYT itself is also perfectly happy to take advantage of the US tax to minimize the amount of money it pays to the government: in 2014 the company got a tax refund of $3.6 million despite having a $29.9 million pretax profit, an effective negative tax rate for 2014, which it explained was favorably affected by approximately $21.1 million for the reversal of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the lapse of applicable statutes of limitations.

Clinton Campaign Admits Hillary Used Same Tax Avoidance "Scheme" As Trump | Zero Hedge

Yes because paying 35% is exactly the same as paying 0%.

Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine Show New Tax Returns, Pressuring Donald Trump

 

[healthmyths]

Well this is a little awkward. With the leaked 1995 Trump tax returns 'scandal' focused on the billionaire's yuuge "net operating loss" and how it might have 'legally' enabled him to pay no taxes for years, we now discover none other than Hillary Rodham Clinton utilized a $700,000 "loss" to avoid paying some taxes in 2015.

In the words of Hillary Clinton's campaign manager, "this bombshell report reveals [Hillary Clinton's] past business failures... and may show just how long [Hillary Clinton] may have avoided paying taxes."

View attachment 91969

Finally, as we noted previously, the NYT itself is also perfectly happy to take advantage of the US tax to minimize the amount of money it pays to the government: in 2014 the company got a tax refund of $3.6 million despite having a $29.9 million pretax profit, an effective negative tax rate for 2014, which it explained was favorably affected by approximately $21.1 million for the reversal of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the lapse of applicable statutes of limitations.

Clinton Campaign Admits Hillary Used Same Tax Avoidance "Scheme" As Trump | Zero Hedge

Yes because paying 35% is exactly the same as paying 0%.

Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine Show New Tax Returns, Pressuring Donald Trump

Hey I didn't say she "didn't pay any taxes" as the MSM is reporting Trump supposedly did for 18 years!
I said very clearly and concisely she used the tax loss to avoid paying some taxes which is 100% true!
Yet you believed the MSM statement Trump paid no taxes for 18 years!

"Trump paid no taxes for 18 years"
Google reports 860 results:

 

[Theowl32]

She is a democrat. She is allowed.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Well this is a little awkward. With the leaked 1995 Trump tax returns 'scandal' focused on the billionaire's yuuge "net operating loss" and how it might have 'legally' enabled him to pay no taxes for years, we now discover none other than Hillary Rodham Clinton utilized a $700,000 "loss" to avoid paying some taxes in 2015.

In the words of Hillary Clinton's campaign manager, "this bombshell report reveals [Hillary Clinton's] past business failures... and may show just how long [Hillary Clinton] may have avoided paying taxes."

View attachment 91969

Finally, as we noted previously, the NYT itself is also perfectly happy to take advantage of the US tax to minimize the amount of money it pays to the government: in 2014 the company got a tax refund of $3.6 million despite having a $29.9 million pretax profit, an effective negative tax rate for 2014, which it explained was favorably affected by approximately $21.1 million for the reversal of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the lapse of applicable statutes of limitations.

Clinton Campaign Admits Hillary Used Same Tax Avoidance "Scheme" As Trump | Zero Hedge

Yes because paying 35% is exactly the same as paying 0%.

Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine Show New Tax Returns, Pressuring Donald Trump

Hey I didn't say she "didn't pay any taxes" as the MSM is reporting Trump supposedly did for 18 years!
I said very clearly and concisely she used the tax loss to avoid paying some taxes which is 100% true!
Yet you believed the MSM statement Trump paid no taxes for 18 years!

"Trump paid no taxes for 18 years"
Google reports 860 results:
View attachment 91988
View attachment 91989

Well this is a little awkward. With the leaked 1995 Trump tax returns 'scandal' focused on the billionaire's yuuge "net operating loss" and how it might have 'legally' enabled him to pay no taxes for years, we now discover none other than Hillary Rodham Clinton utilized a $700,000 "loss" to avoid paying some taxes in 2015.

In the words of Hillary Clinton's campaign manager, "this bombshell report reveals [Hillary Clinton's] past business failures... and may show just how long [Hillary Clinton] may have avoided paying taxes."

View attachment 91969

Finally, as we noted previously, the NYT itself is also perfectly happy to take advantage of the US tax to minimize the amount of money it pays to the government: in 2014 the company got a tax refund of $3.6 million despite having a $29.9 million pretax profit, an effective negative tax rate for 2014, which it explained was favorably affected by approximately $21.1 million for the reversal of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the lapse of applicable statutes of limitations.

Clinton Campaign Admits Hillary Used Same Tax Avoidance "Scheme" As Trump | Zero Hedge

Yes because paying 35% is exactly the same as paying 0%.

Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine Show New Tax Returns, Pressuring Donald Trump

Hey I didn't say she "didn't pay any taxes" as the MSM is reporting Trump supposedly did for 18 years!
I said very clearly and concisely she used the tax loss to avoid paying some taxes which is 100% true!
Yet you believed the MSM statement Trump paid no taxes for 18 years!

"Trump paid no taxes for 18 years"
Google reports 860 results:
View attachment 91988
View attachment 91989

I said very clearly and concisely she used the tax loss to avoid paying some taxes which is 100% true!

They paid 35% on 10 million.
Which is in no way comparable to Trump.

 

[healthmyths]

But as the majority of you idiots including the majority of the MSM didn't READ closely what the NYT insinuated!

The Times hired tax law experts to analyze the documents, which the outlet notes, are "a small fraction of the voluminous tax returns Mr. Trump would have filed in 1995."

Those consultants determined that "tax rules especially advantageous to wealthy filers would have allowed Mr. Trump to use his $916 million loss to cancel out an equivalent amount of taxable income over an 18-year period."
Latest On 'The New York Times' Investigative Report On Trump's Tax Returns

ANY WHERE IN THAT SENTENCE DID THEY SAY HE "USED" the loss?

And if HE DID folks think about this... the absolute maximum he could use is $50 million a year.
What was Trump's annual income according to this article?
Donald Trump’s latest personal financial disclosure, made public on Wednesday morning, revealed surprising increases in revenue on some of his properties. The Office of Government Ethics document, filed with the Federal Elections Committee, followed an announcement from Trump on Tuesday saying his new report would show he raked in $557 million of income since 2015. The disclosure, submitted annually by presidential candidates, covers a period of more than 12 months – from the first day of the preceding year, to the time the candidate files (January 2015 to May 2016, in this case).
Donald Trump Reports 50% Increase In Income, Staggering Uptick In Revenues From Select Properties
So even if he had after operating expenses of 50% $270 million left in 2015 THEN he deducted $50 million tax loss left $220 MILLION to pay taxes at 30% or a
$66 million tax payment!

 

[Hutch Starskey]

But as the majority of you idiots including the majority of the MSM didn't READ closely what the NYT insinuated!

The Times hired tax law experts to analyze the documents, which the outlet notes, are "a small fraction of the voluminous tax returns Mr. Trump would have filed in 1995."

Those consultants determined that "tax rules especially advantageous to wealthy filers would have allowed Mr. Trump to use his $916 million loss to cancel out an equivalent amount of taxable income over an 18-year period."
Latest On 'The New York Times' Investigative Report On Trump's Tax Returns

ANY WHERE IN THAT SENTENCE DID THEY SAY HE "USED" the loss?

And if HE DID folks think about this... the absolute maximum he could use is $50 million a year.
What was Trump's annual income according to this article?
Donald Trump’s latest personal financial disclosure, made public on Wednesday morning, revealed surprising increases in revenue on some of his properties. The Office of Government Ethics document, filed with the Federal Elections Committee, followed an announcement from Trump on Tuesday saying his new report would show he raked in $557 million of income since 2015. The disclosure, submitted annually by presidential candidates, covers a period of more than 12 months – from the first day of the preceding year, to the time the candidate files (January 2015 to May 2016, in this case).
Donald Trump Reports 50% Increase In Income, Staggering Uptick In Revenues From Select Properties
So even if he had after operating expenses of 50% $270 million left in 2015 THEN he deducted $50 million tax loss left $220 MILLION to pay taxes at 30% or a
$66 million tax payment!

It's very easy to clear this up by releasing them.

 

[rdean]

Trump - ZERO

Clinton's - 35%

USMB Republicans - once again bearing false witness

 

[mudwhistle]

Hillary can do exactly the same thing as Trump and will not be attacked by the media.

 

[mudwhistle]

Trump - ZERO

Clinton's - 35%

USMB Republicans - once again bearing false witness

Actually, you don't know that, because not enough information has been released to draw that conclusion.
However, Democrats feel they can lie about any issue and get away with it.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Trump - ZERO

Clinton's - 35%

USMB Republicans - once again bearing false witness

Actually, you don't know that, because not enough information has been released to draw that conclusion.
However, Democrats feel they can lie about any issue and get away with it.

This is an entirely self inflicted wound by Trump himself.
Are you starting to understand why candidates release returns yet?

 

[mudwhistle]

Trump - ZERO

Clinton's - 35%

USMB Republicans - once again bearing false witness

Actually, you don't know that, because not enough information has been released to draw that conclusion.
However, Democrats feel they can lie about any issue and get away with it.

This is an entirely self inflicted wound by Trump himself.
Are you starting to understand why candidates release returns yet?

Bullshit. It's another fraud perpetrated by the mofia......I mean media.