Hillary looks a mess. Fat and dumpy. What american would vote for her.?

Hillary and the Rest of Clinton Inc. Hit with RICO Lawsuit Over Emails PJ Tatler
hillary-clinton-hollywood-money.jpg


Do you really expect the suit filed in your link to go any further than any of the dozens of other suits filed by Klayman, or will they just be kicked out as frivolous like the others?

With the Obumanation administration throwing her under the bus for a compactico hard line left winger such as Warren... I see MUCH TROUBLE for the one who's husband claimed "He played the RACE card on her" in 2008!

BACZnTL.jpg


image-jpg.38233


I know rush told you that Obama doesn't like Hillary, and you really want it to be true, but like most things rush says, there are no facts to back it up.
 


Do you really expect the suit filed in your link to go any further than any of the dozens of other suits filed by Klayman, or will they just be kicked out as frivolous like the others?

With the Obumanation administration throwing her under the bus for a compactico hard line left winger such as Warren... I see MUCH TROUBLE for the one who's husband claimed "He played the RACE card on her" in 2008!

BACZnTL.jpg


image-jpg.38233


I know rush told you that Obama doesn't like Hillary, and you really want it to be true, but like most things rush says, there are no facts to back it up.

If you say so......:badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::ahole-1:



image-jpg.38233
 
That is nothing but a summary of your negative opinion of the Tea Party.

BUt it does not explain why you called me a Tea Bagger, nor the childish glee that you libs have when you use the term.

I have a similarly bad opinion of Democrats, and you do not see me directing an insult at you that has a sexual connotation.


A summary of why they are worthy of ridicule. The right wing continually, and gleefully call the left socialists, communists, lazy, unpatriotic, etc, etc, etc. You haven't been able to come up with one way to tell you from the other teabaggers, so how can I tell? As soon as the left proudly proclaims to be something as hilarious as the teabaggers did, I have no doubt that the right will laugh about it. I don't see that happening soon though. It would be hard to come up with something that funny. The left didn't force that name on you. Embrace it.


I did not ask why you were ridiculing me.

Tea Bagger, as you well kno
That is nothing but a summary of your negative opinion of the Tea Party.

BUt it does not explain why you called me a Tea Bagger, nor the childish glee that you libs have when you use the term.

I have a similarly bad opinion of Democrats, and you do not see me directing an insult at you that has a sexual connotation.


A summary of why they are worthy of ridicule. The right wing continually, and gleefully call the left socialists, communists, lazy, unpatriotic, etc, etc, etc. You haven't been able to come up with one way to tell you from the other teabaggers, so how can I tell? As soon as the left proudly proclaims to be something as hilarious as the teabaggers did, I have no doubt that the right will laugh about it. I don't see that happening soon though. It would be hard to come up with something that funny. The left didn't force that name on you. Embrace it.


Save your rants. I have no doubt you have a negative opinion of anyone to the right of you.

A list of policies you disagree with does explain why you call someone name with a sexual connotation.

Note that the list of names you list from conservative reflect actual political ideologies and/or possible character flaws that could be deduced from certain political positions, such as rewarding not working equally lazy.

NOne of them have meanings that imply that you are a engaging in a sexual act.

As you well know Tea Bagger does.

Calling a liberal a liberal is not an insult. Calling a conservative a conservative is not an insult.


If the left foisted that name on the teabaggers, you would be absolutely right. However, it was not. It was proudly chosen by the teabaggers, and proudly proclaimed throughout the land "WE ARE TEABAGGERS !!!" and I think their choice deserves to be honored. Give it up. Everybody pays the price for dumb choices. This one was yours. Whining about it won't change that.

A pathetic excuse that MIGHT have justified the joking on the first weekend 6 years ago.

Today? NO.

That was not a dumb choice.

There is nothing "dumb" about not knowing all the obscure little terms for every little sex act, that can be imagined.

That you think it is "Dumb" shows that you cannot respect a culture that is not yours.

That you gleefully use a term associated with homosexual activity as an insult, shows that you consider being homosexual to be shamefully.

That is homophobic.

You are a homophobe.

That you are unable to understand why it is homophobic to use an accusation of homosexuality as an insult, shows that you do not understand the concepts of diversity and tolerance and have not internalized such beliefs AT ALL.

As with most libs, you use them as a club to beat up cons when you think you can get away with it, but without any deeper understanding of it.

I notice that they cannot say exactly what it is they disagree with about the TEA party platform. All they can do is act like 12-year-olds. :lol:


Exactly like 12 year olds.

The core of his debate is to basically accuse conservatives of being gay.

And he is to dim to realize that that is homophobic.
 
A summary of why they are worthy of ridicule. The right wing continually, and gleefully call the left socialists, communists, lazy, unpatriotic, etc, etc, etc. You haven't been able to come up with one way to tell you from the other teabaggers, so how can I tell? As soon as the left proudly proclaims to be something as hilarious as the teabaggers did, I have no doubt that the right will laugh about it. I don't see that happening soon though. It would be hard to come up with something that funny. The left didn't force that name on you. Embrace it.


I did not ask why you were ridiculing me.

Tea Bagger, as you well kno
A summary of why they are worthy of ridicule. The right wing continually, and gleefully call the left socialists, communists, lazy, unpatriotic, etc, etc, etc. You haven't been able to come up with one way to tell you from the other teabaggers, so how can I tell? As soon as the left proudly proclaims to be something as hilarious as the teabaggers did, I have no doubt that the right will laugh about it. I don't see that happening soon though. It would be hard to come up with something that funny. The left didn't force that name on you. Embrace it.


Save your rants. I have no doubt you have a negative opinion of anyone to the right of you.

A list of policies you disagree with does explain why you call someone name with a sexual connotation.

Note that the list of names you list from conservative reflect actual political ideologies and/or possible character flaws that could be deduced from certain political positions, such as rewarding not working equally lazy.

NOne of them have meanings that imply that you are a engaging in a sexual act.

As you well know Tea Bagger does.

Calling a liberal a liberal is not an insult. Calling a conservative a conservative is not an insult.


If the left foisted that name on the teabaggers, you would be absolutely right. However, it was not. It was proudly chosen by the teabaggers, and proudly proclaimed throughout the land "WE ARE TEABAGGERS !!!" and I think their choice deserves to be honored. Give it up. Everybody pays the price for dumb choices. This one was yours. Whining about it won't change that.

A pathetic excuse that MIGHT have justified the joking on the first weekend 6 years ago.

Today? NO.

That was not a dumb choice.

There is nothing "dumb" about not knowing all the obscure little terms for every little sex act, that can be imagined.

That you think it is "Dumb" shows that you cannot respect a culture that is not yours.

That you gleefully use a term associated with homosexual activity as an insult, shows that you consider being homosexual to be shamefully.

That is homophobic.

You are a homophobe.

That you are unable to understand why it is homophobic to use an accusation of homosexuality as an insult, shows that you do not understand the concepts of diversity and tolerance and have not internalized such beliefs AT ALL.

As with most libs, you use them as a club to beat up cons when you think you can get away with it, but without any deeper understanding of it.

I notice that they cannot say exactly what it is they disagree with about the TEA party platform. All they can do is act like 12-year-olds. :lol:


Sure we can. It can be summed up as "They are crazy"
here are just a few examples of crazy things said by people the Tea Party hold dear
  1. ...


None of those justifies your use of homophobic slurs.

Actual issues? You think the issues are on your side?

Then why the school yard debating style?

I'll debate issues until the cows come home. I'm not afraid of that.

BUt I will not let you use homophobic slurs as a substitute for real debate and claim that you are doing it for any reason other than being an ass.

Homophobe.
 


Do you really expect the suit filed in your link to go any further than any of the dozens of other suits filed by Klayman, or will they just be kicked out as frivolous like the others?

With the Obumanation administration throwing her under the bus for a compactico hard line left winger such as Warren... I see MUCH TROUBLE for the one who's husband claimed "He played the RACE card on her" in 2008!

BACZnTL.jpg


image-jpg.38233


I know rush told you that Obama doesn't like Hillary, and you really want it to be true, but like most things rush says, there are no facts to back it up.


i wonder if HIllary is starting to think about the fact that she lost her shot to the less qualified black guy.

How's if feel Hillary?
 
There are lots of good reasons to not vote for Hillary Clinton. But by all means, let's focus on idiotic shit.
 
A summary of why they are worthy of ridicule. The right wing continually, and gleefully call the left socialists, communists, lazy, unpatriotic, etc, etc, etc. You haven't been able to come up with one way to tell you from the other teabaggers, so how can I tell? As soon as the left proudly proclaims to be something as hilarious as the teabaggers did, I have no doubt that the right will laugh about it. I don't see that happening soon though. It would be hard to come up with something that funny. The left didn't force that name on you. Embrace it.


I did not ask why you were ridiculing me.

Tea Bagger, as you well kno
A summary of why they are worthy of ridicule. The right wing continually, and gleefully call the left socialists, communists, lazy, unpatriotic, etc, etc, etc. You haven't been able to come up with one way to tell you from the other teabaggers, so how can I tell? As soon as the left proudly proclaims to be something as hilarious as the teabaggers did, I have no doubt that the right will laugh about it. I don't see that happening soon though. It would be hard to come up with something that funny. The left didn't force that name on you. Embrace it.


Save your rants. I have no doubt you have a negative opinion of anyone to the right of you.

A list of policies you disagree with does explain why you call someone name with a sexual connotation.

Note that the list of names you list from conservative reflect actual political ideologies and/or possible character flaws that could be deduced from certain political positions, such as rewarding not working equally lazy.

NOne of them have meanings that imply that you are a engaging in a sexual act.

As you well know Tea Bagger does.

Calling a liberal a liberal is not an insult. Calling a conservative a conservative is not an insult.


If the left foisted that name on the teabaggers, you would be absolutely right. However, it was not. It was proudly chosen by the teabaggers, and proudly proclaimed throughout the land "WE ARE TEABAGGERS !!!" and I think their choice deserves to be honored. Give it up. Everybody pays the price for dumb choices. This one was yours. Whining about it won't change that.

A pathetic excuse that MIGHT have justified the joking on the first weekend 6 years ago.

Today? NO.

That was not a dumb choice.

There is nothing "dumb" about not knowing all the obscure little terms for every little sex act, that can be imagined.

That you think it is "Dumb" shows that you cannot respect a culture that is not yours.

That you gleefully use a term associated with homosexual activity as an insult, shows that you consider being homosexual to be shamefully.

That is homophobic.

You are a homophobe.

That you are unable to understand why it is homophobic to use an accusation of homosexuality as an insult, shows that you do not understand the concepts of diversity and tolerance and have not internalized such beliefs AT ALL.

As with most libs, you use them as a club to beat up cons when you think you can get away with it, but without any deeper understanding of it.

I notice that they cannot say exactly what it is they disagree with about the TEA party platform. All they can do is act like 12-year-olds. :lol:


Exactly like 12 year olds.

The core of his debate is to basically accuse conservatives of being gay.

And he is to dim to realize that that is homophobic.


As expected. you're completely ignoring why the term teabagger is so deserved and funny.
 
I did not ask why you were ridiculing me.

Tea Bagger, as you well kno
Save your rants. I have no doubt you have a negative opinion of anyone to the right of you.

A list of policies you disagree with does explain why you call someone name with a sexual connotation.

Note that the list of names you list from conservative reflect actual political ideologies and/or possible character flaws that could be deduced from certain political positions, such as rewarding not working equally lazy.

NOne of them have meanings that imply that you are a engaging in a sexual act.

As you well know Tea Bagger does.

Calling a liberal a liberal is not an insult. Calling a conservative a conservative is not an insult.


If the left foisted that name on the teabaggers, you would be absolutely right. However, it was not. It was proudly chosen by the teabaggers, and proudly proclaimed throughout the land "WE ARE TEABAGGERS !!!" and I think their choice deserves to be honored. Give it up. Everybody pays the price for dumb choices. This one was yours. Whining about it won't change that.

A pathetic excuse that MIGHT have justified the joking on the first weekend 6 years ago.

Today? NO.

That was not a dumb choice.

There is nothing "dumb" about not knowing all the obscure little terms for every little sex act, that can be imagined.

That you think it is "Dumb" shows that you cannot respect a culture that is not yours.

That you gleefully use a term associated with homosexual activity as an insult, shows that you consider being homosexual to be shamefully.

That is homophobic.

You are a homophobe.

That you are unable to understand why it is homophobic to use an accusation of homosexuality as an insult, shows that you do not understand the concepts of diversity and tolerance and have not internalized such beliefs AT ALL.

As with most libs, you use them as a club to beat up cons when you think you can get away with it, but without any deeper understanding of it.

I notice that they cannot say exactly what it is they disagree with about the TEA party platform. All they can do is act like 12-year-olds. :lol:


Sure we can. It can be summed up as "They are crazy"
here are just a few examples of crazy things said by people the Tea Party hold dear
  1. ...


None of those justifies your use of homophobic slurs.

Actual issues? You think the issues are on your side?

Then why the school yard debating style?

I'll debate issues until the cows come home. I'm not afraid of that.

BUt I will not let you use homophobic slurs as a substitute for real debate and claim that you are doing it for any reason other than being an ass.

Homophobe.


In light of the way and reason that term is used, you still want to call me a homophobe, and you think that is debate? Typical teabagger.
 


Do you really expect the suit filed in your link to go any further than any of the dozens of other suits filed by Klayman, or will they just be kicked out as frivolous like the others?

With the Obumanation administration throwing her under the bus for a compactico hard line left winger such as Warren... I see MUCH TROUBLE for the one who's husband claimed "He played the RACE card on her" in 2008!

BACZnTL.jpg


image-jpg.38233


I know rush told you that Obama doesn't like Hillary, and you really want it to be true, but like most things rush says, there are no facts to back it up.


i wonder if HIllary is starting to think about the fact that she lost her shot to the less qualified black guy.

How's if feel Hillary?


Hillary is a big girl. I don't see her pouting too much.
 
I did not ask why you were ridiculing me.

Tea Bagger, as you well kno
Save your rants. I have no doubt you have a negative opinion of anyone to the right of you.

A list of policies you disagree with does explain why you call someone name with a sexual connotation.

Note that the list of names you list from conservative reflect actual political ideologies and/or possible character flaws that could be deduced from certain political positions, such as rewarding not working equally lazy.

NOne of them have meanings that imply that you are a engaging in a sexual act.

As you well know Tea Bagger does.

Calling a liberal a liberal is not an insult. Calling a conservative a conservative is not an insult.


If the left foisted that name on the teabaggers, you would be absolutely right. However, it was not. It was proudly chosen by the teabaggers, and proudly proclaimed throughout the land "WE ARE TEABAGGERS !!!" and I think their choice deserves to be honored. Give it up. Everybody pays the price for dumb choices. This one was yours. Whining about it won't change that.

A pathetic excuse that MIGHT have justified the joking on the first weekend 6 years ago.

Today? NO.

That was not a dumb choice.

There is nothing "dumb" about not knowing all the obscure little terms for every little sex act, that can be imagined.

That you think it is "Dumb" shows that you cannot respect a culture that is not yours.

That you gleefully use a term associated with homosexual activity as an insult, shows that you consider being homosexual to be shamefully.

That is homophobic.

You are a homophobe.

That you are unable to understand why it is homophobic to use an accusation of homosexuality as an insult, shows that you do not understand the concepts of diversity and tolerance and have not internalized such beliefs AT ALL.

As with most libs, you use them as a club to beat up cons when you think you can get away with it, but without any deeper understanding of it.

I notice that they cannot say exactly what it is they disagree with about the TEA party platform. All they can do is act like 12-year-olds. :lol:


Exactly like 12 year olds.

The core of his debate is to basically accuse conservatives of being gay.

And he is to dim to realize that that is homophobic.


As expected. you're completely ignoring why the term teabagger is so deserved and funny.


I ignored nothing. I have explained why the term is not deserved and not funny.

I have also explained how the possible way the term could be considered an insult, which is obviously how you are using it, is if you use it as a homophobic slur.
 
If the left foisted that name on the teabaggers, you would be absolutely right. However, it was not. It was proudly chosen by the teabaggers, and proudly proclaimed throughout the land "WE ARE TEABAGGERS !!!" and I think their choice deserves to be honored. Give it up. Everybody pays the price for dumb choices. This one was yours. Whining about it won't change that.

A pathetic excuse that MIGHT have justified the joking on the first weekend 6 years ago.

Today? NO.

That was not a dumb choice.

There is nothing "dumb" about not knowing all the obscure little terms for every little sex act, that can be imagined.

That you think it is "Dumb" shows that you cannot respect a culture that is not yours.

That you gleefully use a term associated with homosexual activity as an insult, shows that you consider being homosexual to be shamefully.

That is homophobic.

You are a homophobe.

That you are unable to understand why it is homophobic to use an accusation of homosexuality as an insult, shows that you do not understand the concepts of diversity and tolerance and have not internalized such beliefs AT ALL.

As with most libs, you use them as a club to beat up cons when you think you can get away with it, but without any deeper understanding of it.

I notice that they cannot say exactly what it is they disagree with about the TEA party platform. All they can do is act like 12-year-olds. :lol:


Sure we can. It can be summed up as "They are crazy"
here are just a few examples of crazy things said by people the Tea Party hold dear
  1. ...


None of those justifies your use of homophobic slurs.

Actual issues? You think the issues are on your side?

Then why the school yard debating style?

I'll debate issues until the cows come home. I'm not afraid of that.

BUt I will not let you use homophobic slurs as a substitute for real debate and claim that you are doing it for any reason other than being an ass.

Homophobe.


In light of the way and reason that term is used, you still want to call me a homophobe, and you think that is debate? Typical teabagger.


I called you a homophobe because you are being a homophobe.

Truth is the ultimate defense.

You are implying I am gay when I am not.
 


Do you really expect the suit filed in your link to go any further than any of the dozens of other suits filed by Klayman, or will they just be kicked out as frivolous like the others?

With the Obumanation administration throwing her under the bus for a compactico hard line left winger such as Warren... I see MUCH TROUBLE for the one who's husband claimed "He played the RACE card on her" in 2008!

BACZnTL.jpg


image-jpg.38233


I know rush told you that Obama doesn't like Hillary, and you really want it to be true, but like most things rush says, there are no facts to back it up.


i wonder if HIllary is starting to think about the fact that she lost her shot to the less qualified black guy.

How's if feel Hillary?


Hillary is a big girl. I don't see her pouting too much.


Maybe she internalizes the concept of A.A. to the point she is happy to make that selfless sacrifice in the name of Equality and Fairness...

:haha:
 

Forum List

Back
Top