Hillary looks a mess. Fat and dumpy. What american would vote for her.?

[BULLDOG]

Another imaginary claim by the right that has nothing to do with reality. If liberals were really the monsters you like to pretend we are, I'd be conservative.

By using an accusation of homosexual behavior as an insult, you reveal that you believe being homosexual is something to be ashamed of.

That is what a homophobic slur IS.

It shows that your lib commitment to "diversity" is nothing but a facade that is only brought into play when it is useful to advance your agenda, not something you truly believe, or have internalized into your own thought patterns.

I can tell you really want that to be true, but like so many other accusations the right makes......it just ain't so.

"That is so gay".

Is that a homophobic comment?

Obviously.

It uses the term "Gay" as a derogatory term.

Which is how you, and all the libs like you, have used/using "Tea Bagger".

Nice effort, but a little weak on the follow through. Why don't you ask rush to help you form a usable misrepresentation that might work?

You have been stone cold busted. That you are not intellectually honest enough to admit it is just a further minus to consider when you think about your self image.



Just for laughs, what do you claim you were accusing me of when you called me a "Tea Bagger"?

This



and this

 

[BULLDOG]

I can tell you really want that to be true, but like so many other accusations the right makes......it just ain't so.

"That is so gay".

Is that a homophobic comment?

Obviously.

It uses the term "Gay" as a derogatory term.

Which is how you, and all the libs like you, have used/using "Tea Bagger".

That's ghey. It has nothing to do with sex.

The term "teabag" as applied to the TP comes from here -- at a Tea Party rally -- you can blame this person-of-indeterminate-gender -- and Freerepublic.com whose name appears as a sigline:

​

That's February 2009 (one month after the O'bama inauguration). And right when the whole Tea party concept was invented by Dick Armey, the Kochs and Fox Noise started up. It didn't even have a history yet -- this is right at the beginning.
.
Do you not know this?

If "the liberal Dems" fired back -- what, was it supposed to be a one-way street?

More...

Here too --

​

Not sure what the question is here.
But then again the thread didn't exactly start on solid ground so I guess any tangent is fair game.

No. THe term as it was used originally by Tea Party members was not sexual.

Yuh huh.
What do you think the sign in the first image from "Freerepublic.com" means then? That's from an event February 27, 2009.

Have any idea when the first Tea Party event was?

Freerepublic is another message board so we can't link to it but the first known invocation of the term connected with the TPM was a week earlier, on the morning of Feb. 20 from that same site. It reads, and I quote,

"I would think that Barney Frank would welcome a good tea bag."
--- within half an hour they were cackling about the joke, and a week later it shows up on a sign. With Freerepublic's name on it.

You think he's talking about the Congressman's tastes in warm beverages then, do ya?

The term as it has been used since then by libs, in order to ridicule Tea Party members has been based on another meaning of the word that does have sexual meaning.


And in doing so, they are using the accusation of homosexual behavior as a slur.

Thus,

Using an implication of homosexuality as an insult, does make them homophobes.

That they don't realize it, and all the other libs didn't either, shows all that talk about diversity and tolerance and multiculturalism is complete bullshit.

Save your breath -- see above.

I think they were making veiled references to the Boston Tea Party.

Nothing veiled about it. That is exactly what they wanted their group to be associated with. Their main, and as far as I know only issue was their opposition to the bailouts, and they equated their opposition to the Boston Tea Party. All that was before the Koch's bought them and transformed them into the rabid antigovernment mob of crazies that they are today, and also before they chose such an unfortunate, worthy of ridicule name to be known as.

 

[ChrisL]

"That is so gay".

Is that a homophobic comment?

Obviously.

It uses the term "Gay" as a derogatory term.

Which is how you, and all the libs like you, have used/using "Tea Bagger".

That's ghey. It has nothing to do with sex.

The term "teabag" as applied to the TP comes from here -- at a Tea Party rally -- you can blame this person-of-indeterminate-gender -- and Freerepublic.com whose name appears as a sigline:

​

That's February 2009 (one month after the O'bama inauguration). And right when the whole Tea party concept was invented by Dick Armey, the Kochs and Fox Noise started up. It didn't even have a history yet -- this is right at the beginning.
.
Do you not know this?

If "the liberal Dems" fired back -- what, was it supposed to be a one-way street?

More...

Here too --

​

Not sure what the question is here.
But then again the thread didn't exactly start on solid ground so I guess any tangent is fair game.

No. THe term as it was used originally by Tea Party members was not sexual.

Yuh huh.
What do you think the sign in the first image from "Freerepublic.com" means then? That's from an event February 27, 2009.

Have any idea when the first Tea Party event was?

Freerepublic is another message board so we can't link to it but the first known invocation of the term connected with the TPM was a week earlier, on the morning of Feb. 20 from that same site. It reads, and I quote,

"I would think that Barney Frank would welcome a good tea bag."
--- within half an hour they were cackling about the joke, and a week later it shows up on a sign. With Freerepublic's name on it.

You think he's talking about the Congressman's tastes in warm beverages then, do ya?

The term as it has been used since then by libs, in order to ridicule Tea Party members has been based on another meaning of the word that does have sexual meaning.


And in doing so, they are using the accusation of homosexual behavior as a slur.

Thus,

Using an implication of homosexuality as an insult, does make them homophobes.

That they don't realize it, and all the other libs didn't either, shows all that talk about diversity and tolerance and multiculturalism is complete bullshit.

Save your breath -- see above.

I think they were making veiled references to the Boston Tea Party.

Nothing veiled about it. That is exactly what they wanted their group to be associated with. Their main, and as far as I know only issue was their opposition to the bailouts, and they equated their opposition to the Boston Tea Party. All that was before the Koch's bought them and transformed them into the rabid antigovernment mob of crazies that they are today, and also before they chose such an unfortunate, worthy of ridicule name to be known as.

I don't think so. I think TEA Party is an acronym for Taxed Enough Already.

 

[Interpol]

Really -- so you vote for candidates based on what they look like?

And candidates that aren't even running for anything too. That's deep, man.

You need to turn in your voter registration card. Clearly some people can't handle it.

I agree...we should look at her accomplishments rather than her looks. Could you help me out with her accomplishments?

I always have to laugh at the "Accomplishments" meme that comes from Hillary haters. The meme goes that Hillary hasn't done anything to speak of and is somehow just riding on her husband's coattails.

25 years later and it is clear that had major healthcare reform been able to pass then, we'd have saved money, had a healthier society, and in turn a more productive one. She was right about healthcare and ahead of all of us on the issue. On that issue alone, she qualifies as the best to hand over healthcare related issues to as President.

Remember "Gulf War Syndrome"? When our people were coming back from the first Gulf War, many of them were suffering a various range of acute illnesses. "Gulf War Syndrome" became common knowledge because of the efforts she made as First Lady to put it in the headlines and to pressure Washington to do something about it.

From adoption and foster care reforms, Hillary was always in the lead on those things.

As a baseball card stat alone, she's the only First Lady in the country's history to later win a senate seat.

As a senator she showed a willingness to work with Republicans on a variety of issues. It was rather common knowledge that she was surprisingly well-liked among most senators, including Republicans. She knew how to horse-trade, which is a quality she would bring as President that Obama doesn't really have. He's not from that era where you call people incessantly to get their vote on something in exchange for free stuff for their state. That era ended under Obama, but with times getting better and deficits getting smaller and smaller every passing month now (some months we're actually going into surplus again) old-time horse-trading is going to be a thing again and Hillary's the right one for that job.

Could there have been a better person as NY senator post-9/11? Who she was only helped to secure tens of billions of dollars in re-investment money for the area at the time. It didn't hurt at the time to have a senator with huge star power. It was her leadership that helped 9/11 first responders get the help they need and the funding for the ailments they incurred in the weeks following their efforts at Ground Zero. It is the same funding that Republicans have decided repeatedly to attack and cut at the expense of our first responders' real health problems.

As Secretary of State, when Egypt became the hot spot, the most useful person in the world all of a sudden became Hillary Clinton having a direct line to Hosni Mubarak's wife, who she got to know well from the 90's. Once Obama handed that hot potato to Hillary, Hillary became the shoehorn of that entire transition that saw Mubarak give up power and leave. There simply could not have been a better person in that specific job at that moment in history than Hillary Clinton.

Her single greatest achievement as Sec. of State though was her work on the international stage, repairing the damage done to America's reputation and standing around the world by the Bush administration. She visited 112 countries and did the grunt work of having to re-earn trust that had been lost by 8 years of disastrous American leadership that made the world more violent and gave us the Great Recession.

It is not easy building trust and consensus with foreign countries. Every country has their own issues. But Hillary did an outstanding job of getting the world back on board with who we really are, which is not a chest-beating nation of warmongers, but a just nation that once again would return to diplomacy and negotiations and use violence only as a last resort.

Is there another candidate who has cultivated as many international relationships the last two decades than her and who is eligible to run? Apart from Biden, I can't think of any.

The GOP candidates apart from Jeb are a weak field. I'd put Walker in the strong camp if he didn't sound so stupid on matters of foreign policy. Like Romney and Jindal and Christie before him, he too went to England and made an ass of himself. You know it's bad for the GOP when even the conservative PM of England is calling you a joke.

With Hillary we don't have to worry about that crap.

On the matter of physical attraction, I'll always vote for an ugly smart person over an asshole in a nice suit.

 

[Correll]

By using an accusation of homosexual behavior as an insult, you reveal that you believe being homosexual is something to be ashamed of.

That is what a homophobic slur IS.

It shows that your lib commitment to "diversity" is nothing but a facade that is only brought into play when it is useful to advance your agenda, not something you truly believe, or have internalized into your own thought patterns.

I can tell you really want that to be true, but like so many other accusations the right makes......it just ain't so.

"That is so gay".

Is that a homophobic comment?

Obviously.

It uses the term "Gay" as a derogatory term.

Which is how you, and all the libs like you, have used/using "Tea Bagger".

That's ghey. It has nothing to do with sex.

The term "teabag" as applied to the TP comes from here -- at a Tea Party rally -- you can blame this person-of-indeterminate-gender -- and Freerepublic.com whose name appears as a sigline:

​

That's February 2009 (one month after the O'bama inauguration). And right when the whole Tea party concept was invented by Dick Armey, the Kochs and Fox Noise started up. It didn't even have a history yet -- this is right at the beginning.
.
Do you not know this?

If "the liberal Dems" fired back -- what, was it supposed to be a one-way street?

More...

Here too --

​

Not sure what the question is here.
But then again the thread didn't exactly start on solid ground so I guess any tangent is fair game.

No. THe term as it was used originally by Tea Party members was not sexual.



The term as it has been used since then by libs, in order to ridicule Tea Party members has been based on another meaning of the word that does have sexual meaning.


And in doing so, they are using the accusation of homosexual behavior as a slur.

Thus,

Using an implication of homosexuality as an insult, does make them homophobes.

That they don't realize it, and all the other libs didn't either, shows all that talk about diversity and tolerance and multiculturalism is complete bullshit.

You go ahead and file that right beside your claims that liberals want to indoctrinate children to be gay, and we hate the country. None of that is true but it hasn't stopped you yet.

So. When you called me a Tea Bagger, exactly how did you think you were insulting me? Were you implying that I wear a funny hat?

Really? THat has kept you giggling like a school girl for 6 years?

 

[Correll]

By using an accusation of homosexual behavior as an insult, you reveal that you believe being homosexual is something to be ashamed of.

That is what a homophobic slur IS.

It shows that your lib commitment to "diversity" is nothing but a facade that is only brought into play when it is useful to advance your agenda, not something you truly believe, or have internalized into your own thought patterns.

I can tell you really want that to be true, but like so many other accusations the right makes......it just ain't so.

"That is so gay".

Is that a homophobic comment?

Obviously.

It uses the term "Gay" as a derogatory term.

Which is how you, and all the libs like you, have used/using "Tea Bagger".

Nice effort, but a little weak on the follow through. Why don't you ask rush to help you form a usable misrepresentation that might work?

You have been stone cold busted. That you are not intellectually honest enough to admit it is just a further minus to consider when you think about your self image.



Just for laughs, what do you claim you were accusing me of when you called me a "Tea Bagger"?

This



and this

I asked a simple question. Answer it. I'm not going to watch 5 minutes of film to try to guess what you mean.

Use words.

 

[Politico]

Hillary looks a mess. Fat and dumpy. What american would vote for her.?

Any one with a D on their voter cards.

 

[BULLDOG]

I can tell you really want that to be true, but like so many other accusations the right makes......it just ain't so.

"That is so gay".

Is that a homophobic comment?

Obviously.

It uses the term "Gay" as a derogatory term.

Which is how you, and all the libs like you, have used/using "Tea Bagger".

Nice effort, but a little weak on the follow through. Why don't you ask rush to help you form a usable misrepresentation that might work?

You have been stone cold busted. That you are not intellectually honest enough to admit it is just a further minus to consider when you think about your self image.



Just for laughs, what do you claim you were accusing me of when you called me a "Tea Bagger"?

This



and this

I asked a simple question. Answer it. I'm not going to watch 5 minutes of film to try to guess what you mean.

Use words.

No, it's not just a funny hat, or their unfortunate, for them, choice of names , even though those are integral parts of it. It's the little old lady screaming “KEEP YOUR SOCIALIST HANDS OFF MY SOCIAL SECURITY”, it's the idiot with a gun prancing through the mall clearly trying to intimidate and calling for an armed insurrection because he has been convinced Communists/Socialists/ Sharia law/ or what ever bogy man they are afraid of today, has taken over the government and is wanting to enslave everyone. It's the politician and his followers who don't see the irony and pure stupidity of calling for secession and claiming to be a patriot in the same breath.

As long as the Tea Party controllers can keep their poorly informed followers upset, fearful and in opposition, they will gladly oppose anything else presented to them. A simple matter of reducing pollution becomes an “assault on freedom” in the teabaggers minds. Suddenly tax breaks for the rich becomes “the best way to keep our judicial system from being converted to Sharia Law”.

Even you, who can't name even one way you can be differentiated from then, don't want to be included in their number. They are to be pitied in a sense, but entirely worthy of ridicule as are you who votes in lock step with those intentionally ignorant fools.

 

[Correll]

"That is so gay".

Is that a homophobic comment?

Obviously.

It uses the term "Gay" as a derogatory term.

Which is how you, and all the libs like you, have used/using "Tea Bagger".

Nice effort, but a little weak on the follow through. Why don't you ask rush to help you form a usable misrepresentation that might work?

You have been stone cold busted. That you are not intellectually honest enough to admit it is just a further minus to consider when you think about your self image.



Just for laughs, what do you claim you were accusing me of when you called me a "Tea Bagger"?

This



and this

I asked a simple question. Answer it. I'm not going to watch 5 minutes of film to try to guess what you mean.

Use words.

No, it's not just a funny hat, or their unfortunate, for them, choice of names , even though those are integral parts of it. It's the little old lady screaming “KEEP YOUR SOCIALIST HANDS OFF MY SOCIAL SECURITY”, it's the idiot with a gun prancing through the mall clearly trying to intimidate and calling for an armed insurrection because he has been convinced Communists/Socialists/ Sharia law/ or what ever bogy man they are afraid of today, has taken over the government and is wanting to enslave everyone. It's the politician and his followers who don't see the irony and pure stupidity of calling for secession and claiming to be a patriot in the same breath.

As long as the Tea Party controllers can keep their poorly informed followers upset, fearful and in opposition, they will gladly oppose anything else presented to them. A simple matter of reducing pollution becomes an “assault on freedom” in the teabaggers minds. Suddenly tax breaks for the rich becomes “the best way to keep our judicial system from being converted to Sharia Law”.

Even you, who can't name even one way you can be differentiated from then, don't want to be included in their number. They are to be pitied in a sense, but entirely worthy of ridicule as are you who votes in lock step with those intentionally ignorant foot dils.

That is nothing but a summary of your negative opinion of the Tea Party.

BUt it does not explain why you called me a Tea Bagger, nor the childish glee that you libs have when you use the term.

I have a similarly bad opinion of Democrats, and you do not see me directing an insult at you that has a sexual connotation.

 

[BULLDOG]

Nice effort, but a little weak on the follow through. Why don't you ask rush to help you form a usable misrepresentation that might work?

You have been stone cold busted. That you are not intellectually honest enough to admit it is just a further minus to consider when you think about your self image.



Just for laughs, what do you claim you were accusing me of when you called me a "Tea Bagger"?

This



and this

I asked a simple question. Answer it. I'm not going to watch 5 minutes of film to try to guess what you mean.

Use words.

No, it's not just a funny hat, or their unfortunate, for them, choice of names , even though those are integral parts of it. It's the little old lady screaming “KEEP YOUR SOCIALIST HANDS OFF MY SOCIAL SECURITY”, it's the idiot with a gun prancing through the mall clearly trying to intimidate and calling for an armed insurrection because he has been convinced Communists/Socialists/ Sharia law/ or what ever bogy man they are afraid of today, has taken over the government and is wanting to enslave everyone. It's the politician and his followers who don't see the irony and pure stupidity of calling for secession and claiming to be a patriot in the same breath.

As long as the Tea Party controllers can keep their poorly informed followers upset, fearful and in opposition, they will gladly oppose anything else presented to them. A simple matter of reducing pollution becomes an “assault on freedom” in the teabaggers minds. Suddenly tax breaks for the rich becomes “the best way to keep our judicial system from being converted to Sharia Law”.

Even you, who can't name even one way you can be differentiated from then, don't want to be included in their number. They are to be pitied in a sense, but entirely worthy of ridicule as are you who votes in lock step with those intentionally ignorant foot dils.

That is nothing but a summary of your negative opinion of the Tea Party.

BUt it does not explain why you called me a Tea Bagger, nor the childish glee that you libs have when you use the term.

I have a similarly bad opinion of Democrats, and you do not see me directing an insult at you that has a sexual connotation.

A summary of why they are worthy of ridicule. The right wing continually, and gleefully call the left socialists, communists, lazy, unpatriotic, etc, etc, etc. You haven't been able to come up with one way to tell you from the other teabaggers, so how can I tell? As soon as the left proudly proclaims to be something as hilarious as the teabaggers did, I have no doubt that the right will laugh about it. I don't see that happening soon though. It would be hard to come up with something that funny. The left didn't force that name on you. Embrace it.

 

[Correll]

You have been stone cold busted. That you are not intellectually honest enough to admit it is just a further minus to consider when you think about your self image.



Just for laughs, what do you claim you were accusing me of when you called me a "Tea Bagger"?

This



and this

I asked a simple question. Answer it. I'm not going to watch 5 minutes of film to try to guess what you mean.

Use words.

No, it's not just a funny hat, or their unfortunate, for them, choice of names , even though those are integral parts of it. It's the little old lady screaming “KEEP YOUR SOCIALIST HANDS OFF MY SOCIAL SECURITY”, it's the idiot with a gun prancing through the mall clearly trying to intimidate and calling for an armed insurrection because he has been convinced Communists/Socialists/ Sharia law/ or what ever bogy man they are afraid of today, has taken over the government and is wanting to enslave everyone. It's the politician and his followers who don't see the irony and pure stupidity of calling for secession and claiming to be a patriot in the same breath.

As long as the Tea Party controllers can keep their poorly informed followers upset, fearful and in opposition, they will gladly oppose anything else presented to them. A simple matter of reducing pollution becomes an “assault on freedom” in the teabaggers minds. Suddenly tax breaks for the rich becomes “the best way to keep our judicial system from being converted to Sharia Law”.

Even you, who can't name even one way you can be differentiated from then, don't want to be included in their number. They are to be pitied in a sense, but entirely worthy of ridicule as are you who votes in lock step with those intentionally ignorant foot dils.

That is nothing but a summary of your negative opinion of the Tea Party.

BUt it does not explain why you called me a Tea Bagger, nor the childish glee that you libs have when you use the term.

I have a similarly bad opinion of Democrats, and you do not see me directing an insult at you that has a sexual connotation.

A summary of why they are worthy of ridicule. The right wing continually, and gleefully call the left socialists, communists, lazy, unpatriotic, etc, etc, etc. You haven't been able to come up with one way to tell you from the other teabaggers, so how can I tell? As soon as the left proudly proclaims to be something as hilarious as the teabaggers did, I have no doubt that the right will laugh about it. I don't see that happening soon though. It would be hard to come up with something that funny. The left didn't force that name on you. Embrace it.

I did not ask why you were ridiculing me.

Tea Bagger, as you well kno

You have been stone cold busted. That you are not intellectually honest enough to admit it is just a further minus to consider when you think about your self image.



Just for laughs, what do you claim you were accusing me of when you called me a "Tea Bagger"?

This



and this

I asked a simple question. Answer it. I'm not going to watch 5 minutes of film to try to guess what you mean.

Use words.

No, it's not just a funny hat, or their unfortunate, for them, choice of names , even though those are integral parts of it. It's the little old lady screaming “KEEP YOUR SOCIALIST HANDS OFF MY SOCIAL SECURITY”, it's the idiot with a gun prancing through the mall clearly trying to intimidate and calling for an armed insurrection because he has been convinced Communists/Socialists/ Sharia law/ or what ever bogy man they are afraid of today, has taken over the government and is wanting to enslave everyone. It's the politician and his followers who don't see the irony and pure stupidity of calling for secession and claiming to be a patriot in the same breath.

As long as the Tea Party controllers can keep their poorly informed followers upset, fearful and in opposition, they will gladly oppose anything else presented to them. A simple matter of reducing pollution becomes an “assault on freedom” in the teabaggers minds. Suddenly tax breaks for the rich becomes “the best way to keep our judicial system from being converted to Sharia Law”.

Even you, who can't name even one way you can be differentiated from then, don't want to be included in their number. They are to be pitied in a sense, but entirely worthy of ridicule as are you who votes in lock step with those intentionally ignorant foot dils.

That is nothing but a summary of your negative opinion of the Tea Party.

BUt it does not explain why you called me a Tea Bagger, nor the childish glee that you libs have when you use the term.

I have a similarly bad opinion of Democrats, and you do not see me directing an insult at you that has a sexual connotation.

A summary of why they are worthy of ridicule. The right wing continually, and gleefully call the left socialists, communists, lazy, unpatriotic, etc, etc, etc. You haven't been able to come up with one way to tell you from the other teabaggers, so how can I tell? As soon as the left proudly proclaims to be something as hilarious as the teabaggers did, I have no doubt that the right will laugh about it. I don't see that happening soon though. It would be hard to come up with something that funny. The left didn't force that name on you. Embrace it.

Save your rants. I have no doubt you have a negative opinion of anyone to the right of you.

A list of policies you disagree with does explain why you call someone name with a sexual connotation.

Note that the list of names you list from conservative reflect actual political ideologies and/or possible character flaws that could be deduced from certain political positions, such as rewarding not working equally lazy.

NOne of them have meanings that imply that you are a engaging in a sexual act.

As you well know Tea Bagger does.

Calling a liberal a liberal is not an insult. Calling a conservative a conservative is not an insult.

 

[BULLDOG]

This



and this

I asked a simple question. Answer it. I'm not going to watch 5 minutes of film to try to guess what you mean.

Use words.

No, it's not just a funny hat, or their unfortunate, for them, choice of names , even though those are integral parts of it. It's the little old lady screaming “KEEP YOUR SOCIALIST HANDS OFF MY SOCIAL SECURITY”, it's the idiot with a gun prancing through the mall clearly trying to intimidate and calling for an armed insurrection because he has been convinced Communists/Socialists/ Sharia law/ or what ever bogy man they are afraid of today, has taken over the government and is wanting to enslave everyone. It's the politician and his followers who don't see the irony and pure stupidity of calling for secession and claiming to be a patriot in the same breath.

As long as the Tea Party controllers can keep their poorly informed followers upset, fearful and in opposition, they will gladly oppose anything else presented to them. A simple matter of reducing pollution becomes an “assault on freedom” in the teabaggers minds. Suddenly tax breaks for the rich becomes “the best way to keep our judicial system from being converted to Sharia Law”.

Even you, who can't name even one way you can be differentiated from then, don't want to be included in their number. They are to be pitied in a sense, but entirely worthy of ridicule as are you who votes in lock step with those intentionally ignorant foot dils.

That is nothing but a summary of your negative opinion of the Tea Party.

BUt it does not explain why you called me a Tea Bagger, nor the childish glee that you libs have when you use the term.

I have a similarly bad opinion of Democrats, and you do not see me directing an insult at you that has a sexual connotation.

A summary of why they are worthy of ridicule. The right wing continually, and gleefully call the left socialists, communists, lazy, unpatriotic, etc, etc, etc. You haven't been able to come up with one way to tell you from the other teabaggers, so how can I tell? As soon as the left proudly proclaims to be something as hilarious as the teabaggers did, I have no doubt that the right will laugh about it. I don't see that happening soon though. It would be hard to come up with something that funny. The left didn't force that name on you. Embrace it.

I did not ask why you were ridiculing me.

Tea Bagger, as you well kno

This



and this

I asked a simple question. Answer it. I'm not going to watch 5 minutes of film to try to guess what you mean.

Use words.

No, it's not just a funny hat, or their unfortunate, for them, choice of names , even though those are integral parts of it. It's the little old lady screaming “KEEP YOUR SOCIALIST HANDS OFF MY SOCIAL SECURITY”, it's the idiot with a gun prancing through the mall clearly trying to intimidate and calling for an armed insurrection because he has been convinced Communists/Socialists/ Sharia law/ or what ever bogy man they are afraid of today, has taken over the government and is wanting to enslave everyone. It's the politician and his followers who don't see the irony and pure stupidity of calling for secession and claiming to be a patriot in the same breath.

As long as the Tea Party controllers can keep their poorly informed followers upset, fearful and in opposition, they will gladly oppose anything else presented to them. A simple matter of reducing pollution becomes an “assault on freedom” in the teabaggers minds. Suddenly tax breaks for the rich becomes “the best way to keep our judicial system from being converted to Sharia Law”.

Even you, who can't name even one way you can be differentiated from then, don't want to be included in their number. They are to be pitied in a sense, but entirely worthy of ridicule as are you who votes in lock step with those intentionally ignorant foot dils.

That is nothing but a summary of your negative opinion of the Tea Party.

BUt it does not explain why you called me a Tea Bagger, nor the childish glee that you libs have when you use the term.

I have a similarly bad opinion of Democrats, and you do not see me directing an insult at you that has a sexual connotation.

A summary of why they are worthy of ridicule. The right wing continually, and gleefully call the left socialists, communists, lazy, unpatriotic, etc, etc, etc. You haven't been able to come up with one way to tell you from the other teabaggers, so how can I tell? As soon as the left proudly proclaims to be something as hilarious as the teabaggers did, I have no doubt that the right will laugh about it. I don't see that happening soon though. It would be hard to come up with something that funny. The left didn't force that name on you. Embrace it.

Save your rants. I have no doubt you have a negative opinion of anyone to the right of you.

A list of policies you disagree with does explain why you call someone name with a sexual connotation.

Note that the list of names you list from conservative reflect actual political ideologies and/or possible character flaws that could be deduced from certain political positions, such as rewarding not working equally lazy.

NOne of them have meanings that imply that you are a engaging in a sexual act.

As you well know Tea Bagger does.

Calling a liberal a liberal is not an insult. Calling a conservative a conservative is not an insult.

If the left foisted that name on the teabaggers, you would be absolutely right. However, it was not. It was proudly chosen by the teabaggers, and proudly proclaimed throughout the land "WE ARE TEABAGGERS !!!" and I think their choice deserves to be honored. Give it up. Everybody pays the price for dumb choices. This one was yours. Whining about it won't change that.

 

[Correll]

I asked a simple question. Answer it. I'm not going to watch 5 minutes of film to try to guess what you mean.

Use words.

No, it's not just a funny hat, or their unfortunate, for them, choice of names , even though those are integral parts of it. It's the little old lady screaming “KEEP YOUR SOCIALIST HANDS OFF MY SOCIAL SECURITY”, it's the idiot with a gun prancing through the mall clearly trying to intimidate and calling for an armed insurrection because he has been convinced Communists/Socialists/ Sharia law/ or what ever bogy man they are afraid of today, has taken over the government and is wanting to enslave everyone. It's the politician and his followers who don't see the irony and pure stupidity of calling for secession and claiming to be a patriot in the same breath.

As long as the Tea Party controllers can keep their poorly informed followers upset, fearful and in opposition, they will gladly oppose anything else presented to them. A simple matter of reducing pollution becomes an “assault on freedom” in the teabaggers minds. Suddenly tax breaks for the rich becomes “the best way to keep our judicial system from being converted to Sharia Law”.

Even you, who can't name even one way you can be differentiated from then, don't want to be included in their number. They are to be pitied in a sense, but entirely worthy of ridicule as are you who votes in lock step with those intentionally ignorant foot dils.

That is nothing but a summary of your negative opinion of the Tea Party.

BUt it does not explain why you called me a Tea Bagger, nor the childish glee that you libs have when you use the term.

I have a similarly bad opinion of Democrats, and you do not see me directing an insult at you that has a sexual connotation.

A summary of why they are worthy of ridicule. The right wing continually, and gleefully call the left socialists, communists, lazy, unpatriotic, etc, etc, etc. You haven't been able to come up with one way to tell you from the other teabaggers, so how can I tell? As soon as the left proudly proclaims to be something as hilarious as the teabaggers did, I have no doubt that the right will laugh about it. I don't see that happening soon though. It would be hard to come up with something that funny. The left didn't force that name on you. Embrace it.

I did not ask why you were ridiculing me.

Tea Bagger, as you well kno

I asked a simple question. Answer it. I'm not going to watch 5 minutes of film to try to guess what you mean.

Use words.

No, it's not just a funny hat, or their unfortunate, for them, choice of names , even though those are integral parts of it. It's the little old lady screaming “KEEP YOUR SOCIALIST HANDS OFF MY SOCIAL SECURITY”, it's the idiot with a gun prancing through the mall clearly trying to intimidate and calling for an armed insurrection because he has been convinced Communists/Socialists/ Sharia law/ or what ever bogy man they are afraid of today, has taken over the government and is wanting to enslave everyone. It's the politician and his followers who don't see the irony and pure stupidity of calling for secession and claiming to be a patriot in the same breath.

As long as the Tea Party controllers can keep their poorly informed followers upset, fearful and in opposition, they will gladly oppose anything else presented to them. A simple matter of reducing pollution becomes an “assault on freedom” in the teabaggers minds. Suddenly tax breaks for the rich becomes “the best way to keep our judicial system from being converted to Sharia Law”.

Even you, who can't name even one way you can be differentiated from then, don't want to be included in their number. They are to be pitied in a sense, but entirely worthy of ridicule as are you who votes in lock step with those intentionally ignorant foot dils.

That is nothing but a summary of your negative opinion of the Tea Party.

BUt it does not explain why you called me a Tea Bagger, nor the childish glee that you libs have when you use the term.

I have a similarly bad opinion of Democrats, and you do not see me directing an insult at you that has a sexual connotation.

A summary of why they are worthy of ridicule. The right wing continually, and gleefully call the left socialists, communists, lazy, unpatriotic, etc, etc, etc. You haven't been able to come up with one way to tell you from the other teabaggers, so how can I tell? As soon as the left proudly proclaims to be something as hilarious as the teabaggers did, I have no doubt that the right will laugh about it. I don't see that happening soon though. It would be hard to come up with something that funny. The left didn't force that name on you. Embrace it.

Save your rants. I have no doubt you have a negative opinion of anyone to the right of you.

A list of policies you disagree with does explain why you call someone name with a sexual connotation.

Note that the list of names you list from conservative reflect actual political ideologies and/or possible character flaws that could be deduced from certain political positions, such as rewarding not working equally lazy.

NOne of them have meanings that imply that you are a engaging in a sexual act.

As you well know Tea Bagger does.

Calling a liberal a liberal is not an insult. Calling a conservative a conservative is not an insult.

If the left foisted that name on the teabaggers, you would be absolutely right. However, it was not. It was proudly chosen by the teabaggers, and proudly proclaimed throughout the land "WE ARE TEABAGGERS !!!" and I think their choice deserves to be honored. Give it up. Everybody pays the price for dumb choices. This one was yours. Whining about it won't change that.

A pathetic excuse that MIGHT have justified the joking on the first weekend 6 years ago.

Today? NO.

That was not a dumb choice.

There is nothing "dumb" about not knowing all the obscure little terms for every little sex act, that can be imagined.

That you think it is "Dumb" shows that you cannot respect a culture that is not yours.

That you gleefully use a term associated with homosexual activity as an insult, shows that you consider being homosexual to be shamefully.

That is homophobic.

You are a homophobe.

That you are unable to understand why it is homophobic to use an accusation of homosexuality as an insult, shows that you do not understand the concepts of diversity and tolerance and have not internalized such beliefs AT ALL.

As with most libs, you use them as a club to beat up cons when you think you can get away with it, but without any deeper understanding of it.

 

[ChrisL]

No, it's not just a funny hat, or their unfortunate, for them, choice of names , even though those are integral parts of it. It's the little old lady screaming “KEEP YOUR SOCIALIST HANDS OFF MY SOCIAL SECURITY”, it's the idiot with a gun prancing through the mall clearly trying to intimidate and calling for an armed insurrection because he has been convinced Communists/Socialists/ Sharia law/ or what ever bogy man they are afraid of today, has taken over the government and is wanting to enslave everyone. It's the politician and his followers who don't see the irony and pure stupidity of calling for secession and claiming to be a patriot in the same breath.

As long as the Tea Party controllers can keep their poorly informed followers upset, fearful and in opposition, they will gladly oppose anything else presented to them. A simple matter of reducing pollution becomes an “assault on freedom” in the teabaggers minds. Suddenly tax breaks for the rich becomes “the best way to keep our judicial system from being converted to Sharia Law”.

Even you, who can't name even one way you can be differentiated from then, don't want to be included in their number. They are to be pitied in a sense, but entirely worthy of ridicule as are you who votes in lock step with those intentionally ignorant foot dils.

That is nothing but a summary of your negative opinion of the Tea Party.

BUt it does not explain why you called me a Tea Bagger, nor the childish glee that you libs have when you use the term.

I have a similarly bad opinion of Democrats, and you do not see me directing an insult at you that has a sexual connotation.

A summary of why they are worthy of ridicule. The right wing continually, and gleefully call the left socialists, communists, lazy, unpatriotic, etc, etc, etc. You haven't been able to come up with one way to tell you from the other teabaggers, so how can I tell? As soon as the left proudly proclaims to be something as hilarious as the teabaggers did, I have no doubt that the right will laugh about it. I don't see that happening soon though. It would be hard to come up with something that funny. The left didn't force that name on you. Embrace it.

I did not ask why you were ridiculing me.

Tea Bagger, as you well kno

No, it's not just a funny hat, or their unfortunate, for them, choice of names , even though those are integral parts of it. It's the little old lady screaming “KEEP YOUR SOCIALIST HANDS OFF MY SOCIAL SECURITY”, it's the idiot with a gun prancing through the mall clearly trying to intimidate and calling for an armed insurrection because he has been convinced Communists/Socialists/ Sharia law/ or what ever bogy man they are afraid of today, has taken over the government and is wanting to enslave everyone. It's the politician and his followers who don't see the irony and pure stupidity of calling for secession and claiming to be a patriot in the same breath.

As long as the Tea Party controllers can keep their poorly informed followers upset, fearful and in opposition, they will gladly oppose anything else presented to them. A simple matter of reducing pollution becomes an “assault on freedom” in the teabaggers minds. Suddenly tax breaks for the rich becomes “the best way to keep our judicial system from being converted to Sharia Law”.

Even you, who can't name even one way you can be differentiated from then, don't want to be included in their number. They are to be pitied in a sense, but entirely worthy of ridicule as are you who votes in lock step with those intentionally ignorant foot dils.

That is nothing but a summary of your negative opinion of the Tea Party.

BUt it does not explain why you called me a Tea Bagger, nor the childish glee that you libs have when you use the term.

I have a similarly bad opinion of Democrats, and you do not see me directing an insult at you that has a sexual connotation.

A summary of why they are worthy of ridicule. The right wing continually, and gleefully call the left socialists, communists, lazy, unpatriotic, etc, etc, etc. You haven't been able to come up with one way to tell you from the other teabaggers, so how can I tell? As soon as the left proudly proclaims to be something as hilarious as the teabaggers did, I have no doubt that the right will laugh about it. I don't see that happening soon though. It would be hard to come up with something that funny. The left didn't force that name on you. Embrace it.

Save your rants. I have no doubt you have a negative opinion of anyone to the right of you.

A list of policies you disagree with does explain why you call someone name with a sexual connotation.

Note that the list of names you list from conservative reflect actual political ideologies and/or possible character flaws that could be deduced from certain political positions, such as rewarding not working equally lazy.

NOne of them have meanings that imply that you are a engaging in a sexual act.

As you well know Tea Bagger does.

Calling a liberal a liberal is not an insult. Calling a conservative a conservative is not an insult.

If the left foisted that name on the teabaggers, you would be absolutely right. However, it was not. It was proudly chosen by the teabaggers, and proudly proclaimed throughout the land "WE ARE TEABAGGERS !!!" and I think their choice deserves to be honored. Give it up. Everybody pays the price for dumb choices. This one was yours. Whining about it won't change that.

A pathetic excuse that MIGHT have justified the joking on the first weekend 6 years ago.

Today? NO.

That was not a dumb choice.

There is nothing "dumb" about not knowing all the obscure little terms for every little sex act, that can be imagined.

That you think it is "Dumb" shows that you cannot respect a culture that is not yours.

That you gleefully use a term associated with homosexual activity as an insult, shows that you consider being homosexual to be shamefully.

That is homophobic.

You are a homophobe.

That you are unable to understand why it is homophobic to use an accusation of homosexuality as an insult, shows that you do not understand the concepts of diversity and tolerance and have not internalized such beliefs AT ALL.

As with most libs, you use them as a club to beat up cons when you think you can get away with it, but without any deeper understanding of it.

I notice that they cannot say exactly what it is they disagree with about the TEA party platform. All they can do is act like 12-year-olds.

 

[ChrisL]

I asked a simple question. Answer it. I'm not going to watch 5 minutes of film to try to guess what you mean.

Use words.

No, it's not just a funny hat, or their unfortunate, for them, choice of names , even though those are integral parts of it. It's the little old lady screaming “KEEP YOUR SOCIALIST HANDS OFF MY SOCIAL SECURITY”, it's the idiot with a gun prancing through the mall clearly trying to intimidate and calling for an armed insurrection because he has been convinced Communists/Socialists/ Sharia law/ or what ever bogy man they are afraid of today, has taken over the government and is wanting to enslave everyone. It's the politician and his followers who don't see the irony and pure stupidity of calling for secession and claiming to be a patriot in the same breath.

As long as the Tea Party controllers can keep their poorly informed followers upset, fearful and in opposition, they will gladly oppose anything else presented to them. A simple matter of reducing pollution becomes an “assault on freedom” in the teabaggers minds. Suddenly tax breaks for the rich becomes “the best way to keep our judicial system from being converted to Sharia Law”.

Even you, who can't name even one way you can be differentiated from then, don't want to be included in their number. They are to be pitied in a sense, but entirely worthy of ridicule as are you who votes in lock step with those intentionally ignorant foot dils.

That is nothing but a summary of your negative opinion of the Tea Party.

BUt it does not explain why you called me a Tea Bagger, nor the childish glee that you libs have when you use the term.

I have a similarly bad opinion of Democrats, and you do not see me directing an insult at you that has a sexual connotation.

A summary of why they are worthy of ridicule. The right wing continually, and gleefully call the left socialists, communists, lazy, unpatriotic, etc, etc, etc. You haven't been able to come up with one way to tell you from the other teabaggers, so how can I tell? As soon as the left proudly proclaims to be something as hilarious as the teabaggers did, I have no doubt that the right will laugh about it. I don't see that happening soon though. It would be hard to come up with something that funny. The left didn't force that name on you. Embrace it.

I did not ask why you were ridiculing me.

Tea Bagger, as you well kno

I asked a simple question. Answer it. I'm not going to watch 5 minutes of film to try to guess what you mean.

Use words.

No, it's not just a funny hat, or their unfortunate, for them, choice of names , even though those are integral parts of it. It's the little old lady screaming “KEEP YOUR SOCIALIST HANDS OFF MY SOCIAL SECURITY”, it's the idiot with a gun prancing through the mall clearly trying to intimidate and calling for an armed insurrection because he has been convinced Communists/Socialists/ Sharia law/ or what ever bogy man they are afraid of today, has taken over the government and is wanting to enslave everyone. It's the politician and his followers who don't see the irony and pure stupidity of calling for secession and claiming to be a patriot in the same breath.

As long as the Tea Party controllers can keep their poorly informed followers upset, fearful and in opposition, they will gladly oppose anything else presented to them. A simple matter of reducing pollution becomes an “assault on freedom” in the teabaggers minds. Suddenly tax breaks for the rich becomes “the best way to keep our judicial system from being converted to Sharia Law”.

Even you, who can't name even one way you can be differentiated from then, don't want to be included in their number. They are to be pitied in a sense, but entirely worthy of ridicule as are you who votes in lock step with those intentionally ignorant foot dils.

That is nothing but a summary of your negative opinion of the Tea Party.

BUt it does not explain why you called me a Tea Bagger, nor the childish glee that you libs have when you use the term.

I have a similarly bad opinion of Democrats, and you do not see me directing an insult at you that has a sexual connotation.

A summary of why they are worthy of ridicule. The right wing continually, and gleefully call the left socialists, communists, lazy, unpatriotic, etc, etc, etc. You haven't been able to come up with one way to tell you from the other teabaggers, so how can I tell? As soon as the left proudly proclaims to be something as hilarious as the teabaggers did, I have no doubt that the right will laugh about it. I don't see that happening soon though. It would be hard to come up with something that funny. The left didn't force that name on you. Embrace it.

Save your rants. I have no doubt you have a negative opinion of anyone to the right of you.

A list of policies you disagree with does explain why you call someone name with a sexual connotation.

Note that the list of names you list from conservative reflect actual political ideologies and/or possible character flaws that could be deduced from certain political positions, such as rewarding not working equally lazy.

NOne of them have meanings that imply that you are a engaging in a sexual act.

As you well know Tea Bagger does.

Calling a liberal a liberal is not an insult. Calling a conservative a conservative is not an insult.

If the left foisted that name on the teabaggers, you would be absolutely right. However, it was not. It was proudly chosen by the teabaggers, and proudly proclaimed throughout the land "WE ARE TEABAGGERS !!!" and I think their choice deserves to be honored. Give it up. Everybody pays the price for dumb choices. This one was yours. Whining about it won't change that.

How old are you, seriously? Grow up and act like an adult!

 

[BULLDOG]

No, it's not just a funny hat, or their unfortunate, for them, choice of names , even though those are integral parts of it. It's the little old lady screaming “KEEP YOUR SOCIALIST HANDS OFF MY SOCIAL SECURITY”, it's the idiot with a gun prancing through the mall clearly trying to intimidate and calling for an armed insurrection because he has been convinced Communists/Socialists/ Sharia law/ or what ever bogy man they are afraid of today, has taken over the government and is wanting to enslave everyone. It's the politician and his followers who don't see the irony and pure stupidity of calling for secession and claiming to be a patriot in the same breath.

As long as the Tea Party controllers can keep their poorly informed followers upset, fearful and in opposition, they will gladly oppose anything else presented to them. A simple matter of reducing pollution becomes an “assault on freedom” in the teabaggers minds. Suddenly tax breaks for the rich becomes “the best way to keep our judicial system from being converted to Sharia Law”.

Even you, who can't name even one way you can be differentiated from then, don't want to be included in their number. They are to be pitied in a sense, but entirely worthy of ridicule as are you who votes in lock step with those intentionally ignorant foot dils.

That is nothing but a summary of your negative opinion of the Tea Party.

BUt it does not explain why you called me a Tea Bagger, nor the childish glee that you libs have when you use the term.

I have a similarly bad opinion of Democrats, and you do not see me directing an insult at you that has a sexual connotation.

A summary of why they are worthy of ridicule. The right wing continually, and gleefully call the left socialists, communists, lazy, unpatriotic, etc, etc, etc. You haven't been able to come up with one way to tell you from the other teabaggers, so how can I tell? As soon as the left proudly proclaims to be something as hilarious as the teabaggers did, I have no doubt that the right will laugh about it. I don't see that happening soon though. It would be hard to come up with something that funny. The left didn't force that name on you. Embrace it.

I did not ask why you were ridiculing me.

Tea Bagger, as you well kno

No, it's not just a funny hat, or their unfortunate, for them, choice of names , even though those are integral parts of it. It's the little old lady screaming “KEEP YOUR SOCIALIST HANDS OFF MY SOCIAL SECURITY”, it's the idiot with a gun prancing through the mall clearly trying to intimidate and calling for an armed insurrection because he has been convinced Communists/Socialists/ Sharia law/ or what ever bogy man they are afraid of today, has taken over the government and is wanting to enslave everyone. It's the politician and his followers who don't see the irony and pure stupidity of calling for secession and claiming to be a patriot in the same breath.

As long as the Tea Party controllers can keep their poorly informed followers upset, fearful and in opposition, they will gladly oppose anything else presented to them. A simple matter of reducing pollution becomes an “assault on freedom” in the teabaggers minds. Suddenly tax breaks for the rich becomes “the best way to keep our judicial system from being converted to Sharia Law”.

Even you, who can't name even one way you can be differentiated from then, don't want to be included in their number. They are to be pitied in a sense, but entirely worthy of ridicule as are you who votes in lock step with those intentionally ignorant foot dils.

That is nothing but a summary of your negative opinion of the Tea Party.

BUt it does not explain why you called me a Tea Bagger, nor the childish glee that you libs have when you use the term.

I have a similarly bad opinion of Democrats, and you do not see me directing an insult at you that has a sexual connotation.

A summary of why they are worthy of ridicule. The right wing continually, and gleefully call the left socialists, communists, lazy, unpatriotic, etc, etc, etc. You haven't been able to come up with one way to tell you from the other teabaggers, so how can I tell? As soon as the left proudly proclaims to be something as hilarious as the teabaggers did, I have no doubt that the right will laugh about it. I don't see that happening soon though. It would be hard to come up with something that funny. The left didn't force that name on you. Embrace it.

Save your rants. I have no doubt you have a negative opinion of anyone to the right of you.

A list of policies you disagree with does explain why you call someone name with a sexual connotation.

Note that the list of names you list from conservative reflect actual political ideologies and/or possible character flaws that could be deduced from certain political positions, such as rewarding not working equally lazy.

NOne of them have meanings that imply that you are a engaging in a sexual act.

As you well know Tea Bagger does.

Calling a liberal a liberal is not an insult. Calling a conservative a conservative is not an insult.

If the left foisted that name on the teabaggers, you would be absolutely right. However, it was not. It was proudly chosen by the teabaggers, and proudly proclaimed throughout the land "WE ARE TEABAGGERS !!!" and I think their choice deserves to be honored. Give it up. Everybody pays the price for dumb choices. This one was yours. Whining about it won't change that.

A pathetic excuse that MIGHT have justified the joking on the first weekend 6 years ago.

Today? NO.

That was not a dumb choice.

There is nothing "dumb" about not knowing all the obscure little terms for every little sex act, that can be imagined.

That you think it is "Dumb" shows that you cannot respect a culture that is not yours.

That you gleefully use a term associated with homosexual activity as an insult, shows that you consider being homosexual to be shamefully.

That is homophobic.

You are a homophobe.

That you are unable to understand why it is homophobic to use an accusation of homosexuality as an insult, shows that you do not understand the concepts of diversity and tolerance and have not internalized such beliefs AT ALL.

As with most libs, you use them as a club to beat up cons when you think you can get away with it, but without any deeper understanding of it.

No matter how hard you try, you can't change the fact that this was a self inflicted wound, and you just wish it would stop because it embarrasses you. Considering all the vitriol and vile claims made by the right, do you really expect anyone to let such a perfect example of crazy right wing choices to just fade away? You can't pretend you are a victim because it is self inflicted. You can't spin it to mean something other than what it is. You can't do anything but whine about it, and frankly, the more you do that the better I like it. I miss the old days when the right wing was honorable and not so prone to make incessant lies and claims about the president hating our country, or socialism/communism/any other ism your leaders rile you up about today, but as long as that is the way you insist on playing the game, get used to being called a teabagger, because that is exactly what you are. Nobody forced that name on you.

 

[BULLDOG]

That is nothing but a summary of your negative opinion of the Tea Party.

BUt it does not explain why you called me a Tea Bagger, nor the childish glee that you libs have when you use the term.

I have a similarly bad opinion of Democrats, and you do not see me directing an insult at you that has a sexual connotation.

A summary of why they are worthy of ridicule. The right wing continually, and gleefully call the left socialists, communists, lazy, unpatriotic, etc, etc, etc. You haven't been able to come up with one way to tell you from the other teabaggers, so how can I tell? As soon as the left proudly proclaims to be something as hilarious as the teabaggers did, I have no doubt that the right will laugh about it. I don't see that happening soon though. It would be hard to come up with something that funny. The left didn't force that name on you. Embrace it.

I did not ask why you were ridiculing me.

Tea Bagger, as you well kno

That is nothing but a summary of your negative opinion of the Tea Party.

BUt it does not explain why you called me a Tea Bagger, nor the childish glee that you libs have when you use the term.

I have a similarly bad opinion of Democrats, and you do not see me directing an insult at you that has a sexual connotation.

A summary of why they are worthy of ridicule. The right wing continually, and gleefully call the left socialists, communists, lazy, unpatriotic, etc, etc, etc. You haven't been able to come up with one way to tell you from the other teabaggers, so how can I tell? As soon as the left proudly proclaims to be something as hilarious as the teabaggers did, I have no doubt that the right will laugh about it. I don't see that happening soon though. It would be hard to come up with something that funny. The left didn't force that name on you. Embrace it.

Save your rants. I have no doubt you have a negative opinion of anyone to the right of you.

A list of policies you disagree with does explain why you call someone name with a sexual connotation.

Note that the list of names you list from conservative reflect actual political ideologies and/or possible character flaws that could be deduced from certain political positions, such as rewarding not working equally lazy.

NOne of them have meanings that imply that you are a engaging in a sexual act.

As you well know Tea Bagger does.

Calling a liberal a liberal is not an insult. Calling a conservative a conservative is not an insult.

If the left foisted that name on the teabaggers, you would be absolutely right. However, it was not. It was proudly chosen by the teabaggers, and proudly proclaimed throughout the land "WE ARE TEABAGGERS !!!" and I think their choice deserves to be honored. Give it up. Everybody pays the price for dumb choices. This one was yours. Whining about it won't change that.

A pathetic excuse that MIGHT have justified the joking on the first weekend 6 years ago.

Today? NO.

That was not a dumb choice.

There is nothing "dumb" about not knowing all the obscure little terms for every little sex act, that can be imagined.

That you think it is "Dumb" shows that you cannot respect a culture that is not yours.

That you gleefully use a term associated with homosexual activity as an insult, shows that you consider being homosexual to be shamefully.

That is homophobic.

You are a homophobe.

That you are unable to understand why it is homophobic to use an accusation of homosexuality as an insult, shows that you do not understand the concepts of diversity and tolerance and have not internalized such beliefs AT ALL.

As with most libs, you use them as a club to beat up cons when you think you can get away with it, but without any deeper understanding of it.

I notice that they cannot say exactly what it is they disagree with about the TEA party platform. All they can do is act like 12-year-olds.

Sure we can. It can be summed up as "They are crazy"
here are just a few examples of crazy things said by people the Tea Party hold dear

1. “People now don’t die from prostate cancer, breast cancer and some of the other things.” – Chris Collins, New York GOP State Rep.
2. “You would be giving off more CO2 if you are riding a bike than driving in a car.” – Ed Orcutt, Washington GOP State Rep., stating that bicycles pollute the environment more than cars do.
3. “Oh, no, we’re not going to have any casualties.” – George W. Bush discussing the Iraq war with Christian Coalition founder Pat Robertson in 2003, as quoted by Robertson.
4. “So Miss Fluke, and the rest of you Feminazis, here’s the deal. If we are going to pay for your contraceptives, and thus pay for you to have sex. We want something for it. We want you post the videos online so we can all watch.” – Rush Limbaugh
5. “I think the right approach is to accept this horribly created — in the sense of rape — but nevertheless a gift in a very broken way, the gift of human life, and accept what God has given to you… rape victims should make the best of a bad situation.” – Rick Santorum
6. “If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways of shutting that whole thing down.” -Todd Akin
7. “When a physician removes a child from a woman, that is the largest organ in a body. That’s a big thing. That’s a big surgery. You don’t have any other organs in your body that are bigger than that.” – Mary Sue McClurkin, Alabama GOP State Rep.
8. “To redefine marriage is discriminatory towards those who hold the sincerely held religious belief that it is a sacred institution between a man & a woman.” – Illinois state Sen. Kyle McCarter (R), in response to the state Senate approving same-sex marriage in Illinois.
9. “I struggled with it myself for a long time, but I came to realize life is that gift from God. I think that even when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something that God intended to happen.” – Richard Mourdock, Indiana GOP U.S. Senate candidate.
10. “There is no one who doesn’t have health care in America. No one. Now, they may end up going to the emergency room. There are better ways to deal with people that need health care than this massive new program.” – Phil Bryant, Republican governor of Mississippi.
11. ”Feminism was established so as to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream of society.”-Rush Limbaugh
12. “[America has to import so many workers because] for the last 35 years we have aborted more than a million people who would have been in our workforce.” – Mike Huckabee
13. ”The feminist agenda is not about equal rights for women. It is about a socialist, anti-family political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians.” – Pat Robertson
14. “He is purple – the gay-pride color, and his antenna is shaped like a triangle – the gay pride symbol.” – Jerry Falwell’s warning to parents that Tinky Winky of Teletubbies, may be gay.
15. “Some girls, they rape so easy” – Roger Rivard, Wisconsin GOP State Rep.

 

[Vigilante]

Hillary and the Rest of Clinton Inc. Hit with RICO Lawsuit Over Emails PJ Tatler

 

[BULLDOG]

Hillary and the Rest of Clinton Inc. Hit with RICO Lawsuit Over Emails PJ Tatler

Do you really expect the suit filed in your link to go any further than any of the dozens of other suits filed by Klayman, or will they just be kicked out as frivolous like the others?

 

[Vigilante]

Hillary and the Rest of Clinton Inc. Hit with RICO Lawsuit Over Emails PJ Tatler

Do you really expect the suit filed in your link to go any further than any of the dozens of other suits filed by Klayman, or will they just be kicked out as frivolous like the others?

With the Obumanation administration throwing her under the bus for a compactico hard line left winger such as Warren... I see MUCH TROUBLE for the one who's husband claimed "He played the RACE card on her" in 2008!