Hillary Clinton muses about 2020 'rematch' against Trump: 'I can beat him again'

shockedcanadian

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2012
Messages
10,721
Reaction score
5,173
Points
390
I thought her constant media campaigns were for a reason. Many of you laughed at my suggestion 2 weeks ago. If Biden gets crushed, expect her to come out of nowhere, without any debating if needed, and winning the Dem Primary.

I might have to start considering a small wage, odds can't be 20:1

Update: Wow. Just looked at oddshark and they actually took Clinton OTB (off the board), as of yesterday. That means either they are certain she isn't running, or they aren't comfortable at offering even 20:1 long shot odds and if they believe she may be running, they can't risk taking a bath.

(Trump’s Odds to Win 2020 Election Slip, Warren’s and Pence’s Rise)

Hillary Clinton muses about 2020 'rematch' against Trump: 'I can beat him again'

Hillary Clinton could beat President Trump "again" if she decides to run for president in 2020, the former secretary of state said Tuesday in an interview.

Clinton appeared on PBS News Hour and was asked about Trump's antagonistic attitude towards her after he goaded Clinton to run for the White House again. She called him "obsessed" for mocking her email scandal and said she could beat Trump in an electoral rematch, if she ever decided to jump back in.

"It truly is remarkable how obsessed he remains with me," she said. "But this latest tweet is so typical of him. Nothing has been more examined and looked at than my e-mails. We all know that. So he's either lying or delusional or both.

"So maybe there does need to be a rematch," Clinton added. "Obviously, I can beat him again. But, just seriously, I don't understand, I don't think anybody understands what motivates him, other than personal grievance, other than seeking adulation."
 
Last edited:

Pogo

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2012
Messages
115,947
Reaction score
18,328
Points
2,190
Location
Fennario
What's "remarkable" is how you dittoes keep lifting this quote out of its context and deliberately leaving out the part where she adds that she was joking.

Life in Mendaciousland.

But hey, you're still claiming to be Canadian, so none of this should matter to you anyway. Eh?

"Obsessed" is indeed the right word.
 

WTH_Progs?

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2019
Messages
2,727
Reaction score
1,181
Points
210
Oh cool. When she loses she stands to claim the trophy for Most Improved.
 

WTH_Progs?

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2019
Messages
2,727
Reaction score
1,181
Points
210
What's "remarkable" is how you dittoes keep lifting this quote out of its context and deliberately leaving out the part where she adds that she was joking.

Life in Mendaciousland.

But hey, you're still claiming to be Canadian, so none of this should matter to you anyway. Eh?

"Obsessed" is indeed the right word.
ILMAO she was joking. It's YOU who cannot pay attention.
 

whitehall

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
44,943
Reaction score
8,649
Points
2,040
Location
Western Va.
The question is whether the democrat party muses about Hillary. So far it seems that they are relying on the other liberal babe.
 

TomParks

Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2016
Messages
2,968
Reaction score
677
Points
390
If there was the slightest chance of winning she would run. Trump now has 260 EV and only needs PA, WI, or MI to win
 

SAYIT

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2012
Messages
45,945
Reaction score
9,751
Points
2,100
Oh cool. When she loses she stands to claim the trophy for Most Improved.
To place next to her Participation Trophy from 2016. Nice.
"So maybe there does need to be a rematch," Clinton added. "Obviously, I can beat him again." :laughing0301:
 

Pogo

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2012
Messages
115,947
Reaction score
18,328
Points
2,190
Location
Fennario
If there was the slightest chance of winning she would run. Trump now has 260 EV and only needs PA, WI, or MI to win
Rump has zero EV. NOBODY has any EV. EVs do not exist until December of 2020.

What's more, last time around he couldn't win ANY of those states. Fer fuxsake he couldn't even win frickin' UTAH.
 

JustAGuy1

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2019
Messages
3,649
Reaction score
1,444
Points
190
What's "remarkable" is how you dittoes keep lifting this quote out of its context and deliberately leaving out the part where she adds that she was joking.

Life in Mendaciousland.

But hey, you're still claiming to be Canadian, so none of this should matter to you anyway. Eh?

"Obsessed" is indeed the right word.
Yet Trump joking about Russia helping with emails on National TV wasn't a joke. You're a joke.
 

Pogo

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2012
Messages
115,947
Reaction score
18,328
Points
2,190
Location
Fennario
What's "remarkable" is how you dittoes keep lifting this quote out of its context and deliberately leaving out the part where she adds that she was joking.

Life in Mendaciousland.

But hey, you're still claiming to be Canadian, so none of this should matter to you anyway. Eh?

"Obsessed" is indeed the right word.
Yet Trump joking about Russia helping with emails on National TV wasn't a joke. You're a joke.
Uhhmmmmmmm................... nothing in my post made any reference to "Russia", or to Rump.

Go forth and learn how the fuck to read.
 
OP
shockedcanadian

shockedcanadian

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2012
Messages
10,721
Reaction score
5,173
Points
390
Oh cool. When she loses she stands to claim the trophy for Most Improved.

Blue Participation Ribbon to honor of all the P.C crowd who don't believe one loses, as finishing second is really just the "the first co-winner".
 

JustAGuy1

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2019
Messages
3,649
Reaction score
1,444
Points
190
What's "remarkable" is how you dittoes keep lifting this quote out of its context and deliberately leaving out the part where she adds that she was joking.

Life in Mendaciousland.

But hey, you're still claiming to be Canadian, so none of this should matter to you anyway. Eh?

"Obsessed" is indeed the right word.
Yet Trump joking about Russia helping with emails on National TV wasn't a joke. You're a joke.
Uhhmmmmmmm................... nothing in my post made any reference to "Russia", or to Rump.

Go forth and learn how the fuck to read.
LOL, so you are incapable of understanding anything reveals your bias, got it. Write it down, she will again be your nominee.
 

Pogo

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2012
Messages
115,947
Reaction score
18,328
Points
2,190
Location
Fennario
What's "remarkable" is how you dittoes keep lifting this quote out of its context and deliberately leaving out the part where she adds that she was joking.

Life in Mendaciousland.

But hey, you're still claiming to be Canadian, so none of this should matter to you anyway. Eh?

"Obsessed" is indeed the right word.
Yet Trump joking about Russia helping with emails on National TV wasn't a joke. You're a joke.
Uhhmmmmmmm................... nothing in my post made any reference to "Russia", or to Rump.

Go forth and learn how the fuck to read.
LOL, so you are incapable of understanding anything reveals your bias, got it. Write it down, she will again be your nominee.

I don't have "nominees", and I don't cotton to fallacies. Again, learn to read.
And don't be trotting your red herrings around here, they'll be shot down wid a quickness. Capice?
 

JustAGuy1

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2019
Messages
3,649
Reaction score
1,444
Points
190
What's "remarkable" is how you dittoes keep lifting this quote out of its context and deliberately leaving out the part where she adds that she was joking.

Life in Mendaciousland.

But hey, you're still claiming to be Canadian, so none of this should matter to you anyway. Eh?

"Obsessed" is indeed the right word.
Yet Trump joking about Russia helping with emails on National TV wasn't a joke. You're a joke.
Uhhmmmmmmm................... nothing in my post made any reference to "Russia", or to Rump.

Go forth and learn how the fuck to read.
LOL, so you are incapable of understanding anything reveals your bias, got it. Write it down, she will again be your nominee.

I don't have "nominees", and I don't cotton to fallacies. Again, learn to read.
And don't be trotting your red herrings around here, they'll be shot down wid a quickness. Capice?
You aren't able to shoot anything down, I recognize your shortcomings. BTW, can you show where Hillary SAID she was joking?
 
OP
shockedcanadian

shockedcanadian

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2012
Messages
10,721
Reaction score
5,173
Points
390
Regardless of what one believes about her running again, ask yourself, why is she doing all these media events all of a sudden? Why her own pushing of the election and b.s cheating narrative?

In my estimation, either she wants to usurp the Will of the U.S people on behalf of the global socialists and have him overthrown via political impeachment, or, she is throwing out feelers to see how her position is being taken. She's waiting for the MSM Talking Heads to start asking the question, first jokingly, but then with more seriousness, "should Hillary jump back in the presidential race?"

She can then say "well I wasn't really interested in running again, but I must do so out of duty to my party and nation. Thank you for having so much faith in me. I'm With Her!"
 

Pogo

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2012
Messages
115,947
Reaction score
18,328
Points
2,190
Location
Fennario
What's "remarkable" is how you dittoes keep lifting this quote out of its context and deliberately leaving out the part where she adds that she was joking.

Life in Mendaciousland.

But hey, you're still claiming to be Canadian, so none of this should matter to you anyway. Eh?

"Obsessed" is indeed the right word.
Yet Trump joking about Russia helping with emails on National TV wasn't a joke. You're a joke.
Uhhmmmmmmm................... nothing in my post made any reference to "Russia", or to Rump.

Go forth and learn how the fuck to read.
LOL, so you are incapable of understanding anything reveals your bias, got it. Write it down, she will again be your nominee.

I don't have "nominees", and I don't cotton to fallacies. Again, learn to read.
And don't be trotting your red herrings around here, they'll be shot down wid a quickness. Capice?
You aren't able to shoot anything down, I recognize your shortcomings. BTW, can you show where Hillary SAID she was joking?
TRY to keep up, Whizzo. This ain't the first time this mendacity came up.
 
Joined
Aug 15, 2017
Messages
23,068
Reaction score
5,792
Points
290
Location
Tejas
'I can beat him again'
ummm....

Article II

Section 1. The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

The Congress may determine the Time of choosing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.

Twelfth Amendment

The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate; The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;--The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice.... The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President to the United States.

U. S. Electoral College: Presidential Election Laws

I'm sorry, did Hillary claim to be a lawyer? She needs to go back to law school.

.
 

DigitalDrifter

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2013
Messages
32,768
Reaction score
8,010
Points
1,330
Location
Oregon
Good god, when is this fucking woman EVER going to go the fuck away ?!!!!!!
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top