Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No knumb knut, standard summer and Memorial weekend price hikes, mandatory summer blend gas production.The pulling out of the Iranian nuclear deal did nothing for the US but it sure helped petro-criminals like Putin and the Saudis. With Iranian oil off the market the Russians, Saudis and big oil are all able to make huge profits.
The American consumer is now stuck with the bill. That scam wasn't much different from Trump University scams.
Americans being extorted at gas pump and Trump trolls jump to Hillary! Ok, how much, if anything, is Hillary's supposed corruption costing average Americans?Gee your own post shows no Russian donations to the Clinton Foundation, so thank you for confirming the $145 million the lying scum Right said was donated to the Clinton Foundation by the Russians for the Uranium One deal was actually donated by a Canadian.Sure, it is the same kind of "proof" the lying scum Right uses to say Hillary was paid by the Russians for the Uranium One sale, so you can't deny it. The lying scum Right says millions were paid to a third party shell entity, the Clinton Foundation, and the Russians, Saudis, AT&T and many others paid millions to Tramp's bag-man Cohen's shell company Essential Consulting. The only difference is the millions paid to the Clinton Foundation were from a Canadian, and the millions paid to Essential Consulting WERE from the Russians, Saudis, AT&T and many others.Why is one mutually exclusive of the other?????So now you're no longer claiming Trump got kick backs from Russian and Saudi Arabia but that he "shook down" AT&T for millions?
I'd settle for proof that EITHER happened...something that Sparky can't seem to produce! Care to help?
LOL...wow...do you REALLY think that nonsense is going to stand up to an examination, Ed? You're now claiming that Russians and Saudis didn't pay into the Clinton Foundation?
"That the Clinton Foundation has done some good work is beyond dispute. But that fact has exactly nothing to do with the profound ethical problems and corruption threats raised by the way its funds have been raised. Hillary Clinton was America’s chief diplomat, and tyrannical regimes such as the Saudis and Qataris jointly donated tens of millions of dollars to an organization run by her family and operated in its name, one whose works has been a prominent feature of her public persona. That extremely valuable opportunity to curry favor with the Clintons, and to secure access to them, continues as she runs for president.
The claim that this is all just about trying to help people in need should not even pass a laugh test, let alone rational scrutiny. To see how true that is, just look at who some of the biggest donors are. Although it did not give while she was secretary of state, the Saudi regime by itself has donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation, with donations coming as late as 2014, as she prepared her presidential run. A group called “Friends of Saudi Arabia,” co-founded “by a Saudi Prince,” gave an additional amount between $1 million and $5 million. The Clinton Foundation says that between $1 million and $5 million was also donated by “the State of Qatar,” the United Arab Emirates, and the government of Brunei. “The State of Kuwait” has donated between $5 million and $10 million.
Theoretically, one could say that these regimes — among the most repressive and regressive in the world — are donating because they deeply believe in the charitable work of the Clinton Foundation and want to help those in need. Is there a single person on the planet who actually believes this? Is Clinton loyalty really so strong that people are going to argue with a straight face that the reason the Saudi, Qatari, Kuwaiti and Emirates regimes donated large amounts of money to the Clinton Foundation is because those regimes simply want to help the foundation achieve its magnanimous goals?"
Why Did the Saudi Regime and Other Gulf Tyrannies Donate Millions to the Clinton Foundation?
I'll give you a hint...one year he made $36,000,000 and for another he made less than four hundred thousand! Guess which one was BEFORE Hillary lost and which one was AFTER!Gee your own post shows no Russian donations to the Clinton Foundation, so thank you for confirming the $145 million the lying scum Right said was donated to the Clinton Foundation by the Russians for the Uranium One deal was actually donated by a Canadian.Sure, it is the same kind of "proof" the lying scum Right uses to say Hillary was paid by the Russians for the Uranium One sale, so you can't deny it. The lying scum Right says millions were paid to a third party shell entity, the Clinton Foundation, and the Russians, Saudis, AT&T and many others paid millions to Tramp's bag-man Cohen's shell company Essential Consulting. The only difference is the millions paid to the Clinton Foundation were from a Canadian, and the millions paid to Essential Consulting WERE from the Russians, Saudis, AT&T and many others.Why is one mutually exclusive of the other?????
I'd settle for proof that EITHER happened...something that Sparky can't seem to produce! Care to help?
LOL...wow...do you REALLY think that nonsense is going to stand up to an examination, Ed? You're now claiming that Russians and Saudis didn't pay into the Clinton Foundation?
"That the Clinton Foundation has done some good work is beyond dispute. But that fact has exactly nothing to do with the profound ethical problems and corruption threats raised by the way its funds have been raised. Hillary Clinton was America’s chief diplomat, and tyrannical regimes such as the Saudis and Qataris jointly donated tens of millions of dollars to an organization run by her family and operated in its name, one whose works has been a prominent feature of her public persona. That extremely valuable opportunity to curry favor with the Clintons, and to secure access to them, continues as she runs for president.
The claim that this is all just about trying to help people in need should not even pass a laugh test, let alone rational scrutiny. To see how true that is, just look at who some of the biggest donors are. Although it did not give while she was secretary of state, the Saudi regime by itself has donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation, with donations coming as late as 2014, as she prepared her presidential run. A group called “Friends of Saudi Arabia,” co-founded “by a Saudi Prince,” gave an additional amount between $1 million and $5 million. The Clinton Foundation says that between $1 million and $5 million was also donated by “the State of Qatar,” the United Arab Emirates, and the government of Brunei. “The State of Kuwait” has donated between $5 million and $10 million.
Theoretically, one could say that these regimes — among the most repressive and regressive in the world — are donating because they deeply believe in the charitable work of the Clinton Foundation and want to help those in need. Is there a single person on the planet who actually believes this? Is Clinton loyalty really so strong that people are going to argue with a straight face that the reason the Saudi, Qatari, Kuwaiti and Emirates regimes donated large amounts of money to the Clinton Foundation is because those regimes simply want to help the foundation achieve its magnanimous goals?"
Why Did the Saudi Regime and Other Gulf Tyrannies Donate Millions to the Clinton Foundation?
No the Russians cut out the middle man...they just paid Bill Clinton a cool $500,000 for giving one short speech! Gee....care to take a guess at how much Slick Willie is getting for speaking engagements now that his wife isn't the presumptive favorite to be the next President?
Frank Giustra was the Canadian, and in June 2007 Giustra stepped down as chairman of Endeavour Financial "to pursue his philanthropic interests." He was donating to the Clinton Foundation while he had absolutely nothing to do with Uranium One, but you knew that already when you posted your made up lies.Gee your own post shows no Russian donations to the Clinton Foundation, so thank you for confirming the $145 million the lying scum Right said was donated to the Clinton Foundation by the Russians for the Uranium One deal was actually donated by a Canadian.Sure, it is the same kind of "proof" the lying scum Right uses to say Hillary was paid by the Russians for the Uranium One sale, so you can't deny it. The lying scum Right says millions were paid to a third party shell entity, the Clinton Foundation, and the Russians, Saudis, AT&T and many others paid millions to Tramp's bag-man Cohen's shell company Essential Consulting. The only difference is the millions paid to the Clinton Foundation were from a Canadian, and the millions paid to Essential Consulting WERE from the Russians, Saudis, AT&T and many others.Why is one mutually exclusive of the other?????
I'd settle for proof that EITHER happened...something that Sparky can't seem to produce! Care to help?
LOL...wow...do you REALLY think that nonsense is going to stand up to an examination, Ed? You're now claiming that Russians and Saudis didn't pay into the Clinton Foundation?
"That the Clinton Foundation has done some good work is beyond dispute. But that fact has exactly nothing to do with the profound ethical problems and corruption threats raised by the way its funds have been raised. Hillary Clinton was America’s chief diplomat, and tyrannical regimes such as the Saudis and Qataris jointly donated tens of millions of dollars to an organization run by her family and operated in its name, one whose works has been a prominent feature of her public persona. That extremely valuable opportunity to curry favor with the Clintons, and to secure access to them, continues as she runs for president.
The claim that this is all just about trying to help people in need should not even pass a laugh test, let alone rational scrutiny. To see how true that is, just look at who some of the biggest donors are. Although it did not give while she was secretary of state, the Saudi regime by itself has donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation, with donations coming as late as 2014, as she prepared her presidential run. A group called “Friends of Saudi Arabia,” co-founded “by a Saudi Prince,” gave an additional amount between $1 million and $5 million. The Clinton Foundation says that between $1 million and $5 million was also donated by “the State of Qatar,” the United Arab Emirates, and the government of Brunei. “The State of Kuwait” has donated between $5 million and $10 million.
Theoretically, one could say that these regimes — among the most repressive and regressive in the world — are donating because they deeply believe in the charitable work of the Clinton Foundation and want to help those in need. Is there a single person on the planet who actually believes this? Is Clinton loyalty really so strong that people are going to argue with a straight face that the reason the Saudi, Qatari, Kuwaiti and Emirates regimes donated large amounts of money to the Clinton Foundation is because those regimes simply want to help the foundation achieve its magnanimous goals?"
Why Did the Saudi Regime and Other Gulf Tyrannies Donate Millions to the Clinton Foundation?
Who was that Canadian, Ed? Care to guess why he'd be giving all that money to the Clinton Foundation at that moment? Care to guess how much he's given SINCE? The real proof of what the Clinton's were doing is simply looking at what they were taking in in donations before Hillary lost her bid for the Presidency and what they're taking in now! Why WOULD those donations drop off a cliff like they have! Duh?
When Obama came into office gas here was $1.35 a gallon and it rose during his entire Presidency and never got close to that again and as they always do the right wing partisan idiots blamed Obama and the left wing partisan idiots suddenly realized Presidents don't control gas Prices. I didn't blame Bush for high gas prices nor did I blame Obama for them I don't blame Trump for them nor will I blame whoever is President after him for them of the two of us I'm the only one who can honestly say that so feel free to fuck you blind partisan hack.Right because gas prices have never gone up in the Summer before.
View attachment 195318
It's not summer yet. It's spring.
Plus the price of gas has been going up for months.
When Obama left office gas was around 2 dollars a gallon here. Now, it's as high as 3.55 a gallon.
That didn't happen over night. And it's not summer.
Got any other excuses?
How do you feel that trump is making you pay more for gas so that you're making muslims in a nation that 15 of the 19 9-11 hijackers came from? Don't you just love giving your hard earned money to people who attacked our nation? People who threw telethons to raise money for those terrorists?
Doesn't it just make you feel warm and fuzzy?
A million a pop?Gee your own post shows no Russian donations to the Clinton Foundation, so thank you for confirming the $145 million the lying scum Right said was donated to the Clinton Foundation by the Russians for the Uranium One deal was actually donated by a Canadian.Sure, it is the same kind of "proof" the lying scum Right uses to say Hillary was paid by the Russians for the Uranium One sale, so you can't deny it. The lying scum Right says millions were paid to a third party shell entity, the Clinton Foundation, and the Russians, Saudis, AT&T and many others paid millions to Tramp's bag-man Cohen's shell company Essential Consulting. The only difference is the millions paid to the Clinton Foundation were from a Canadian, and the millions paid to Essential Consulting WERE from the Russians, Saudis, AT&T and many others.Why is one mutually exclusive of the other?????
I'd settle for proof that EITHER happened...something that Sparky can't seem to produce! Care to help?
LOL...wow...do you REALLY think that nonsense is going to stand up to an examination, Ed? You're now claiming that Russians and Saudis didn't pay into the Clinton Foundation?
"That the Clinton Foundation has done some good work is beyond dispute. But that fact has exactly nothing to do with the profound ethical problems and corruption threats raised by the way its funds have been raised. Hillary Clinton was America’s chief diplomat, and tyrannical regimes such as the Saudis and Qataris jointly donated tens of millions of dollars to an organization run by her family and operated in its name, one whose works has been a prominent feature of her public persona. That extremely valuable opportunity to curry favor with the Clintons, and to secure access to them, continues as she runs for president.
The claim that this is all just about trying to help people in need should not even pass a laugh test, let alone rational scrutiny. To see how true that is, just look at who some of the biggest donors are. Although it did not give while she was secretary of state, the Saudi regime by itself has donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation, with donations coming as late as 2014, as she prepared her presidential run. A group called “Friends of Saudi Arabia,” co-founded “by a Saudi Prince,” gave an additional amount between $1 million and $5 million. The Clinton Foundation says that between $1 million and $5 million was also donated by “the State of Qatar,” the United Arab Emirates, and the government of Brunei. “The State of Kuwait” has donated between $5 million and $10 million.
Theoretically, one could say that these regimes — among the most repressive and regressive in the world — are donating because they deeply believe in the charitable work of the Clinton Foundation and want to help those in need. Is there a single person on the planet who actually believes this? Is Clinton loyalty really so strong that people are going to argue with a straight face that the reason the Saudi, Qatari, Kuwaiti and Emirates regimes donated large amounts of money to the Clinton Foundation is because those regimes simply want to help the foundation achieve its magnanimous goals?"
Why Did the Saudi Regime and Other Gulf Tyrannies Donate Millions to the Clinton Foundation?
No the Russians cut out the middle man...they just paid Bill Clinton a cool $500,000 for giving one short speech! Gee....care to take a guess at how much Slick Willie is getting for speaking engagements now that his wife isn't the presumptive favorite to be the next President?
Americans being extorted at gas pump and Trump trolls jump to Hillary! Ok, how much, if anything, is Hillary's supposed corruption costing average Americans?Gee your own post shows no Russian donations to the Clinton Foundation, so thank you for confirming the $145 million the lying scum Right said was donated to the Clinton Foundation by the Russians for the Uranium One deal was actually donated by a Canadian.Sure, it is the same kind of "proof" the lying scum Right uses to say Hillary was paid by the Russians for the Uranium One sale, so you can't deny it. The lying scum Right says millions were paid to a third party shell entity, the Clinton Foundation, and the Russians, Saudis, AT&T and many others paid millions to Tramp's bag-man Cohen's shell company Essential Consulting. The only difference is the millions paid to the Clinton Foundation were from a Canadian, and the millions paid to Essential Consulting WERE from the Russians, Saudis, AT&T and many others.Why is one mutually exclusive of the other?????
I'd settle for proof that EITHER happened...something that Sparky can't seem to produce! Care to help?
LOL...wow...do you REALLY think that nonsense is going to stand up to an examination, Ed? You're now claiming that Russians and Saudis didn't pay into the Clinton Foundation?
"That the Clinton Foundation has done some good work is beyond dispute. But that fact has exactly nothing to do with the profound ethical problems and corruption threats raised by the way its funds have been raised. Hillary Clinton was America’s chief diplomat, and tyrannical regimes such as the Saudis and Qataris jointly donated tens of millions of dollars to an organization run by her family and operated in its name, one whose works has been a prominent feature of her public persona. That extremely valuable opportunity to curry favor with the Clintons, and to secure access to them, continues as she runs for president.
The claim that this is all just about trying to help people in need should not even pass a laugh test, let alone rational scrutiny. To see how true that is, just look at who some of the biggest donors are. Although it did not give while she was secretary of state, the Saudi regime by itself has donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation, with donations coming as late as 2014, as she prepared her presidential run. A group called “Friends of Saudi Arabia,” co-founded “by a Saudi Prince,” gave an additional amount between $1 million and $5 million. The Clinton Foundation says that between $1 million and $5 million was also donated by “the State of Qatar,” the United Arab Emirates, and the government of Brunei. “The State of Kuwait” has donated between $5 million and $10 million.
Theoretically, one could say that these regimes — among the most repressive and regressive in the world — are donating because they deeply believe in the charitable work of the Clinton Foundation and want to help those in need. Is there a single person on the planet who actually believes this? Is Clinton loyalty really so strong that people are going to argue with a straight face that the reason the Saudi, Qatari, Kuwaiti and Emirates regimes donated large amounts of money to the Clinton Foundation is because those regimes simply want to help the foundation achieve its magnanimous goals?"
Why Did the Saudi Regime and Other Gulf Tyrannies Donate Millions to the Clinton Foundation?
Trump has been playing people forever, his Trump University scam was just a trial run, he's making way more now!
A million a pop?Gee your own post shows no Russian donations to the Clinton Foundation, so thank you for confirming the $145 million the lying scum Right said was donated to the Clinton Foundation by the Russians for the Uranium One deal was actually donated by a Canadian.Sure, it is the same kind of "proof" the lying scum Right uses to say Hillary was paid by the Russians for the Uranium One sale, so you can't deny it. The lying scum Right says millions were paid to a third party shell entity, the Clinton Foundation, and the Russians, Saudis, AT&T and many others paid millions to Tramp's bag-man Cohen's shell company Essential Consulting. The only difference is the millions paid to the Clinton Foundation were from a Canadian, and the millions paid to Essential Consulting WERE from the Russians, Saudis, AT&T and many others.I'd settle for proof that EITHER happened...something that Sparky can't seem to produce! Care to help?
LOL...wow...do you REALLY think that nonsense is going to stand up to an examination, Ed? You're now claiming that Russians and Saudis didn't pay into the Clinton Foundation?
"That the Clinton Foundation has done some good work is beyond dispute. But that fact has exactly nothing to do with the profound ethical problems and corruption threats raised by the way its funds have been raised. Hillary Clinton was America’s chief diplomat, and tyrannical regimes such as the Saudis and Qataris jointly donated tens of millions of dollars to an organization run by her family and operated in its name, one whose works has been a prominent feature of her public persona. That extremely valuable opportunity to curry favor with the Clintons, and to secure access to them, continues as she runs for president.
The claim that this is all just about trying to help people in need should not even pass a laugh test, let alone rational scrutiny. To see how true that is, just look at who some of the biggest donors are. Although it did not give while she was secretary of state, the Saudi regime by itself has donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation, with donations coming as late as 2014, as she prepared her presidential run. A group called “Friends of Saudi Arabia,” co-founded “by a Saudi Prince,” gave an additional amount between $1 million and $5 million. The Clinton Foundation says that between $1 million and $5 million was also donated by “the State of Qatar,” the United Arab Emirates, and the government of Brunei. “The State of Kuwait” has donated between $5 million and $10 million.
Theoretically, one could say that these regimes — among the most repressive and regressive in the world — are donating because they deeply believe in the charitable work of the Clinton Foundation and want to help those in need. Is there a single person on the planet who actually believes this? Is Clinton loyalty really so strong that people are going to argue with a straight face that the reason the Saudi, Qatari, Kuwaiti and Emirates regimes donated large amounts of money to the Clinton Foundation is because those regimes simply want to help the foundation achieve its magnanimous goals?"
Why Did the Saudi Regime and Other Gulf Tyrannies Donate Millions to the Clinton Foundation?
No the Russians cut out the middle man...they just paid Bill Clinton a cool $500,000 for giving one short speech! Gee....care to take a guess at how much Slick Willie is getting for speaking engagements now that his wife isn't the presumptive favorite to be the next President?
You have no idea how much was donated to the Clinton Foundation in 2017 as the data has not been released yet. One 2017 donation we do know about is Canada donating $20 million!!!!The real proof of what the Clinton's were doing is simply looking at what they were taking in in donations before Hillary lost her bid for the Presidency and what they're taking in now! Why WOULD those donations drop off a cliff like they have! Duh?
You have no idea how much he made in 2017 as the data has not been made public yet. So again you are just making shit up!!!A million a pop?Gee your own post shows no Russian donations to the Clinton Foundation, so thank you for confirming the $145 million the lying scum Right said was donated to the Clinton Foundation by the Russians for the Uranium One deal was actually donated by a Canadian.Sure, it is the same kind of "proof" the lying scum Right uses to say Hillary was paid by the Russians for the Uranium One sale, so you can't deny it. The lying scum Right says millions were paid to a third party shell entity, the Clinton Foundation, and the Russians, Saudis, AT&T and many others paid millions to Tramp's bag-man Cohen's shell company Essential Consulting. The only difference is the millions paid to the Clinton Foundation were from a Canadian, and the millions paid to Essential Consulting WERE from the Russians, Saudis, AT&T and many others.
LOL...wow...do you REALLY think that nonsense is going to stand up to an examination, Ed? You're now claiming that Russians and Saudis didn't pay into the Clinton Foundation?
"That the Clinton Foundation has done some good work is beyond dispute. But that fact has exactly nothing to do with the profound ethical problems and corruption threats raised by the way its funds have been raised. Hillary Clinton was America’s chief diplomat, and tyrannical regimes such as the Saudis and Qataris jointly donated tens of millions of dollars to an organization run by her family and operated in its name, one whose works has been a prominent feature of her public persona. That extremely valuable opportunity to curry favor with the Clintons, and to secure access to them, continues as she runs for president.
The claim that this is all just about trying to help people in need should not even pass a laugh test, let alone rational scrutiny. To see how true that is, just look at who some of the biggest donors are. Although it did not give while she was secretary of state, the Saudi regime by itself has donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation, with donations coming as late as 2014, as she prepared her presidential run. A group called “Friends of Saudi Arabia,” co-founded “by a Saudi Prince,” gave an additional amount between $1 million and $5 million. The Clinton Foundation says that between $1 million and $5 million was also donated by “the State of Qatar,” the United Arab Emirates, and the government of Brunei. “The State of Kuwait” has donated between $5 million and $10 million.
Theoretically, one could say that these regimes — among the most repressive and regressive in the world — are donating because they deeply believe in the charitable work of the Clinton Foundation and want to help those in need. Is there a single person on the planet who actually believes this? Is Clinton loyalty really so strong that people are going to argue with a straight face that the reason the Saudi, Qatari, Kuwaiti and Emirates regimes donated large amounts of money to the Clinton Foundation is because those regimes simply want to help the foundation achieve its magnanimous goals?"
Why Did the Saudi Regime and Other Gulf Tyrannies Donate Millions to the Clinton Foundation?
No the Russians cut out the middle man...they just paid Bill Clinton a cool $500,000 for giving one short speech! Gee....care to take a guess at how much Slick Willie is getting for speaking engagements now that his wife isn't the presumptive favorite to be the next President?
He's not even making a million for the year! Gee, why do you think that is, Ed?
No knumb knut, standard summer and Memorial weekend price hikes, mandatory summer blend gas production.The pulling out of the Iranian nuclear deal did nothing for the US but it sure helped petro-criminals like Putin and the Saudis. With Iranian oil off the market the Russians, Saudis and big oil are all able to make huge profits.
The American consumer is now stuck with the bill. That scam wasn't much different from Trump University scams.
Ok so explain why the price of gas has been going up for about a year now.
Why was I paying over 3 dollars a gallon for gas this winter when I paid 2 dollars a gallon for gas in the winter in the Obama years?
Why has the price of gas been steadily going up since trump became president? And why does the price of gas always seem to increase when we have a republican president?
Because investors freak out if someone sneezes on the trading floor, a comet races across the sky, someone flushes a toilet, the sun rises, the sun sets......... Presidents, regardless of which party they belong to actually have very little to no control over prices despite what partisan hacks from both sides claim.No knumb knut, standard summer and Memorial weekend price hikes, mandatory summer blend gas production.The pulling out of the Iranian nuclear deal did nothing for the US but it sure helped petro-criminals like Putin and the Saudis. With Iranian oil off the market the Russians, Saudis and big oil are all able to make huge profits.
The American consumer is now stuck with the bill. That scam wasn't much different from Trump University scams.
Ok so explain why the price of gas has been going up for about a year now.
Why was I paying over 3 dollars a gallon for gas this winter when I paid 2 dollars a gallon for gas in the winter in the Obama years?
Why has the price of gas been steadily going up since trump became president? And why does the price of gas always seem to increase when we have a republican president?
Oh please you know Iran never supplied us with any oil.
For a conservative you sure don't understand capitalism and the law of supply and demand.
Less oil on the market, the higher the price is.
Take Iran's oil off the market and there's less oil which allows those nations that do sell their oil to charge much higher prices.
Wow, maybe a remedial pop up book on capitalism might help. Be sure to study the pictures. They will help you understand the written text.
You have no idea how much he made in 2017 as the data has not been made public yet. So again you are just making shit up!!!A million a pop?Gee your own post shows no Russian donations to the Clinton Foundation, so thank you for confirming the $145 million the lying scum Right said was donated to the Clinton Foundation by the Russians for the Uranium One deal was actually donated by a Canadian.LOL...wow...do you REALLY think that nonsense is going to stand up to an examination, Ed? You're now claiming that Russians and Saudis didn't pay into the Clinton Foundation?
"That the Clinton Foundation has done some good work is beyond dispute. But that fact has exactly nothing to do with the profound ethical problems and corruption threats raised by the way its funds have been raised. Hillary Clinton was America’s chief diplomat, and tyrannical regimes such as the Saudis and Qataris jointly donated tens of millions of dollars to an organization run by her family and operated in its name, one whose works has been a prominent feature of her public persona. That extremely valuable opportunity to curry favor with the Clintons, and to secure access to them, continues as she runs for president.
The claim that this is all just about trying to help people in need should not even pass a laugh test, let alone rational scrutiny. To see how true that is, just look at who some of the biggest donors are. Although it did not give while she was secretary of state, the Saudi regime by itself has donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation, with donations coming as late as 2014, as she prepared her presidential run. A group called “Friends of Saudi Arabia,” co-founded “by a Saudi Prince,” gave an additional amount between $1 million and $5 million. The Clinton Foundation says that between $1 million and $5 million was also donated by “the State of Qatar,” the United Arab Emirates, and the government of Brunei. “The State of Kuwait” has donated between $5 million and $10 million.
Theoretically, one could say that these regimes — among the most repressive and regressive in the world — are donating because they deeply believe in the charitable work of the Clinton Foundation and want to help those in need. Is there a single person on the planet who actually believes this? Is Clinton loyalty really so strong that people are going to argue with a straight face that the reason the Saudi, Qatari, Kuwaiti and Emirates regimes donated large amounts of money to the Clinton Foundation is because those regimes simply want to help the foundation achieve its magnanimous goals?"
Why Did the Saudi Regime and Other Gulf Tyrannies Donate Millions to the Clinton Foundation?
No the Russians cut out the middle man...they just paid Bill Clinton a cool $500,000 for giving one short speech! Gee....care to take a guess at how much Slick Willie is getting for speaking engagements now that his wife isn't the presumptive favorite to be the next President?
He's not even making a million for the year! Gee, why do you think that is, Ed?
Well then according to your lie he should have made millions in 2016 since Hillary had not lost yet until the end of the year, but you claimed the last year you have data on, which would be 2016 since you admit you have no data on 2017, he made less than a million, shooting down your own premise.You have no idea how much he made in 2017 as the data has not been made public yet. So again you are just making shit up!!!A million a pop?Gee your own post shows no Russian donations to the Clinton Foundation, so thank you for confirming the $145 million the lying scum Right said was donated to the Clinton Foundation by the Russians for the Uranium One deal was actually donated by a Canadian.
No the Russians cut out the middle man...they just paid Bill Clinton a cool $500,000 for giving one short speech! Gee....care to take a guess at how much Slick Willie is getting for speaking engagements now that his wife isn't the presumptive favorite to be the next President?
He's not even making a million for the year! Gee, why do you think that is, Ed?
I was quoting what he made in the last year that WAS made public! Would you like to wager on whether that number has gone up or down for the next year?
Well then according to your lie he should have made millions in 2016 since Hillary had not lost yet until the end of the year, but you claimed the last year you have data on, which would be 2016 since you admit you have no data on 2017, he made less than a million, shooting down your own premise.You have no idea how much he made in 2017 as the data has not been made public yet. So again you are just making shit up!!!A million a pop?No the Russians cut out the middle man...they just paid Bill Clinton a cool $500,000 for giving one short speech! Gee....care to take a guess at how much Slick Willie is getting for speaking engagements now that his wife isn't the presumptive favorite to be the next President?
He's not even making a million for the year! Gee, why do you think that is, Ed?
I was quoting what he made in the last year that WAS made public! Would you like to wager on whether that number has gone up or down for the next year?
Thank you.
Now the US can take advantage of the world's largest oil reserves. The ones right here in America. When this happens I bet you won't be thanking Trump.The pulling out of the Iranian nuclear deal did nothing for the US but it sure helped petro-criminals like Putin and the Saudis. With Iranian oil off the market the Russians, Saudis and big oil are all able to make huge profits.
The American consumer is now stuck with the bill. That scam wasn't much different from Trump University scams.
You want me to thank Trump for paying more for gas??? My God you Trumptards are seriously sheep. No wonder he ran a Trump University scam, it worked!Now the US can take advantage of the world's largest oil reserves. The ones right here in America. When this happens I bet you won't be thanking Trump.The pulling out of the Iranian nuclear deal did nothing for the US but it sure helped petro-criminals like Putin and the Saudis. With Iranian oil off the market the Russians, Saudis and big oil are all able to make huge profits.
The American consumer is now stuck with the bill. That scam wasn't much different from Trump University scams.
It correctly shows Gas was HIGHEST under Bush, your fake graph had gas lower under Bush. In any case gas was NOT $4.00 in 2016 as the the Right-wing liar posted.Fake graph.View attachment 195362
As we can see, gasoline prices soared after DumBama's first term. While you like to brag about what they were when his second term ended, it had nothing to do with anything he did. It was fracking that greatly lowered our fuel costs as well as stir up our economy. People found more money in their household; some people into the hundreds of dollars per month. We were able to pay off outstanding bills, spend more of that money into the economy, and even expand our personal investments.
Now if you want to credit Ears with any of the success in fuel, please tell me what policy that was.
Because it goes against your beliefs. Very well, post a better graph from a more reliable source.
Thanks, but it's not much different than the one I posted.
