1.The use of the above, the title of the OP, is the result of allowing the Left, the Democrats, to control education.
The communists were worse than the Nazis or Fascists, by every metric.
Historian I. G. Dyadkin estimated that 56 to 62 million people died “unnatural deaths” from 1928 to 1954, and that excludes wartime casualties. Stalin himself admitted to destroying 10 million." The Amazing Durability of the Russians - theTrumpet.com
2. While a study of the twin Leftist views, Nazis and Marxists, would show both originating from Karl Marx, the Left in our nation, the Democrats, take their cues from the Bolsheviks, so they teach that the worst possible curse is "he's Hitler," rather than the true worst curse, "He's Stalin," or "He's Mao!"
Nazism is national socialism, Marxism is internatonal socialism
3. .…as Martin Amis put it, '
Bolshevism was
exportable and
produced near-
identical results elsewhere.
Nazism could not be
duplicated. Compared to it, the other fascist states were simply amateurish' (Amis, 2002, p. 91).
This makes communism more dangerous than Nazism.
Nazism was based on blood and nationalism, so, could not be duplicated in nations like America, which is made up of so very many nations.
4.The consequence of allowing the Democrats to control education, and to define what is "the worst" is this, from the socialist magazine, Jacobin:
"First, democratic socialism is now a recognized pole within the Democratic Party. Democrats surveyed preferred “democratic socialism” to “capitalism” by a wide margin, favored democratic socialists like Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez over centrist Democrats like Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries, and were just as supportive of candidates who explicitly identified as democratic socialists as they were of candidates who ran simply as Democrats."
5. "Second, there is meaningful — if uneven — openness to democratic socialism beyond the Democratic base. Independents, Latinos, and working-class voters show pockets of receptivity, yet the “democratic socialist” label can be a real liability in red and purple contexts, raising practical questions about the most effective paths for presenting democratic socialist politics to electorates who might have economic populist instincts but are skeptical of democratic socialism as they understand it. "
A new national poll shows democratic socialism has made enormous strides over the last decade. But to grow beyond blue strongholds, its champions will need to continue to anchor campaigns in bread-and-butter economics.
jacobin.com
To put it succinctly, the Democrat Party was always tinted red.....now it is the Communist Party.
And they call opponents "Hitler."