Here we go: Democrat leader Pelosi and Schumer call for gun control in wake of Texas mass shooting

Another senseless massacre and gun nuts start spouting........you are not allowed to talk about guns

The problem are NOT the guns it is the people, especially a class of people democrats ignores over and over.

Have you ever bothered to examine the Demographics of the mass shooters?

They are nearly always on drugs and/or mentally ill, and amazingly often a democrat who does the mass shootings.

I have to disagree with your assertion that the shooters are often of one particular party but setting that aside, let's say your position that it's not the gun but the wielder of the gun that is the problem. What do you think is the best approach to making society safe luntil we are able to get a handle on those behavioral influencers?
Society didnt get here overnite. There are no quick fixes.

I agree.....so what steps can we start taking to move towards a fix?

Stop letting criminals out of jail for starters. Quit coddling them. Recognize that evil exists & that the right to self defense is evident. Quit punishing the law abiding for the law breaking. Expand concealed carry nation wide with full reciprocity.
Are you a law abider who was punished? Tell us about your punishment.
 
Honest inquiry into whats different about todays society. Guns have been a constant.....no name mass shooters are new.

The capabilities and the performance of the gun has changed therefore guns have not been as constant as what you are suggesting. Of course, society has also evolved and changed.
No they have not changed. Goes to step one...honesty....tons of semi-autos came home after WWII and Korea and nothing happened …...

Who'd they come home with? That was a rhetorical question. We both know the answer - soldiers who were trained when and how to use those weapons not weekend warriors who just get a thrill out of having something so powerful. Soldiers knew the damage those guns could do.
Continuing the infantilization of America and solidifying worldwide-held beliefs that Americans are stupid, a Missouri councilwoman, Kelli Dunaway (D), was sworn into office with her hand on a Dr. Suess book. "Just because we've done things the way we've always done them is no reason to keep doing them that way,” she told ABC News.

America hasn’t seen anything this ridiculous since RompHims for men. In the same way rompers infantilized men, using children’s books to swear in members of our legislatures similarly reduces our vaunted institutions into a clown show. NOT SATIRE: Missouri Councilwoman Takes Oath on Dr. Seuss Book
And that was not the only thing different in them than "men" today. Forged in the Great Depression and Fifth Great Awakening.

Yes, we no longer have men, we have boys.
 
The capabilities and the performance of the gun has changed therefore guns have not been as constant as what you are suggesting. Of course, society has also evolved and changed.
No they have not changed. Goes to step one...honesty....tons of semi-autos came home after WWII and Korea and nothing happened …...

Who'd they come home with? That was a rhetorical question. We both know the answer - soldiers who were trained when and how to use those weapons not weekend warriors who just get a thrill out of having something so powerful. Soldiers knew the damage those guns could do.
Continuing the infantilization of America and solidifying worldwide-held beliefs that Americans are stupid, a Missouri councilwoman, Kelli Dunaway (D), was sworn into office with her hand on a Dr. Suess book. "Just because we've done things the way we've always done them is no reason to keep doing them that way,” she told ABC News.

America hasn’t seen anything this ridiculous since RompHims for men. In the same way rompers infantilized men, using children’s books to swear in members of our legislatures similarly reduces our vaunted institutions into a clown show. NOT SATIRE: Missouri Councilwoman Takes Oath on Dr. Seuss Book
And that was not the only thing different in them than "men" today. Forged in the Great Depression and Fifth Great Awakening.

Yes, we no longer have men, we have boys.
And its not just the men, yes I know they do the shooting but same forces are at work. There is less direct
connection with even your neighbors these days.
 
Because shooting have nothing go do with guns. Right?
68786982_2326447144236848_3581909429584396288_n.jpg
 
Another senseless massacre and gun nuts start spouting........you are not allowed to talk about guns

The problem are NOT the guns it is the people, especially a class of people democrats ignores over and over.

Have you ever bothered to examine the Demographics of the mass shooters?

They are nearly always on drugs and/or mentally ill, and amazingly often a democrat who does the mass shootings.

I have to disagree with your assertion that the shooters are often of one particular party but setting that aside, let's say your position that it's not the gun but the wielder of the gun that is the problem. What do you think is the best approach to making society safe until we are able to get a handle on those behavioral influencers?
Society didnt get here overnite. There are no quick fixes.

I agree.....so what steps can we start taking to move towards a fix?
59574108_2221027804610796_5901393766031294464_n.jpg

Get the nuts help, that's a start.
 
Or why should one refrain from burning hatred, whatever its basis—race, class, or ideology? Such hatred is in fact corroding many hearts today. Atheist teachers in the West are bringing up a younger generation in a spirit of hatred of their own society. Amid all the vituperation we forget that the defects of capitalism represent the basic flaws of human nature, allowed unlimited freedom together with the various human rights; we forget that under Communism (and Communism is breathing down the neck of all moderate forms of socialism, which are unstable) the identical flaws run riot in any person with the least degree of authority; while everyone else under that system does indeed attain “equality”—the equality of destitute slaves. This eager fanning of the flames of hatred is becoming the mark of today’s free world. Indeed, the broader the personal freedoms are, the higher the level of prosperity or even of abundance–the more vehement, paradoxically, does this blind hatred become. The contemporary developed West thus demonstrates by its own example that human salvation can be found neither in the profusion of material goods nor in merely making money. This article, which originally ran in the July 22, 1983, issue of National Review, is adapted from the address Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn gave on the occasion of his acceptance, in London on May 10, 1983, of the Templeton Prize for Progress in Religion Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's "Men Have Forgotten God" Speech | National Review
 
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) called for the Senate to vote on gun control legislation in the wake of the mass shooting in Midland, Texas.
HERE WE GO: Democrat Leaders Pelosi and Schumer Call For Gun Control in Wake of Texas Mass Shooting


WE SAW THIS GUN BS COMING A MILE AWAY!! YOU CAN READ A DEMOCRATIC MORON LIKE AN OPENN BOOK ..........
Everyone kNNows you idiots lie cheat and steal---------- everyone also knows when you stupid mother fkrs want guns taken you have a nice shoot out happen so you can get your weak minded stupid asses to start their ggun grab shit


NNEWS FLASH FKRS . 10000 PPL COULD GET SHOT UP BY . A NON LAW ABIDING GUN OWNER AND WE STILL WONN'T GIVE UP OUR 2NND AMENDMENT ASSHOLES KEEP SLAPPING UR LAWS PP L WILL STILL HAVE GUNS YOU MENTLA PUSSIES!!
Trump administration's recently released 2018 federal budget outline could mean significant cuts to the $2.5 billion per year the United States contributes to United Nations peacekeeping operations. These costs savings would go toward increased U.S. military spending.

In theory, this sounds like a good idea: Why should the United States spend taxpayer dollars on foreign peacekeepers when it could be using the money to increase the capabilities of its own military?

The answer is that U.N. peacekeeping operations are generally successful and much more cost-effective than using U.S. forces. Research by RAND found that U.N. peacekeeping operations have a pretty good track record and can be “an effective means of terminating conflicts, insuring against their reoccurrence, and promoting democracy.” This conclusion is supported by research by Nicholas Sambanis who found U.N. peacekeeping operations have a “robust positive effect on peacebuilding outcomes … (which is) stronger when peacekeepers remain.” In other words, U.N. peacekeepers are good at their jobs, especially if they stick around.

U.N. Peacekeeping Is a Good Deal for the U.S.

U.N. Peacekeeping Faces Overhaul as U.S. Threatens to Cut Funding





giphy.gif

th

giphy.gif
 
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) called for the Senate to vote on gun control legislation in the wake of the mass shooting in Midland, Texas.
HERE WE GO: Democrat Leaders Pelosi and Schumer Call For Gun Control in Wake of Texas Mass Shooting


WE SAW THIS GUN BS COMING A MILE AWAY!! YOU CAN READ A DEMOCRATIC MORON LIKE AN OPENN BOOK ..........
Everyone kNNows you idiots lie cheat and steal---------- everyone also knows when you stupid mother fkrs want guns taken you have a nice shoot out happen so you can get your weak minded stupid asses to start their ggun grab shit


NNEWS FLASH FKRS . 10000 PPL COULD GET SHOT UP BY . A NON LAW ABIDING GUN OWNER AND WE STILL WONN'T GIVE UP OUR 2NND AMENDMENT ASSHOLES KEEP SLAPPING UR LAWS PP L WILL STILL HAVE GUNS YOU MENTLA PUSSIES!!
Never let a tragedy go to waste

Most dangerous place is between a Liberal and a shooting
 
Because shooting have nothing go do with guns. Right?
None of my guns were involved so no they aren't
Is this the "I drive drunk all the tome & never killed anyone" argument against drunk driving laws?


Not at all. Responsible drivers don't get loaded before road trips.


The liberal response would be to ban cars, or booze, or both, so that Drunk Driving would presumably be incapable of happening.
 
Because shooting have nothing go do with guns. Right?
View attachment 276986
Polive are trained. Most of you toting assfucks are not.
There are plenty of threads about police and their training in putting 50 or more rounds into the direction of a perp. There are some great shooters. But there are some who have a problem hitting the side of a barn. You area Prog am I correct? You hate police from the getgo.
 
Because shooting have nothing go do with guns. Right?
View attachment 276986
Polive are trained. Most of you toting assfucks are not.


A lot of people are trained. America has millions of veterans, security guards and ex security guards, police, hunters, you name it, who are capable of shooting people when they need shot.
See, you just proved how fucking stupid you are.

Being trained is more than hitting a target.
 
Because shooting have nothing go do with guns. Right?
View attachment 276986
Polive are trained. Most of you toting assfucks are not.
There are plenty of threads about police and their training in putting 50 or more rounds into the direction of a perp. There are some great shooters. But there are some who have a problem hitting the side of a barn. You area Prog am I correct? You hate police from the getgo.
Lying piece of shit. How the fuck does an assfuck like you get that I hate police from my post?
 
Because shooting have nothing go do with guns. Right?
None of my guns were involved so no they aren't
Is this the "I drive drunk all the tome & never killed anyone" argument against drunk driving laws?


Not at all. Responsible drivers don't get loaded before road trips.


The liberal response would be to ban cars, or booze, or both, so that Drunk Driving would presumably be incapable of happening.


When you carry, you create a risk.
 
Because shooting have nothing go do with guns. Right?
None of my guns were involved so no they aren't
Is this the "I drive drunk all the tome & never killed anyone" argument against drunk driving laws?


Not at all. Responsible drivers don't get loaded before road trips.


The liberal response would be to ban cars, or booze, or both, so that Drunk Driving would presumably be incapable of happening.


When you carry, you create a risk.


My mother is an 89 year old law abider.

How does her carrying a firearm in her purse "creating a risk" at all.

She isn't going to shoot someone unless they truly have it coming
 
The problem are NOT the guns it is the people, especially a class of people democrats ignores over and over.

Have you ever bothered to examine the Demographics of the mass shooters?

They are nearly always on drugs and/or mentally ill, and amazingly often a democrat who does the mass shootings.

I have to disagree with your assertion that the shooters are often of one particular party but setting that aside, let's say your position that it's not the gun but the wielder of the gun that is the problem. What do you think is the best approach to making society safe luntil we are able to get a handle on those behavioral influencers?
Society didnt get here overnite. There are no quick fixes.

I agree.....so what steps can we start taking to move towards a fix?

Stop letting criminals out of jail for starters. Quit coddling them. Recognize that evil exists & that the right to self defense is evident. Quit punishing the law abiding for the law breaking. Expand concealed carry nation wide with full reciprocity.
Are you a law abider who was punished? Tell us about your punishment.

Every time an Unconstitutional barrier is erected against the 2nd Amendment while easing penalties on criminals to prey on society. That’s the punishment right there.
 
So we live in a society where we need to protect ourselves and democrats cure is to take our protecting away lol
 

Forum List

Back
Top