The problem with your simplistic views is that in the UK there hasn't been a school shooting since 1996.
The US has had loads of them with loads of dead kids.
What's the difference?
Oh, yeah, these people can get guns.
But... you just ignore reality and start talking about Timothy McVeigh to prove you can't make an honest argument.
You don't know what you are talking about.......
You say school shooting....but you don't mention the fact that Jewish schools in the U.K. all have armed guards, to keep muslims from murdering their children.
Then you forget the other mass public shootings that have happened in England after the ban....
School shootings in this country are rare.....rarer than rare....a country of over 350 million people, over 600 million guns, 30 million AR-15 rifles.......
Then you have this list.....of mass public shootings in Britain.....
Cumbria shooting....12 killed, 11 wounded....he used a sawn off shotgun, 12 gauge pump shotgun and a .22 caliber bolt action rifle....you dope...
All of those guns are accessible in Britain.......so at any time, they too could have mass public shootings, you idiot......
It isn't the type of gun that determines how many are murdered.....how much free time the killer has before good people with guns start shooting back at him determines how many live or die...
the Plymouth shooting....5 killed, 2 injured a weatherby, pump action shotgun was the weapon........
The majority of mass shootings in England are men murdering their families....and there have been several of those since the 1996 ban.........and there have been attempted mass public shootings but the killer was a bad shot and failed to murder 3 or more people...
Then you have the increasing gang violence caused by the immigrant drug gangs....
Guns are used more and more in Britain, the British police can't stop it.......
en.wikipedia.org