Has the United States surrendered to anthropogenic climate change?

[westwall]

It's painfully obvious that an ilk of hardcore ideologues is utterly impervious to scientific consensus regarding anthropogenic climate change by those most knowledgeable in climatology.

So be it.

It is painfully obvious that an ilk of hard-core ideologues is utterly impervious to actual scientific reality, and instead relies on a form of religious faith to support their belief in AGW.

They are scientific illiterates, who are woefully ignorant of the scientific method, and the processes involved in scientific research. They rely instead on computer derived fiction and refer to it the exact same way that the religious peoples refer to their scriptures.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

It's painfully obvious that an ilk of hardcore ideologues is utterly impervious to scientific consensus regarding anthropogenic climate change by those most knowledgeable in climatology.

So be it.

AnthroChinese Climate change

China CO2 = (USA *2) + India

 

[Contumacious]

Obviously, capitalism cannot afford to indulge itself in your scientific denialism, but must confront reality:

THAT ASININE STATEMENT CONFIRMS THAT YOU DO NOT KNOW YOU ASS FROM A HOLE IN THE GROUND - THE US CEASED BEING A CAPITALIST COUNTRY IN 1913

 

[schmidlap]

Trump's surrender to the dirty fuel profiteers will exact an exorbitant cost on Americans.

Trump megabill gives the oil industry everything it wants
and ends key support for solar and wind
​

Climate change will cost about $38 trillion a year by 2049​

That's okay with science haters.

​

 

[EMH]

Trump's surrender to the dirty fuel profiteers will exact an exorbitant cost on Americans.

Trump megabill gives the oil industry everything it wants
and ends key support for solar and wind
​

Climate change will cost about $38 trillion a year by 2049​

That's okay with science haters.

View attachment 1132482​

LOL!!!

The CO2 FRAUD is due to be "exposed..."

Perhaps that is why

Bill Gates recently defunded his climate activist group
Blackrock recently divested from climate stocks
despite schmidlap being up for it, there has not yet been a Million MORON March about Trump's "climate denialism"


This is about to get really old and stale, a very sore subject for those who ever sullied themselves by defending the "credibility" of the media and the Dem Party. A bit like Republicans who don't quite understand that making the NYC Mayoral race about 911 and terrorism will do nothing but ensure that Zohran wins, because precisely nobody in NYC still believes the official version of 911. Two parties and their two big FRAUDS.

Dems and CO2 FRAUD
GOP and 911/"Terror"/Israel being our "ally"

 

[Sunsettommy]

From post #1 article is this crap:

WASHINGTON, July 1 (UPI) -- The Trump administration has quietly shut down a major federal website that hosted congressionally mandated national climate assessments, which were the U.S. government's preeminent reports on climate change impacts, risks and responses.

The disappearance Monday of the U.S. Global Change Research Program's website marked an unexpected loss in public access to the most crucial source for climate-related science.

It was a leveraged scam promoted by a series of leftist government supported report based on unverifiable climate modeling scenarios and a pile of misleading claims that doesn't add up to anything credible.

I am glad the propaganda are being dumped and a return to scientist's research independence where REPRODUCIBLE science is once again the measuring stick to a greater understanding.

Here are some examples of credible reality to the state of the Weather/Climate as it really happening because it is based on OFFICIAL data:

Death rate is waaaay down!

===

Storminess has not gone up, and there’s been no increase in hurricane strength or frequency … no “emergency” there.

First, the strength.

And here is the global hurricane frequency, both for all hurricanes and for the strongest hurricanes.

And here are the numbers of Pacific typhoons (hurricanes) from the Japanese Meteorological Agency.

And here are a century and a half of records of the number of landfalling hurricanes in Florida.

Finally, here are the declining numbers of both strong and average cyclones (Southern Hemisphere hurricanes) in Australian waters, from the Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BOM).

===

Strong tornadoes in the US are steadily decreasing over the last 72 years.

And the same is true of weaker tornadoes … decreasing.

===

Regarding heat, very hot days in the US (over 100°F, or 38°C) were much higher in the 1930s than at any other time in the last 125 years.

But if you want to worry about heat waves, please get back to me when the heat waves are worse than those of the 1930s, well before the large increase in CO2 …

LINK

============

There is a lot more like this in the LINK above, here is how the stupid AGW failed so bigly:

NO predicted Hotspot exist

NO Positive Feedback Loop exist

They were predicted and a cornerstone of the AGW scam, yet they don't exist even after 35 years of waiting for it to show up..., yet climate Cultists continue with their delusions as they are mentally ill and nearly 100% of them are democrats that is how fucked up they are.

 

[schmidlap]

LOL!!!

The CO2 FRAUD is due to be "exposed..."

Perhaps that is why

Bill Gates recently defunded his climate activist group
Blackrock recently divested from climate stocks
despite schmidlap being up for it, there has not yet been a Million MORON March about Trump's "climate denialism"


This is about to get really old and stale, a very sore subject for those who ever sullied themselves by defending the "credibility" of the media and the Dem Party. A bit like Republicans who don't quite understand that making the NYC Mayoral race about 911 and terrorism will do nothing but ensure that Zohran wins, because precisely nobody in NYC still believes the official version of 911. Two parties and their two big FRAUDS.

Dems and CO2 FRAUD
GOP and 911/"Terror"/Israel being our "ally"

I prefer the overwhelming corroborative empirical data-based science to the ideological dogma, but if you differ, you differ.

Your vast, enduring conspiracy by qualified climatologists and every scientific authority on earth is certainly a real doozie.

 

[EMH]

empirical data

FUDGE is not "empirical data," it is fraud.


The EMPIRICAL DATA from atmosphere showed NO WARMING, then was FUDGED in 2005....

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

You cannot even answer the FIRST question about climate change

WHY does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?


You are just a PARROT, a science invalid mindlessly repeating treasonous lies.

 

[EMH]

From post #1 article is this crap:



It was a leveraged scam promoted by a series of leftist government supported report based on unverifiable climate modeling scenarios and a pile of misleading claims that doesn't add up to anything credible.

I am glad the propaganda are being dumped and a return to scientist's research independence where REPRODUCIBLE science is once again the measuring stick to a greater understanding.

Here are some examples of credible reality to the state of the Weather/Climate as it really happening because it is based on OFFICIAL data:

Death rate is waaaay down!

View attachment 1132493

===

Storminess has not gone up, and there’s been no increase in hurricane strength or frequency … no “emergency” there.

First, the strength.


View attachment 1132495
And here is the global hurricane frequency, both for all hurricanes and for the strongest hurricanes.

View attachment 1132496
And here are the numbers of Pacific typhoons (hurricanes) from the Japanese Meteorological Agency.

View attachment 1132497

And here are a century and a half of records of the number of landfalling hurricanes in Florida.

View attachment 1132498

Finally, here are the declining numbers of both strong and average cyclones (Southern Hemisphere hurricanes) in Australian waters, from the Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BOM).

View attachment 1132500

===

Strong tornadoes in the US are steadily decreasing over the last 72 years.

View attachment 1132507
And the same is true of weaker tornadoes … decreasing.

View attachment 1132508
===

Regarding heat, very hot days in the US (over 100°F, or 38°C) were much higher in the 1930s than at any other time in the last 125 years.

View attachment 1132501

View attachment 1132503

But if you want to worry about heat waves, please get back to me when the heat waves are worse than those of the 1930s, well before the large increase in CO2 …

View attachment 1132504

LINK

============

There is a lot more like this in the LINK above, here is how the stupid AGW failed so bigly:

NO predicted Hotspot exist

NO Positive Feedback Loop exist

They were predicted and a cornerstone of the AGW scam, yet they don't exist even after 35 years of waiting for it to show up..., yet climate Cultists continue with their delusions as they are mentally ill and nearly 100% of them are democrats that is how fucked up they are.

No increase in cane activity = NO WARMING in the oceans

 

[schmidlap]

FUDGE is not "empirical data," it is fraud.


The EMPIRICAL DATA from atmosphere showed NO WARMING, then was FUDGED in 2005....

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

You cannot even answer the FIRST question about climate change

WHY does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?


You are just a PARROT, a science invalid mindlessly repeating treasonous lies.

If you have an alternative explanation for the unprecedented global warming as millions of tonnes of industrial waste have been spewed into the atmosphere, you should explain it to the world's climatologists.

 

[EMH]

If you have an alternative explanation for the unprecedented global warming as millions of tonnes of industrial waste have been spewed into the atmosphere, you should explain it to the world's climatologists.

There is NO WARMING ongoing on planet Earth. The only warming in the actual data is from

URBAN HEAT ISLAND EFFECT

Google Search

The ACTUAL DATA continues to read precisely

NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE
NO WARMING in the OCEANS
NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT
NO BREAKOUT in CANE ACTIVITY
NO OCEAN RISE
NO RISE in SURFACE AIR PRESSURE


and that last one is the smoking gun on both warming and net ice melt, both not happening on this planet.

 

[Oddball]

 

[EMH]

As for explaining Earth climate change...

Thread 'Since Co2 does nothing, what does cause Earth climate change?'

Jun 11, 2023

The first part is understanding what is climate and what is weather. Climate is the parameters of Earth that allow certain ranges of weather. We don't get Cat 10 canes now, but we would if Earth had no ice.

What are the parameters of climate that can change?

Ocean levels
Atmospheric thickness
Temperature
Humidity


What controls those?

The amount of ice on the planet. Period. Ocean level is 100% inversely correlated to Earth ice content (on land, not sea ice, which is pathetically small) - duh. Trapped in ice age glacier is compressed gas. When it snows 10 feet, you can compress...

• EMH
• Replies: 544
• Forum: Environment

• 
• 
• 

Thread 'Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...'

Jun 23, 2023

What is an ICE AGE?

Most apparently still believe it is a terrifying horror movie event where Earth all at once freezes up. The data has never supported such a scenario. Since 2010, there has been a massive effort to re-write Earth climate history into a series of rapid "glaciations" and ice retreats, as if "Day After Tomorrow" movie is accurate... LOL!!! What was North American Ice Age before 2010 is now spun into a series of rapid "ice ages" where it took a mere 75k years for the "ice age" to start in Northern Canada and put 2.5 mile thick glaicers on Chicago. This is "Milankovich"...

• EMH
• Replies: 338
• Forum: Environment

• 
• 
• 

Thread 'How old were the 2.5 mile thick glaciers covering Chicago in the past 20k-5 million years?'

May 15, 2023

This is where the climate debate is now stuck.

Every piece of land within 600 miles of a pole is in ice age, everything outside of that is not. Nobody has attempted to dispute that. It is the clear truth of Earth today.

Milankovitch Cycles, which I call McBullshit Cycles, take a very "Dennis Quaid" approach to ice ages - they are lightning fast, quick, and agile. They come and go really fast.

Since 2010, Milankovitch has replaced "North American Ice Age" with the claim that the ice on Chicago recently that was 2.5 miles thick was only 75k years old.

Really....

My side, which is...

• EMH
• Replies: 134
• Forum: Environment

• 

 

[westwall]

I prefer the overwhelming corroborative empirical data-based science to the ideological dogma, but if you differ, you differ.

Your vast, enduring conspiracy by qualified climatologists and every scientific authority on earth is certainly a real doozie.

There IS no empirical data. That's the point.

Your so called "studies" are ALL based on self described " simple models".

 

[westwall]

If you have an alternative explanation for the unprecedented global warming as millions of tonnes of industrial waste have been spewed into the atmosphere, you should explain it to the world's climatologists.

Ummmmm.....there is none.

 

[Muhammed]

e

It's obvious that there are those who are in denial of the scientific consensus, despite their impotence in concocting scientific data to refute it.

Attempts to make them aware of the climatological reality, even in the face of its ongoing manifestation, is futile.

**** you and your doomsday cult, moron. Quit trying to scam people you ******* lowlife scumbag. The leaked climategate emails exposed your scam over a decade ago.

Go suck some more commie dick, low IQ loser.

 

[Contumacious]

I prefer the overwhelming corroborative empirical data-based science

If you have an alternative explanation for the unprecedented global warming as millions of tonnes of industrial waste have been spewed into the atmosphere, you should explain it to the world's climatologists.

The Greenhouse Myth​

By Steven Milloy

Al Gore's global warming documentary hits theaters on May 28. Entitled, "An Inconvenient Truth," the film purports to make the case for concern over manmade emissions of greenhouse gases.

Meanwhile at JunkScience.com, we've produced "The Real Inconvenient Truth" - debunking two key myths of climate alarmism, including that the Earth's atmosphere acts like a greenhouse and that reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) emission will avert significant temperature change.

The notion that our atmosphere acts like a greenhouse - that is, so-called atmospheric "greenhouse gases," like water vapor and CO2, "trap" incoming solar radiation to warm the atmosphere - is wrong. Not only doesn't the atmosphere work that way, greenhouses don't either.

The Greenhouse Myth

Neither the atmosphere nor "greenhouse gases" block convection, so there is no literal atmospheric "greenhouse effect."

www.wtoc.com

 

[schmidlap]

It's amusing that the science deniers cannot concoct an alternative explanation to that of experts in climatology who have compiled and analyzed a vast amount of corroborative empirical data regarding the rising temperatures that correspond to industrialization and the millions of tonnes of industrial gases being spewed into the atmosphere.

Their inability to cite such studies would account for their anger.

 

[schmidlap]

The Greenhouse Myth​

By Steven Milloy

Al Gore's global warming documentary hits theaters on May 28. Entitled, "An Inconvenient Truth," the film purports to make the case for concern over manmade emissions of greenhouse gases.

Meanwhile at JunkScience.com, we've produced "The Real Inconvenient Truth" - debunking two key myths of climate alarmism, including that the Earth's atmosphere acts like a greenhouse and that reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) emission will avert significant temperature change.

The notion that our atmosphere acts like a greenhouse - that is, so-called atmospheric "greenhouse gases," like water vapor and CO2, "trap" incoming solar radiation to warm the atmosphere - is wrong. Not only doesn't the atmosphere work that way, greenhouses don't either.

The Greenhouse Myth

Neither the atmosphere nor "greenhouse gases" block convection, so there is no literal atmospheric "greenhouse effect."

www.wtoc.com

Steven J. Milloy is a lawyer, lobbyist, author, and former Fox News entertainer with no scientific credentials.

 

[Contumacious]

Steven J. Milloy is a lawyer, lobbyist, author, and former Fox News entertainer with no scientific credentials.

Is that right?

Hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

In that case >>>>>>SCIENTIFICALLY<<<<<<<<DESTROYING HIS POSITION - BY REFUTING OR REBUTTING THE ALLEGATIONS HE MADE - SHOULD BE A PIECE OF CAKE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!