Has the United States surrendered to anthropogenic climate change?

Global Cooling is Real – Major Temperature Low 2046?

By Martin Armstrong

Armstrong Economics

LOL Wow, what a find!!!!!!!!!!

Martin A. Armstrong - Wikipedia
American economist
Martin Arthur Armstrong is an American self-taught economic forecaster and convicted felon who spent 11 years in jail for cheating investors out of $700 million and hiding $15 million in assets from regulators. At age thirteen, Armstrong began working at a coin and stamp ...
See more on Wikipedia
 
Can you document you fake claim?
No, he cannot. What he is referring to is the 1970's worries about the aerosol pollution that was then delaying the warming from GHGs. However, even at that time, the majority of climate scientists were more worried about a GHG driven warming. By 1980, it was clearly evident that we were in a warming. And Dr. Hansen's 1981 National Academy of Science paper clearly showed that we were going to warm, and even made predictions as to the extent of the warming.
 
No, he cannot. What he is referring to is the 1970's worries about the aerosol pollution that was then delaying the warming from GHGs. However, even at that time, the majority of climate scientists were more worried about a GHG driven warming. By 1980, it was clearly evident that we were in a warming. And Dr. Hansen's 1981 National Academy of Science paper clearly showed that we were going to warm, and even made predictions as to the extent of the warming.

The Upper Atmosphere Is Cooling, Prompting New Climate Concerns​

A new study reaffirming that global climate change is human-made also found the upper atmosphere is cooling dramatically because of rising CO2 levels. Scientists are worried about the effect this cooling could have on orbiting satellites, the ozone layer, and Earth’s weather.
By Fred Pearce • May 18, 2023

Reason Steve Milloy has concluded that "CLIMATE SCIENCE" IS A JUNK SCIENCE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1751753976323.webp
 
No, he cannot. What he is referring to is the 1970's worries about the aerosol pollution that was then delaying the warming from GHGs. However, even at that time, the majority of climate scientists were more worried about a GHG driven warming. By 1980, it was clearly evident that we were in a warming. And Dr. Hansen's 1981 National Academy of Science paper clearly showed that we were going to warm, and even made predictions as to the extent of the warming.
The denialists attempt any feeble ploys they can to discredit science.

They are driven by dogma, not data.
 
Wrong on all counts. China has and is building more renewables than the rest of the nations combined. While China is still #1 in GHGs, we are #2 currently, and in total GHGs emitted since the industrial revolution, we are #1. We cannot adapt to it getting hot enough to make areas uninhabitable. That eliminates both agriculture and people. You want to cut overspending? Cut the subsidies for fossil fuels. Update our grid so we lose far less in transmission. Encourage residential generation and storage. It is the use of fossil fuels that is manipulating the climate. And while this is happening with have an insane and incompetent admin that is cutting funding to the Weather Service and NOAA so horrors like just happened yesterday in Texas are not caught in time for a timely warning.
All the trillions and trillions spent on so-called green energy, all the restrictions, mandatory stuff, bans and requirements have not reduced the CO2 in the atmosphere by a single particle or reduced temperatures anywhere by a single degree.

The world needs to start putting resources into practical and EFFECTIVE ways to adjust to inevitable climate change and stop the insanity that accomplishes nothing other than taking away people choices, options, liberties, and opportunities.
 

The Upper Atmosphere Is Cooling, Prompting New Climate Concerns​

A new study reaffirming that global climate change is human-made also found the upper atmosphere is cooling dramatically because of rising CO2 levels. Scientists are worried about the effect this cooling could have on orbiting satellites, the ozone layer, and Earth’s weather.
By Fred Pearce • May 18, 2023

Reason Steve Milloy has concluded that "CLIMATE SCIENCE" IS A JUNK SCIENCE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
View attachment 1132792
Again, I suggest a third grade remedial reading class for you.

Stratopheric cooling as the troposphere warms​

The phenomenon of stratospheric cooling while the troposphere warms is a significant aspect of the global climate system. This cooling has been attributed to human-induced increases in greenhouse gases, which retain heat more effectively in the troposphere. The study by UCLA-led researchers indicates that from 1986 to 2022, the human-produced greenhouse gases led to a mean cooling of about 1.8 to 2.2 degrees Celsius in the middle and upper stratosphere globally. This cooling is 12 to 15 times greater than what could have been caused by natural variations. The findings are a direct rebuttal to claims that natural factors could explain the observed pattern of warming in the troposphere and cooling in the stratosphere.

UCLA+1


UCLA
Stratospheric cooling: The concerning flip side of global warming


Harvard University
Responses to Why does the stratosphere cool when the troposphere warms


View all

LOL Steve Milloy, a paid whore for fossil fuel and tobacco companies. A lawyer, no education in science. Just another lying flap yapper.


Steven J. Milloy is an American lawyer, lobbyist, author, and former Fox News commentator. Milloy is the founder and editor of the blog JunkScience.com where he publishes articles that oppose and attack environmental and public health science.<a href="Steven Milloy - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>1<span>]</span></a> His close financial and organizational ties to tobacco and oil companies have been the subject of much criticism, as Milloy consistently disputes the scientific consensus on climate change and the health risks of second-hand smoke.<a href="Steven Milloy - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>2<span>]</span></a><a href="Steven Milloy - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>3<span>]</span></a>

Milloy has been employed at a number of think tanks. In the 1990s he worked at The Advancement of Sound Science Center (TASSC) which established by Philip Morris Companies Inc. to counter legislation against second-hand smoke, eventually becoming its director in 1997. He was an adjunct scholar at the libertarian Cato Institute from the 1990s until the end of 2005 and an adjunct scholar at the Competitive Enterprise Institute from 2005 to 2009.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_M Since 2020 Milloy has served on the board of the Heartland Institute. As of 2023 Milloy is a Senior Policy Fellow with the Energy & Environment Legal Institute.


https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=de0a...b2xpbmctdmVydGljYWwtZmluZ2VycHJpbnRpbmc&ntb=1
 
All the trillions and trillions spent on so-called green energy, all the restrictions, mandatory stuff, bans and requirements have not reduced the CO2 in the atmosphere by a single particle or reduced temperatures anywhere by a single degree.

The world needs to start putting resources into practical and EFFECTIVE ways to adjust to inevitable climate change and stop the insanity that accomplishes nothing other than taking away people choices, options, liberties, and opportunities.
And how does the installation of renewable energy, the least costly form of generation, cost trillions of dollars, when we have to install more generation no matter what? Tell me, just how the hell you adjust to what just happened in Texas? To what happened in North Carolina?
 
And Dr. Hansen's 1981 National Academy of Science paper clearly showed that we were going to warm, and even made predictions as to the extent of the warming


except Earth is not warming, and James Hansen is a seriously sick fudgebaking liar, and easily outed as such by the actual data.
 



is not about...

1. fudging data
2. parroting
3. fraud


it is about truth, irrefutable truth, like this...




and by the way, why did your hero homO go SILENT for two years about this...


 
No, it is paid liars like you that are the whores for fossil fuel companies. Appeal to Authority? Silly ass, when you use that to denigrate all the scientists in the world, we know that you are just a shill for the fossil fuel companies. Again, all the Scientific Societies, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities in the world have policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger.
Mikey Mann, your hero, claims to be a Nobel recipient.

DURRRRRR

There's stupid and gullible, and then there's you.
 
Silly ass, when you use that to denigrate all the scientists in the world,

All the scientists in the world? Don't you mean all the scientists supporting man-made climate change? Because there are an awful lot of scientists that call it bunk. So, by ignoring the opinions of everyone who disagrees with you pretending as if they don't exist, aren't you acting like a shill for the environmental-globalists looking to hit it rich with carbon credits?
 
All the scientists in the world? Don't you mean all the scientists supporting man-made climate change? Because there are an awful lot of scientists that call it bunk. So, by ignoring the opinions of everyone who disagrees with you pretending as if they don't exist, aren't you acting like a shill for the environmental-globalists looking to hit it rich with carbon credits?


He refers to "climate scientists" which are not scientists since they never practiced actual science, all they do is fudge data and lie....
 
Mikey Mann, your hero, claims to be a Nobel recipient.

DURRRRRR

There's stupid and gullible, and then there's you.


STFU Mossad.

You are here for one reason, to shout down the actual truth and prevent CO2 FRAUD from being terminated...
 
is not about...

1. fudging data
2. parroting
3. fraud


it is about truth, irrefutable truth, like this...




and by the way, why did your hero homO go SILENT for two years about this...


You can pretend that the world's climatologists do not know as much about climatology as you do, or that they have all been engaged in a vast corroborative conspiracy for many years, despite your inability to expose it.

Both are quite silly, of course.
 
You can pretend that the world's climatologists do not know as much about climatology as you do, or that they have all been engaged in a vast corroborative conspiracy for many years, despite your inability to expose it.

Both are quite silly, of course.


Then you take your smart ass and find ONE, just ONE of these "experts" you moronically PARROT who can actually answer the questions you CHICKENED OUT from doing yourself...

1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?



Start the Jeopardy! music...
 
schmidlap

You might not have noticed during the last 5 years, but we found much conclusive evidence that scientists are just like other humans--they can be bribed to write anything and say anything. "Follow the science" came to have the same political flavor as "anti-semitism". They have no meaning because many scientists accepted bribes to publish falsehoods.

To be clear, I'm certain that man's actions HAVE had an effect on the climate, but the climate has been changing ever since, and long before the industrial revolution.
 
15th post
Liar;




First link states for the chart:

Note that this largely reflects increases in data reporting, and should not be used to assess the total number of events.

Second link is misleading as they don't show actual storms data at all, just alleged "extreme weather events" which I have already debunked numerous times as there are NO increase in Hurricanes, flooding events, Tornadoes using the OFFICIAL data from NASA, NOAA and more
which you constantly ignore because you are a dishonest climate cultist bent on delusions.

Third link is misleading/lying again since they don't back up their assertions with data sources, while I have repeatedly given you OFFICIAL data from the NOAA showing the very opposite.

Once again you show that you are a profoundly dishonest liar and you continual failure to actually address my posts such as this one that destroys your three articles as they are based on OFFICIAL data.

Post #126 LINK

You will ignore this as well because you can't address it at all which you must to maintain your delusion and dishonest narrative as you are another miserable leftist who lives on lies of your masters.
 
Last edited:
Then you take your smart ass and find ONE, just ONE of these "experts" you moronically PARROT who can actually answer the questions you CHICKENED OUT from doing yourself...

1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?



Start the Jeopardy! music...
You are upset by the consensus of climatologists, bur are unable to cherry pick or concoct any of their data that they have already taken into account.
 
The 15% of Americans who are still science deniers (20% in OK, MS, AL, and ND) would be harmless, if it were not for Trump indulging fantasies such as global warming being a Chinese plot to destroy U.S. industry.

Such monumental ignorance is harmful, but ignorance serves his agenda.




^ From the "Science" Party that believes all a man has to do to become a woman is click his heels together three times and say, "I have a vag"
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: EMH

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom