HikerGuy83
Diamond Member
- Dec 26, 2021
- 18,733
- 14,920
- 2,288
Let's hope so.
It will be less than 100 F in Phoenix today.
It will be less than 100 F in Phoenix today.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And what would you mitigate.I think we'd better start thinking about mitigation.
Unless that's a commie plot, too.
If indeed the climate is getting hotter -- there would have to be some agreement with the tribes -- we'd look at mitigating the damage of heat, drought, flooding/drainage, crops, etc. That doesn't require agreement over WHY it's getting hotter, and since the tribes will never agree on that, we should be looking at the back end.And what would you mitigate.
Asking for a friend.
If indeed the climate is getting hotter -- there would have to be some agreement with the tribes -- we'd look at mitigating the damage of heat, drought, flooding/drainage, crops, etc. That doesn't require agreement over WHY it's getting hotter, and since the tribes will never agree on that, we should be looking at the back end.
Now, virtually all of your posts to me include personal insults and namecalling. If that's the best you can do, I've answered your question, and you're welcome.
This has nothing to do with my post.China CO2 = (USA *2) + India
I know you guys clam to be all about the "Science"
Maybe focus on China?
This has nothing to do with my post.
Play with someone else.
See post 87.So CO2 is no longer a threat to human Civilization?
China and India seem to be not so worried.
Ban private jets first.Should we ban jets and automobiles now?
First, lest you are ignorant, all of your posts about most of anything degrade those you don't agree with.Now, virtually all of your posts to me include personal insults and namecalling.
O.K. I guess I wasn't clear. I understand this much. What specifics might people be talking about ?If indeed the climate is getting hotter -- there would have to be some agreement with the tribes -- we'd look at mitigating the damage of heat, drought, flooding/drainage, crops, etc.
Again.....I was not clear. You've posted this before and we had part of this discussion a while back.That doesn't require agreement over WHY it's getting hotter, and since the tribes will never agree on that, we should be looking at the back end.
As the climate alarmists fly their private jets to their oceanfront properties on Martha's Vineyard.Dirty fuel profiteers obviously have a powerful economic incentive to deny the scientific reality.
A climatologist who could compile data showing that spewing millions of tonnes of industrial waste gases into the atmosphere does not impact the atmosphere would be paid a fortune.

www.homesandgardens.com
If indeed the climate is getting hotter -- there would have to be some agreement with the tribes -- we'd look at mitigating the damage of heat, drought, flooding/drainage, crops, etc. That doesn't require agreement over WHY it's getting hotter, and since the tribes will never agree on that, we should be looking at the back end.
Now, virtually all of your posts to me include personal insults and namecalling. If that's the best you can do, I've answered your question, and you're welcome.
Yes, for all intensive purpose, the United States has surrendered to anthropogenic climate change, rejecting scientific expertise and embracing the ideological dogma of the deniers' media entertainers and politicians with no expertise in climatology.
Political. Not science. There is zero empirical evidence to support AGW. It is ALL derived from computer models.Expert consensus in all disciplines of science is not political.
Your ideological perversions do not apply to any of them.
I agree with your point, but the other side is that "climate change" has been the false flag to restrict liberty. The fact is that climate has ALWAYS changed, with or without man. The record for that is clear.Its not panic, but simply switching to more sustainable methods we should have considered long ago.
I'm older than you, AND I'm a scientist. And I can recognize a pseudo science when I see one.The old farts who can't handle the science strain to make it an ideological matter because they are ideologues but, obviously, it is a scientific one, and younger, better-educated conservatives get it.