Has the United States surrendered to anthropogenic climate change?

[CrusaderFrank]

So, you persist in your futile attempts to avoid admitting the obvious - that Trump has no scientific basis for his ideological denial of climatological reality.

Climatological reality: China CO2 = (USA *2) + India
Per Capita China = 400% India (same populations)

 

[Sunsettommy]

So, you persist in your futile attempts to avoid admitting the obvious - that Trump has no scientific basis for his ideological denial of climatological reality.

You can't answer a very simple question because YOU don't have the answer thank you for clearing that up..... LOL

 

[schmidlap]

Climatological reality: China CO2 = (USA *2) + India
Per Capita China = 400% India (same populations)

I had asked what scientific basis Trump has for his ideological denial of climatological reality.

If you know of none, neither do I.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I had asked what scientific basis Trump has for his ideological denial of climatological reality.

If you know of none, neither do I.

There isn't one single repeatable laboratory experiment demonstrating that a 120PPM increase in CO2 will raise temperature

 

[ReinyDays]

If that's your attempt to avoid my inquiry regarding the climatological studies that cause Trump to deny anthropogenic global warming, it won't work.

What scientific studies does he cite?

Latitude and longitude ... where has climate changed? ... no answer is an answer in itself ... the answer is climate hasn't changed anywhere ... global warming is small, not enough to change weather ... so it won't change climate ...

 

[EMH]

So, the convicted felon/sexual abuser/business fraud denies the scientific consensus, but can cite no empirical climatological data for his ideological dogma.

Mr. Trump is a busy man. He doesn't debate climate change, but he has an army of us who appreciate him, and if you want to debate climate change, EMH is your guy... because EMH is the source of the case Mukasey through Garland should all get sentenced to death and total asset forfeiture for not prosecuting... we are out $20 trillion because of those traitors.

Let's start with basic climate questions... which you already chickened out from trying to answer...


And the atmospheric ACTUAL DATA, which showed NO WARMING...

and the fact that there is NO BREAKOUT in CANE ACTIVITY proving OCEANS ARE NOT WARMING....


How about this one.

Find us ONE SINGLE PHOTO of ocean rise?

Pictures, your level of "scientific" understanding...

 

[EMH]

There isn't one single repeatable laboratory experiment demonstrating that a 120PPM increase in CO2 will raise temperature

The laboratory is the lab. The actual atmosphere is where the action is. Highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed precisely NO WARMING in the atmosphere for more than 3 decades of rising CO2.

 

[EMH]

I had asked what scientific basis Trump has for his ideological denial of climatological reality.

If you know of none, neither do I.

Why don't you organize a

Million MORON March

on DC to protest this "denial...."

LOL!!!

 

[schmidlap]

Mr. Trump is a busy man. He doesn't debate climate change, but he has an army of us who appreciate him, and if you want to debate climate change, EMH is your guy... because EMH is the source of the case Mukasey through Garland should all get sentenced to death and total asset forfeiture for not prosecuting... we are out $20 trillion because of those traitors.

Let's start with basic climate questions... which you already chickened out from trying to answer...


And the atmospheric ACTUAL DATA, which showed NO WARMING...

and the fact that there is NO BREAKOUT in CANE ACTIVITY proving OCEANS ARE NOT WARMING....


How about this one.

Find us ONE SINGLE PHOTO of ocean rise?

Pictures, your level of "scientific" understanding...

Why don't you organize a

Million MORON March

on DC to protest this "denial...."

LOL!!!

My request is a simple, appropriate, and reasonable.

Climatological analysis and projections are based upon the compilation of empirical data. That has resulted in the corroborative consensus of climatologists.

Trump is in denial.

Where is the empirical data upon which he bases his denial?

 

[westwall]

My request is a simple, appropriate, and reasonable.

Climatological analysis and projections are based upon the compilation of empirical data. That has resulted in the corroborative consensus of climatologists.

Trump is in denial.

Where is the empirical data upon which he bases his denial?

No, it isn't. It is based on lies. You were asked a very simple question, and you couldn't answer it.

THAT, is the actual answer to your disingenuous question.

 

[schmidlap]

No, it isn't. It is based on lies.

Apparently, you are unable to admit that there is no empirical data to support Trump's denial of the scientific consensus that is based upon the compilation of corroborative empirical data.

Your need to resort to fantasizing that there is a vast conspiracy by all the world's climatologists to explain the rise in global temperature.

That's crackpot ideological dogma, not science.

Trump Clings to Inaccurate Climate Change Talking Points​

 

[EMH]

the empirical data

You and I appear to disagree on the definition of "empirical data." You define "empirical data" as FUDGE. I do not. I define it as the actual readings the instruments gave us... for example, atmosphere

is the atmosphere warming?

the two and only two measures we have said NO

Your side did not accept that. It FUDGED the data. That FUDGE JOB would not stand up in court. It is pathetic and laughable, and only a complete science invalid would accept it.


is there a breakout in hurricane activity?

Empirical data says no

U.S. Hurricane Strikes by Decade

It documents that the strongest decade for canes was the 1940s, second place the 1890s....


So why does your side keep lying about that?



The EARTH ICE data is also a subject your side AVOIDS and CENSORS. Antarctica has 90% of Earth ice, Greenland 7%. Greenland is buried under ice south of Arctic Circle, yet Alaska has no such mile thick ice north of Arctic Circle. When asked why, YOUR SIDE REFUSES TO ANSWER....

 

[EMH]

fantasizing that there is a vast conspiracy by all the world's climatologists

YOU have been asked to find just ONE of these omniscient "climatologists" to answer 5 basic climate questions....

 

[schmidlap]

.... You define "empirical data" as FUDGE....

Your premise is a lie. The empirical data I cite is the compilation climatological data that has resulted in the consensus of the world's climatologists regarding global warming.

Trump's suppression of scientific agencies does not negate the science.

You have made it clear that you can cite no climatological studies upon which Trump bases his denial.

 

[westwall]

Apparently, you are unable to admit that there is no empirical data to support Trump's denial of the scientific consensus that is based upon the compilation of corroborative empirical data.

Your need to resort to fantasizing that there is a vast conspiracy by all the world's climatologists to explain the rise in global temperature.

That's crackpot ideological dogma, not science.

View attachment 1134895​

Trump Clings to Inaccurate Climate Change Talking Points​

Ummmm, it's the other way round, silly girl. YOU have to present empirical evidence to support YOUR claims.

That's how the scientific method works.

To date your precious consensus political hack "scientists" have failed to do so.

That's why your cult of AGW doom is no longer relevant.

You cultists are barking at the moon but no one is listening to you any longer.

 

[schmidlap]

Ummmm, it's the other way round, silly girl. YOU have to present empirical evidence to support YOUR claims.

That's how the scientific method works.

To date your precious consensus political hack "scientists" have failed to do so.

That's why your cult of AGW doom is no longer relevant.

You cultists are barking at the moon but no one is listening to you any longer.

Your inability to provide any supportive empirical data from Trump, or any evidence of a vast conspiracy by the world's climatologists, is blatant.

It is reminiscent of the blowhard's inability to accept his 2020 loss, despite all states and Congress certifying the election's result.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Your inability to provide any supportive empirical data from Trump, or any evidence of a vast conspiracy by the world's climatologists, is blatant.

It is reminiscent of the blowhard's inability to accept his 2020 loss, despite all states and Congress certifying the election's result.

Still dodging the question are you scared?

 

[EMH]

The empirical data I cite is the compilation climatological data that has resulted in the consensus of the world's climatologists regarding global warming.

which has been documented here over and over as FUDGED FRAUD.


Face it, you are just going to endlessly parrot

"I'm parroting the climatologists"



You cannot refute one word of what EMH posts.
You cannot answer basic climate questions.
You cannot find a "climatologist" willing to answer basic climate questions.
When confronted with data like hurricanes, you ignore it. LOL!! No, that's the data, NO INCREASE IN CANES, which proves OCEANS ARE NOT WARMING because canes would increase if oceans were warming.
You are not interested in climate truth
You are part of a treasonous cabal that steals money from the taxpayer over CO2 FRAUD.

and you are THE BIGGEST INTELLECTUAL COWARD to ever show up in Environment section...

 

[EMH]

Still dodging the question are you scared?

A big mouthed kleptocratic COWARD.

 

[westwall]

Your inability to provide any supportive empirical data from Trump, or any evidence of a vast conspiracy by the world's climatologists, is blatant.

It is reminiscent of the blowhard's inability to accept his 2020 loss, despite all states and Congress certifying the election's result.

Your inability to provide any supportive empirical data, from ANY source, to support the failed theory of AGW is blatant.

Nice strawman there at the end.

Where did those 15,000,000 extra votes go? I mean Trump was literally Hitler, according to you morons. Why did all of those DEMOCRATS not vote for kameltoe?

Because they never existed.