Has the United States surrendered to anthropogenic climate change?

[EMH]

You have still failed to post any studies

LOL!!!

A "study" is what CO2 FRAUD has used to FUDGE DATA.

Science is not about clandestine fudged "studies" where the ACTUAL DATA is hidden.

Science is about THEORY and DATA, and your side has NO ACTUAL DATA backing it up...

Einstein never used "studies." Einstein used theory and data to prove his point. He kept everything out in the open. He did not hide data. He did not fudge data. He did not have a "Relativity Legal Defense Fund."


Here you are still insisting that there is an "ocean rise" with Lady Liberty clearly showing otherwise. You reject ACTUAL DATA and insist that only parroting FUDGED FRAUD "matters." You are not a person of science.

You are a Left Wing Science Invalid PARROT of LIES....

 

[Carl in Michigan]

It obviously is not a hoax since we clearly have doubled the CO2 concentration.

Look it up.
CO2 is opaque to infrared heat that would otherwise have left the planet and radiated out into space.
CO2 converts infrared photonic energy into vibratory heat energy that can't conduct out into space.

Like water vapor?

 

[schmidlap]

LOL!!!

A "study" is what CO2 FRAUD has used to FUDGE DATA.

Science is not about clandestine fudged "studies" where the ACTUAL DATA is hidden.

Science is about THEORY and DATA, and your side has NO ACTUAL DATA backing it up...

Einstein never used "studies." Einstein used theory and data to prove his point. He kept everything out in the open. He did not hide data. He did not fudge data. He did not have a "Relativity Legal Defense Fund."


Here you are still insisting that there is an "ocean rise" with Lady Liberty clearly showing otherwise. You reject ACTUAL DATA and insist that only parroting FUDGED FRAUD "matters." You are not a person of science.

You are a Left Wing Science Invalid PARROT of LIES....

So, you can cite no climatological studies that support your aberrant ideological dogma,

 

[westwall]

If you actually believe your ideological dogma rather than the scientific consensus, so be it.

In what other scientific disciplines do you fantasize about such a vast conspiracy?

I don't follow dogma. That's YOUR shtik, junior. You trot out a false "consensus" a political term, not a scientific one.

I follow actual science and the evidence from paleoclimate records PROVE your religious dogma false.

 

[schmidlap]

I don't follow dogma. That's YOUR shtik, junior. You trot out a false "consensus" a political term, not a scientific one.

I follow actual science and the evidence from paleoclimate records PROVE your religious dogma false.

I cite the concurrence of all climatological bodies regarding their overwhelming, corroborative empirical data.

Your preference for ideologically-driven media entertainers over the empirical data of research scientists is unfortunate.

... We estimate that 14.8% of Americans do not believe in climate change. This denialism is highest in the central and southern U.S... Political affiliation has the strongest correlation, followed by level of education, COVID-19 vaccination rates, carbon intensity of the regional economy, and income. The analysis reveals how a coordinated social media network uses periodic events, such as cold weather and climate conferences, to sow disbelief about climate change and science, in general, Trump was the strongest influencer in this network, followed by conservative media outlets and right-wing activists.​

The social anatomy of climate change denial in the United States - Scientific Reports

Using data from Twitter (now X), this study deploys artificial intelligence (AI) and network analysis to map and profile climate change denialism across the United States. We estimate that 14.8% of Americans do not believe in climate change. This denialism is highest in the central and southern...

www.nature.com

​

 

[schmidlap]

What empirical data has Trump, the ringleader of the global warming deniers, cited to justify his refusal to acknowledge the scientific consensus?

 

[Dr.Destructo]

Has the United States surrendered to anthropogenic climate change?​

No. Those of us with brains know that mankinds pollution has an effect on this planet, but aside from physical pollution of the environment and earthshift, we don't know to what extent.

There's no stopping this planet from it changing on its own. Thats what it has been doing since it cooled down and organisms began to grow on it.

This planet is a living thing, and it's going to change no matter what WE do to it, or even if we all die tomorrow.......this planet will keep on shifting and changing, because thats what it does!!

 

[westwall]

I cite the concurrence of all climatological bodies regarding their overwhelming, corroborative empirical data.

Your preference for ideologically-driven media entertainers over the empirical data of research scientists is unfortunate.

... We estimate that 14.8% of Americans do not believe in climate change. This denialism is highest in the central and southern U.S... Political affiliation has the strongest correlation, followed by level of education, COVID-19 vaccination rates, carbon intensity of the regional economy, and income. The analysis reveals how a coordinated social media network uses periodic events, such as cold weather and climate conferences, to sow disbelief about climate change and science, in general, Trump was the strongest influencer in this network, followed by conservative media outlets and right-wing activists.​

The social anatomy of climate change denial in the United States - Scientific Reports

Using data from Twitter (now X), this study deploys artificial intelligence (AI) and network analysis to map and profile climate change denialism across the United States. We estimate that 14.8% of Americans do not believe in climate change. This denialism is highest in the central and southern...

www.nature.com

​

Yeah, you quote religious dogma, just like every other religious nutjob out there.

You quote your scripture, and only listen to your high priests.

Pretty much the antithesis of science.

You're welcome.

 

[EMH]

So, you can cite no climatological studies that support your aberrant ideological dogma,

YOU cannot answer basic climate questions
YOU cannot show us any ACTUAL DATA that shows Earth warming, just FUDGE
YOU are TOO STUPID to understand the difference between DATA and FUDGE

I am the cause of this...

Google Search

and hopefully, this time, the scumbag Kenyan ********** will be held accountable for treason...

 

[schmidlap]

YOU cannot answer basic climate questions
YOU cannot show us any ACTUAL DATA that shows Earth warming, just FUDGE
YOU are TOO STUPID to understand the difference between DATA and FUDGE

I am the cause of this...

Google Search

and hopefully, this time, the scumbag Kenyan ********** will be held accountable for treason...

So, Trump's ideological dogma you substitute for the empirical data that results in the scientific consensus is supported by no data that you can cite whatever.

Of course, we already knew that, didn't we?

 

[EMH]

So, Trump's ideological dogma you substitute for the empirical data that results in the scientific consensus is supported by no data that you can cite whatever.

Of course, we already knew that, didn't we?

Why did homO go silent for 2 years?

Hmmmm....

You apparently don't care, but hopefully soon YOU WILL.

Do you own an EV??

Thread 'Introducing the (treasonously stupid left wing science invalid) Moron Tax'

Nov 23, 2024

Taxpayers Are Subsidizing Rich Electric-Vehicle Owners—To the Tune of Billions

A new report has exposed electric vehicles as wasteful money pits, living up to the adage: If it seems too good to be true, it is.

www.heritage.org

Subsidies and regulatory credits amount to almost $50,000 per EV over a decade.



We need the complete science invalid morons who bought EVs to pay back the subsidies, since there was no reason at all to subsidize EVs from the start, since Co2 does absolutely nothing, and Earth is neither warming nor experiencing an ongoing net ice melt.

Introducing the MORON TAX

If you bought an EV, that is proof you are a treasonously stupid left wing science invalid...

• EMH
• Replies: 14
• Forum: Politics

• 
• 

 

[HikerGuy83]

So, Trump's ideological dogma you substitute for the empirical data that results in the scientific consensus is supported by no data that you can cite whatever.

Of course, we already knew that, didn't we?

This guy is quite versed in a great deal related to climate change.

Certainly more than you.

So, no, just like climate facts.....you don't know anything.

 

[EMH]

What empirical data has Trump, the ringleader of the global warming deniers, cited to justify his refusal to acknowledge the scientific consensus?

TRUMP knows he told Sessions and Barr to prosecute... and they treasonously sold out... and the reason why Trump was so certain it was a fraud in his first term is because

HE KNOWS WHY THIS HAPPENED...

Google Search

The first "cancel" of the fraud prosecution was actually by Mukasey...

 

[schmidlap]

TRUMP knows he told Sessions and Barr to prosecute... and they treasonously sold out... and the reason why Trump was so certain it was a fraud in his first term is because

HE KNOWS WHY THIS HAPPENED...

Google Search

The first "cancel" of the fraud prosecution was actually by Mukasey...

Your need to avoid the question is blatant.

Again, what empirical data has Trump, the ringleader of the global warming deniers, cited to justify his refusal to acknowledge the scientific consensus?

Please link to the climatological studies upon which he bases his aberrant opinion.

 

[EMH]

what empirical data has Trump

Mr. Trump is not a scientist. He counts on supporters who are brilliant in science to help him. Unfortunately for America, he did not listen to EMH during Covid. He now realizes what a mistake that was.

Trump took over in January 2017. He was informed that there was a FBI FRAUD prosecution of CO2 FRAUD that dated back to Jew Supremacist Zionist Fascist Left Wing 911 Traitor Mikey Mukasey. He ordered Sessions to prosecute it. Zionist Fascist 911 Traitor Sessions lied and stalled it. Barr revived it, and then Barr was "gotten to."

We'll see if it get stalled for these four years again....

Trump KNOWS there is an FBI FRAUD prosecution of the CO2 FRAUD that DATES BACK to 2007 if not earlier.

Trump hence has no need to produce data that already exists...

 

[schmidlap]

Mr. Trump is not a scientist. He counts on supporters who are brilliant in science to help him. Unfortunately for America, he did not listen to EMH during Covid. He now realizes what a mistake that was.

Trump took over in January 2017. He was informed that there was a FBI FRAUD prosecution of CO2 FRAUD that dated back to Jew Supremacist Zionist Fascist Left Wing 911 Traitor Mikey Mukasey. He ordered Sessions to prosecute it. Zionist Fascist 911 Traitor Sessions lied and stalled it. Barr revived it, and then Barr was "gotten to."

We'll see if it get stalled for these four years again....

Trump KNOWS there is an FBI FRAUD prosecution of the CO2 FRAUD that DATES BACK to 2007 if not earlier.

Trump hence has no need to produce data that already exists...

So, the convicted felon/sexual abuser/business fraud denies the scientific consensus, but can cite no empirical climatological data for his ideological dogma.

That's much like his inability to accept his loss in 2020, despite being impotent in ever concocting evidence to the contrary.

 

[ReinyDays]

So, the convicted felon/sexual abuser/business fraud denies the scientific consensus, but can cite no empirical climatological data for his ideological dogma.

That's much like his inability to accept his loss in 2020, despite being impotent in ever concocting evidence to the contrary.

Do you have a latitude and longitude where climate has changed? ...

 

[schmidlap]

Do you have a latitude and longitude where climate has changed? ...

If that's your attempt to avoid my inquiry regarding the climatological studies that cause Trump to deny anthropogenic global warming, it won't work.

What scientific studies does he cite?

 

[Sunsettommy]

If that's your attempt to avoid my inquiry regarding the climatological studies that cause Trump to deny anthropogenic global warming, it won't work.

What scientific studies does he cite?

So you can't answer a very simple question..... LOL

 

[schmidlap]

So you can't answer a very simple question..... LOL

So, you persist in your futile attempts to avoid admitting the obvious - that Trump has no scientific basis for his ideological denial of climatological reality.