Has the United States surrendered to anthropogenic climate change?

[schmidlap]

Your inability to provide any supportive empirical data, from ANY source, to support the failed theory of AGW is blatant.

Nice strawman there at the end.

Where did those 15,000,000 extra votes go? I mean Trump was literally Hitler, according to you morons. Why did all of those DEMOCRATS not vote for kameltoe?

Because they never existed.

I cite the consensus of the world's climatologists whose corroborative extensive empirical data confirms anthropogenic clime change.

You cite Trump, who has no scientific qualifications, expertise or data, pulling a contrary opinion from his big, flabby butt.

 

[EMH]

I cite the consensus of the world's climatologists whose corroborative extensive empirical data confirms anthropogenic clime change.

You cite Trump, who has no scientific qualifications, expertise or data, pulling a contrary opinion from his big, flabby butt.

Notice the time, this sick person is posting from Tel Aviv...


Get one of your hero "climatologists" here to actually answer questions.

Endlessly posting

"I am a science invalid parrot of the climatologists" is getting stale...

 

[schmidlap]

Notice the time, this sick person is posting from Tel Aviv...


Get one of your hero "climatologists" here to actually answer questions.

Endlessly posting

"I am a science invalid parrot of the climatologists" is getting stale...

Scientific Consensus - NASA Science​

Please cite the climatological studies that form the basis of Trump's global warming denial

 

[EMH]

Scientific Consensus - NASA Science​

Please cite the climatological studies that form the basis of Trump's global warming denial

broken record... repeats over and over.

For the 17th time, when Trump took office in 2017, he was told about the FBI fraud prosecution of CO2 FRAUD that was covered up by

Mukasey
Holder
Lynch
Sessions
Barr
Garland


Trump is not a person of science and neither are you. You live in ISRAEL and you are a treasonous liar.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I cite the consensus of the world's climatologists whose corroborative extensive empirical data confirms anthropogenic clime change.

You cite Trump, who has no scientific qualifications, expertise or data, pulling a contrary opinion from his big, flabby butt.

Consensus is not a scientific word, it's a Cult word

Here's science:

China CO2 output = (USA * 2) + India

If you say yeah but per populat....

I say hush

India and China same population 1.4 Billion, but

China CO2 = 400% Of India's

 

[schmidlap]

broken record... repeats over and over.

For the 17th time, when Trump took office in 2017, he was told about the FBI fraud prosecution of CO2 FRAUD that was covered up by

Mukasey
Holder
Lynch
Sessions
Barr
Garland


Trump is not a person of science and neither are you. You live in ISRAEL and you are a treasonous liar.

Yes, your inability to honestly answer the pertinent question, "Upon what climatological studies does Trump base his denial of global warming?" exposes his scientific ignorance and ideological perversion.

I would never voluntarily live in Israel, and have now idea why you fantasize otherwise.

 

[westwall]

I cite the consensus of the world's climatologists whose corroborative extensive empirical data confirms anthropogenic clime change.

You cite Trump, who has no scientific qualifications, expertise or data, pulling a contrary opinion from his big, flabby butt.

Big deal. As has been shown, they are engaged in wholesale data fraud.

I don't cite Trump at all, you blithering idiot. I cite paleo climate records.

Those records prove your vaunted "consensus" to be nothing but lies.

 

[EMH]

Yes, your inability to honestly answer the pertinent question, "Upon what climatological studies does Trump base his denial of global warming?" exposes his scientific ignorance and ideological perversion.

I would never voluntarily live in Israel, and have now idea why you fantasize otherwise.

Does not notice the time difference....

YOU are the ONE who CANNOT ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. ALL of YOUR QUESTIONS have been answered.


WHY does Trump need a "study" if HE IS INFORMED THAT THE FBI ALREADY HAS A PROSECUTION AND HAS HAD IT SINCE 2007???

Google Search

 

[schmidlap]

"Mr President, could you please cite your climate studies
whose empirical data contradicts the global consensus
that recognizes the scientific reality of
anthropogenic climate change?’

"DEPORT HIM!"​

 

[westwall]

View attachment 1135373
"Mr President, could you please cite your climate studies
whose empirical data contradicts the global consensus
that recognizes the scientific reality of
anthropogenic climate change?’

View attachment 1135374
"DEPORT HIM!"​

Yeah, total bullshit. The empirical paleo climate records prove AGW is a failed theory.

All you anti science deniers have left is data falsification and appeals to authority.

You failed little one.

No one believes your lies any longer.

Well....smart people don't. Stupid people though. You have a bunch of them.

The STUPIDS party!

 

[schmidlap]

Yeah, total bullshit. The empirical paleo climate records prove AGW is a failed theory.

All you anti science deniers have left is data falsification and appeals to authority.

You failed little one.

No one believes your lies any longer.

Well....smart people don't. Stupid people though. You have a bunch of them.

The STUPIDS party!

Trumphumps desperately try to avoid admitting that their Messiah has no scientific expertise or empirical data when he raves against the data-based global consensus of climatologists.

 

[westwall]

Trumphumps desperately try to avoid admitting that their Messiah has no scientific expertise or empirical data when he raves against the data-based global consensus of climatologists.

Demofascists desperately try to deflect away from the actual science that proves they are lying.

 

[schmidlap]

Demofascists desperately try to deflect away from the actual science that proves they are lying.

Your hyper-partisan rants fail to elude the obvious:

You are impotent in citing any empirical data that forms a basis for the blowhard's denial of anthropogenic climate change, the consensus of qualified climatologists.

 

[westwall]

Your hyper-partisan rants fail to elude the obvious:

You are impotent in citing any empirical data that forms a basis for the blowhard's denial of anthropogenic climate change, the consensus of qualified climatologists.

My position, based on scientific FACT, refutes your hyper partisan appeals to authority, and your demand that the world submit to your religion.

 

[EMH]

View attachment 1135373
"Mr President, could you please cite your climate studies
whose empirical data contradicts the global consensus
that recognizes the scientific reality of
anthropogenic climate change?’

View attachment 1135374
"DEPORT HIM!"​

YOUR QUESTION has been ANSWERED.

TRUMP is NOT a SCIENTIST.

Trump is certain Global Warming is fraud because he knows there is an FBI FRAUD case, covered up by every AG from Mukasey to Garland.

The author of most of that case is EMH.

You want to debate science with EMH come at it, but you have already proven to everyone here

1. you cannot/will not answer basic climate questions
2. you do not understand the difference between data and fudge
3. you won't acknowledge documentable EMPIRICAL TRUTH that hurricanes are not getting stronger/more prevalent...
4. all you do is endlessly repeat

"I'm parroting the climatologists"

WE GET THAT.

All parroting has ever proven is that the individual doing the parroting has a BEAK and a BIRDBRAIN

 

[schmidlap]

YOUR QUESTION has been ANSWERED.

TRUMP is NOT a SCIENTIST.

Trump is certain Global Warming is fraud because he knows there is an FBI FRAUD case, covered up by every AG from Mukasey to Garland.

The author of most of that case is EMH.

You want to debate science with EMH come at it, but you have already proven to everyone here

1. you cannot/will not answer basic climate questions
2. you do not understand the difference between data and fudge
3. you won't acknowledge documentable EMPIRICAL TRUTH that hurricanes are not getting stronger/more prevalent...
4. all you do is endlessly repeat

"I'm parroting the climatologists"

WE GET THAT.

All parroting has ever proven is that the individual doing the parroting has a BEAK and a BIRDBRAIN

Where is Trump's scientific data upon which he bases his denial of anthropogenic climate change and refusal to respect the consensus of the world's climatologists?

Yet again, I'm giving you the opportunity to evade giving an honest answer,

 

[EMH]

Where is Trump's scientific data

For some reason, the "human parrot" "species" believes endlessly repeating already answered questions somehow does something.

It doesn't.

"Trump's" scientific data is the FBI's scientific data...

NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE - documented 6 times here already
NO BREAKOUT IN CANES = indisputable, documented here 5 times already
NO BREAKOUT IN CANES PROVES OCEANS ARE NOT WARMING
NO OCEAN RISE, and YOU CANNOT SHOW US ONE PHOTO to the contrary
NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT = NO OCEAN RISE, NO RISE IN SURFACE AIR PRESSURE


WHERE IS THE "scientific data" for CO2 FRAUD?

A = there is NONE, because all their "data" is FUDGE, and you lack an IQ over 5 to understand that


Can your side answer basic climate questions? NO
Can your side produce actual data showing warming? NO

 

[schmidlap]

For some reason, the "human parrot" "species" believes endlessly repeating already answered questions somehow does something.

It doesn't.

"Trump's" scientific data is the FBI's scientific data...

NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE - documented 6 times here already
NO BREAKOUT IN CANES = indisputable, documented here 5 times already
NO BREAKOUT IN CANES PROVES OCEANS ARE NOT WARMING
NO OCEAN RISE, and YOU CANNOT SHOW US ONE PHOTO to the contrary
NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT = NO OCEAN RISE, NO RISE IN SURFACE AIR PRESSURE


WHERE IS THE "scientific data" for CO2 FRAUD?

A = there is NONE, because all their "data" is FUDGE, and you lack an IQ over 5 to understand that


Can your side answer basic climate questions? NO
Can your side produce actual data showing warming? NO

In regard to anthropogenic climate change, what are the scientific studies of empirical data and its analysis upon which Trump bases his denial of the consensus of climatologists?

If there are any, please cite them. If not, it'll be obvious that you can't because there are none.

The scientific reality:

• While Earth’s climate has changed throughout its history, the current warming is happening at a rate not seen in the past 10,000 years.
• According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), "Since systematic scientific assessments began in the 1970s, the influence of human activity on the warming of the climate system has evolved from theory to established fact."
• Scientific information taken from natural sources (such as ice cores, rocks, and tree rings) and from modern equipment (like satellites and instruments) all show the signs of a changing climate.
• From global temperature rise to melting ice sheets, the evidence of a warming planet abounds.

Evidence - NASA Science

Earth's climate has changed throughout history. Just in the last 800,000 years, there have been eight cycles of ice ages and warmer periods, with the end of

science.nasa.gov

 

[westwall]

Where is Trump's scientific data upon which he bases his denial of anthropogenic climate change and refusal to respect the consensus of the world's climatologists?

Yet again, I'm giving you the opportunity to evade giving an honest answer,

It's called "PALEOCLIMATE RECORDS"

And no, you are not honest at all. You are a liar, just like everyone pushing the AGW narrative.

 

[schmidlap]

It's called "PALEOCLIMATE RECORDS"

And no, you are not honest at all. You are a liar, just like everyone pushing the AGW narrative.

You insist on reconfirming that you can't concoct a single climatological study where the empirical data and analysis contradicts the consensus of climatologists regarding anthropogenic climate change.

Your petulance and incivility may arise from your impotence in the matter.