Has the United States surrendered to anthropogenic climate change?

[EMH]

and once again THE ACTUAL DATA completely refutes PARROTING "the science"

U.S. Hurricane Strikes by Decade

 

[EMH]

I am skeptical of CO2 emissions being the reason for it, I am more inclined to believe it has more to do with the Icecaps as you say.

Here's the "tale" of what happened to the ACTUAL ATMOSPHERIC TEMP DATA... read carefully...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

The CO2 FRAUD has NO ACTUAL DATA showing atmospheric warming, just laughably BS fudge....

 

[JanetTheGreat]

Here's the "tale" of what happened to the ACTUAL ATMOSPHERIC TEMP DATA... read carefully...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

The CO2 FRAUD has NO ACTUAL DATA showing atmospheric warming, just laughably BS fudge....

I used to believe this kind of stuff years ago but when I looked into it, the more I saw it was an alarmist cult. Thank you for providing this.

 

[westwall]

As noted, the consensus has now risen to 99%.

The ‘97% climate consensus’ is over. Now it’s well above 99% (and the evidence is even stronger than that)

One of the most famous stats in the climate debate is the 97% of scientists who endorse the consensus on human-induced global heating. Ahead of the Glasgow summit, that figure has climbed even higher.

theconversation.com

If you have any credible alternative data concerning the scientific consensus, please cite it.

The "consensus" is bullshit. The original claim of 97% was a lie. Proven so. So upping the claim to 99% is merely piling on top of the lie.

Like I said before, the alternative is that everything happening now is completely natural. I need do nothing but look back into the historical record to prove it.

That's why YOUR high priests of climatology cut off their historical record at 1970.

Because the historical record of the prior years, and centuries, proves beyond doubt that AGW is a failed theory.

 

[schmidlap]

Data has always refuted "the science," because "the science" isn't science, it is Fauxi, CO2 FRAUD, Murderous Fraud Vax, and the "official version of 911."


AS for "what it's worth," it is now worth $20 trillion, because that's how much America has been BILKED by CO2 FRAUD since Jew Supremacist Zionist Fascist Left Wing 911 Traitor Michael Mukasey flushed it in 2007.... followed by traitors

Eric DEI/Affirmative Action Holder
Loretta DEI/Affirmatice Action Lynch
911 Traitor Jeff Sessions
Sellout Bill Barr
Jew Supremacist Zionist Fascist Left Wing Traitor Merrick Garland


and that is why homO went silent for two years, then bought a beachfront mansion on an island last hit by Cat 5 winds in 1938... the last Cat 5 to get that far north (ie no ocean warming dumbass)

You already succinctly stated your theory on global warming that differs radically from the consensus of climatologists and climatological bodies:

"The Chinese are the biggest beneficiaries of the hoax, but it is definitely a Jewish hoax, not Chinese..." (your post #220)​

 

[schmidlap]

The "consensus" is bullshit. The original claim of 97% was a lie. Proven so. So upping the claim to 99% is merely piling on top of the lie.

Like I said before, the alternative is that everything happening now is completely natural. I need do nothing but look back into the historical record to prove it.

That's why YOUR high priests of climatology cut off their historical record at 1970.

Because the historical record of the prior years, and centuries, proves beyond doubt that AGW is a failed theory.

You whine about the consensus of climatologists and climatological bodies, but offer none that espouse your ideological dogma.

 

[EMH]

You already succinctly stated your theory on global warming that differs radically from the consensus of climatologists and climatological bodies:

"The Chinese are the biggest beneficiaries of the hoax, but it is definitely a Jewish hoax, not Chinese..." (your post #220)​

One minor difference.

Their theory is EASILY REFUTED.

Mine has NEVER BEEN REFUTED because IT IS SPOT ON THE TRUTH...


and the cause of this...

Google Search

 

[EMH]

You whine about the consensus of climatologists and climatological bodies, but offer none that espouse your ideological dogma.

The Mossad is the enforcer of CO2 FRAUD, and Westwall and Toddster are both Mossad funded "faux skeptics" who reject that which they cannot refute... because both want CO2 FRAUD ongoing, because it enriches and empowers their demographic to do so...

 

[schmidlap]

The science deniers' ideological dogma is not supported by data-based, empirical climatological studies, which upsets them because there are none they can cite.

 

[ReinyDays]

The total number of tropical cyclones worldwide has not shown a significant upward trend. However, evidence indicates an increase in the frequency of the most intense hurricanes. The National Climate Assessment reports a substantial increase in the number of the strongest (Category 4 and 5) hurricanes since the early 1980s. Similarly, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s ACE Index reflects a rise in cyclone intensity over the past 30 years. Therefore, while the overall storm count remains stable, the occurrence of more severe storms has increased.

Landsea is a meteorologist who does not deny global warming. He does not believe that global warming has as significant effect on hurricanes and cyclones as others.

In 2005, he said:

"We certainly see substantial warming in the ocean and atmosphere over the last several decades on the order of a degree Fahrenheit and I have no doubt a portion of that, at least, is due to greenhouse warming."​

​

(Landsea was not "kicked off" the IPCC. He resigned.)

Can't do Middle School math then ... well ... believe what you will ... NPR can't broadcast lies, right? ...

 

[schmidlap]

Can't do Middle School math then ... well ... believe what you will ... NPR can't broadcast lies, right? ...

I explained to you that meteorologist Christopher Landsea whom you cited is not a climate change denier.

"We certainly see substantial warming in the ocean and atmosphere over the last several decades on the order of a degree Fahrenheit and I have no doubt a portion of that, at least, is due to greenhouse warming."​

Do you understand that?

 

[westwall]

You whine about the consensus of climatologists and climatological bodies, but offer none that espouse your ideological dogma.

I don't whine about anything. That's YOUR shtick. You piss and moan about what compromised and corrupt scientists have to say.

I merely shoot down your idiotic appeals to authority, which if you had more than two braincells to rub together, you would know is a logic fail.

But you people don't do logic. You are religious nutjobs, so all you need is your faith in the scriptures brought down from on high by your high priests.

You're all laughably stupid.

 

[schmidlap]

I don't whine about anything. That's YOUR shtick. You piss and moan about what compromised and corrupt scientists have to say.

I merely shoot down your idiotic appeals to authority, which if you had more than two braincells to rub together, you would know is a logic fail.

But you people don't do logic. You are religious nutjobs, so all you need is your faith in the scriptures brought down from on high by your high priests.

You're all laughably stupid.

All that I have asked the science-denying ideologues to do is to list the actual climatologists and climatological bodies that share their denial of anthropogenic global warming.

Their impotence in fulfilling that simple request is blatant.

 

[EMH]

All that I have asked the science-denying ideologues to do is to list the actual climatologists and climatological bodies that share their denial of anthropogenic global warming.

Their impotence in fulfilling that simple request is blatant.

Science is not a tabulation of who you parrot.

Science starts with theory and data. Your THEORY is that increasing atmospheric CO2 causes warming. The ACTUAL DATA refuted that completely, so your side FUDGED the data in 2005... and the FUDGE JOB would be embarrassed in a courtroom...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

does increasing atmospheric CO2 cause warming?

highly correlated satellite and balloon data = NO


"Scientists were left with two choices: either the atmosphere wasn't warming up, or something was wrong with the data."


translation from NBC spin - faced with the clear, definitive and absolute proof that the THEORY is COMPLETELY WRONG, the conflicted taxpayer funded fudgebaking liars had a choice

admit the truth, CO2 does nothing, shut down, get a resume ready and get a new job

or

FUDGE THE DATA, LIE, and KEEP BILKING THE TAXPAYER

 

[EMH]

data-based, empirical climatological studies

LOL!!!

FUDGE is NOT DATA. FUDGE is not EMPIRICAL. FUDGE is just POLITICIZED FRAUD.

MORON!!!

 

[schmidlap]

Americans overwhelmingly prefer the scientific, empirical data-based study of climatology by experts to what Trump pulls from his big, flabby butt.

​

As the Trump administration takes steps to dismantle climate research across NASA, NOAA, the EPA, and other agencies, recent polling shows that this move is deeply unpopular.​

​

In May 2025, registered voters were asked whether they supported or opposed government orders that would halt research on global warming. Voters were also asked if they supported directives that would stop federal agencies from sharing information about global warming with the public.​

​

Overwhelmingly, voters said they oppose efforts to shut down climate science and communication.​

​

Americans’ views of climate change​

​

“The biggest threat is not global warming,
where the ocean is going to rise one-eighth of an inch
over the next 400 years… and you’ll have
more oceanfront property!”
https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/4826175-trump-climate-change-not-biggest-threat/ ​

Sea level rise is being caused by global warming. Over the next 30 years, sea levels along U.S. coastlines are expected to rise by between 10 and 12 inches, according to a 2022 federal report.

By the end of the century, the sea level could rise even higher. By the year 2100, sea levels are expected to be between 2 and 7 feet higher than they were in 2000.

​

​

 

[EMH]

Sea level rise is

NOT HAPPENING, BECAUSE THERE IS NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT, BECAUSE EARTH IS NOT WARMING

Sincerely,

Statue of Liberty (and Surface Air Pressure)

 

[westwall]

All that I have asked the science-denying ideologues to do is to list the actual climatologists and climatological bodies that share their denial of anthropogenic global warming.

Their impotence in fulfilling that simple request is blatant.

Ummm. It's you clods who are the science deniers.

You trot out failed appeals to authority and then ignore the real science that refutes it.

You are nothing more than typical religious nutjob screeching scripture while holding a sandwich board.

 

[schmidlap]

NOT HAPPENING, BECAUSE THERE IS NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT, BECAUSE EARTH IS NOT WARMING

Sincerely,

Statue of Liberty (and Surface Air Pressure)

Your "Jewish conspiracy" has been noted.

You have still failed to post any studies by real climatologists or climatological bodies that support your ideological dogma.

Meanwhile, back in the realm of empirical data,

There is unequivocal evidence that Earth is warming at an unprecedented rate.
Human activity is the principal cause.​

 

[schmidlap]

Ummm. It's you clods who are the science deniers.

You trot out failed appeals to authority and then ignore the real science that refutes it.

You are nothing more than typical religious nutjob screeching scripture while holding a sandwich board.

If you actually believe your ideological dogma rather than the scientific consensus, so be it.

In what other scientific disciplines do you fantasize about such a vast conspiracy?