Oh, dummy, I am not upset in the slightest. I AM a scientist. I laugh at the claims these losers make.
I laugh even harder at dolts, like you, who are scientific cripples, but you bleat the party line, like the devoted sheep you are.
Has the United States surrendered to anthropogenic climate change?
- Thread starter schmidlap
- Start date
I laugh even harder at dolts, like you, who are scientific cripples, but you bleat the party line, like the devoted sheep you are.
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 30,692
- 18,114
- 2,788
Well, things might be better if people actually believed in the 10/7 hate hoax, and you can help fix that problem. People don't believe 30 "Hamas terrorists" took off in motorized paragliders, got to 300 feet, flew in formation for 2-3 miles, and then landed on streets lined with trees and light posts. YOU can help us "believe" if you just hop in a motorized paraglider yourself and demonstrate how easy it is to do that....
But you won't do that, just as you won't answer basic climate questions, nor will you admit that YOU COULD NOT FIND ONE SINGLE CLIMATE "SCIENTIST" WILLING TO PUBLICLY ATTEMPT TO ANSWER THEM...
I'll give you a hint.
The credibility of the cause of Zionist Fascism is seriously getting CRUSHED in America right now...
NOBODY BELIEVES 911
NOBODY BELIEVES 107
EVERYONE WITH AN IQ OVER 5 HAS FIGURED OUT "GLOBAL WARMING" IS BULLSHIT
EVERYONE BELIEVES ISRAEL IS FASCIST
That's why "Zohran" is winning in NYC...
Yeah, he's an idiot. I'm not. Let me know when you have a point that isn't under your hat.
schmidlap
Platinum Member
- Oct 30, 2020
- 14,147
- 9,047
- 1,138
- Thread starter
- #226
Ideological dogma, no matter how fanatically espoused, cannot be substituted for scientific reality.
theconversation.com
Despite the overwhelming evidence, it’s still common to see politicians, media commentators or social media users cast doubt on the role of humans in driving climate change.
But this denialism is now almost nonexistent among climate scientists, as a study released this month confirms. US researchers examined the peer-reviewed literature and found more than 99% of climate scientists now endorse the evidence for human-induced climate change.
That’s even higher than the 97% reported by an influential 2013 study, which has become a widely cited statistic by both climate change deniers and those who accept the evidence.
The ‘97% climate consensus’ is over. Now it’s well above 99% (and the evidence is even stronger than that)
One of the most famous stats in the climate debate is the 97% of scientists who endorse the consensus on human-induced global heating. Ahead of the Glasgow summit, that figure has climbed even higher.
theconversation.com
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 30,692
- 18,114
- 2,788
Ideological dogma, no matter how fanatically espoused, cannot be substitute for scientific reality.
Despite the overwhelming evidence, it’s still common to see politicians, media commentators or social media users cast doubt on the role of humans in driving climate change.But this denialism is now almost nonexistent among climate scientists, as a study released this month confirms. US researchers examined the peer-reviewed literature and found more than 99% of climate scientists now endorse the evidence for human-induced climate change.That’s even higher than the 97% reported by an influential 2013 study, which has become a widely cited statistic by both climate change deniers and those who accept the evidence.The ‘97% climate consensus’ is over. Now it’s well above 99% (and the evidence is even stronger than that)
One of the most famous stats in the climate debate is the 97% of scientists who endorse the consensus on human-induced global heating. Ahead of the Glasgow summit, that figure has climbed even higher.
A poll of conflicted fudgebaking liars is not science, it is... typical of your mindset....
Either parrot fudged fraud with me, or i'll call you names!!!
Wow, so tough coming from a message board moron too chickenshit to answer 5 basic climate questions....
JanetTheGreat
Diamond Member
- Jul 7, 2025
- 1,155
- 1,594
- 1,908
Let's say that Climate Change is caused by humans as they say - so what are the actual solutions? Go all electric? Our grids can't handle that, plus, all that infrastructure has to be constructed using fossil fuels. Batteries? Horrible for the environment, all that digging and mining needs fossil fuels. All I am seeing from people who are being alarmist over the issue is cheap shots at political figures they don't like for brownie points, and no actual workable solutions.
Plus, if it was as they say, why are the rich billionaires and elites still having their properties on the beach shores? Aren't those shores supposed to rise in a couple of years? You'd think that the rich elites would want to protect their property, no?
The Hoax is the Alarmism. There IS Climate Change, however its not the end of the world scenario the Alarmists/Activists are saying. Pollution is an issue, and anybody sane would agree. Its funny for all the Alarmist and Activist politicians crying over Climate Change when they can't even clean up their own city! What an utter joke they want us to believe their policies will save us from "Climate Change".
Plus, if it was as they say, why are the rich billionaires and elites still having their properties on the beach shores? Aren't those shores supposed to rise in a couple of years? You'd think that the rich elites would want to protect their property, no?
The Hoax is the Alarmism. There IS Climate Change, however its not the end of the world scenario the Alarmists/Activists are saying. Pollution is an issue, and anybody sane would agree. Its funny for all the Alarmist and Activist politicians crying over Climate Change when they can't even clean up their own city! What an utter joke they want us to believe their policies will save us from "Climate Change".
When you resort to lies then you truly have nothing. That 97% lie was debunked well over a decade ago, yet here you are trotting that lie out as if it actually means something other than you are a lying idiot.Ideological dogma, no matter how fanatically espoused, cannot be substituted for scientific reality.
Despite the overwhelming evidence, it’s still common to see politicians, media commentators or social media users cast doubt on the role of humans in driving climate change.But this denialism is now almost nonexistent among climate scientists, as a study released this month confirms. US researchers examined the peer-reviewed literature and found more than 99% of climate scientists now endorse the evidence for human-induced climate change.That’s even higher than the 97% reported by an influential 2013 study, which has become a widely cited statistic by both climate change deniers and those who accept the evidence.The ‘97% climate consensus’ is over. Now it’s well above 99% (and the evidence is even stronger than that)
One of the most famous stats in the climate debate is the 97% of scientists who endorse the consensus on human-induced global heating. Ahead of the Glasgow summit, that figure has climbed even higher.
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 30,692
- 18,114
- 2,788
Climate Change is a science. Global Warming is a Fraud. You are on the right track.
Now, learn the simple and irrefutable truth of Earth Climate Change here...
schmidlap
Platinum Member
- Oct 30, 2020
- 14,147
- 9,047
- 1,138
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 30,692
- 18,114
- 2,788
Mine is better...
Not understanding the difference between DATA and FUDGE, a necessary level of idiocy required to fall for CO2 FRAUD....
schmidlap
Platinum Member
- Oct 30, 2020
- 14,147
- 9,047
- 1,138
- Thread starter
- #233
As noted, the consensus has now risen to 99%.
The ‘97% climate consensus’ is over. Now it’s well above 99% (and the evidence is even stronger than that)
One of the most famous stats in the climate debate is the 97% of scientists who endorse the consensus on human-induced global heating. Ahead of the Glasgow summit, that figure has climbed even higher.
theconversation.com
If you have any credible alternative data concerning the scientific consensus, please cite it.
ReinyDays
Platinum Member
Chris Landsea of the National Hurricane Center ...
He was kicked off the IPCC because his views are that there isn't enough data to make such predictions ... indeed if you analyze hurricane data we'll find there's no changes in frequency or intensity of hurricanes ... the data is freely available to the public ... the math is from Middle School ...
You can perform Middle School math, can't you? ...
If hurricane frequency and intensity aren't changing ... why do you say they are? ...
JanetTheGreat
Diamond Member
- Jul 7, 2025
- 1,155
- 1,594
- 1,908
I am skeptical of CO2 emissions being the reason for it, I am more inclined to believe it has more to do with the Icecaps as you say.Climate Change is a science. Global Warming is a Fraud. You are on the right track.
Now, learn the simple and irrefutable truth of Earth Climate Change here...
schmidlap
Platinum Member
- Oct 30, 2020
- 14,147
- 9,047
- 1,138
- Thread starter
- #238
The total number of tropical cyclones worldwide has not shown a significant upward trend. However, evidence indicates an increase in the frequency of the most intense hurricanes. The National Climate Assessment reports a substantial increase in the number of the strongest (Category 4 and 5) hurricanes since the early 1980s. Similarly, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s ACE Index reflects a rise in cyclone intensity over the past 30 years. Therefore, while the overall storm count remains stable, the occurrence of more severe storms has increased.
Landsea is a meteorologist who does not deny global warming. He does not believe that global warming has as significant effect on hurricanes and cyclones as others.
In 2005, he said:
(Landsea was not "kicked off" the IPCC. He resigned.)
Last edited:
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 30,692
- 18,114
- 2,788
Data has always refuted "the science," because "the science" isn't science, it is Fauxi, CO2 FRAUD, Murderous Fraud Vax, and the "official version of 911."
AS for "what it's worth," it is now worth $20 trillion, because that's how much America has been BILKED by CO2 FRAUD since Jew Supremacist Zionist Fascist Left Wing 911 Traitor Michael Mukasey flushed it in 2007.... followed by traitors
Eric DEI/Affirmative Action Holder
Loretta DEI/Affirmatice Action Lynch
911 Traitor Jeff Sessions
Sellout Bill Barr
Jew Supremacist Zionist Fascist Left Wing Traitor Merrick Garland
and that is why homO went silent for two years, then bought a beachfront mansion on an island last hit by Cat 5 winds in 1938... the last Cat 5 to get that far north (ie no ocean warming dumbass)
JanetTheGreat
Diamond Member
- Jul 7, 2025
- 1,155
- 1,594
- 1,908
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Trump slams fake news Barak Ravid ex Haaretz, currently @ axios- Started by Pastelli
- Replies: 1
-
BREAKING : 🇨🇺 The Cuban Bolshevik dictatorship has just announced PERESTROIKA on national television.- Started by Litwin
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
