In a sense I agree. It does reveal your reliance on pedantry and prejudicial personal interpretations disguised as scholarship, something I regularly expose here.
I have, several times and will do so again below. You refuse to accept these though and so that's that, I don't seek to convince you of anything, your agreement or disagreement means absolutely nothing to me, you serve one purpose for me, a source of Zionist apologisms that exemplify the lengths some are prepared to go to to defend the criminal state of Israel.
That might have a degree of credibility if there were no examples of analysts and experts saying the opposite.
So enjoy - of course you'll reject and of course you'll resort to pedantry and minutiae to imply this or that isn't "really" true and so on, let the reader decide for themselves, I must point out though that you are the same person who denies genocide, who supports punitive home demolitions, who insists Palestinian Israeli citizens are treated equitably to Jewish Israeli citizens, canards that I and others have demolished on this forum over the past year.
So without further ado I present
not as single example of apartheid but
eleven for you to study.
These are all well known organizations with a huge international experience of world affairs and conflict.
Israel's Apartheid Against Palestinians Amnesty International
Does Israel’s Treatment of Palestinians Rise to the Level of Apartheid? Human Rights Watch
This is Apartheid B'Tselem
A Threshold Crossed Human Rights Watch
Israel’s occupation of Palestinian Territory is ‘apartheid’: UN rights expert United Nations News
Israel is an apartheid state, Amnesty International says National Public Radio
Israeli apartheid factsheet War On Want
Human Rights Groups Agree: Israel Is Practicing Apartheid Institute For Policy Studies
ICJ denounces Israel’s system of apartheid against Palestinians International Commission of Jurists
Yes, Israel Is Obviously an Apartheid State. The Nation
Israel’s Apartheid Doesn’t Make a Difference Council On Foreign Relations
In closing, can you explain why a visitor to this page should reject each of these informed publications and simply accept your word?